Faculty Bibliography

Introduction/Aim: NYU Langone Health's first neonatal ECMO patient was in March 2015, marking the start of the Pediatric and Neonatal ECMO Program within the institution. Since then, our program averages 5 ECMO patients per fiscal year (September 1 to August 31). A core ECMO Team, consisting of a Medical Director, a Surgical Director, an ECMO coordinator, 2 Chiefs of Perfusion, and 3 ECMO Intensivists, was identified to establish a reservoir of ECMO expertise within our new, low volume ECMO program. When a patient requires ECMO support, the core ECMO Team collaborates with the multidisciplinary ICU team to optimize both patient and circuit management. The teams provide concurrent care with the ECMO Team overseeing all ECMO-related decision making. Despite having the core ECMO Team as a resource during each ECMO case, a low volume of ECMO patients per year augments slower institutional learning and highlights the need for more frequent educational opportunities. The core ECMO Team worked together to create a recurring multidisciplinary Pediatric ECMO In-situ Simulation to bridge the educational gap in a new, low volume ECMO center. Material and Methods: The goal of establishing Pediatric ECMO In-Situ Simulation was to have either a real life patient on ECMO support or have a simulated ECMO patient once a month to establish routine ECMO exposure and promote multidisciplinary learning and competency. The first simulation session took place in September 2017. For 9 consecutive months, we achieved this goal with 4 real life ECMO patients and 5 simulated ECMO patients. Each simulation session took place over 4 hours and included a complete critical care team, consisting of an ICU Attending Physician, an Advanced Practice Provider, a Resident, 2 Critical Care Nurses, a Perfusionist, and a Respiratory Therapist. Pre-and postsimulation, participants completed self-assessments and knowledge tests, which were then, analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed-rank test. Simulation logistics included a high fidelity simulation mannequin that was connected to a running ECMO circuit, as well as IV infusions and a mechanical ventilator. Simulation medications, fluids, blood products, and bedside supplies were readily available for the participants. Contact information to simulated ancillary departments, such as Inpatient STAT Lab, Blood Bank and Radiology, was distributed. We also collaborated with Hospital Informatics to create a virtual medical record for the simulated patient, which allowed the participants to view the ECMO order set, lab values, imaging results, vital signs, etc. The participants could also place orders in real time and document in the "patient's" medical record. The primary learning objective of the simulation was to improve competency in the daily management of an ECMO patient with less emphasis on ECMO circuit troubleshooting and emergency management. Scenarios included routine ECMO practices, such as conducting multidisciplinary ECMO rounds, adhering to programmatic processes, completing hourly patient assessments and documentation requirements, and monitoring patient fluid volume status. Results: 27 participants took pre-and post-course tests to assess their ECMO knowledge. They also filled out pre-and post-course selfassessments to determine their level of self-confidence in caring for an ECMO patient. One participant was excluded from the data analysis due to incomplete test scores and survey responses. Using the Wilcoxon Signed-rank test, we found a statistically significant improvement in the self-assessment scores (p=0.00001284). There was also a trend towards improvement in the knowledge scores (p=0.09). Conclusions: High fidelity in-situ simulation targeting various learner groups is effective with improvement in self-confidence and written knowledge. Recurring simulation opportunities in a new, low volume ECMO Center promotes continued familiarity and experience in caring for ECMO patients. Next steps include conducting multiple simulation sessions throughout a longer time span, such as over a 12 to 24 hour period

Introduction/Aim: Our Pediatric ECMO Program was launched in March of 2015. Based on historical volumes and projections we anticipated a low volume center. Per ELSO Guidelines, ECMO centers require institutional structure and organization for effective use of ECMO therapy. Also, literature review of pediatric ECMO patient outcomes imply that high volume ECMO centers are associated with improved survival rates in pediatric ECMO patients. Our goal was to implement a formal Pediatric ECMO Program, along with a structured educational course, to demonstrate that successful patient survival rates are obtainable in a low volume ECMO center. Material and Methods: A comprehensive review was completed to identify gaps and areas for improvement within the current state of ECMO at the institution with the goal of establishing an ECMO Program, per ELSO Guidelines, that ensures safe use of ECMO, improved patient outcomes, and optimized programmatic processes. Interventions implemented to formalize the ECMO Program included establishment of clinical practice guidelines and protocols, creation of an ECMO credentialing process, standardization of intrahospital processes related to ECMO, and organization of patient data collection. To assure reasonable use of this resource all cannulation and decannulation decisions required agreement of both the Medical and Surgical ECMO Directors. Formalization of the interprofessional collaboration with the critical care teams and ancillary departments was established with structured morning and evening rounds. Collaboration continued through implementation of formal multidisciplinary team meetings, including patient case reviews and quality assurance meetings. Last, a primary intervention in formalization of an ECMO Program was the establishment of an ECMO education course that was required for all providers who would be involved in the care of ECMO patients. The course was geared towards frontline critical care physicians and advanced practice providers caring for pediatric ECMO patients. The course included didactic learning and simulation training with a high fidelity simulation mannequin and a running ECMO circuit. Pre-and postcourse, participants completed self-assessments and knowledge tests. Results: Since March 2015, our Pediatric ECMO Program averages 5 ECMO patients per fiscal year (September 1 to August 31). In the first fiscal year (FY) 2015, our survival from ECMO rate was 33% with 0% of our patients surviving to discharge. Our hemorrhagic and neurologic complication rates were 67%. The formalization of our ECMO Program and implementation of ECMO education occurred in April 2016, mid FY 2016. Our survival from ECMO rate for FY 2016 improved from 33% to 86%, showing a 160.6% increase. Subsequently, our survival from ECMO rates continued to improve with FY 2017 having 100% survival rate and FY 2018 having 80% survival rate. We also observed a notable decrease in hemorrhagic and neurologic complications per FY. These complications decreased by 40.3% and 70.1%, respectively. Along with tracking our ECMO patient outcomes and complications, our program closely monitors our ECMO consults. Since March 2015, we average 23 ECMO consults per FY with an average of 5 patients (20%) placed on ECMO and 18 patients (80%) denied from ECMO. Out of the patients who were denied ECMO support, 30% of patients expired and 70% of patients recovered and survived to discharge, emphasizing the importance of strict patient selection criteria and centralized ECMO decision-making. For our ECMO course results, our team has held seven courses since August 2016. Among the first time participants (n=82), 84% showed improvement, 10% did worse, and 6% had incomplete data in their post-test written knowledge test. Conclusions: Despite a low institutional case volume of ECMO patients, creation of a structured ECMO Program with a recurring comprehensive ECMO course, promotes both self-confidence and clinical abilities of the multidisciplinary critical care team, as well as improves patient outcomes. Ongoing data collection and quality improvement will be essential to maintain this high level of performance

PURPOSE: Documenting surgical complications is limited by multiple barriers and is not fostered in the electronic health record. Tracking complications is essential for quality improvement (QI) and required for board certification. Current registry platforms do not facilitate meaningful complication reporting. We developed a novel web application that improves accuracy and reduces barriers to documenting complications. METHODS: We deployed a custom web application that allows pediatric surgeons to maintain case logs. The program includes a module for entering complication data in real time. Reminders to enter outcome data occur at key postoperative intervals to optimize recall of events. Between October 1, 2014, and March 31, 2015, frequencies of surgical complications captured by the existing hospital reporting system were compared with data aggregated by our application. RESULTS: 780 cases were captured by the web application, compared with 276 cases registered by the hospital system. We observed an increase in the capture of major complications when compared to the hospital dataset (14 events vs. 4 events). CONCLUSIONS: This web application improved real-time reporting of surgical complications, exceeding the accuracy of administrative datasets. Custom informatics solutions may help reduce barriers to self-reporting of adverse events and improve the data that presently inform pediatric surgical QI. TYPE OF STUDY: Diagnostic study/Retrospective study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I

Thrombotic disease is rare in neonates. Many of the cases reported in literature are attributed to the placement of central catheters. We report on a case of aortic thrombosis in a newborn infant with significant respiratory distress due to meconium aspiration, necessitating intubation and placement of central catheters. Due to the location and size of the thrombus in our case, various subspecialties were involved, which ultimately guided therapy to anti-coagulate the patient

Laparascopic repair of inguinal hernias in female children can be achieved using the inversion and ligation technique in which the hernia sac is inverted into the peritoneal cavity and ligated using endoloops. This technique has been shown to reduce operative time and post-operative complications such as missed contralateral hernia, wound infection and hernia recurrence. We describe a case of a 3-month old female who underwent laparoscopic repair of bilateral inguinal hernias, and presented one year post-operatively with bilateral groin bulges. On re-operation the bulges were determined not to be true hernia recurrences, but rather pseudorecurrences of accumulated fluid distal to the ligation point after incomplete inversion. They were successfully repaired in an open fashion, without subsequent development of groin bulges. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license

Appendicitis remains the most common cause for emergency abdominal surgery in children. Immediate appendectomy in complicated, perforated appendicitis can be hazardous and nonoperative therapy has been gaining use as an initial therapy in children. Previous studies have reported failure rates in nonoperative therapy in such cases ranging from 10% to 41%. Factors leading to treatment failures have been studied with various and disparate results. We reviewed our institutional experience in treated complicated appendicitis, with focus on those initially managed nonoperatively. METHODS: Records of all children admitted with the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis to NYU Langone Medical Center and Bellevue Hospital Center from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2013 were reviewed. The diagnosis was made with ultrasound and/or computed tomography scan. Those with abscesses amenable to drainage underwent aspiration and drain placement by an interventional radiologist. Broad spectrum intravenous (IV) antibiotics were given until the patient became afebrile, pain free and tolerating a regular diet. Oral antibiotics were continued for an additional week and interval appendectomy was done eight weeks later. The primary outcome measure was treatment response with failure defined as those who did not improve or required readmission for additional IV antibiotics and/or early appendectomy. Multiple patient and treatment related variables, including those previously reported as predicting failure in nonoperative therapy, were studied. Continuous variables were reported as means +/- standard error and compared using 2-tailed unpaired t tests; nonparametric variables were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U tests. Categorical variables were reported as medians +/- interquartile ranges and compared using Chi-square testing. Statistical significance was accepted for p<.05. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were identified as undergoing initial nonoperative therapy. Fifty-two (81%) were categorized as treatment successes being treated nonoperatively and 12 (19%) were failures. Variables showing no significance in predicting treatment failures included duration of symptoms, presence of appendicolith, presence of phlegmon, presence of abscess, initial white blood cell count, and SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) positive. The variables that predicted failure of nonoperative therapy vs. successes were presence of bandemia (75% vs. 40%, p=0.052) and small bowel obstruction on imaging (42% vs. 15%, p=0.052) and presence of bandemia >/=15% which was highly predictive of failure (67% vs. 4%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Predicting which patients with complicated perforated appendicitis will respond well to nonoperative therapy may allow us to more effectively treat patients with complicated perforated appendicitis. In our study the presence of small bowel obstruction and bandemia, especially >/=15% correlated with treatment failure; this suggests that these select patients may need a modified treatment strategy.

PURPOSE: Quality improvement (QI) bundles have been widely adopted to reduce surgical site infections (SSI). Improvement science suggests when organizations achieve high-reliability to QI processes, outcomes dramatically improve. However, measuring QI process compliance is poorly supported by electronic health record (EHR) systems. We developed a custom EHR tool to facilitate capture of process data for SSI prevention with the aim of increasing bundle compliance and reducing adverse events. METHODS: Ten SSI prevention bundle processes were linked to EHR data elements that were then aggregated into a snapshot display superimposed on weekly case-log reports. The data aggregation and user interface facilitated efficient review of all SSI bundle elements, providing an exact bundle compliance rate without random sampling or chart review. RESULTS: Nine months after implementation of our custom EHR tool, we observed centerline shifts in median SSI bundle compliance (46% to 72%). Additionally, as predicted by high reliability principles, we began to see a trend toward improvement in SSI rates (1.68 to 0.87 per 100 operations), but a discrete centerline shift was not detected. CONCLUSION: Simple informatics solutions can facilitate extraction of QI process data from the EHR without relying on adjunctive systems. Analyses of these data may drive reductions in adverse events. Pediatric surgical departments should consider leveraging the EHR to enhance bundle compliance as they implement QI strategies.