Faculty Bibliography

The availability of direct-acting antiviral agents for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has resulted in a profound shift in the approach to the management of this infection. These changes have affected the practice of solid organ transplantation by altering the framework by which patients with end-stage organ disease are managed and receive organ transplants. The high level of safety and efficacy of these medications in patients with chronic HCV infection provides the opportunity to explore their use in the setting of transplanting organs from HCV-viremic patients into non-HCV-viremic recipients. Because these organs are frequently discarded and typically come from younger donors, this approach has the potential to save lives on the solid organ transplant waitlist. Therefore, an urgent need exists for prospective research protocols that study the risk versus benefit of using organs for hepatitis C-infected donors. In response to this rapidly changing practice and the need for scientific study and consensus, the American Society of Transplantation convened a meeting of experts to review current data and develop the framework for the study of using HCV viremic organs in solid organ transplantation.

Vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS) has been described in different pathologic conditions including infection, ischemia, adverse drug reactions, autoimmune diseases, allograft rejection, and humoral factors associated with malignancy. It is an acquired condition characterized by progressive destruction and loss of the intra-hepatic bile ducts leading to cholestasis. Prognosis is variable and partially dependent upon the etiology of bile duct injury. Irreversible bile duct loss leads to significant ductopenia, biliary cirrhosis, liver failure, and death. If biliary epithelial regeneration occurs, clinical recovery may occur over a period of months to years. VBDS has been described in a number of cases of patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) where it is thought to be a paraneoplastic phenomenon. This case describes a 25-year-old man found on liver biopsy to have VBDS. Given poor response to medical treatment, the patient underwent transplant evaluation at that time and was found to have classical stage IIB HL. Early recognition of this underlying cause or association of VBDS, including laboratory screening, and physical exam for lymphadenopathy are paramount to identifying potential underlying VBDS-associated malignancy. Here we review the literature of HL-associated VBDS and report a case of diagnosed HL with biopsy proven VBDS.

BACKGROUND & AIMS:Renal clearance is the major elimination pathway for sofosbuvir (SOF). We assessed the safety and efficacy of SOF-containing regimens in patients with varying baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). METHODS:HCV-TARGET database is a multicentre, longitudinal 'real-world' treatment cohort. RESULTS:A total of 1789 patients [genotypes 1 (72%), 2 (17%) 3 (9%), 4-6 (2%)] had baseline eGFR determination: 73 with eGFR≤45 (18 with eGFR≤30, 5 on dialysis) were compared to 1716 with eGFR>45 ml/min/1.73 m(2) . Patients with baseline eGFR≤45 vs. >45 differed in being female (55% vs. 36%), age ≥65 years (24% vs. 16%), Black race (22% vs. 12%), having cirrhosis with decompensation (73% vs. 24%) and being post-transplant (49% vs. 10%), all P < 0.05. All patients with eGFR≤45 were treated with SOF 400 mg/day (including those on haemodialysis) and had median starting ribavirin (RBV) dose of 800 mg (IQR: 400-1200). Sustained virologic response (SVR) frequencies were similar across eGFR groups, ranging from 82-83%. Patients with eGFR ≤45 more frequently experienced anaemia, worsening renal function and serious AEs (all P < 0.05), and these associations persisted when limiting analysis to RBV-free regimens. Patients with baseline eGFR≤30 and eGFR 31-45 had similar frequencies of efficacy and safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:Sustained viral clearance was achieved in 83% of patients with renal impairment (eGFR ≤45 ml/min/1.73 m(2) ) treated with SOF-containing regimens. However, these patients had higher rates of anaemia, worsening renal dysfunction and serious adverse events regardless of use of RBV. Patient with renal impairment require close monitoring and should be treated by providers extensively experienced with SOF-containing regimens.