Faculty Bibliography

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common disease, with prevalence rates as high as 44-57% in middle aged and post menopausal women.[1] Those suffering from UI may experience physical, functional, and psychological limitations and diminished quality of life at home and at work.[2] The financial burden of UI care is significant with an estimated direct cost of $19.5 billion in the United States alone. [3].

Introduction: Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is an efficacious treatment option for overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). There is a paucity of data surrounding long-term efficacy of PTNS and limited studies are aimed at characterizing those patients who seek post-PTNS follow up maintenance. The aim of this study was to evaluate those who completed PTNS treatment and continued with posttreatment PTNS maintenance versus alternative therapeutic options.
Method(s): This is a prospective cohort study at a single academic institution. Ninety patients started PTNS according to our clinical protocol. The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGII), and OAB Short Form (OABq-SF) questionnaires were used to assess OAB symptom severity and improvement, respectively. Following 12 sessions, patients were given the choice to continue maintenance PTNS or to pursue other options.
Result(s): Our completion rate was 70/90 (77.8%). Of all patients who continued some type of therapy for OAB, significantly more patients went on to monthly PTNS maintenance compared with all other options (54.3% vs 37.1%, P=0.02). There were no differing demographic features between those who pursued Post-PTNS maintenance and those who chose an alternative therapy. Overall OABq-SF scores improved significantly by the end of treatment but did not differ between those who chose PTNS maintenance and those who pursued another treatment. Medications did not improve the perception of improvement when added to PTNS (P=0.45). Individuals who chose PTNS maintenance showed significant improvement in urgency (3.4 (0.89) to 2.6 (0.89); P=0.049) and incontinence (3.2 (1.72) to 2.7 (1.37); P=0.038) over the initial 12 weeks, while those who chose otherwise did not. Individuals who went on to monthly maintenance showed lower PGII scores compared with those who sought alternatives (2.70 (1.6) vs 3.81 (1.07); P=0.01), despite no difference in starting severity of OAB symptoms (PGIS score 3.33 (0.72) vs 3.33 (0.70); P=1).
Conclusion(s): Patients were more likely to continue maintenance PTNS than any other form of treatment. Despite no predictive characteristics found, favorable improvement subscores in urgency and incontinence were associated with those pursuing maintenance therapy. Overall, those who perceived greater improvement were more likely to pursue long-term PTNS therapy as their OAB treatment of choice

AIMS/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the impact of a protocol for standardized image capture during video urodynamics (VUD) on radiation exposure. Secondly, to categorize radiation exposure by condition warranting VUD and to identify clinical variables that correlate with increased radiation exposure. METHODS:One hundred fifty patients underwent VUD using our standardized protocol. All images were taken using low dose and pulsed settings. Four images are captured: one scout image, one filling image, one voiding image, and one post-void image. If the patient is unable to void with the catheter in place, the catheter is removed and a second image is taken during an attempt at unintubated flow. If vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is identified, an alternate protocol is entered to document parameters. The mean radiation exposure measured in dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and number of images were noted and compared with previously published fluoroscopy data collected at our institution before protocol implementation. RESULTS:taking 5.2 images in 4.5 seconds. Protocol implementation leads to a 51.2% reduction in radiation exposure calculated by mean DAP (P < .0001) and a 96.5% reduction in fluoroscopy time (P < .0001). The presence of VUR, fluoroscopy time, and body mass index (BMI) > 25 were associated with higher radiation exposure (P < .0001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Implementation and adherence to a standardized protocol for fluoroscopy led to a reduction in radiation exposure fluoroscopy time. The presence of VUR, fluoroscopy time, and BMI > 25 were associated with higher radiation exposure.

Purpose of Review: The goal of this paper is to provide the reader with three distinct definitions of midurethral sling failure and provide guidance on the work up and management of each definition. Recent Findings: The definition of sling failure should include not only patients with recurrent and persistent stress urinary incontinence but also those with de novo voiding symptoms and overactive bladder as a result of their midurethral sling. Urodynamics are less commonly performed for the straightforward patient with stress urinary incontinence prior to a midurethral sling. However, there is evidence that urodynamics studies can help with diagnosis and guide management in the patient with a failed midurethral sling. Summary: When a patient experiences abnormalities of urinary storage or emptying after a midurethral sling, a comprehensive workup can help guide thoughtful and effective management of symptoms.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Stress urinary incontinence is highly prevalent and sling surgery has increased since 2000. Urethrolysis traditionally had been standard management of complications after anti-incontinence surgery; however, partial excision is a less aggressive option. This study describes the different populations in a contemporary cohort that undergo sling excision and urethrolysis and their surgical outcomes. METHODS:Chart analysis was performed on patients assigned Current Procedural Terminology codes for removal or revision of sling for stress incontinence, urethrolysis, or revision of graft at our institution from 2010 to 2015. Demographics, indications, outcomes, and subsequent treatment were evaluated. RESULTS:A total of 110 patients underwent surgery and were included. Partial excision was performed on 82 patients and urethrolysis on 28 patients. About 32.7% had prior revision, and median length to revision was 3.1 years. Overall success was 75.0% for urethrolysis and 86.6% for partial excision. Without concomitant sling placement, stress incontinence developed in 25.0% of urethrolysis and 21.6% of partial excision patients. New onset overactive bladder symptoms developed in 21.4% of urethrolysis patients and 7.3% of partial excision, which was significantly different (P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS:Both approaches had good success, 75.0% for formal urethrolysis and 86.6% for partial excision. New onset urgency was lower for partial excision, but rates of all other complications were similar. These procedures are often used for different patient populations, and thus, outcomes are not meant to be directly compared. Future work on sling revision should report these procedures separately.

In this article, we review the current uses and future directions of robotic surgery in the field of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. Pelvic surgery is ideal for the use of surgical robots, which provide improved visualization and ease of suturing deep within the pelvis. Robots have been successfully used for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, in procedures such as sacrocolpopexy, sacrohysteropexy, and uterosacral ligament plication. Surgeons have used the robotic successfully to treat various etiologies of female pelvic pain including fibroids, endometriosis, and nerve entrapment. Robotic repair of iatrogenic injury has been described with excellent outcomes and avoidance of conversion to open surgery in the event of an injury caused using the robotic platform. While more data is needed on this topic, there has been increasing interest in using the robot for urologic reconstruction including repair of vesico-vaginal fistula, cystectomy, augmentation cystoplasty, and continent and non-continent diversions. Recently the use of the robot has been described in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in females, with robotic placement of an artificial urinary sphincter. While robotic surgery is associated with increased cost, the outcomes of robotic surgery in female urology are promising. More studies that properly evaluate the benefits of robotic surgery as compared to open and laparoscopic approaches are needed.