Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) has been described after anterior cervical fusion surgeries though ASD is not always clinically relevant. Hilibrand et al described a grading system for ASD after anterior cervical fusion. We expand the ASD definition with an analysis of radiographic adjacent segment pathology (RASP) by also assessing the progression of kyphotic alignment, and spondylolisthesis at adjacent segments in patients following cervical laminoplasty (LP) and posterior cervical decompression and fusion (CDF). PURPOSE: To assess radiographic adjacent segment pathology by analyzing adjacent segment degeneration, and the progression of kyphotic alignment and spondylolisthesis at segments adjacent to operated levels for LP and CDF surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis of cervical radiographs in patients undergoing prior LP and CDF surgery. PATIENT SAMPLE: 64 patients undergoing prior LP and CDF surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: NDI and mJOA. METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were analyzed for ASD, progression of adjacent level kyphosis and spondylolisthesis at proximal, distal or any other segments. The RASP was determined by combining proximal and distal ASD, and the adjacent level kyphosis and spondylolisthesis into one spectrum of disease. The presence and rate of development of adjacent segment pathology was compared for LP and CDF. HRQOLs included NDI and mJOA. RESULTS: 64 patients were included (24 LP and 40 CDF) with mean age 59.9 years (46.9% female) and 30.2 months mean follow-up. Spondylolisthesis at the adjacent segment was more prevalent in CDF (29.2% vs 4.5%). Both LP and CDF demonstrated a similar rate of RASP (LP 40.9%, CDF 44%). NDI correlated with proximal adjacent level degeneration (r = 0.34, p = 0.024) and kyphosis (r = 0.36 p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Both cervical laminoplasty and posterior cervical decompression and fusion are associated with adjacent level degeneration. However, there is a higher rate of adjacent segment spondylolisthesis after CDF. Motion preservation procedures may have less of a role in preventing adjacent level degeneration than previously thought. Adjacent segment degeneration correlated with NDI disability in these patients

There has been a rapid increase in the number of lumbar fusion procedures performed in the last 10 years. Many of these procedures involve the use of bone grafts and specifically bone graft extenders and substitutes. Fusion depends on host and surgical factors including the selection of an appropriate graft. Bone grafts have osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic properties. Iliac crest autograft has long been considered the gold standard for bone graft procedures as it inherently imparts all three. However, its use is associated with significant disadvantages including donor site pain, increased operative time, and insufficient availability. Allograft has been used to avoid the complications of donor site morbidity but has increased risks of rejection, disease transmission, and slower incorporation into the host bone. The use of alternative bone grafting options, such as demineralized bone matrix, synthetics (ceramics), bone morphogenetic proteins, collagen-based matrices, autogenous growth factors, and bone marrow aspirate, have become routine in some institutions. This review paper highlights the different bone grafting options currently available, discusses their pros and cons, and briefly reviews the relevant literature.

Epidural spinal injections can be administered via a translaminar or transforaminal route, depending on the clinical scenario. When it is more desirable to target a specific nerve root, a transforaminal approach is typically used, and when the target is more diffuse, a translaminar method is chosen. Both are commonly used and can be utilized similarly in the lumbar or cervical spine. However, it is essential that the clinician understand the risks and benefits of these injections. In the lumbar spine, both translaminar epidural steroid injections (TLESI) and transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) have been shown to provide up to 6 months of pain relief, though long-term benefits are less reliable. In the cervical spine, translaminar injections may provide longer relief and have a lower complication rate than cervical transforaminal injections. Proper technique is essential to minimize the rate of these rare but occasionally severe complications.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of potential total disc replacement (TDR) candidates among cervical and lumbar fusion patient populations using strict Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria and with relative exclusion criteria removed. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Recent studies suggest that the potential percentage of patients that are candidates for TDR ranges from 0-5% in lumbar fusions and 43% in cervical fusions. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 280 consecutive patients who had lumbar (n = 174) and cervical (n = 106) fusion or TDR performed by one of four independent adult orthopaedic spine surgeons. Charts were screened for investigational device exemption (IDE) inclusion/exclusion criteria and later reanalyzed excluding relative exclusion criteria, such as history of chronic medical illness, twolevel disease (cervical cases), and history of prior fusion surgery in the anatomic region. RESULTS: Of the 174 lumbar surgeries, 10 were TDR with Prodisc-L and 164 were lumbar fusions. The most common TDR exclusion criteria were lytic spondylolisthesis or spinal stenosis (47.7% of patients) and more than 2 level degenerative disc disease (37.9%). 14.9% had no IDE exclusion criteria and would be considered candidates for TDR. After excluding the relative lumbar exclusion criteria, this percentage increased to 25.8%. Of the 106 cervical cases, 3 had a TDR with Prodisc-C and 103 had a cervical fusion. Twenty eight percent had no IDE exclusion criteria and would be considered candidates for cervical TDR. CONCLUSIONS: A larger percentage of cervical fusion candidates are potential candidates for TDR (28%) than lumbar fusion candidates (14.9%) based on the strict IDE criteria

The incidence of isthmic spondylolysis is approximately 3% to 6% in the general population. Spondylolytic defects involving multiple vertebral levels, on the other hand, are extremely rare. Only a handful of reports have examined the outcomes of surgical treatment of multi-level spondylolysis. Here, we present one case of bilateral pars defects at L3, L4, and L5. The patient, a 46-year-old female, presented with lower back pain radiating into the left lower extremity. Radiographs and CT scans of the lumbar spine revealed bilateral pars defects at L3-L5. The patient underwent lumbar discectomy and interbody fusion of L4-S1 as well as direct repair of the pars defect at L3. There were no postoperative complications, and by seven months the patient had improved clinically. While previous reports describe the use of either direct repair or fusion in the treatment of spondylolysis, we are unaware of reports describing the use of both techniques at adjacent levels.

BACKGROUND:: Osteomyelitis associated with using synthetic mesh for laparoscopic sacral colpopexy is rare. CASE:: We present a patient who developed Staphylococcus sacral osteomyelitis after sacral colpopexy with synthetic mesh and titanium tack fixation to the sacral promontory in the absence of mesh erosion or fistula formation. The patient presented with low back pain 6 weeks postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging, bone aspirate, and culture confirmed sacral osteomyelitis and discitis 10 weeks after surgery. The patient underwent 8 weeks of outpatient antibiotic treatment. Six months after surgery, serial laboratory values have demonstrated excellent response to antibiotic treatment, and the patient has clinically improved without the need for mesh removal. CONCLUSION:: We recommend a high index of suspicion for osteomyelitis in patients who present with back pain after sacral colpopexy. Osteomyelitis can occur as a complication of laparoscopic, robotic sacral colpopexy using mesh in the absence of abscess or fistula formation

Of the estimated 1.5 million osteoporosis-related fragility fractures that occur each year in the United States, vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are the most common. It is estimated that approximately 20% to 25% of people who sustain a VCF have symptoms severe enough to seek medical attention. However, nonoperative outpatient management for VCFs is often successful in only 75% to 80% of cases. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of VCFs and of the surgical alternatives for VCF management, including indications for surgical intervention, overview of surgical techniques, clinical results, complications, and areas of future investigation

Objective. Spinal cord stimulator (SCS) parameter settings have been well studied; however, the goal of this exploratory study was to examine the SCS parameters used during intra-operative stimulation (IOS) at trial lead placement. Methods. In this retrospective study, we report the IOS parameter settings for 22 patients who underwent thoracic SCS lead trial for treatment of refractory low back and/or leg pain. Results. Paresthesia coverage was shown to differ depending upon the pain syndrome and the region involved (back and/or leg, p = 0.03). Certain stimulation parameters were demonstrated to be linked, including pulse width with rate (p = 0.04) and bipolar activation distance with amplitude (p < 0.01). Important variations in field configuration practice patterns also emerged. Conclusions. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm and extend the current results. The ultimate goal for this report is to establish a foundation for future studies to create an evidence-based standardized algorithm for IOS to enhance the success rate of SCS trial screening