Faculty Bibliography

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains a disruptive force upon the health care system, with particular import for thoracic surgery given the pulmonary pathophysiology and disease implications of the virus. The rapid and severe onset of disease required expedient innovation and change in patient management and novel approaches to care delivery and nimbleness of workforce. In this review, we detail our approaches to patients with COVID-19, including those that required surgical intervention, our expedited and novel approach to bronchoscopy and tracheostomy, and our expansion of telehealth. The pandemic has created a unique opportunity to reflect on our delivery of care in thoracic surgery and apply lessons learned during this time to "rethink" how to optimize resources and deliver excellent and cutting-edge patient care.

Management of patients with lung cancer continues to be challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic, due to the increased risk of complications in this subset of patients. During the COVID-19 surge in New York City, New York University Langone Health adopted triage strategies to help with care for lung cancer patients, with good surgical outcomes and no transmission of COVID-19 to patients or healthcare workers. Here, we will review current recommendations regarding screening and management of lung cancer patients during both a non-surge phase and surge phase of COVID-19.

While lung cancer remains the most common cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States, surgery for curative intent continues to be a mainstay of therapy. The robotic platform for pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been utilized for more than a decade now. With respect to more localized resections, such as wedge resection or lobectomy, considerable data exist demonstrating shorter length of stay, decreased postoperative pain, improved lymph node dissection, and overall lower complication rate. There are a multitude of technical advantages the robotic approach offers, such as improved optics, natural movement of the operator's hands to control the instruments, and precise identification of tissue planes leading to a more ergonomic and safe dissection. Due to the advantages, the scope of robotic resections is expanding. In this review, we will look at the existing data on extended robotic pulmonary resections, specifically post-induction therapy resection, sleeve lobectomy, and pneumonectomy. Additionally, this review will examine the indications for these more complex resections, as well as review the data and outcomes from other institutions' experience with performing them. Lastly, we will share the strategy and outlook of our own institution with respect to these three types of extended pulmonary resections. Though some controversy remains regarding the use and safety of robotic surgery in these complex pulmonary resections, we hope to shed some light on the existing evidence and evaluate the efficacy and safety for patients with NSCLC.

Objective: Homograft aortic root replacement provides an excellent hemodynamic restoration of valve function for prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis, but is susceptible to degeneration and calcification. The optimal surgical intervention for valvular disease after homograft root replacement is controversial due to the high risk of morbidity and mortality with reintervention.
Method(s): This video demonstrates a case of redo sternotomy with mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR) in a patient post 2 previous AVRs and a porcelain homograft. A 38-year-old female presented in heart failure from prosthetic valve endocarditis, with a history of systemic lupus erythematosus, complicated by end-stage renal failure requiring dialysis and lupus anticoagulant.
Result(s): The patient had severe prosthetic aortic insufficiency, severe mitral regurgitation, and severe tricuspid regurgitation. A third-time redo sternotomy was performed. A mechanical sized #17 valve was placed in the aortic position and a #23 sized mechanical valve was placed in the mitral position. A bovine patch aortoplasty of the aorta was required after the calcified wall shattered into fragments upon transection with a patch of bovine pericardium. Postoperative echo revealed preserved left ventricular and right ventricular function with good function of the mechanical aortic and mitral valves.
Conclusion(s): Mechanical AVR, without replacement of the aortic root, is a feasible and potentially effective method of reestablishing a functional aortic valve in a patient with a severely calcified aortic homograft

Robotic thoracic surgery continues to gain momentum and is emerging as the optimal method for minimally invasive thoracic surgery. As a rapidly advancing field, continued review of the surgical and anesthetic concerns unique to robotic thoracic operations is necessary to maintain safe and efficient practice. In this review, we discuss the intraoperative concerns as they pertain to pulmonary, esophageal, and mediastinal thoracic robotic operations.

BACKGROUND:Our objective is to report our outcomes and demonstrate our evolving technique for robotic sleeve resection of the airway, with or without lobectomy, using video vignettes. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed a single surgeon prospective database from October 2010 to October 2019. RESULTS:Over 9 years, there were 5,573 operations of which 1951 were planned for a robotic approach. There were 755 robotic lobectomies, 306 robotic segmentectomies, and 23 consecutive patients were scheduled for elective completely portal, robotic sleeve resection. Sleeve lobectomy was performed in 18 patients: 10 right upper lobe, 6 left upper lobe, and 2 right lower lobe. Two patients had mainstem bronchus resections and two underwent right bronchus intermedius resections that preserved all of the lung. One patient had a robotic pneumonectomy. There was one conversion to open thoracotomy due to concern for anastomotic tension in a patient who received neoadjuvant therapy. All patients had an R0 resection. In the last 10 operations, we modified our airway anastomosis, using a running self-locking absorbable suture. The median length of stay was 3 days (range 1-11). There were no 30- or 90-day mortalities. Within a median follow-up of 18 months, there were no anastomotic strictures and no recurrent cancers. CONCLUSIONS:Our early and midterm results show that a completely portal robotic sleeve resection is safe and oncologically effective. The technical aspects of a robotic sleeve resection of the airway are demonstrated using video vignettes.

BACKGROUND:Lymphocytes have become the target of cancer interventions through engineering or immune checkpoint antibodies. We previously found decreased lymphocyte counts to be a predictor of mortality and complications in trauma and cardiac surgery patients. We hypothesized lack of lymphocyte count recovery postoperatively would predict outcomes in esophagectomy patients. METHODS:A retrospective review of all patients undergoing esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma performed over 13 y at our center by a single surgeon after institutional review board approval was performed. Patients were grouped by postoperative lymphocytes counts: never low, low with recovery, and low without recovery. Resolution of lymphopenia was assessed by day 4. Primary end points were overall and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS:In total, 198 patients were included with a minimum 6-mo follow-up. Collectively the 5-y recurrence and overall survival rates were 36% and 50%, respectively. Recurrence was significantly higher at 5 y in patients with persistent lymphopenia (43%) compared with those who recovered (14% P = 0.0017) and those who never dropped (0% P = 0.0009). The persistent lymphopenia group had significantly lower survival (45%) compared with the two other groups (67% P = 0.0232). CONCLUSIONS:There is a significant decrease in the overall and recurrence-free survival in those patients whose lymphocyte count drops without recovery after their esophagectomy. These data imply differences in immune responses to the stress of surgery that can be measured with routine postoperative laboratory values and are indicative of overall outcomes.

The use of telemedicine and telehealth services has grown exponentially over the past decade and has become increasingly relevant and necessary during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. There remains ample opportunity to electronically connect cardiothoracic surgeons with their patients during both preoperative and postoperative visits. In this review, we examine the various implementations of telemedicine within thoracic surgery and explore future applications in this quickly developing field.