Faculty Bibliography

Purpose/UNASSIGNED:Pediatric sarcomas provide a unique diagnostic challenge. There is considerable morphologic overlap between entities, increasing the importance of molecular studies in the diagnosis, treatment, and identification of therapeutic targets. We developed and validated a genome-wide DNA methylation based classifier to differentiate between osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, and synovial sarcoma. Materials and Methods/UNASSIGNED:DNA methylation status of 482,421 CpG sites in 10 Ewing's sarcoma, 11 synovial sarcoma, and 15 osteosarcoma samples were determined using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 array. We developed a random forest classifier trained from the 400 most differentially methylated CpG sites within the training set of 36 sarcoma samples. This classifier was validated on data drawn from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) synovial sarcoma, TARGET Osteosarcoma, and a recently published series of Ewing's sarcoma. Results/UNASSIGNED:Methylation profiling revealed three distinct patterns, each enriched with a single sarcoma subtype. Within the validation cohorts, all samples from TCGA were accurately classified as synovial sarcoma (10/10, sensitivity and specificity 100%), all but one sample from TARGET-OS were classified as osteosarcoma (85/86, sensitivity 98%, specificity 100%) and 14/15 Ewing's sarcoma samples classified correctly (sensitivity 93%, specificity 100%). The single misclassified osteosarcoma sample demonstrated high EWSR1 and ETV1 expression on RNA-seq although no fusion was found on manual curation of the transcript sequence. Two additional clinical samples, that were difficult to classify by morphology and molecular methods, were classified as osteosarcoma when previously suspected to be a synovial sarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma on initial diagnosis, respectively. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Osteosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, and Ewing's sarcoma have distinct epigenetic profiles. Our validated methylation-based classifier can be used to provide diagnostic assistance when histological and standard techniques are inconclusive.

BACKGROUND:The majority of chemoradiation (CRT) trials for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have relied on platinum-based chemotherapy regimens administered every-3-weeks. However, given the increased utilization of weekly platinum regimens, it remains unclear how different chemotherapy schedules compare regarding efficacy and toxicity. METHODS:We retrospectively identified 212 patients with HNSCC who were treated at a single academic medical center with concurrent platinum-based CRT given weekly (N = 68) or every-three-weeks (N = 144). JMP version 10 (SAS Institute) was used for statistical analysis. Discrete variables were compared with the chi-square test and differences in the medians were assessed using the Wilcoxon test. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method and significance was assessed using the log rank test. For univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, we used Cox proportional hazard or logistic regression models to compare differences in survival or differences in categorical variables, respectively. RESULTS:Patients receiving weekly platinum regimens were more likely to be older (median age 61.4 vs. 55.5 y; P < .001), have high or very high Charlson comorbidity index (45.6% vs. 27.8%; P = .01), and receive carboplatin-based chemotherapy (6.3% vs. 76.5%; P < .001). Weekly and every-3-week platinum regimens had similar locoregional control (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.63-1.88; P = .72), progression-free survival (HR 1.13; 95% CI 0.75-1.69; P = .55), and overall survival (HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.64-1.86; P = .71). Every-3-weeks platinum regimens were associated with increased days of hospitalization (median: 3 days vs. 0 days; P = .03) and acute kidney injury (AKI) during radiotherapy (50.0% vs. 22.1%; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, AKI was significantly associated with every-3-weeks regimens (OR: 24.38; 95% CI 3.00-198.03; P = .003) and high comorbidity scores (OR: 2.74; 95% CI 2.15-5.99; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS:Our results suggest that every-3-weeks and weekly platinum-containing CRT regimens have similar disease control but weekly platinum regimens are associated with less acute toxicity.

PURPOSE: Maximum dose to the left anterior descending artery (LADmax) is an important physical constraint to reduce the risk of cardiovascular toxicity. We generated a simple algorithm to guide the positioning of the tangent fields to reliably maintain LADmax <10 Gy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dosimetric plans from 146 consecutive women treated prone to the left breast enrolled in prospective protocols of accelerated whole breast radiation therapy, with a concomitant daily boost to the tumor bed (40.5 Gy/15 fraction to the whole breast and 48 Gy to the tumor bed), provided the training set for algorithm development. Scatter plots and correlation coefficients were used to describe the bivariate relationships between LADmax and several parameters: distance from the tumor cavity to the tangent field edge, cavity size, breast separation, field size, and distance from the tangent field. A logistic sigmoid curve was used to model the relationship of LADmax and the distance from the tangent field. Furthermore, we tested this prediction model on a validation data set of 53 consecutive similar patients. RESULTS: A lack of linear relationships between LADmax and distance from cavity to LAD (-0.47), cavity size (-0.18), breast separation (-0.02), or field size (-0.28) was observed. In contrast, distance from the tangent field was highly negatively correlated to LADmax (-0.84) and was used in the models to predict LADmax. From a logistic sigmoid model we selected a cut-point of 2.46 mm (95% confidence interval, 2.19-2.74 mm) greater than which LADmax is <10 Gy (95% confidence interval, 9.30-10.72 Gy) and LADmean is <3.3 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Placing the edge of the tangents at least 2.5 mm from the closest point of the contoured LAD is likely to assure LADmax is <10 Gy and LADmean is <3.3 Gy in patients treated with prone accelerated breast radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To identify differences in breast cancer patient-reported quality of life (QOL) between 2 radiation tumor bed boost dose regimens. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four hundred patients with stage 0, I, or II breast cancer who underwent segmental mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy and/or axillary node dissection were treated with either a daily or weekly boost. Patients were treated prone to 40.5 Gy/15 fractions to the whole breast, 5 days per week. Patients were randomized to a concomitant daily boost to the tumor bed of 0.5 Gy, or a weekly boost of 2 Gy on Friday. Patients completed 6 validated QOL survey instruments at baseline, last week of treatment (3 weeks), 45-60 days from the completion of radiation treatment, and at 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: There were no statistically significance differences in responses to the 6 QOL instruments between the daily and weekly radiation boost regimens, even after adjustment for important covariates. However, several changes in responses over time occurred in both arms, including worsening functional status, cosmetic status, and breast-specific pain at the end of treatment as compared with before and 45 to 60 days after the conclusion of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-breast, prone intensity modulated radiation has similar outcomes in QOL measures whether given with a daily or weekly boost. This trial has generated the foundation for a current study of weekly versus daily radiation boost in women with early breast cancer in which 3-dimensional conformal radiation is allowed as a prospective stratification factor.

PURPOSE: To report the results of a prospective randomized trial comparing a daily versus weekly boost to the tumor cavity during the course of accelerated radiation to the breast with patients in the prone position. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2009 to 2012, 400 patients with stage 0 to II breast cancer who had undergone segmental mastectomy participated in an institutional review board-approved trial testing prone breast radiation therapy to 40.5 Gy in 15 fractions 5 d/wk to the whole breast, after randomization to a concomitant daily boost to the tumor bed of 0.5 Gy, or a weekly boost of 2 Gy, on Friday. The present noninferiority trial tested the primary hypothesis that a weekly boost produced no more acute toxicity than did a daily boost. The recurrence-free survival was estimated for both treatment arms using the Kaplan-Meier method; the relative risk of recurrence or death was estimated, and the 2 arms were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: At a median follow-up period of 45 months, no deaths related to breast cancer had occurred. The weekly boost regimen produced no more grade >/=2 acute toxicity than did the daily boost regimen (8.1% vs 10.4%; noninferiority Z = -2.52; P=.006). No statistically significant difference was found in the cumulative incidence of long-term fibrosis or telangiectasia of grade >/=2 between the 2 arms (log-rank P=.923). Two local and two distant recurrences developed in the daily treatment arm and three local and one distant developed in the weekly arm. The 4-year recurrence-free survival rate was not different between the 2 treatment arms (98% for both arms). CONCLUSIONS: A tumor bed boost delivered either daily or weekly was tolerated similarly during accelerated prone breast radiation therapy, with excellent control of disease and comparable cosmetic results.

We prospectively addressed whether EGFR and KRAS mutations, EML4-ALK, ROS1 and RET rearrangements, or wild-type (WT), affects radiosurgery outcomes and overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BM). Of 326 patients with BM treated in 2012-2014 with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS), 112 NSCLC patients received GKRS as their initial intracranial treatment. OS, intracranial progression-free survival, and time to intracranial failure were determined. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to determine factors affecting OS. Toxicity of treatment was evaluated. Median follow-up was 9 months. Patients with EGFR mutant BM had improved survival compared to WT. Median time to development of BM was higher in EGFR mutant patients, but this difference was not significant (2.2 vs 0.9 months; p = 0.2). Median time to distant brain failure was independent of EGFR mutation status. Karnofsky performance status (KPS), non-squamous histopathology, targeted therapy, systemic disease control, EGFR mutation, and low tumor volume were predictive of increased OS on univariate analysis. KPS (p = 0.001) and non-squamous histopathology (p = 0.03) continued to be significant on multivariate analysis. Patients with EGFR mutant BM underwent salvage treatment more often than those without (p = 0.04). Treatment-related toxicity was no different in patients treated with GKRS combined with targeted therapies versus GKRS alone (5 vs 7 %, p = 0.7). Patients with EGFR mutant BM had improved survival compared to a WT cohort. Intracranial disease control following radiosurgery was similar for all tumor subtypes. Radiosurgery is effective for BM and concurrent treatment with targeted therapy appears to be safe.

OBJECT Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) are advocated to provide high-level medical evidence. However, in neurosurgery, there are barriers to conducting RCTs. The authors of this study sought to analyze the quality of neurosurgical RCTs since 2000 to determine the adequacy of their design and reporting. METHODS A search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (2000-2014) was conducted. The medical subject heading (MeSH) terms used in the search included: "neurosurgery" OR "neurosurgical procedure," "brain neoplasms," "infarction" and "decompression," "carotid stenosis," "cerebral hemorrhage," and "spinal fusion." These studies were limited to RCTs, in humans, and in the English language. The Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) and Jadad scales were used to assess the quality of RCT design and reporting. The standardized median times cited (median citations divided by years since publication) were used to assess impact. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary-based scale was used to assess the design of the studies as primarily pragmatic or explanatory. RESULTS Sixty-one articles were identified, and the following subspecialties were the most common: vascular (23, 37%), followed by functional neurosurgery and neurooncology (both 13, 21%). The following nations were the primary leaders in RCTs: US (25 studies, 41%), Germany (8 studies, 13%), and the United Kingdom (7 studies, 11%). Median sample size was 100 (interquartile range [IQR] 41.5-279). The majority of the studies (40, 66%) had pragmatic objectives. The median number of times cited overall was 69 (IQR 20.5-193). The combined median CONSORT score was 36 (IQR 27.5-39). Blinding was most deficiently reported. Other areas with a relatively low quality of reporting were sample size calculation (34.2% of surgical, 38.5% of drug, and 20% of device studies), allocation concealment (28.9% of surgical, 23.1% of drug, and 50% of device studies), and protocol implementation (18.4% of surgical, 23% of drug, and 20% of device studies). The quality of reporting did not correlate with the study impact. All studies had a median Jadad score