Faculty Bibliography

Cerebral cavernous malformations are abnormal clusters of thin-walled sinusoidal vascular channels without intervening brain parenchyma. The most common presenting symptom is seizure, which results from hemosiderin deposition in surrounding tissues. Early surgical resection of these malformations confers the greatest likelihood of long-term seizure freedom. This operative video demonstrates the resection of a posterior mediobasal temporal cavernous malformation through a contralateral supracerebellar-transtentorial (cSCTT) approach. The patient, a 65-year-old woman, presented with a complex partial seizure with secondary generalization. On preoperative evaluation, she was neurologically intact. The risks and benefits of treatment alternatives, including observation, were explained to her. She consented to proceed with surgery to remove the cavernous malformation. The patient was placed in the sitting position with neck flexion to flatten the angle of the tentorium. A torcular craniotomy was performed to expose the confluence of the sagittal and transverse sinuses. Gravity retraction of the cerebellum plus contralateral supracerebellar arachnoid dissection allowed generous exposure of the ambient cistern and incisura with no brain retraction or transgression. The tentorium was opened, and the cavernous malformation was then circumferentially dissected and removed en bloc. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings indicated complete resection without cortical injury. The patient remained free of seizures through the 6-month follow-up. Video 1 demonstrates the cSCTT approach to lesions of the posterior mediobasal temporal lobe without the need for retraction or transcortical dissection. The cSCTT approach extends the reach of the ipsilateral, infratentorial approach laterally, which is nearly 2 cm off midline, more than is possible without cutting the tentorium.

BACKGROUND:The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic necessitated the use of telemedicine for most medical specialties, including neurosurgery, although before the pandemic, neurosurgeons infrequently used telemedicine for outpatient visits. We conducted a patient-centric evaluation of telemedicine in our endovascular neurosurgery practice, covering a 4-month period early in the pandemic. METHODS:Survey e-mails after telemedicine visits were sent to all patients who underwent an outpatient telemedicine visit between March 11, 2020, and June 22, 2020, at an endovascular neurosurgery clinic affiliated with a tertiary care center. RESULTS:Of 140 patients, 65 (46%) completed the e-mail survey. Of the 65 respondents, 35 (54%) agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that even before their telemedicine experience, they thought telemedicine would be a convenient way to receive a neurological consultation. After their telemedicine visit, 47 (72%) agreed or strongly agreed with this statement, and 28 (43%) agreed or strongly agreed that they would prefer telemedicine for future visits. Of the 65 respondents, 61 (94%) rated their telemedicine visit as average or better: 34 (52%) rated it excellent, 12 (18%) rated it above average, and 15 (23%) rated it average. When patients compared their telemedicine visit with a prior in-person clinic visit, only 10 of 44 patients (23%) thought the telemedicine visit was more complicated than an in-person visit, and 21 of 44 (48%) said they would prefer telemedicine for future visits. CONCLUSIONS:Our patients expressed satisfaction with their telemedicine visits, and telemedicine will likely play an important role in future outpatient endovascular neurosurgery consultations.

BACKGROUND:Although the full transcavernous approach affords extensive mobilization of the oculomotor nerve (OMN) for exposure of the basilar apex and interpeduncular cistern region, this time-consuming procedure requires substantial dural dissection along the anterior middle cranial fossa. OBJECTIVE:To quantify the extent to which limited middle fossa dural elevation affects the carotid-oculomotor window (C-OMW) surgical area during transcavernous exposure after OMN mobilization. METHODS:Four cadaveric specimens were dissected bilaterally to study the C-OMW area afforded by the transcavernous exposure. Each specimen underwent full and limited transcavernous exposure and anterior clinoidectomy (1 procedure per side; 8 procedures). Limited exposure was defined as a dural elevation confined to the cavernous sinus. Full exposure included dural elevation over the gasserian ganglion, extending to the middle meningeal artery and lateral middle cranial fossa. RESULTS:The C-OMW area achieved with the limited transcavernous exposure, compared with full transcavernous exposure, provided significantly less total area with OMN mobilization (22 ± 6 mm2 vs 52 ± 26 mm2, P = .03) and a smaller relative increase in area after OMN mobilization (11 ± 5 mm2 vs 36 ± 13 mm2, P = .03). The increase after OMN mobilization in the C-OMW area after OMN mobilization was 136% ± 119% with a limited exposure vs 334% ± 216% with a full exposure. CONCLUSION:In this anatomical study, the full transcavernous exposure significantly improved OMN mobilization and C-OMW area compared with a limited transcavernous exposure. If a transcavernous exposure is pursued, the difference in the carotid-oculomotor operative corridor area achieved with a limited vs full exposure should be considered.

BACKGROUND:Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) with low Spetzler-Martin grades (I and II) are associated with good neurological outcomes after microsurgical resection; however, the use of preoperative embolization for these lesions is controversial. OBJECTIVE:To compare the neurological outcomes of preoperative embolization with no embolization in patients with low-grade AVMs. METHODS:Patients with a Spetzler-Martin grade I or II AVM who underwent microsurgical resection during January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2019, were analyzed. Patients undergoing preoperative embolization were compared with patients not undergoing embolization. A propensity score was constructed from baseline characteristics and used to match intervention (embolization) and control (nonembolization) groups in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was poor neurological status on last follow-up examination, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score >2 and a modified Rankin Scale score worse at follow-up than at the preoperative examination. RESULTS:Of the 603 patients analyzed, 310 (51.4%) underwent preoperative embolization and 293 (48.6%) did not. Patients in the embolization cohort compared with those in the nonembolization cohort had a higher percentage of Spetzler-Martin grade II AVMs (71.6% vs 52.6%, P < .001) and a lower percentage of hemorrhage (41% vs 55%, P = .001). After propensity score matching, no differences were found between paired cohorts (each N = 203) for baseline characteristics with a significant reduction in absolute standardized mean differences. No significant differences were found in primary outcomes between treatment groups in the matched or unmatched cohorts. CONCLUSION:Preoperative embolization of low-grade Spetzler-Martin AVMs is not associated with improved neurological outcomes after microsurgical resection.

OBJECTIVE:Supplemented Spetzler-Martin grading (Supp-SM), which is the combination of Spetzler-Martin and Lawton-Young grades, was validated as being more accurate than stand-alone Spetzler-Martin grading, but an operability cutoff was not established. In this study, the authors surgically treated intermediate-grade AVMs to provide prognostic factors for neurological outcomes and to define AVMs at the boundary of operability. METHODS:Surgically treated Supp-SM intermediate-grade (5, 6, and 7) AVMs were analyzed from 2011 to 2018 at two medical centers. Worsened neurological outcomes were defined as increased modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores on postoperative examinations. A second analysis of 2000-2011 data for Supp-SM grade 6 and 7 AVMs was performed to determine the subtypes with improved or unchanged outcomes. Patients were separated into three groups based on nidus size (S1: < 3 cm, S2: 3-6 cm, S3: > 6 cm) and age (A1: < 20 years, A2: 20-40 years, A3: > 40 years), followed by any combination of the combined supplemented grade: low risk (S1A1, S1A2, S2A1), intermediate risk (S2A2, S1A3, S3A1, or high risk (S3A3, S3A2, S2A3). RESULTS:Two hundred forty-six patients had intermediate Supp-SM grade AVMs. Of these patients, 102 had Supp-SM grade 5 (41.5%), 99 had Supp-SM grade 6 (40.2%), and 45 had Supp-SM grade 7 (18.3%). Significant differences in the proportions of patients with worse mRS scores at follow-up were found between the groups, with 24.5% (25/102) of patients in Supp-SM grade 5, 29.3% (29/99) in Supp-SM grade 6, and 57.8% (26/45) in Supp-SM grade 7 (p < 0.001). Patients with Supp-SM grade 7 AVMs had significantly increased odds of worse postoperative mRS scores (p < 0.001; OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.9-7.3). In the expanded cohort of 349 Supp-SM grade 6 AVM patients, a significantly higher proportion of older patients with larger Supp-SM grade 6 AVMs (grade 6+, 38.6%) had neurological deterioration than the others with Supp-SM grade 6 AVMs (22.9%, p = 0.02). Conversely, in an expanded cohort of 197 Supp-SM grade 7 AVM patients, a significantly lower proportion of younger patients with smaller Supp-SM grade 7 AVMs (grade 7-, 19%) had neurological deterioration than the others with Supp-SM grade 7 AVMs (44.9%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with Supp-SM grade 7 AVMs are at increased risk of worse postoperative neurological outcomes, making Supp-SM grade 6 an appropriate operability cutoff. However, young patients with small niduses in the low-risk Supp-SM grade 7 group (grade 7-) have favorable postoperative outcomes. Outcomes in Supp-SM grade 7 patients did not improve with surgeon experience, indicating that the operability boundary is a hard limit reflecting the complexity of high-grade AVMs.