Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: To review the authors' experience with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKR) for small recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGGs) following prior radical resection, external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT), and chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ). METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed 26 consecutive adults (9 women and 17 men; median age 60.4 years; Karnofsky Performance Status [KPS] >/=70) who underwent GKR for recurrent HGGs from 2004-2009. Median lesion volume was 1.22 cc, and median treatment dose was 15 Gy. Pathology included glioblastoma multiforme (GBM; n = 16), anaplastic astrocytoma (AA; n = 5), and anaplastic mixed oligoastrocytoma (AMOA; n = 5). Two patients lost to follow-up were excluded from radiographic outcome analyses. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort from the time of GKR was 13.5 months. Values for 12-month actuarial survival from time of GKR for GBM, AMOA, and AA were 37%, 20% and 80%. Local failure occurred in 9 patients (37.5%) at a median time of 5.8 months, and 18 patients (75%) experienced distant progression at a median of 4.8 months. Complications included radiation necrosis in two patients and transient worsening of hemiparesis in one patient. Multivariate hazard ratio (HR) analysis showed KPS 90 or greater, smaller tumor volumes, and increased time to recurrence after resection to be associated with longer OS following GKR. CONCLUSIONS: GKR provided good local tumor control in this group of clinically stable and predominantly high-functioning patients with small recurrent HGGs after radical resection. Meaningful survival times after GKR were seen. GKR can be considered for selected patients with recurrent HGGs

BACKGROUND:: Metastases to the brain occur in 20-30% of patients with cancer and have been identified on autopsy in as many as 50% of patients. OBJECTIVE:: To analyze the efficacy of 20 Gy gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) as initial treatment in patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases </= 2 cm in greatest diameter. METHODS:: A retrospective analysis of 114 consecutive adults with KPS >/= 60 who received GKR for 1 to 3 brain metastases </= 2 cm in size was performed. Five patients lacked detailed follow-up and were excluded, leaving 109 for outcome analysis (34 males/75 females; median age: 61.2 years). All metastases received 20 Gy to the 50%-isodose line. RESULTS:: One hundred-nine patients underwent treatment of 164 metastases at initial GKR. Twenty-six patients (23.9%) were alive at last follow-up (median time: 29.9 months; range: 6.6 months to 7.8 years). The median overall survival was 13.8 months (range: 1 day to 7.6 years). Among the 52 patients with distant failure, 33 patients received 20 Gy to 95 new lesions. A total of 259 metastases received 20 Gy and 4 patients lacked imaging follow-up secondary to death prior to post-treatment imaging. Local failure occurred in 17 of 255 treated lesions (6.7%), yielding an overall local control rate of 93.3%. Actuarial local control at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-months was 96%, 93%, 89%, and 88%, respectively. Permanent neurological complications occurred in 3 patients (2.8%). CONCLUSION:: Among patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases </= 2 cm in size who have not received whole-brain radiation therapy, GKR with 20 Gy provides high rates of local control with low morbidity and excellent neurological symptom-free survival

Prognosis of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) remains poor. Failure has been predominantly local, with leptomeningeal dissemination (LD) occurring in 4-33% of patients in pre-MRI era series. Routine craniospinal imaging after initial treatment may reveal other relapse patterns relapse. Sixteen consecutive pediatric patients with DIPG treated between 2006 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment regimens, recurrence patterns, survival, and pathologic diagnosis were recorded. Fourteen patients received involved-field radiotherapy to 54 Gy, and two patients received craniospinal irradiation for LD at presentation. Neuraxis MRI was performed at diagnosis and at 4 month intervals following radiotherapy. Fifteen patients have had progression of disease (median progression-free survival 5.0 +/- 1.2 months), and 13 patients have died (median survival 9.0 +/- 1.4 months). Local failure occurred in 12 patients (75%). LD occurred in nine patients (56%). LD was present at diagnosis in three patients, after initial staging and treatment in six patients, and during autopsy in two patients. Median overall survival was 12.0 +/- 3.3 months without LD and 8.0 +/- 2.1 months with LD (P = 0.059, log rank test). Median progression-free survival was 9.5 +/- 3.9 months without LD and 3.0 +/- 2.1 months with LD (P = 0.012, log rank test). The high incidence of LD probably reflects liberal use of spine MRI surveillance. All patients should undergo routine craniospinal imaging at diagnosis and follow-up. Central nervous system prophylaxis should be considered in future clinical trials

OBJECT: Reports on resection of tumors in or near eloquent cortices have noted neurological complications in up to 30% of patients. This paper contains an analysis of symptom resolution and neurological morbidity following 20-Gy Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for supratentorial brain metastases < or = 2 cm in greatest diameter. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 98 consecutively treated adults (33 men and 65 women with a median age of 61.4 years at the time of GKS) with Karnofsky Performance Scale score > or = 60, who underwent GKS for supratentorial brain metastases < or = 2 cm in diameter. Lesion location was classified as noneloquent (Grade I), near eloquent (Grade II), or eloquent (Grade III), in accordance with the grading system developed by the group at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Following treatment, the patients underwent MR imaging and clinical examinations at 6 weeks and every 3 months thereafter. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients underwent 20-Gy GKS for 131 metastases at initial presentation and 31 patients underwent salvage 20-Gy GKS for 76 new lesions, for a total of 207 lesions (mean lesion volume 0.44 cm3). Lesions were classified as follows: Grade I, 96 (46.4%); Grade II, 51 (24.6%); and Grade III, 60 (29%). Fifteen patients (2 with Grade II and 13 with Grade III lesions) presented with deficits referable to their lesions, yielding pre-GKS deficit rates of 7.2% per lesion and 15.3% per patient. The pre-GKS deficits improved or resolved in 10 patients (66.7%) at a median time of 2.8 months and remained stable in 3 patients (20%). Two patients (13.3%) experienced worsened neurological deficits. One patient who was neurologically intact prior to treatment developed a new hemiparesis (1 of 83 patients [1.2%]). The rates of permanent neurological deterioration following GKS for Grades I, II, and III lesions were 0% (0 of 96 tumors), 2% (1 of 51), and 3.3% (2 of 60), respectively. The pre-GKS neurological deficits and larger lesions were the most significant risk factors for post-GKS neurological deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: Gamma Knife surgery performed using a 20-Gy dose provides amelioration of neurological deficits from brain metastases that are < or = 2 cm in diameter and located in or near eloquent cortices in nearly two-thirds of patients with a low incidence of morbidity. Consistent with the surgical literature, higher rates of neurological complications were observed as proximity to eloquent regions and lesion size increased. There was no neurological deterioration in patients harboring metastases in noneloquent areas

BACKGROUND: Thirty percent of newly diagnosed NSCLC patients present with synchronous brain metastases, most of whom are treated with whole brain radiation. Systemic chemotherapy is usually avoided during WBRT due to concerns regarding toxicity. However, concurrent administration of targeted agents, such as Erlotinib, during WBRT may address systemic disease without causing toxicity. We report our institutional data on outcomes and toxicities with this treatment approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC and brain metastases receiving concurrent WBRT and Erlotinib treatment were reviewed. Radiographic response to therapy and toxicities were analyzed. RESULT: Eight patients were identified and 7 were evaluable for response. All patients had intracranial disease control. In the extracranial sites, 3 (37.5%, intent-to-treat) showed partial response (PR), 2 (25%) had stable disease (SD), 1 (12.5%) had progression (PD) and 1 (12.5%) had new air space disease obscuring tumor response assessment. Among the three responders, two were female never smokers, while one was a female current smoker. Unanticipated grade 3 hepatotoxitity, hyponatremia, mental status changes, grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia, and grade 4 neutropenia with sepsis were observed. Three deaths occurred without clear signs of disease progression: one from neutropenic sepsis, one from wide spread air space disease, and one from neurologic deterioration. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrates a high percentage of extracranial tumor response rates with first line Erlotinib in selected NSCLC patients. We observed unexpected serious complications and postulate possible mechanisms. We recommend caution to be exercised when considering Erlotinib treatment during WBRT, particularly in regard to drug-drug interactions and infection control. Data from prospective trials are needed to determine the benefits and toxicities of Erlotinib during WBRT.

PURPOSE: To verify feasibility and monitor progression-free survival and overall survival in children with high-risk medulloblastoma and noncerebellar primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) treated in a Phase II study with preradiotherapy chemotherapy (CHT) followed by high-dose, hyperfractionated craniospinal radiotherapy (CSRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligibility criteria included age >3 years at diagnosis, medulloblastoma with either high M stage and/or >1.5 cm(2) postoperative residual disease, and all patients with noncerebellar PNET. Treatment was initiated with five alternating monthly cycles of CHT (A [cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and vincristine], B [carboplatin and etoposide], A, B, and A) followed by hyperfractionated CSRT (40 Gy) with a boost to the primary tumor (72 Gy) given in twice-daily 1-Gy fractions. RESULTS: The valid study group consisted of 124 patients whose median age at diagnosis was 7.8 years. Eighty-four patients (68%) completed the entire protocol according to study guidelines (within 9 months), and the median time to complete CSRT was 1.6 months. Major reasons for failure to complete CHT included progressive disease (17%) and toxic death (2.4%). The 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 43% +/- 5% and 52% +/- 5%, respectively. No significant differences were detected in subset analysis related to response to CHT, site of primary tumor, postoperative residual disease, or M stage. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of this intensive multimodality protocol was confirmed, and response to pre-RT CHT did not impact on survival. Survival data from this protocol can not be compared with data from other studies, given the protocol design

BACKGROUND: We used a novel combination of induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine (GEM) and cisplatin (CDDP), followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with the same agents in patients with locoregionally advanced pancreatic cancer. Surgery or additional chemotherapy followed on the basis of response. METHODS: Patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer received induction weekly with GEM (1000 mg/m(2)) or CDDP (30 g/m(2)). Patients without progression of disease then underwent surgery or CCRT, including four cohorts of escalating GEM/CDDP doses combined with full-dose radiotherapy. After CCRT, patients deemed resectable underwent surgery; patients with disease that remained unresectable and that did not progress received additional GEM/CDDP for 2 months. RESULTS: A mean 76% of intended GEM dose and 75% of CDDP dose was delivered during induction (n = 26). There were three incidences of grade 4 toxicity (fever or neutropenia). After induction, five patients progressed and one patient underwent resection. Eighteen patients received CCRT, and three patients underwent resection. After CCRT, disease of 10 patients progressed, and in 5 patients, it remained unresectable without progression, and the patient received additional GEM/CDDP. Dose-limiting toxicity was at dose level IV (thrombocytopenia). Median overall and disease-specific survival was 13 months. CONCLUSION: GEM/CDDP induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT is well tolerated and rendered the disease of 4 of 26 patients resectable in this study. The recommended phase II dose for GEM and CDDP in combination with full-dose radiotherapy (5040 cGy) is 300 mg/m(2) and 10 mg/m(2) weekly for 5 weeks. Median survival in this group was 13 months. This neoadjuvant combined modality approach is both feasible and active; further studies are warranted