Faculty Bibliography

Importance/UNASSIGNED:Laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) is used for various medical and cosmetic applications. However, there is insufficient evidence-based guidance to assist clinicians performing LADD. Objective/UNASSIGNED:To develop recommendations for the safe and effective use of LADD. Evidence Review/UNASSIGNED:A systematic literature review of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE was conducted in December 2019 to identify publications reporting research on LADD. A multidisciplinary panel was convened to draft recommendations informed by the systematic review; they were refined through 2 rounds of Delphi survey, 2 consensus meetings, and iterative review by all panelists until unanimous consensus was achieved. Findings/UNASSIGNED:Of the 48 published studies of ablative fractional LADD that met inclusion criteria, 4 were cosmetic studies; 21, oncologic; and 23, medical (not cosmetic/oncologic), and 6 publications of nonablative fractional LADD were included at the request of the expert panel, producing a total of 54 studies. Thirty-four studies (63.0%) were deemed to have low risk of bias, 17 studies (31.5%) had moderate risk, and 3 (5.5%) had serious risk. The key findings that informed the guidelines developed by the expert panel were as follows: LADD is safe in adults and adolescents (≥12 years) with all Fitzpatrick skin types and in patients with immunosuppression; it is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ, actinic cheilitis, hypertrophic scars, and keloids; it is useful for epidermal and dermal analgesia; drug delivery may be increased through the application of heat, pressure, or occlusion, or by using an aqueous drug solution; laser settings should be selected to ensure that channel diameter is greater than the delivered molecule; antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended, except with impaired wound healing; antiviral prophylaxis is recommended when treating the face and genitalia; and antifungal prophylaxis is not recommended. The guideline's 15 recommendations address 5 areas of LADD use: (I) indications and contraindications; (II) parameters to report; (III) optimization of drug delivery; (IV) safety considerations; and (V) prophylaxis for bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. Conclusions and Relevance/UNASSIGNED:This systematic review and Delphi consensus approach culminated in an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for safe and effective use of LADD in a variety of applications. Future research will further improve our understanding of this novel treatment technique.

BACKGROUND:Although the stratum corneum limits transdermal absorption of topicals, laser devices can enhance topical uptake by disrupting the skin barrier. Nonablative lasers are commonly used, but their effects on topical uptake should be quantified to optimize outcomes. OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study is to analyze transdermal uptake of 4 topicals after nonablative fractional diode laser pretreatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:Human donor tissue was pretreated ex vivo with a nonablative fractional diode laser (1,927 nm or 1,440 nm, at varying treatment densities, powers, and peak energies) followed by application of either 2% salicylic acid, 10% ascorbic acid, over-the-counter mineral eye serum, or 4% hydroquinone. Topical uptake was quantified over 24 hours. RESULTS:Despite lower power settings, pretreatment with the 1,927 nm wavelength was associated with greater uptake of 10% ascorbic acid, mineral eye serum, and 4% hydroquinone than the 1,440 nm wavelength. In addition, 1,440-nm laser pretreatment with higher density (320 microscopic treatment zones [MTZ]/cm2) and peak power (3 W) was associated with similar uptake but greater retention of 2% salicylic acid and greater uptake of 10% ascorbic acid than that with lower density (80 MTZ/cm2) and peak power (1.2 W). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:When using laser pretreatment, device settings should be adjusted to balance outcomes with potential side effects.

Importance/UNASSIGNED:It has been suggested that Mohs surgery for skin cancer among individuals with limited life expectancy may be associated with needless risk and discomfort, along with increased health care costs. Objective/UNASSIGNED:To investigate patient- and tumor-specific indications considered by clinicians for treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancer in older individuals. Design, Setting, and Participants/UNASSIGNED:This multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted using data from US private practice and academic centers. Included patients were those older than age 85 years presenting for skin cancer surgery and referred for Mohs surgery, with reference groups of those younger than age 85 years receiving Mohs surgery and those older than age 85 years not receiving Mohs surgery. Data were analyzed from November 2018 through January 2019. Exposures/UNASSIGNED:Mohs surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures/UNASSIGNED:Reason for treatment selection. Results/UNASSIGNED:Among 1181 patients older than age 85 years referred for Mohs surgery (724 [61.9%] men among 1169 patients with sex data; 681 individuals aged >85 to 88 years [57.9%] among 1176 patients with age data) treated at 22 sites, 1078 patients (91.3%) were treated by Mohs surgery, and 103 patients (8.7%) received alternate treatment. Patients receiving Mohs surgery were more likely to have tumors on the face (738 patients [68.5%] vs 26 patients [25.2%]; P < .001) and nearly 4-fold more likely to have high functional status (614 patients [57.0%] vs 16 patients [15.5%]; P < .001). Of 15 distinct reasons provided by surgeons for opting to proceed with Mohs surgery, the most common were patient desire for treatment with a high cure rate (712 patients [66.0%]), good or excellent patient functional status for age (614 patients [57.0%]), and high risk associated with the tumor based on histology (433 patients [40.2%]). Conclusions and Relevance/UNASSIGNED:This study found that older patients who received Mohs surgery often had high functional status, high-risk tumors, and tumors located on the face. These findings suggest that timely surgical treatment may be appropriate in older patients given that their tumors may be aggressive, painful, disfiguring, and anxiety provoking.

A port-wine stain (PWS) is a vascular birthmark present in 0.3% to 0.5% of newborns. If untreated, this erythematous patch will grow proportionally with the child to thicken and darken with age. PWSs have implications for the child's quality of life for many years, with cosmetic, medical, and psychosocial disability. Controversy exists in many aspects surrounding laser treatment of these birthmarks in the pediatric population. We have reviewed the clinical features as well as the historic and current laser treatment of PWS. We have also examined the current hot topics of debate surrounding the treatment of PWS in the pediatric population. These controversies include the patient age of treatment initiation, the long-term psychologic impact, the use of general anesthesia, the application of eye shields, and alternative treatments for recalcitrant PWS. We have concluded with a discussion on the future directions of management and treatment.

BACKGROUND:Ultrasound energy has been used for cutaneous rejuvenation, including treatment of fine lines and wrinkles. Ultrasound waves of high intensity can induce thermal injury in the dermis, which causes tissue coagulation and remodeling. OBJECTIVE:To examine the safety and utility of a novel ultrasound device that uses high-intensity, high-frequency, parallel ultrasound beams to improve fine lines and wrinkles of the face and neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A prospective, multicenter, clinical study investigated the utility of this novel ultrasound device to improve fine lines and wrinkles. Sixty subjects were enrolled for single treatment to the face and neck. RESULTS:Fifty-eight subjects completed the study. The mean age was 58 years, and 87.9% were women. Fitzpatrick skin Types I to VI were represented. Assessments compared 12-week follow-up with baseline. Two blinded reviewers agreed in identifying pretreatment and post-treatment photographs for 78% of subjects. There was significant improvement of 1 to 3 Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale units in 86% of subjects. For investigator global improvement scores, 88% of subjects had improvement. Overall, 72% of subjects noted improvement, and the majority were satisfied. There were no device-related adverse events. CONCLUSION:Treatment with a novel ultrasound device that uses high-intensity, high-frequency, parallel ultrasound beams safely improved the clinical appearance of fine lines and wrinkles of the face and neck.