Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To assess the healing outcomes of patients who sustained a comminuted clavicle fracture and underwent operative fixation with or without the addition of demineralized bone matrix (DBM). METHODS:A total of 271 comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures that presented to our hospital system and underwent operative fixation with a plate and screw construct were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected include patient demographics, initial injury information, and use of demineralized bone matrix during surgery to enhance bone healing. Patients were grouped based on whether or not their fixation was augmented with DBM. Fracture-related infection (FRI), lack of fracture healing, and the need for revision fracture surgery were reviewed. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder and screw back out were categorized as "minor complications." Clinical healing was defined as non-tenderness about the fracture site, and radiographic healing was defined as presence of bridging callus and lack of fracture line on X-ray. Chi-square, T-test, and linear regression analysis were used to determine any significant differences between cohorts. RESULTS:Sixty-nine patients had DBM used in their repair, and 202 patients did not. Cohorts had a similar follow-up (range: 6-18 months). There were no differences in patient demographics or fracture pattern between the two groups (P > 0.05 for all). There were no differences in major and minor complications; however, the cohort treated with DBM had shorter time to radiographic healing, confirmed with regression analysis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Augmentation of midshaft clavicle fracture constructs with DBM was associated with quicker radiographic healing.

OBJECTIVE:To develop a stratification tool to identify hip fracture patients at risk for second contralateral hip fracture and mortality within 5 years of an index fracture, and to assess the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic fixation in high-risk/low-mortality patients. METHODS:Design: Retrospective prognostic cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Single academic system with 2 Level 1 Trauma Centers, 1 orthopedic specialty hospital, and 1 tertiary care hospital. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA/UNASSIGNED:Patients who were 60 years or older with OTA 31A/B hip fractures from low-energy mechanisms between 11/1/2014 and 11/31/2023 with ≥5 years follow-up or until death were included. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS/UNASSIGNED:The study included four phases: (1) identifying factors associated with second hip fracture within 5 years; (2) using multivariate logistic regression to generate models predicting 5-year second hip fracture (vs. FRAX) and mortality risk; (3) creating a "risk matrix" to identify candidates for prophylactic fixation using Youden's Index which determined cutoff points encompassing the maximum sensitivity and specificity for each risk equation and were used to define a value-based target group; (4) cost analysis comparing standard vs. prophylactic care in high-risk/low-mortality patients. RESULTS:Of 426 patients (mean age 80.25 years, 73.4% female), 78 sustained second hip fractures (mean interval: 594 days). Predictors included higher FRAX score (p=0.004), dementia (p<.001), ICU stay (p=0.014), discharge to subacute care (p<.001), and 90-day readmission (p=0.011). Logistic regression predicted 5-year second fracture risk (AUC 0.742 vs. FRAX 0.617, p=0.012) and 5-year mortality (AUC 0.723). The risk matrix used cutoff points of 18.2% (mortality) and 38.2% (second fracture) to define a value-based target group (n=26; 13 experienced second fracture). Cost analysis showed prophylactic fixation of all 26 patients ($781,508) would save $353,067 compared to treating the 13 who fractured again ($1,134,575). CONCLUSIONS:A novel matrix was developed that accurately predicted 5-year second hip fracture and mortality risk. Prophylactic fixation in low-mortality, high-risk patients may reduce costs and prevent future fractures. [Tool available: https://sttgmacom.wpcomstaging.com/predicting-risk-of-second-hip-fractures/]. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III Diagnostic.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To compare functional outcomes of distal third humeral shaft fractures (OTA 12A-C and 13A2-3) treated with either triceps-splitting or triceps-sparing surgical approach. Secondarily, the purpose was to compare healing and complication rates between the two surgical approaches. METHOD/METHODS:A retrospective review of a prospectively collected humeral shaft registry was performed from 01/2018-12/2024. Inclusion criteria was: age > 18yo, OTA 12A-C or 13A2-3 distal third humeral shaft fracture, either triceps-splitting or triceps-sparing surgical approach, and minimum 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome was 1-year postoperative functional status measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Secondary outcomes measures included surgical time, radiographic union times, union rates, iatrogenic nerve injury, fracture related infection, hardware failure, reoperation, and documented range of motion (ROM) at last follow-up. Univariate analysis with two-tailed Student's t-tests and chi-square tests was used to compare demographics, injury and surgical characteristics. RESULT/RESULTS:A total of 39 patients met inclusion criteria: 27 (69.2%) underwent a triceps-splitting approach and 12 (30.8%) a triceps-sparing approach. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics. At final follow-up, functional outcomes were comparable. DASH scores were similar between groups (7.7 ± 13.8 vs 7.0 ± 9.0, p = 0.89), as were fracture healing times (5.5 ± 2.2 vs 6.1 ± 3.6 months, p = 0.63), with all fractures achieving union. Surgical duration was shorter in the splitting group (83 ± 42 vs 103 ± 52 min, p = 0.26), though not statistically significant. No hardware-related complications were reported. Two radial nerve palsies (7.6%) occurred in the splitting group, while one postoperative infection (8.3%) occurred in the sparing group (all p > 0.05). Elbow range of motion was similar. Mean flexion was 137.9 ± 10.0° in the splitting group vs 131.3 ± 30.0° in the sparing group (p = 0.47); mean extension was 2.3 ± 4.7° vs 4.6 ± 5.5°, respectively (p = 0.21). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:There is no difference in 1-year functional outcomes as measured by the DASH score between the triceps-splitting versus triceps-sparing approach for surgical fixation of the OTA 12A-C and 13A2-3 distal third humeral shaft fractures. Either surgical approach is viable for distal third humeral shaft fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study was to examine factors that were associated with a decline in functional ambulatory status following fractures of the tibial diaphysis. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective review of an IRB-approved tibial diaphysis fracture database from 2012 to 2024 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18, isolated OTA 42A-C tibia fracture treated with an intramedullary nail, and minimum 12 months follow-up. Demographics, injury, and surgical information were collected. Functional ambulatory status was measured at routine follow up intervals by the Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC) score, a six-point scale where zero represents non-ambulation and five represents normal ambulatory ability. Univariate analysis was performed using Student's T-tests and Chi-squared tests. A backwards stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors that were independently associated with a decline in FAC score (SPSS version 29, Armonk, NY). RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:289 patients, with a mean follow up time of 15.04 ± 6.18 months, were included in the analysis with a mean age of 43.24 ± 16.22 years, body mass index of 27.19 ± 6.30, and age-unadjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0.18 ± 0.54. 39.1 % of patients were female, 28.0 % patients sustained open fractures, and 52.6 % sustained high energy injuries. The logistic regression demonstrated that older age (OR = 1.04 p < .001), higher BMI (OR = 1.06 p = .024), high-energy mechanism (OR = 3.18 p = .003), nonunion (OR = 3.66, p = .005), and concomitant lower extremity fractures (OR = 4.47 p = 002), were risk factors for a decrease in final FAC score. The AUROC of the logistic regression equation was 0.787 indicating a moderate ability to discriminate between patients that will experience a loss in functional ambulatory ability and those who will not. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:This study suggests that concomitant lower extremity injuries, increased age, increased BMI, high-energy mechanisms, and nonunion are risk factors that are associated with a decline in ambulatory capacity following diaphyseal tibia fractures.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing patella open reduction internal fixation procedures based on the type of anesthesia administered. METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted of patients who were surgically treated for displaced patella fractures from 2012 to 2024 at a single multi-site academic institution. Patients were included if they were > 18 years of age, sustained an isolated patella fracture, and had a minimum of 6-month follow-up. Patients were divided into groups based on the anesthetic modality used during their surgery: regional anesthesia only (RA), general/neuraxial anesthesia (NR), and a combination of these methods (CA). Comparisons of statistics were performed using Pearson chi-squared tests, one-way ANOVA tests, and linear regression tests as appropriate. RESULTS:There were no complications associated with the administration of anesthesia within each cohort. There was no significant difference in fracture healing rates (p = .210) nor complication rates between the anesthesia groups (p = .088). The RA and CA groups had significantly shorter operating room (wheels in to wheels out) times than the NR group (p < .001), significantly greater 3-month (p = .001) and 6-month knee ROM (p = .016) than the NR group when controlling for age, fracture pattern, and repair method. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates the efficacy of the use of regional anesthesia only for repair of a patella fracture. This technique is associated with greater early range of knee motion in patients after surgery and a shorter surgical time with no increase in intra or postoperative complications.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To identify factors associated with prolonged length of stay following geriatric hip fractures. METHODS:A single-center retrospective study of a consecutive series of geriatric (age > 65) hip fractures between 10/1/14 and 11/1/23 was performed. Patient demographics, injury/surgery characteristics, and inpatient complications were reviewed. Patients who died during hospitalization were excluded. Patients were cohorted into "average" LOS (nLOS) and "prolonged" LOS (pLOS); pLOS was defined as 1 standard deviation above the mean LOS. Cohort variables were compared using standard statistical tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to isolate covariates that were independently associated with pLOS while controlling for confounders. RESULTS:A total of 3383 patients were identified. Average LOS was 6.38 days (S.D. = 4.24 days), and prolonged LOS was 10.62 days. The pLOS cohort was sicker and less functionally independent at baseline. The pLOS cohort had a more complicated hospital course with a 6 × increase in major complications and 2 × increase in minor complications. The demographic characteristic associated the most to pLOS was male gender. The injury/surgery characteristic contributing the most to pLOS was time from admission to surgery. The complication contributing the most to pLOS was new-onset stroke. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Multiple demographic and outcome factors are associated with pLOS in geriatric hip fractures. While demographics cannot be changed, teams should focus on modifiable factors such as reducing time to surgery and identification, prevention, and treatment of perioperative complications, most importantly stroke and pneumonia, to prevent delays in discharge following hip fracture in the elderly population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level IV.

This study aims to identify if there are significant differences in hospital quality measures between hip fracture patients who were treated under the management of a dedicated Hip Fracture Care Coordinator (HFCC) and those who were not. An institutional review board-approved hip fracture registry was queried for patients who were admitted at an orthopedic hospital under the care of HFCC from October 2021 to April 2023 (2.5 years). A comparison cohort of patients was obtained from reviewing patients in the 2.5 years (April 2019-October 2021) before the hiring of the HFCC. Univariable comparisons and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to assess the impact of the HFCC on outcomes such as hospital quality measures, inpatient complications, discharge location, and readmission and mortality rates. One thousand fifty-six hip fracture patients were identified: 532 (50.4%) without-HFCC and 524 (49.6%) HFCC. When controlling for covariates using binary logistic regression, the presence of an HFCC was associated with a higher likelihood of home discharge (odds ratio = 2.481, p < .001). Regression analyses demonstrated similar benefits of the HFCC with outcome variables such as intensive care unit stay (p < .001) and time to surgery (p < .001). This study demonstrates an association between the HFCC and improved outcomes for both patients and the hospital system.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The Moore type II tibial plateau fracture dislocation (M2) represents a specific subset of tibial plateau injuries. This study aims to assess outcomes for M2 fractures and examine the impact of surgical approach on recovery. METHODS:Patients were identified in a prospectively collected tibial plateau fracture database. Inclusion criteria included age ≥ 18 years, operative treatment, and minimum 1-year follow-up. Fractures were classified according to the systems of Schatzker et al. and Moore. Patients classified as Moore type 2 (M2) were identified and compared to all others. Demographic, injury, and surgical data were collected. Outcomes included knee range of motion (ROM), pain (VAS), and functional status (SMFA). M2 patients were categorized by surgical approach: medial (M), lateral (L), or combined (C). Statistical analyses were performed using Pearson Chi-Squared, t-tests, and ANOVA. RESULTS:A total of 595 patients met inclusion criteria; 58 (10%) sustained an M2 fracture (mean follow-up = 28.34 months). The M2 cohort had fewer females (p = 0.048) and a higher complication rate (22.4% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.085). At 6 months, the M2 group had worse SMFA scores (p = 0.004), but by 1 year, differences were not significant (p = 0.199). Complications included knee contracture, fracture-related infections, venous thromboembolism events, and peroneal nerve issues. The combined surgical approach (C) had more external fixation use (50%) and poorer outcomes for pain and function compared to isolated approaches (p = 0.004, p = 0.041). The lateral approach (L) showed better ROM but was associated with higher rates of postoperative peroneal nerve injuries. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Moore type II fractures are complex, with poorer outcomes and higher complication rates than other tibial plateau fractures. Isolated medial surgery yields better results compared to combined approaches.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study is to determine differences in outcomes between "extreme" tibial metaphyseal fractures treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN) or plate osteosynthesis. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:545 prospectively collected patients were reviewed by two board-certified orthopedic trauma surgeons to identify extreme tibial shaft fractures (defined as most proximal or distal segments that involved or would have involved the area encompassed by the nail locking bolts). Fifty-one patients were identified. Twenty-five patients treated with an intramedullary nail were compared to 24 patients treated with plate and screws for similar patterns. Data collected included patient demographics, surgical details, and outcomes. Cohorts were compared using fisher's exact test, independent T tests, and multivariable linear regression. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The mean age of all patients was 46.73 years. There were no differences in ASA, CCI, age, male/female composition, or BMI between cohorts. There were no differences in low vs. high-energy mechanism of injury between cohorts, however the IMN cohort had a greater proportion of open fractures (p = 0.018). When controlling for covariates, patients who underwent IMN were allowed earlier weight bearing on the operative extremity. There were no differences in ankle or knee range of motion at latest follow up. There was a greater incidence of total complications among IMN (p = 0.033). Single variable analysis revealed an association between IMN and nonunion (p = 0.050). IMN trended towards greater need for reoperation (p = 0.086). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Intramedullary nailing of "extreme tibia fractures" was associated with higher rates of total complications compared to plate osteosynthesis and trended with greater need for reoperation. However, it should be noted that there was a higher incidence of open fractures in this cohort. There were no differences in the rate of malalignment, range of motion, or time to healing between cohorts.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to assess the demographic characteristics of hip fracture patients who followed up versus those who did not and secondarily to evaluate if follow-up duration correlated with long-term functional outcomes. METHODS:This was a retrospective review that queried a trauma database for all patients aged >55 years with hip fractures because of low-energy mechanisms between February 2019 and May 2020. Demographic characteristics, hospital quality measures, clinical outcomes, follow-up attendance, and 1-year functional outcomes were collected from the electronic medical record or through phone. Comparative analyses were conducted between patients who attended >50% of their follow-up appointments and those who attended <50% of their follow-up appointments. Patients were stratified based on the number of follow-up appointments attended and were compared. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to identify factors influencing follow-up attendance and its association with functional outcomes. RESULTS:Four hundred fifty-two patients were included for analysis. Patients attending follow-up were younger, more likely to be community ambulators, White, and female. Multivariable regression revealed that younger age, White ethnicity, and female sex were independently associated with higher 1-year follow-up attendance. A positive linear relationship was observed between follow-up attendance and improved functional outcomes. Patients attending >50% of their appointments had better outcome scores. Overall, 218 patients were contacted through phone for 1-year follow-up and thus the 1-year follow-up rate increased to 69%. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Consistent follow-up is associated with better 1-year outcomes in geriatric hip fracture patients. Recognizing the demographic factors associated with follow-up attendance can assist in patient education and engagement.