Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:loebs01

Total Results:

521


Development and Validation of a Survey to Assess Sexual Health in Female Partners of Patients with Prostate Cancer

Loeb, Stacy; Gupta, Natasha; Wittmann, Daniela; Nelson, Christian J; Mulhall, John P; Salter, Carolyn A; Byrne, Nataliya; Sanchez Nolasco, Tatiana; Zebib, Laura; Garrett, Leigh; Schofield, Elizabeth
BACKGROUND:Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and treatment can have a significant negative impact on sexual health, affecting patients and their partners; however, the impact on partners is insufficiently addressed in current practice. OBJECTIVE:We describe the development and validation of an instrument to measure sexual health in female partners of patients with PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:Questions assessing sexual health were developed through a literature review, two qualitative studies, and an expert consensus process. Candidate survey items were tested through cognitive interviews and used to iteratively refine the questionnaire. INTERVENTION/METHODS:The final questionnaire was tested in a validation study among 200 female partners. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS/METHODS:We performed an exploratory factor analysis, followed by an analysis for internal validity, test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:An initial set of 32 items was developed and refined through cognitive interviews. The resulting 27-item questionnaire was tested among 200 female partners of patients with PCa from across the USA. The exploratory factor analysis eliminated eight items and revealed seven key factors: (1) distress/satisfaction, (2) loss of connection as a couple, (3) active communication, (4) discomfort with communication, (5) frustration with sexual counseling, (6) expansion of sexual repertoire, and (7) nonpenetrative sexual activity. The overall scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (ordinal alpha 0.94) and test-retest reliability (0.89). Strengths of the study include development and evaluation of the first questionnaire to evaluate sexual quality of life among female partners of patients with PCa. However, additional work is needed to assess sexual health and quality of life among male and nonbinary partners. CONCLUSIONS:We developed a new instrument, the Sexual Concerns In Partners of Patients with Prostate cancer (SCIPPP-F), and found it to be valid in a diverse sample of female partners across the USA. PATIENT SUMMARY/RESULTS:Our new instrument can be used to characterize sexual health among female partners of patients with prostate cancer.
PMID: 38762369
ISSN: 2588-9311
CID: 5733762

Plant-based diets and urological health

Loeb, Stacy; Borin, James F; Venigalla, Greeshma; Narasimman, Manish; Gupta, Natasha; Cole, Alexander P; Amin, Katherine
Plant-based diets have grown in popularity owing to multiple health and environmental benefits. Some evidence suggests that plant-based diets are associated with benefits for urological health. In genitourinary oncology, most research has focused on prostate cancer. Clinical trial results suggest a favourable influence of healthy lifestyle modifications including plant-based diets before and after prostate cancer treatment. Epidemiological evidence shows that a diet higher in plant-based and lower in animal-based food is associated with a lower risk of aggressive prostate cancer and better quality-of-life scores than a diet with less plant-based and more animal-based food. Studies on bladder and kidney cancer are scarce, but limited data suggest that vegetarian or plant-forward dietary patterns (increased consumption of fruits and vegetables and minimizing meat) are associated with a lower risk of development of these cancers than dietary patterns with fewer fruits and vegetables and more meat. With respect to benign urological conditions, epidemiological studies suggest that plant-based dietary patterns are associated with a lower risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia and urinary tract infections than non-plant-based dietary patterns. Compared with diets high in animal-based foods and low in plant-based foods, a substantial body of epidemiological evidence also suggests that increased consumption of healthy plant-based food is associated with a lower risk of erectile dysfunction. Plant-based dietary patterns that are high in fruits and vegetables with normal calcium intake, while limiting animal protein and salt, are associated with a lower risk of kidney stone development than dietary patterns that do not follow these parameters. Overall, increasing consumption of plant-based foods and reducing intake of animal-based foods has favourable associations with multiple urological conditions.
PMID: 39375468
ISSN: 1759-4820
CID: 5705962

Active Surveillance or Watchful Waiting for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer, 2010-2020

Ajjawi, Ismail; Loeb, Stacy; Cooperberg, Matthew R; Catalona, William J; Gross, Cary P; Ma, Xiaomei; Leapman, Michael S
PMCID:11579888
PMID: 39565605
ISSN: 1538-3598
CID: 5758592

Plant-based diet associated with better quality of life in prostate cancer survivors

Loeb, Stacy; Hua, Qi; Bauer, Scott R; Kenfield, Stacey A; Morgans, Alicia K; Chan, June M; Van Blarigan, Erin L; Shreves, Alaina H; Mucci, Lorelei A
BACKGROUND:Plant-based diets have many health benefits, including a lower risk of fatal prostate cancer, and greater environmental sustainability. However, less is known regarding the impact of plant-based diets on quality of life among individuals diagnosed with prostate cancer. The authors' objective was to examine the relationship between plant-based diet indices postdiagnosis with quality of life. METHODS:This prospective cohort study included 3505 participants in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (1986-2016) with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Food-frequency questionnaires were used to calculate overall and healthful plant-based diet indices. Quality-of-life scores were calculated using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine associations over time between plant-based diet indices and quality-of-life domains (sexual functioning, urinary irritation/obstruction, urinary incontinence, bowel functioning, hormonal/vitality), adjusted for demographics, oncologic history, body mass index, caloric intake, health-related behaviors, and comorbidities. RESULTS:The median age at prostate cancer diagnosis was 68 years; 48% of patients underwent radical prostatectomy, and 35% received radiation as primary therapy. The median time from diagnosis/treatment to first the quality-of-life questionnaire was 7.0 years. A higher plant-based diet index was associated with better scores for sexual function, urinary irritation/obstruction, urinary incontinence, and hormonal/vitality. Consuming more healthful plant-based foods was also associated with better sexual and bowel function, as well as urinary incontinence and hormonal/vitality scores in the age-adjusted analysis, but not in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS:This prospective study provides supportive evidence that greater consumption of healthful plant-based foods is associated with modestly higher scores in quality-of-life domains among patients with prostate cancer.
PMCID:11009061
PMID: 38348508
ISSN: 1097-0142
CID: 5738402

Plant-Based Diets and Disease Progression in Men With Prostate Cancer

Liu, Vivian N; Van Blarigan, Erin L; Zhang, Li; Graff, Rebecca E; Loeb, Stacy; Langlais, Crystal S; Cowan, Janet E; Carroll, Peter R; Chan, June M; Kenfield, Stacey A
IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Plant-based diets are associated with many health and environmental benefits, including primary prevention of fatal prostate cancer, but less is known about postdiagnostic plant-based diet patterns in individuals with prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To examine whether postdiagnostic plant-based dietary patterns are associated with risk of prostate cancer progression and prostate cancer-specific mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This longitudinal observational cohort study included men with biopsy-proven nonmetastatic prostate cancer (stage ≤T3a) from the diet and lifestyle substudy within the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) enrolled at 43 urology practices across the US from 1999 to 2018. Participants completed a comprehensive diet and lifestyle questionnaire (including a validated food frequency questionnaire [FFQ]) between 2004 and 2016. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to April 2023. EXPOSURES/UNASSIGNED:Overall plant-based diet index (PDI) and healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI) scores were calculated from the FFQ. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The primary outcome was prostate cancer progression (recurrence, secondary treatment, bone metastases, or prostate cancer-specific mortality). The secondary outcome was prostate cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 2062 participants (median [IQR] age, 65.0 [59.0-70.0] years), 61 (3%) identified as African American, 3 (<1%) identified as American Indian or Alaska Native, 9 (<1%) identified as Asian or Pacific Islander, 15 (1%) identified as Latino, and 1959 (95%) identified as White. Median (IQR) time from prostate cancer diagnosis to FFQ was 31.3 (15.9-62.0) months after diagnosis. During a median (IQR) follow-up of 6.5 (1.3-12.8) years after the FFQ, 190 progression events and 61 prostate cancer-specific mortality events were observed. Men scoring in the highest vs lowest quintile of PDI had a 47% lower risk of progression (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37-0.74; P for trend = .003). The hPDI was not associated with risk of progression overall. However, among 680 individuals with Gleason grade 7 or higher at diagnosis, the highest hPDI quintile was associated with a 55% lower risk of progression compared with the lowest hPDI quintile (HR 0.45; 95% CI, 0.25-0.81; P for trend = .01); no association was observed in individuals with Gleason grade less than 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this cohort study of 2062 men with prostate cancer, higher intake of plant foods after prostate cancer diagnosis was associated with lower risk of cancer progression. These findings suggest nutritional assessment and counseling may be recommended to patients with prostate cancer to help establish healthy dietary practices and support well-being and overall health.
PMCID:11063803
PMID: 38691361
ISSN: 2574-3805
CID: 5738522

Quality of erectile dysfunction information from ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence chatbots

Pan, Alexander; Musheyev, David; Loeb, Stacy; Kabarriti, Abdo E
PMID: 37997563
ISSN: 1464-410x
CID: 5738302

Feasibility of Pay for Performance and Transparency Interventions on the Selection and Quality of Observational Management for Patients with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in the Community Practice

Gaylis, Franklin D; Leapman, Michael S; Ellis, Shellie D; Hu, Steven; Cooperberg, Matthew R; Loeb, Stacy; Chen, Ronald C; Cohen, Edward S; Dato, Paul E; Aynehchi, Shahrad; David, Richard; Topp, Robert; Santomauro, Bianca; Ginsburg, Kevin; Catalona, William J
PMID: 39453985
ISSN: 2352-0787
CID: 5738952

Readability and Information Quality in Cancer Information From a Free vs Paid Chatbot

Musheyev, David; Pan, Alexander; Gross, Preston; Kamyab, Daniel; Kaplinsky, Peter; Spivak, Mark; Bragg, Marie A; Loeb, Stacy; Kabarriti, Abdo E
IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:The mainstream use of chatbots requires a thorough investigation of their readability and quality of information. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To identify readability and quality differences in information between a free and paywalled chatbot cancer-related responses, and to explore if more precise prompting can mitigate any observed differences. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This cross-sectional study compared readability and information quality of a chatbot's free vs paywalled responses with Google Trends' top 5 search queries associated with breast, lung, prostate, colorectal, and skin cancers from January 1, 2021, to January 1, 2023. Data were extracted from the search tracker, and responses were produced by free and paywalled ChatGPT. Data were analyzed from December 20, 2023, to January 15, 2024. EXPOSURES/UNASSIGNED:Free vs paywalled chatbot outputs with and without prompt: "Explain the following at a sixth grade reading level: [nonprompted input]." MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The primary outcome measured the readability of a chatbot's responses using Flesch Reading Ease scores (0 [graduate reading level] to 100 [easy fifth grade reading level]). Secondary outcomes included assessing consumer health information quality with the validated DISCERN instrument (overall score from 1 [low quality] to 5 [high quality]) for each response. Scores were compared between the 2 chatbot models with and without prompting. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:This study evaluated 100 chatbot responses. Nonprompted free chatbot responses had lower readability (median [IQR] Flesh Reading ease scores, 52.60 [44.54-61.46]) than nonprompted paywalled chatbot responses (62.48 [54.83-68.40]) (P < .05). However, prompting the free chatbot to reword responses at a sixth grade reading level was associated with increased reading ease scores than the paywalled chatbot nonprompted responses (median [IQR], 71.55 [68.20-78.99]) (P < .001). Prompting was associated with increases in reading ease in both free (median [IQR], 71.55 [68.20-78.99]; P < .001)and paywalled versions (median [IQR], 75.64 [70.53-81.12]; P < .001). There was no significant difference in overall DISCERN scores between the chatbot models, with and without prompting. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this cross-sectional study, paying for the chatbot was found to provide easier-to-read responses, but prompting the free version of the chatbot was associated with increased response readability without changing information quality. Educating the public on how to prompt chatbots may help promote equitable access to health information.
PMCID:11282443
PMID: 39058491
ISSN: 2574-3805
CID: 5738662

Shared decision-making before prostate cancer screening decisions

Pekala, Kelly R; Shill, Daniela K; Austria, Mia; Langford, Aisha T; Loeb, Stacy; Carlsson, Sigrid V
Decisions around prostate-specific antigen screening require a patient-centred approach, considering the benefits and risks of potential harm. Using shared decision-making (SDM) can improve men's knowledge and reduce decisional conflict. SDM is supported by evidence, but can be difficult to implement in clinical settings. An inclusive definition of SDM was used in order to determine the prevalence of SDM in prostate cancer screening decisions. Despite consensus among guidelines endorsing SDM practice, the prevalence of SDM occurring before the decision to undergo or forgo prostate-specific antigen testing varied between 11% and 98%, and was higher in studies in which SDM was self-reported by physicians than in patient-reported recollections and observed practices. The influence of trust and continuity in physician-patient relationships were identified as facilitators of SDM, whereas common barriers included limited appointment times and poor health literacy. Decision aids, which can help physicians to convey health information within a limited time frame and give patients increased autonomy over decisions, are underused and were not shown to clearly influence whether SDM occurs. Future studies should focus on methods to facilitate the use of SDM in clinical settings.
PMCID:11250989
PMID: 38168921
ISSN: 1759-4820
CID: 5738352

The Lancet Commission on prostate cancer: planning for the surge in cases

James, Nicholas D; Tannock, Ian; N'Dow, James; Feng, Felix; Gillessen, Silke; Ali, Syed Adnan; Trujillo, Blanca; Al-Lazikani, Bissan; Attard, Gerhardt; Bray, Freddie; Compérat, Eva; Eeles, Ros; Fatiregun, Omolara; Grist, Emily; Halabi, Susan; Haran, Áine; Herchenhorn, Daniel; Hofman, Michael S; Jalloh, Mohamed; Loeb, Stacy; MacNair, Archie; Mahal, Brandon; Mendes, Larissa; Moghul, Masood; Moore, Caroline; Morgans, Alicia; Morris, Michael; Murphy, Declan; Murthy, Vedang; Nguyen, Paul L; Padhani, Anwar; Parker, Charles; Rush, Hannah; Sculpher, Mark; Soule, Howard; Sydes, Matthew R; Tilki, Derya; Tunariu, Nina; Villanti, Paul; Xie, Li-Ping
PMID: 38583453
ISSN: 1474-547x
CID: 5738462