Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Xenografts from genetically modified pigs have become one of the most promising solutions to the dearth of human organs available for transplantation. The challenge in this model has been hyperacute rejection. To avoid this, pigs have been bred with a knockout of the alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase gene and with subcapsular autologous thymic tissue. METHODS:We transplanted kidneys from these genetically modified pigs into two brain-dead human recipients whose circulatory and respiratory activity was maintained on ventilators for the duration of the study. We performed serial biopsies and monitored the urine output and kinetic estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to assess renal function and xenograft rejection. RESULTS:in Recipient 2. In both recipients, the creatinine level, which had been at a steady state, decreased after implantation of the xenograft, from 1.97 to 0.82 mg per deciliter in Recipient 1 and from 1.10 to 0.57 mg per deciliter in Recipient 2. The transplanted kidneys remained pink and well-perfused, continuing to make urine throughout the study. Biopsies that were performed at 6, 24, 48, and 54 hours revealed no signs of hyperacute or antibody-mediated rejection. Hourly urine output with the xenograft was more than double the output with the native kidneys. CONCLUSIONS:Genetically modified kidney xenografts from pigs remained viable and functioning in brain-dead human recipients for 54 hours, without signs of hyperacute rejection. (Funded by Lung Biotechnology.).

OBJECTIVE:Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) after renal transplantation is a common cause of graft dysfunction and failure. Endovascular intervention in the form of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting has rapidly become the dominant treatment modality for the TRAS. There is a paucity of clinical data on use of drug-eluting stent (DES) for TRAS. We investigated the outcomes of patients with clinically significant TRAS undergoing DES placement. METHODS:A retrospective review of patients with clinically significant TRAS undergoing PTA with DES placement from June 2014 to April 2021 was conducted. Patients treated for TRAS exhibited uncontrolled hypertension and/or unexplained allograft dysfunction. Patient demographics, procedural details, and follow-up outcomes were collected. Primary endpoints were the in-stent primary patency and graft survival. Secondary endpoints were freedom from reintervention, primary-assisted patency and access-related complications. RESULTS:Thirteen TRAS in twelve patients with graft function alteration were treated with DES. The median age was 57 years (interquartile range (IQR), 48-63 years), and nine (70%) patients were male (Table). The median follow-up was 9 months (IQR, 4-52 months). The most common comorbidity was hypertension (100%), coronary artery disease (83%) and diabetes. The median time from deceased donor transplant to intervention was 5.8 months (IQR, 3.5-6.7 months). TRAS was most commonly found at the juxta-ostial segment (77%). The procedure was performed with carbon dioxide angiography with minimal amount of iodinated contrast (median, 3 mL) under local anesthesia in nine (69%) and general anesthesia in four (31%) patients. The median stent diameter was 4.5 mm (IQR, 4-5 mm), and the median stent length was 15 mm (IQR, 15-18 mm). No intraoperative complications occurred. The rates of stenosis-free primary patency of the DES and graft survival were 76% and 100%, respectively. All three reinterventions for restenosis resulted from the kinking of the transplant renal artery proximal to the DES, which were treated by extending the stent more proximally 1-2 mm into the external iliac artery. There were no access-related complications. The median time to reintervention was 0.9 months (range, 0.23-2 months). Freedom from reintervention and primary-assisted patency were 76% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Our study demonstrates that DES is a safe and effective treatment modality in patients with TRAS at short to mid-term follow-up. As all reinterventions after DES were performed due to kinking of the transplant renal artery proximal to the stent, bridging of the DES 1-2 mm into the external iliac artery is recommended.

Background/UNASSIGNED:The shortage of transplantable organs has led to increased utilization of kidneys that may be particularly vulnerable to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and delayed graft function (DGF). Kidneys from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors have additional IRI from donor procurement that results in increased risk of DGF. Verapamil may reduce IRI in kidney allografts when given at the time of organ reperfusion. This study sought to determine if intraoperative administration of verapamil (Ver) could reduce the risk of DGF in DCD kidney transplants. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A single-center retrospective matched cohort study was performed of 93 Ver (-) kidney transplant recipients compared with 93 Ver (+) kidney transplant recipients, matched by donor age, Kidney Donor Profile Index, and DCD status. Covariates that could impact DGF risk were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results/UNASSIGNED:The Ver (-) and Ver (+) matched cohorts did not have any significant differences in the demographic covariates. There was no difference in DGF rate between the Ver cohorts in either the overall study population or within the DCD subgroup. There was a trend toward reduced DGF in the Ver (+) cohort for cold ischemia time (CIT) ≤24 h, but this failed to achieve statistical significance. On multivariate analysis, only CIT was found to be independently associated with DGF. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Intraoperative verapamil failed to reduce DGF risk in DCD kidney allografts. Limitations to this study include nonrandomization for the intraoperative administration of verapamil and the mean CIT >24 h in the study population. Only CIT was an independent prognosticator for DGF on multivariate analysis in a cohort matched for DCD status, consistent with prior studies.

Purpose: Utilization of HCV viremic donor kidneys for transplant into HCV naive recipients has become more widespread, yet best practices governing the initiation, timing or duration of direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy are lacking. Most published series describe DAA initiation weeks to months after transplant. However, fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis has been reported with delayed DAA initiation. Herein we report our center practice utilizing donor blood for HCV genotyping to expedite DAA insurance approval and minimize the duration of recipient viremia.
Method(s): Patients received education and DAA insurance benefits were ensured prior to listing for HCV+ organs. At the time of transplant, donor blood accompanying the kidney was used for HCV genotyping. Results were received within one week of transplant. Recipients were screened for HCV RNA by POD#4, and weekly for 12 weeks. Insurance authorization for DAA coverage was sought after both recipient viremia and donor HCV genotyping resulted. In 3 cases, donor viral load was insufficient for genotyping, and these recipients were genotyped once viremic.
Result(s): 80 hepatitis C naive patients received hepatitis C positive donor kidneys between July, 2018 and October, 2020. 17 donors were HCV Ab+/NAT-and 63 donors were HCV Ab+/NAT+. All recipients of NAT+ donor organs became viremic; 89% were genotype 1a or 3. The median time to DAA initiation was 10 days for cases with donor genotyping (IQR 8-13). In contrast, the median time to DAA initiation was 20 days for the 3 cases with recipient genotyping (IQR 18-24). Median time from transplant to clearance of HCV viremia was 38 days (IQR 30-47) (Table 1). SVR12 was achieved in all patients, and no cases of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis have been observed. There were 2 needlestick exposures of patient family members, though no HCV transmission occurred.
Conclusion(s): Early HCV genotyping using donor blood results in expedited initiation of DAA therapy for recipients of HCV+ kidneys. Compared to published reports, our patients are clearing viremia at the time that most other centers' patients are initiating DAA therapy. Whether duration of viremia or peak viral load are associated with adverse allograft events such as acute rejection is not known. The advantages to a shortened duration of HCV viremia remain to be characterized, but may include a lower risk of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis and lower risk of HCV exposure to family members and caregivers. Our practice of expedited genotyping using donor blood is immediately implementable at all centers performing these transplants. (Table Presented)

Purpose: Blood type B candidates on the deceased donor kidney waitlist have a lower transplantation rate and longer wait time than candidates of other blood types. The new national kidney allocation system (KAS), implemented in December 2014, prioritizes the allocation of kidneys from blood type A2 and A2B deceased donors to blood type B candidates to mitigate this disparity in access to transplantation. We analyzed our center's data to determine whether blood type A2/A2B to B transplantation is clinically feasible without the need for additional immunosuppression.
Method(s): We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study to analyze the utilization and outcomes in A2/A2B to B deceased donor renal transplants. Data on adult, kidney-only recipients were extracted with custom reports from the United Network for Organ transplantation (UNOS) portal. We used multivariable Coxproportional hazards models to compare graft and patient survival in blood type A2/A2B to B deceased donor renal transplants to survival in blood type B to B transplants. We estimated Kaplan-Meier (KM) graft and patient survival functions.
Result(s): Since 2015, our center has performed 44 A2/A2B to B and 65 B to B kidney transplants. We followed the patients for a median of 712 days (IQR 343-1143). Recipients of A2/A2B to B and B to B kidney transplants were similar with respect to age, gender, estimated post-transplant survival (EPTS), calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA), HLA ABDR mismatch, kidney donor profile index (KDPI), and the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF). A higher percentage of A2/A2B to B transplant recipients were Black/African American (22/44, 50%) than B to B transplant recipients (14/65, 21.5%). Blood type A2/A2B to B and B to B transplant recipients had similar 1-year graft (97.7% vs. 93.8%, p=0.34) and 1-year patient survival (97.7% vs. 98.5%, p=0.78) rates. Multivariable models adjusted for race/ ethnicity showed that death censored graft survival (adjusted HR=1.45, p=0.70, 95% CI=0.21 to 9.82) and patient survival (4.22, p=0.14, 95% CI=0.64 to 27.92) in A2/A2B to B transplant recipients were similar to the traditionally ABO blood type compatible B to B transplants.
Conclusion(s): The NYU Langone blood type A2/A2B to B transplantation adds to the body of evidence suggesting that blood type A2/A2B to B transplantation is clinically feasible. This provision of the KAS appears to be having its intended effect of increasing access to transplantation in blood type B candidates with no attendant compromise in overall patient or death censored graft survival

Purpose: As an early epicenter in the coronavirus pandemic, our center modified induction immunosuppression strategies for transplantation. We sought to determine if changes in induction immunosuppression secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the incidence of acute rejection.
Method(s): Adult kidney transplant recipients at NYU Langone Health between 09/2019 and 08/2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients who received a multiorgan transplant or whose induction regimen was changed due to clinical course were excluded. Patients transplanted before and after 3/17/2020 were grouped as pre-pandemic (PRE) and post-pandemic (POST), respectively, based on temporary interruption of transplantation. Induction immunosuppression discordance was identified by blind adjudication from a standard protocol. Reduced induction agent use (basiliximab given when pre-pandemic protocol indicated rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG)) was compared between groups using a Chi-square test. Biopsyproven acute rejection (BPAR) and the incidence of rejection was compared using a Poisson regression model.
Result(s): 203 kidney transplant recipients were retrospectively identified. 38 patients were excluded, leaving 165 patients for analysis. Median patient age was 57 years, 67% were male, and diabetes mellitus (35%) was the most common cause of renal disease. Discordance from protocol induction agent was 16% in the PRE group and 28% in the POST group (p=0.06). More patients received reduced induction with basiliximab in lieu of rATG in the POST group than the PRE group (26% vs. 7%, p=0.001). BPAR occurred in 5 PRE (5%) and 6 POST (11%) patients (p=0.19). The incidence of rejection was 0.13 and 0.75 rejection episodes/1,000-patient days for the PRE and POST groups, respectively; this was significantly different between the 2 time periods (unadjusted IRR 5.69, 95% CI 1.74-18.6, p=0.004).
Conclusion(s): More patients received reduced induction immunosuppression driven by the COVID-19 pandemic concerns. These COVID-related changes in immunosuppression may have contributed to a trend in increased acute rejection in a preliminary analysis

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapeutics have ushered in an era in which transplanting organs from donors infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV+) into recipients without (HCV-) is an increasingly common practice. Rare but potentially life-threatening events have been reported in recipients of HCV+ organs. METHODS:Since 2018 at our institution, 182 HCV- patients have received HCV+ donor organs. Here, we retrospectively reviewed cases in which recipients' family member caregivers reported sustaining needlestick exposures at home following discharge of the transplant recipient from the hospital. RESULTS:Caregiver needlestick exposures were passively reported in three cases of HCV+ into HCV- transplants (1.64% of such cases at our center). In all instances, the exposed individuals were aiding in diabetic management and the exposure occurred via lancets or insulin needles. In one case, the recipient viral load was undetectable at the time of the exposure but in the other two, recipients were viremic, putting their family members at risk to contract HCV infection. Surveillance for the exposed individuals was undertaken and no transmissions occurred. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:For centers performing HCV+ into HCV- transplants, it is important that informed consent includes discussion of potential secondary risks to family members and caregivers. Further, protocols for post-exposure surveillance and for the acquisition of DAA treatment in the event of a secondary transmission should be in place. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.