Faculty Bibliography

Seizures occur in 20-45% of patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and can potentially influence their quality of life. Some studies have suggested risk factors influencing their development, but the evidence is limited to small cohorts. To analyze seizure presentation and factors influencing seizure development in patients with cerebral AVMs using a multi-institutional consortium. Retrospective multicenter registry from multiple centers in North America and Europe of patients aged 1 to 89 years who had undergone any intervention for brain AVMs between January 2010 and December 2023. Demographics, functional assessment (modified Rankin Scale; mRS), and AVM characteristics, were evaluated to assess for relationship with seizures using a multivariate generalized linear mixed-effects model. 1,005 AVM patients were analyzed; the median age was 42, 73% had a baseline mRS ≤ 2. The median nidus size was 2.2 cm, and most AVMs were Spetzler-Martin grade II (37%). Seizure was the presenting symptom in 237 patients (24%). After adjusting for significant variables, patient-specific factors associated with seizures were younger age (OR 0.99, CI95% 0.98-1), male sex (OR 1.65, CI95% 1.18-2.30), and smoking history (OR 1.69, CI95% 1.17-2.44). AVM-specific factors associated with seizures included rupture status (OR 0.42, CI95% 0.30-0.61); eloquent cortex (OR 1.61, CI95% 1.13-2.29); frontal (OR 1.54, CI95% 1.01-2.35), temporal (OR 1.93, CI95% 1.26-2.96) and parietal (OR 1.71 CI95% 1.08-2.71) location; larger nidal size (OR = 1.23, CI95% 1.08-1.39), and superficial draining vein location (OR 1.86, CI95% 1.15-3.01). In this multicenter consortium, after controlling for significant variables, the incidence of AVM-related seizures was associated with younger age, male sex, smoking history, larger AVMs, eloquent locations, and AVMs in the frontal, temporal, and parietal cortices. Conversely, rupture status, deep venous drainage, and cerebellar locations were negatively associated with seizures.

BACKGROUND:Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex vascular lesions that pose a risk for hemorrhagic stroke. The number of draining veins has recently emerged as a significant predictor of rupture risk. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the outcomes in adult AVM patients with single versus multiple draining veins. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective analysis of 735 AVM patients from the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs (MISTA) database. Patients were categorized into single draining vein (n = 430) and multiple draining veins (n = 305) groups. Logistic and linear regression models were used to assess outcomes, adjusting for baseline characteristics, including age, rupture status, Spetzler-Martin grade, and other relevant factors. RESULTS:After adjustment, no significant differences were observed in complete AVM obliteration at last follow-up between the multiple and single draining veins groups (OR: 1.1; 95 % CI: 0.72-1.93, p = 0.49) after any treatment type. Good functional outcomes at last follow-up (mRS 0-2) were similar between the two groups (OR: 1.00; 95 % CI: 0.48-2.09, p = 0.98), as were retreatment rates (OR: 1.68; 95 % CI: 0.74-3.83, p = 0.21). Ruptured AVMs were more common in the single draining vein group (52.0 % vs. 35.4 %, p < 0.001). Patients in the multiple draining vein group had lower odds of hemorrhagic complications compared to the single vein group (OR: 0.38; 95 % CI: 0.14-1.02, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Single draining vein AVMs were more likely to present with rupture, but no significant differences in obliteration rates, functional outcomes, or retreatment rates were found between the groups after adjustment. These findings suggest that while venous drainage patterns may influence initial presentation, they do not appear to affect overall treatment success or patient prognosis after any treatment type. Further studies are needed to confirm.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Bladder cancer rarely metastasizes to the brain. This study was performed to evaluate stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the management of bladder cancer brain metastases. METHODS:Cases of bladder cancer brain metastases treated with SRS were collected by members of the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF) and outcome data was analyzed for patients with at least one clinical or imaging follow-up. RESULTS:103 patients received SRS for 301 brain metastases. Median age at SRS was 68 and 73.8% of patients were male. Median KPS was 80%. Median time from primary to brain metastases diagnosis was 18 months. At the time of SRS, 50% of patients had other systemic metastases. The median number of metastases treated was 1, and median cumulative SRS volume was 1.16 cc. Most patients had single fraction SRS using a median margin dose of 18 Gy. At the time of analysis, 9.7% of patients were alive. Median survival after SRS was 7 months. Local control was achieved for 89.3% of metastases, 42% of patients developed new remote brain metastases, and 4.9% had leptomeningeal dissemination. Subsequent management included repeat SRS in 21.7%, surgical resection in 8.8% and WBRT in 7.6% of patients. At last follow-up, 32.1% of patients had improvement of their symptoms, whereas 38.5% remained stable. Adverse radiation effects occurred in 4.3% of treated metastases. On multivariate analyses, KPS ≥ 80% and non-urothelial histology predicted improved survival, while absence of corticosteroid intake predicted longer tumor control. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Bladder cancer brain metastases can be safely managed with SRS.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma care. Stereotactic radiosurgery combined with ICI has shown promise to improve clinical outcomes in prior studies in patients who have metastatic melanoma with brain metastases. However, others have suggested that concurrent ICI with stereotactic radiosurgery can increase the risk of complications. METHODS:We present a retrospective, single-institution analysis of 98 patients with a median follow up of 17.1 months managed with immune checkpoint inhibition and stereotactic radiosurgery concurrently and non-concurrently. A total of 55 patients were included in the concurrent group and 43 patients in the non-concurrent treatment group. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relation between concurrent or non-concurrent treatment and overall survival or local progression-free survival. The Wald test was used to assess significance. Significant differences between patients in both groups experiencing adverse events including adverse radiation effects, perilesional edema, and neurological deficits were tested for using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS:Patients receiving concurrent versus non-concurrent ICI showed a significant increase in overall survival (median 37.1 months, 95% CI: 18.9 months - NA versus median 11.4 months, 95% CI: 6.4-33.2 months, p = 0.0056) but not local progression-free survival. There were no significant differences between groups with regards to adverse radiation effects (2% versus 3%), perilesional edema (20% versus 9%), neurological deficits (3% versus 20%). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These results suggest that the timing of ICI does not increase risk of neurological complications when delivered within 4 weeks of SRS.

Spetzler-Martin Grade IV arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are challenging due to high risks associated with both treatment and natural progression. This study compares the outcomes of microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in high-grade AVMs, analyzing obliteration rates, complications, and functional outcomes. A retrospective cohort of 96 patients treated with either microsurgical resection (33 patients) or SRS (63 patients) was analyzed. Propensity-score matching was employed to account for baseline variables such as AVM size (cm), preoperative embolization and rupture status. Primary endpoints included AVM obliteration, complication rates, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. After matching, 31 patients per group were analyzed. Microsurgical resection achieved significantly higher obliteration rates (87.1%) compared to SRS (32.3%, p < 0.001). In the matched SRS cohort (n = 31), the actuarial obliteration rates were 11% (95% CI: 0-22%) at 1 year, 17% (95% CI: 0-31%) at 3 years, and 43% (95% CI: 13-63%) at 5 years post-treatment. Complication rates were similar (32.3% resection, 38.7% SRS, p = 0.6). Functional outcomes in terms of improvement in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were observed in 50.0% of microsurgery patients and 41.4% of SRS patients. However, the absolute number of patients improving was similar (13 vs. 12), and the microsurgery group had more cases of worsening mRS scores compared to the SRS group (4 vs. 2). The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.4). Microsurgical resection offers superior obliteration rates for high-grade AVMs with comparable complication risks to SRS. SRS remains a valuable alternative for select patients, particularly those ineligible for resection. Future research should focus on optimizing multimodal treatment approaches. Clinical trial number Not applicable.

The management of brain metastases is challenging and should ideally be coordinated through a multidisciplinary approach. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been the cornerstone of management for most patients with oligometastatic central nervous system involvement (one to four brain metastases), and several technological and therapeutic advances over the past decade have broadened the indications for SRS to include polymetastatic central nervous system involvement (>4 brain metastases), preoperative application and fractionated SRS, as well as combinatorial approaches with targeted therapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitors. For example, improved imaging and frameless head-immobilization technologies have facilitated fractionated SRS for large brain metastases or postsurgical cavities, or lesions in proximity to organs at risk. However, these opportunities come with new challenges and questions, including the implications of tumour histology as well as the role and sequencing of concurrent systemic treatments. In this Review, we discuss these advances and associated challenges in the context of ongoing clinical trials, with insights from a global group of experts, including recommendations for current clinical practice and future investigations. The updates provided herein are meaningful for all practitioners in clinical oncology.

BACKGROUND:Spetzler-Martin (SM) Grade III brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs) represent a transitional risk zone between low- and high-grade BAVMs, characterized by diverse angioarchitecture. The primary treatment options are endovascular embolization, microsurgical resection (MS), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This study compares the efficacy and outcomes of MS and SRS. METHODS:We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study involving patients from the MISTA database with SM Grade III BAVMs treated with MS or SRS between 2010 and 2023. Propensity matching was based on age, favorable modified Rankin Score (mRS) at presentation, nidus size, rupture status, location depth, and eloquence. RESULTS:, p = 0.6) were similar. MS showed higher obliteration rates (93.3 %) compared to SRS (46.7 %) at the last follow-up (p < 0.001). The median time to obliteration post-SRS was 31.5 months (IQR: 15.3-60.0). SRS obliteration rates were 19 %, 29 %, and 59 % at 24, 36, and 60 months, respectively. Overall complication rates (MS: 30 % vs. SRS: 20 %, p = 0.4) and permanent complications (MS: 10 % vs. SRS: 13.3 %, p > 0.9) were similar. Hemorrhage occurred once in the MS group and none in the SRS (p > 0.9). Favorable outcomes (mRS 0-2) were higher with SRS than MS (93.3 % vs 80.0 %, p = 0.3), with one AVM-related mortality in the MS group. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:MS and SRS are viable treatments for SM Grade III BAVMs. Treatment choice should be individualized by a multidisciplinary team, considering patient goals.

Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are congenital vascular anomalies that can lead to severe complications, including hemorrhage and neurological deficits. This study compares the outcomes of microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for SM grade I and II AVMs. Out of a large multicenter registry, we identified 180 matched patients with SM grade I and II AVMs treated with either microsurgical resection or SRS between 2010 and 2023. The primary outcomes were AVM obliteration rates and complications; secondary outcomes included neurological status and functional outcomes measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to ensure comparability between treatment groups. After PSM, 90 patients were allocated to each treatment group. Significant differences were observed in complete obliteration rates, with resection achieving higher rates compared to SRS in overall cases (97.8% vs. 60.0%, p < 0.001), unruptured AVMs (100% vs. 58.3%, p < 0.001), and ruptured AVMs (95.2% vs. 61.9%, p < 0.001). Functional improvement rates were similar between the groups for overall cases (67.2% in resection vs. 66.7% in SRS, p = 0.95), unruptured AVMs (55.2% in resection vs. 55.6% in SRS, p > 0.9), and ruptured AVMs (78.1% in resection vs. 74.1% in SRS, p = 0.7). Symptomatic complication rates were identical between the groups (11.1% each, p > 0.9), while permanent complication rates were comparable (6.7% in resection vs. 5.6% in SRS, p = 0.8). Resection demonstrated significantly higher complete obliteration rates compared to SRS across all cases, including unruptured and ruptured AVMs. Functional improvement rates were similar between the two treatment groups, with no significant differences in symptomatic or permanent complication rates.

BACKGROUND:Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex vascular anomalies with a high risk of hemorrhage and neurological deficits, especially when located in eloquent brain regions. The eloquence of an AVM location is a critical factor in the treatment planning, influencing both the risk of complications and long-term functional outcomes. This study aims to compare outcomes between eloquent and non-eloquent AVMs. METHODS:This multicenter, retrospective study utilized data from the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs (MISTA) consortium. Patients with eloquent and non-eloquent AVMs were compared on baseline characteristics, angiographic outcomes, and functional outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Propensity score weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for confounding variables. RESULTS:The study included 1,013 patients, with 498 (49.2%) AVMs located in eloquent regions and 515 (50.8%) in non-eloquent regions. In unadjusted analysis, eloquent AVMs had lower complete obliteration rates (67.6% vs. 79.5%, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.39-0.72, p < 0.001) and higher complication rates (24.5% vs. 19.0%, OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.02-1.86, p = 0.03) compared to non-eloquent AVMs. After IPTW adjustment, eloquent AVMs continued to show significantly higher odds of overall complications (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.12-2.52, p = 0.01) and symptomatic complications (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.12-2.80, p = 0.01). Secondary analysis within the eloquent group indicated that embolization was linked to an elevated risk of complications. Surgery and radiosurgery showed comparable functional outcomes at last follow-up and complications rates with higher complete obliteration rates in surgery. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:AVMs in eloquent brain areas present higher risks of complications and lower obliteration rates, emphasizing the need for cautious, individualized treatment planning. Within the eloquent group, embolization increased the risk of complications, while surgery and radiosurgery showed comparable functional outcomes at last follow-up and complication rates with higher complete obliteration rates in surgery. These findings highlight the importance of location in AVM management and support further research focusing on comparing treatment strategies for AVMs in eloquent brain areas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Stereotactic procedures are used to manage a diverse set of patients across a variety of clinical contexts. The stereotactic devices and software used in these procedures vary between surgeons, but the fundamental principles that constitute safe and accurate execution do not. The aim of this work is to describe these principles to equip readers with a generalizable knowledge base to execute and understand stereotactic procedures. METHODS:A combination of a review of the literature and empirical experience from several experienced surgeons led to the creation of this work. Thus, this work is descriptive and qualitative by nature, and the literature is used to support instead of generate the ideas of this framework. RESULTS:The principles detailed in this work are categorized based on 5 clinical domains: imaging, registration, mechanical accuracy, target planning and adjustment, and trajectory planning and adjustment. Illustrations and tables are used throughout to convey the concepts in an efficient manner. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Stereotactic procedures are complex, requiring a thorough understanding of each step of the workflow. The concepts described in this work enable functional neurosurgeons with the fundamental knowledge necessary to provide optimal patient care.