Faculty Bibliography

The origins of Hand Surgery in New York City are temporally centered around World War II. Arthur J. Barsky, MD, Condict W. Cutler, Jr, MD and Emanuel B. Kaplan, MD laid the groundwork for our regional specialty prior to the War. J. William Littler, MD, Robert E. Carroll, MD, served in the Armed Forces and were instrumental in the development of the specialty in the second half of the 20th century. Hand services evolved in each of the major academic centers in New York including those led by Lee Ramsey Straub, MD, at the Hospital for Special Surgery, Richard J. Smith, MD at the Hospital for Joint Disease, Robert W. Beasley, MD at New York University and Berish Strauch, MD, and Morton Spinner, MD, at Albert Einstein and Montefiore. Several surgeons who worked with or were trained by these masters formed the nucleus of the next generation of leaders including Richard G. Eaton, MD, Martin A. Posner, MD, Harold M. Dick, MD, and Charles Melone, MD. Their proteges and a relatively small number of surgeons trained elsewhere, like Andrew J. Weiland, MD, and Robert Hotchkiss, MD, make up the current leadership of Hand Surgery in New York City.

Intraarticular step and gap displacements represent the most common indication for surgical treatment of distal radius fractures. Most often, treatment decision making relies only on good-quality plain radiographs taken before and after reduction with measurement accuracy maximized by using the longitudinal axis method. When plain radiographs alone prove insufficient, CT scans or tomograms will significantly improve interobserver and intraobserver reliability of measurements, especially when evaluated using the arc method. Tomography is an effective method for postoperative evaluation of fractures immobilized in splints or casts. The role of MRI in assessing intraarticular distal radius fractures is limited to confirming injuries to carpal ligaments or the triangular fibrocartilage complex. Intraoperatively, we use fluoroscopy to obtain 30 degrees cephalad posteroanterior views and as 22 degrees lateral views to best observe articular surface reduction. Our current operative indications include fractures with radiocarpal or distal radioulnar joint step or gap deformities greater than 1-2 mm, gross distal radioulnar joint instability, or those with extensive metaphyseal comminution rendering them particularly unstable after closed reduction. In general, we tend to lean toward operative fixation in younger, more active patients.

PURPOSE: Casting for 3 to 4 weeks has been the accepted protocol after primary repair of digital nerve lacerations. In contrast, combined digital nerve and flexor tendon repairs are rehabilitated with immediate postsurgical range of motion. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of primary nerve repair in isolated digital nerve lacerations immobilized after surgery with nerve repairs combined with flexor tendon repairs that are mobilized in a limited, protected fashion immediately after surgery. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively patients who had had surgical repair of isolated digital nerve lacerations or combined digital nerve and flexor tendon lacerations. Demographics recorded included age, hand dominance, injured digit, and time to mobilization. Follow-up data included range of motion at the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, distal interphalangeal, and wrist joints; static 2-point discrimination; and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing. Between-group comparisons were based on t-tests for continuous measures and chi-square tests for categoric measures. Paired t-tests were used for within-group comparisons. All comparisons were based on 2-tailed.05-level tests. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (16 digits) with isolated nerve repairs (group 1) and 12 patients (14 digits) with combined nerve and tendon repairs (group 2) were evaluated. The average age and duration at follow-up evaluation were similar in the 2 groups. The average time to mobilization, however, was 21 days in group 1 and 4 days in group 2. Injuries occurred equally in dominant and nondominant hands. Good range of motion returned in all digits. In addition there was no significant difference in final 2-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein testing between groups 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed a decrease in sensibility between the injured and uninjured digits in each of the 2 groups studied, as has been shown previously. The difference in sensibility between the 2 groups, however, was not statistically significant. These data challenge the long-held belief that digital nerve repairs should be completely immobilized after surgery.

PURPOSE: To our knowledge, there are no reports in the literature regarding treatment of chronic, posttraumatic proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint hyperextension deformities with flexor digitorum superficialis tenodesis. The purpose of this study was to describe the surgical treatment and results of flexor digitorum superficialis tenodesis for the treatment of chronic, posttraumatic PIP joint hyperextension deformities. METHODS: Twelve patients were reviewed retrospectively and re-examined at a mean follow-up period of 35 months (range, 6-108 mo). Evaluation included completion of a Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire and range of motion (ROM) measurements. RESULTS: There were 5 excellent, 5 good, and 2 fair results. Five patients had a residual flexion contracture at the PIP joint of 5 degrees to 15 degrees, although this did not create any functional impairment as determined by responses to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire at follow-up evaluation. The 2 patients with fair results had postoperative PIP flexion contractures of 30 degrees and 60 degrees. All 12 patients returned to their previous occupations and recreational activities. CONCLUSIONS: Flexor digitorum superficialis tenodesis is an effective method with predictable results for the treatment of chronic, traumatic hyperextension deformities of the PIP joint.

Isolation of the extensor pollicis brevis (EPB) tendon in a separate compartment has been reported to contribute to the pathogenesis of de Quervain's disease and affect the patient's response to nonsurgical treatment. The EPB entrapment test was developed to evaluate the patient with de Quervain's disease. The purpose of this study was to compare the results from this preoperative test with the anatomic findings at surgery in patients who failed nonsurgical treatment. One hundred seventy-eight patients who were treated for de Quervain's disease (200 wrists) were asked to compare the amount of pain elicited by firm resistance with thumb metacarpophalangeal joint extension with that from resistance to palmar abduction. Twenty-six wrists (13%) had surgical release after failure of nonsurgical treatment. Of those having surgery the proportion of wrists with a positive EPB entrapment test was significantly higher among those with 2 compartments (18 of 22) than among those with 1 compartment (0 of 4) (Fisher's exact test). In the surgical group the EPB entrapment test showed 81% sensitivity and 50% specificity in identifying wrists with a separate EPB compartment.

Chronic instability of the ulnar collateral ligament of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb can cause significant functional disability due to pain and weakness of pinch and grasp. In the absence of adequate ligament to repair, stability of the joint can be restored by reconstruction using a free tendon graft. The technique described here routes the tendon graft through two holes in the proximal phalangeal base and one hole in the metacarpal neck in a triangular configuration, which recapitulates the normal anatomy of the ulnar collateral ligament. The results of reconstruction are good. Stability and strength are restored without sacrificing significant range of motion and with minimal donor site morbidity.

Osteoarthritis of the basal joint of the thumb causes pain and disability for a huge segment of the adult population, particularly women. Radiographically, there is a spectrum of disease that has been staged according to severity of involvement of the TM and scaphotrapezial joints. The staging system proposed by Littler and Eaton is used most widely. The severity of clinical symptoms does not necessarily correspond with the radiographic stage of disease, however, so decisions about treatment are predicated upon the notion that we "treat patients, not x-rays." Treatment is based upon the extent to which the pain and functional limitations caused by the disease impact upon the patient's activities of daily living. The evaluation of basal joint disease has been reviewed and modalities of treatment outlined. Conservative treatment includes splinting, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, thenar intrinsic strengthening exercise, and corticosteroid injection. Failure of conservative treatment and unremitting pain are indications for basal joint reconstruction by arthroplasty, osteotomy, or arthrodesis. Staging of basal joint disease provides a rationale for selecting the appropriate surgical procedure for a particular patient.

BACKGROUND: Anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve at the elbow produces generally good results regardless of whether the nerve is transposed subcutaneously, intramuscularly, or submuscularly. The eventual recovery of nerve function is related less to the specific surgical technique than to the severity of the intrinsic nerve pathology. A primary variable in surgical management is the duration of postoperative elbow immobilization. The purpose of this study was to review the longterm results of a specific technique of subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve that utilizes a stabilizing fasciodermal sling. The study compared the results of immediate and late institution of a range of motion postoperatively. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with fifty-one elbows were reexamined, by an investigator who had not been involved in their treatment, at a minimum of two years (range, twenty-four months to fourteen years) after an anterior transposition. Of the fifty-one elbows, twenty-one were immobilized for two to three weeks whereas thirty were managed with an immediate range of motion. RESULTS: At the latest follow-up evaluation, there were occasional, mild paresthesias in 16 percent of the limbs and there was still subjective weakness of 19 percent. Both pinch and grip strength had increased substantially. No patient had lost elbow motion. A positive Tinel sign persisted in 31 percent of the limbs, but it was mildly positive in most of them. The elbow flexion test was uniformly negative. The results for 92 percent of the limbs were satisfactory to the patients, who stated that they would undergo the same procedure again if necessary. Overall, 73 percent of the limbs had an excellent result; 18 percent, a good result; 4 percent, a fair result; and 6 percent, a poor result. With the numbers available, no significant difference could be detected, with regard to these outcomes, between the group managed with elbow immobilization and that managed with immediate elbow mobilization. However, patients treated with a postoperative cast returned to work at an average of thirty days after surgery whereas the group treated with immediate motion of the elbow returned to work at an average of ten days. CONCLUSIONS: This technique of stabilized subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve yielded predictably good results for a wide spectrum of patients. Patients returned to their occupation sooner when the elbow had been mobilized immediately.

Thumb pain secondary to arthritis at the basal joint of the thumb is a common condition, especially in women, and can be quite disabling. An accurate diagnosis can be readily made from the history and examination. Radiographs are used to stage the severity of the arthritis. Splinting is the mainstay of conservative care. Reconstructive procedures for each stage of the disease are aimed at restoring thumb motion and strength. Partial or complete trapeziectomy with tendon interposition and ligament reconstruction to stabilize the metacarpal base is used for advanced disease. Secondary metacarpophalangeal joint hyper-extension deformity may need to be addressed. Surgery can reliably improve function and engender high patient satisfaction.

Proximal interphalangeal joint fracture dislocations are complex, potentially disabling injuries for any patient, especially the competitive athlete. Dorsal fracture dislocations are fairly common and volar fracture dislocations are rare. Stable injuries often heal with minimal functional deficit, whereas unstable injuries can result in limitation in range of motion, joint incongruity, and degenerative joint disease. A number of surgical procedures have been described to treat the unstable dorsal fracture dislocation, including ORIF, extension block pinning, external fixation, dynamic traction, and volar plate arthroplasty. Volar fracture dislocations are usually amenable to closed or open reduction and internal fixation. The results of treatment of both volar and dorsal fracture dislocations can be unpredictable.