Faculty Bibliography

CONTEXT/BACKGROUND:The role of overactive bladder (OAB) treatment in women beyond antimuscarinics has been evaluated extensively. Beta-3 agonists, botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A), and nerve stimulation are indicated in these patients. However, data on male patients in this clinical scenario are scarce. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence on treatment options beyond antimuscarinics in men with OAB. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION/METHODS:A search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Central Database of Systematic Reviews databases was performed for relevant articles published between January 2000 and October 2020, using the following Medical Subject Headings: "male/man," "LUTS," "overactive bladder," "storage symptoms," "urgency," "nocturia," "incontinence," "beta-3 agonist," "PDE-5 inhibitors," "botulinum toxin," "sacral nerve stimulation/neurostimulation," "percutaneous/transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation," "PTENS," and "combination therapy." Evidence acquisition was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PROSPERO registration number is CRD42020201223. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS/RESULTS:-blocker tamsulosin improved the mean number of micturitions per day (-0.27, 95% CI: -0.46 to -0.09, p <  0.05), urgency episodes (-0.50, 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.22, p <  0.05), total OAB symptom score (-0.66, 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.38, p <  0.05), and mean volume voided (+10.76 ml, 95% CI: 4.87-16.64, p <  0.05). MIRA treatment is well tolerated in men. Other pharmacological treatment options, such as phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors, should be considered investigational. BTX-A seems to be effective as third-line treatment in male OAB patients. A higher rate of intermittent self-catheterization (5-42%) is observed in male than in female patients. Data on nerve stimulation are scarce. CONCLUSIONS:MIRA has the most robust data in terms of safety and efficacy in this patient population. Preliminary data in men suggest that BTX-A is indicated as an interventional treatment. Evidence for PDE-5 inhibitors and nerve stimulation is too limited to provide recommendations. Future studies in this population should aim to better define the best treatment sequence and to identify predictors for treatment response and failure, to determine a therapeutic approach tailored to patients' characteristics. PATIENT SUMMARY/UNASSIGNED:Overactive bladder is highly prevalent in men. Mirabegron 50 mg is the treatment option supported by the highest level of evidence when antimuscarinics failed. Botulinum toxin A injections seems to be an effective treatment as interventional option. Roles of nerve stimulation and phosphodiesterase inhibitors in male OAB patients are still to be defined.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate whether progression to maintenance percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) was related to perceived global impression of improvement (PGII) rather than symptom-specific improvement in patient with overactive bladder (OAB). We hypothesize that PGII will predict continuation of PTNS long-term. METHODS:This prospective observational study included 90 patients with OAB that initiated PTNS. The PGII and overactive bladder short-form questionnaires (OABq-SF) were used to assess bladder symptom severity and improvement. Those that completed the 12-week induction phase were offered to continue PTNS monthly maintenance or pursue other options. The primary outcome was difference in PGII score between those pursuing maintenance therapy versus other options. Descriptive statistics and mixed effect modeling analysis were employed. RESULTS:Seventy patients (78%) completed 12 weeks of PTNS. The majority of completers pursued monthly maintenance (p<0.01) and had significantly lower median PGII scores compared with those who sought alternatives (p<0.01), while OABq-SF scores did not differ significantly (p=0.65). Patients that pursued monthly PTNS maintenance had lower body mass index than those who chose alternative therapies (p<0.01). Only 19% continued PTNS therapy for at least 1 year. CONCLUSIONS:More patients pursued PTNS monthly maintenance over any other therapy, and this was significantly associated with lower PGII scores. Global improvement, and not symptom-specific response, predicts long-term PTNS maintenance. No symptom-specific predictors were identified in those who pursued maintenance over other options. One-year continuation rates are low.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to assess whether mid-urethral sling (MUS) placement at the time of vaginal prolapse repair compared to vaginal prolapse repair alone is associated with an increase in 30-day postoperative complications. METHODS:Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Database, Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify cases of vaginal prolapse repair with and without concomitant MUS from 2012 to 2017. Student's t-test and chi-square test were used to compare differences between the groups. RESULTS:A total of 1469 cases of vaginal prolapse repair with sling were compared to 4566 cases without sling. There was no difference between prolapse repair with sling compared to without sling in mean hospital length of stay (LOS) (1.42 versus 1.32 days, p = 0.65), postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) (6.1% versus 5.8%, p = 0.670), perioperative blood transfusion (1.1% versus 1.2%, p = 0.673), readmission (2.7% versus 2.6%, p = 0.884) and postoperative wound infection (0.5% versus 0.7%, p = 0.51). There was a higher rate of reoperation (2.2% versus 1.5%, p = 0.049) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) (0.4% versus 0.1%, p = 0.030) in patients undergoing concomitant MUS compared to those undergoing prolapse repair alone. CONCLUSIONS:Compared to prolapse repair alone, the addition of a sling did not increase hospital LOS, UTI, perioperative blood transfusions, readmission or postoperative wound infections. However, concomitant sling was found to be associated with a higher risk of reoperation and VTE.

AIM/OBJECTIVE:Venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates in vaginal pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair are low. Our aim is to evaluate specific risk factors for VTE in patients undergoing vaginal POP repair. METHODS: tests for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with VTE. RESULTS:Of 44 207 women who underwent vaginal POP repair, there were 69 cases of VTE (0.16%). VTE rates for obliterative (0.15%) and functional (0.16%) vaginal POP repair, as well as for repairs with hysterectomy (0.17%) and without hysterectomy (0.12%) were not significantly different (p = .616 and .216, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated predictors for postoperative VTE to be ASA physical status classification ≥ 3 (aOR, 1.99; p = .014), length of stay >75th percentile (aOR, 2.01; p = .007), operative time >3 h (aOR, 2.24; p = .007), and dyspnea (aOR, 3.26, p = .004). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Despite the low incidence of VTE after vaginal POP repair, patients with ASA physical status classification ≥ 3, length of stay >75th percentile, operative time >3 h, and dyspnea were at higher risk for VTE. Vaginal POP repair may have independent VTE risk factors not captured in standard risk assessment tools.

Objective: Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA) is an effective treatment for urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). A possible adverse effect of ONA is incomplete bladder emptying requiring temporary clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). The goal of this study was to determine whether uncorrected patient-reported stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in those with urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) had an effect on CIC rates.
Method(s): This was a retrospective chart review conducted at a single academic institution between 1/2010 and 12/2019. Unique female subjects were identified by CPT and/or J codes for intradetrusor injection of ONA. Charts were reviewed for demographic information, past medical and surgical history, symptoms of SUI, post void residual (PVR) before and after ONA injection, and whether catheterization was required after index ONA 100 unit injection. Subjects with a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder, urethral stricture, and baseline catheterization requirement were excluded from this analysis. Anti-stress incontinence (ASI) procedures were historic as documented in urogynecologic history prior to index ONA injection. CIC was at the discretion of the clinician, typically with CIC recommended if PVR>350 mL. Patient characteristics and CIC rates were analyzed using descriptive statistics after assessing for normality. Two-sided P values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Result(s): Of 517 charts, 178 females were included for analysis. The mean age of women was 68.63 (+/-15.2) years. A total of 78 (41.6%) women had UUI but no SUI, 57 (32.0%) reported SUI along with UUI (ie, MUI) without any prior ASI procedure, and 47 (26.4%) reported SUI with prior ASI procedure. Demographic and outcome data are demonstrated in table 1. The overall CIC rate following ONA was 11.23%. We found that a lower proportion of women with uncorrected SUI required CIC following ONA compared to women without SUI or women with previous ASI procedure (P=0.017). The pre-ONA PVR was not significantly different between all three groups (P=0.12) while the post-ONA PVR was significantly higher among women with prior ASI procedure (P<0.001).
Conclusion(s): Rates of CIC are lower among women with uncorrected SUI, despite an overall significantly older population and similar baseline PVRs. This would suggest that a decreased outlet resistance may be protective against urinary retention. This is an important finding to consider when counseling our patients on the risks and benefits of ONA for the treatment of urge-predominant mixed urinary incontinence

Purpose of Review: The goal of this paper is to provide the reader with three distinct definitions of midurethral sling failure and provide guidance on the work up and management of each definition. Recent Findings: The definition of sling failure should include not only patients with recurrent and persistent stress urinary incontinence but also those with de novo voiding symptoms and overactive bladder as a result of their midurethral sling. Urodynamics are less commonly performed for the straightforward patient with stress urinary incontinence prior to a midurethral sling. However, there is evidence that urodynamics studies can help with diagnosis and guide management in the patient with a failed midurethral sling. Summary: When a patient experiences abnormalities of urinary storage or emptying after a midurethral sling, a comprehensive workup can help guide thoughtful and effective management of symptoms.

OBJECTIVE:To determine the patient-perceived effectiveness and tolerability of mirabegron compared to solifenacin in a multiple sclerosis (MS) population with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:MS patients with OAB symptoms who were not on medication for their urinary symptoms at enrollment were prospectively recruited. Patients enrolled in years 1-2 were prescribed mirabegron, whereas patients enrolled in years 3-4 were prescribed solifenacin. At enrollment and 6-week followup, patients completed several patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). The primary outcome was change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF) symptom severity and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement. The Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) was used to assess bowel function over the treatment period. RESULTS:61 patients were enrolled. The majority of the mirabegron (70%) and the solifenacin (69%) group achieved the OAB-q SF symptom severity MCID. The solifenacin group had a statistically significant greater decrease in its end of study OAB-q SF score (Δ = -37.87 versus -20.43, p=0.02). Constipation improved in the mirabegron group and worsened in the solifenacin group (ΔPAC-SYM =-0.38 versus +0.22; p=0.02), with 30% of patients prescribed solifenacin experiencing worsening above the MCID threshold. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Among MS patients, we demonstrated similar response rates to mirabegron and solifenacin, with approximately 50-70% achieving each PROM's MCID. Though this small study showed some short-term evidence that improvement in urinary symptom severity was greater with solifenacin, this potential benefit must be weighed against the observed risk of worsening constipation. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Introduction: Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is an efficacious treatment option for overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). There is a paucity of data surrounding long-term efficacy of PTNS and limited studies are aimed at characterizing those patients who seek post-PTNS follow up maintenance. The aim of this study was to evaluate those who completed PTNS treatment and continued with posttreatment PTNS maintenance versus alternative therapeutic options.
Method(s): This is a prospective cohort study at a single academic institution. Ninety patients started PTNS according to our clinical protocol. The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGII), and OAB Short Form (OABq-SF) questionnaires were used to assess OAB symptom severity and improvement, respectively. Following 12 sessions, patients were given the choice to continue maintenance PTNS or to pursue other options.
Result(s): Our completion rate was 70/90 (77.8%). Of all patients who continued some type of therapy for OAB, significantly more patients went on to monthly PTNS maintenance compared with all other options (54.3% vs 37.1%, P=0.02). There were no differing demographic features between those who pursued Post-PTNS maintenance and those who chose an alternative therapy. Overall OABq-SF scores improved significantly by the end of treatment but did not differ between those who chose PTNS maintenance and those who pursued another treatment. Medications did not improve the perception of improvement when added to PTNS (P=0.45). Individuals who chose PTNS maintenance showed significant improvement in urgency (3.4 (0.89) to 2.6 (0.89); P=0.049) and incontinence (3.2 (1.72) to 2.7 (1.37); P=0.038) over the initial 12 weeks, while those who chose otherwise did not. Individuals who went on to monthly maintenance showed lower PGII scores compared with those who sought alternatives (2.70 (1.6) vs 3.81 (1.07); P=0.01), despite no difference in starting severity of OAB symptoms (PGIS score 3.33 (0.72) vs 3.33 (0.70); P=1).
Conclusion(s): Patients were more likely to continue maintenance PTNS than any other form of treatment. Despite no predictive characteristics found, favorable improvement subscores in urgency and incontinence were associated with those pursuing maintenance therapy. Overall, those who perceived greater improvement were more likely to pursue long-term PTNS therapy as their OAB treatment of choice