Faculty Bibliography

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta1, -beta2, and -beta3) has been implicated in the ontogenetic transition from scarless fetal repair to adult repair with scar. Generally, TGF-beta exerts its effects through type I and II receptors; however, TGF-beta modulators such as latent TGF-beta binding protein-1 (LTBP-1), decorin, biglycan, and fibromodulin can bind and potentially inhibit TGF-beta activity. To more fully explore the role of TGF-beta ligands, receptors, and potential modulators during skin development and wound healing, we have used a rat model that transitions from scarless fetal-type repair to adult-type repair with scar between days 16 and 18 of gestation. We showed that TGF-beta ligand and receptor mRNA levels did not increase during the transition to adult-type repair in fetal skin, whereas LTBP-1 and fibromodulin expression decreased. In addition, TGF-beta1 and -beta3; type I, II, and III receptors; as well as LTBP-1, decorin, and biglycan were up-regulated during adult wound healing. In marked contrast, fibromodulin expression was initially down-regulated in adult repair. Immunostaining demonstrated significant fibromodulin induction 36 hours after injury in gestation day 16, but not day 19, fetal wounds. This inverse relationship between fibromodulin expression and scarring in both fetal and adult rat wound repair suggests that fibromodulin may be a biologically relevant modulator of TGF-beta activity during scar formation

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO) has become an important technique to lengthen the hypoplastic mandible and to reconstruct osseous defects after ablative surgery. The hallmark of successful DO is the creation of new bone within the distraction gap. Several anecdotal reports have described alternating compressing and lengthening protocols (i.e., 'pumping the regenerate') to augment regenerate bone formation. The purpose of this experiment was to analyze formally the effects of an alternating compression/distraction protocol with a traditional distraction protocol. Ten adult male rats underwent unilateral mandibular osteotomy with placement of a custom distractor. After a latency period of 5 days, distraction was initiated at a rate of 0.25 mm twice daily. Animals in the control group (N = 5) were distracted to a length of 5.0 mm for 10 days at a rate of 0.25 mm twice daily. In contrast, animals in the experimental group (N = 5) were distracted to a length of 2.5 mm (at a rate of 0.25 mm twice daily) for 5 days, then compressed 1.0 mm for a 2-day period, and redistracted to a length of 5.0 mm. Regenerate cross-sectional area was evaluated by computed tomography performed after 5 weeks of consolidation. Gross examination and histological analysis were performed by a panel of experienced reviewers. Radiological as well as histological analysis of regenerate cross-sectional area demonstrated no significant differences between experimental (i.e., 'pumped') and control groups. Both groups demonstrated excellent regenerate bone formation with no evidence of fibrous union. This study represents the first attempt to investigate the anecdotal technique of pumping the mandibular regenerate. The authors have demonstrated that pumping the regenerate leads to no substantial differences in radiological or histological appearance of regenerate bone formation

Distraction osteogenesis has proven to be an effective technique for the correction of mandibular deficiencies. However, problems have been encountered in achieving a final, idealized form of the mandible when using distraction devices capable of moving the bone segments in only one dimension (uniplanar). Specifically, occlusal irregularities and deficiencies in lower facial contour have been seen following uniplanar distraction. To address these problems, a distraction device capable of independent movements in three planes (multiplanar) was developed. Previously reported studies in a canine model have demonstrated that this device can successfully distract the mandible along both the sagittal axis (anteroposterior or z-axis) and the vertical axis (superoinferior or y-axis). This study examines the ability of the multiplanar device to distract along the sagittal and horizontal axes (mediolateral or x-axis). A total of 12 dogs were included in the study. All animals underwent unilateral or bilateral mandibular distraction using an external multiplanar device. After a latency period of 5 days, primary distraction along the anteroposterior axis at a rate of 1 mm/day for 10 days (10 mm total) was performed. During the following 10 days, along with an additional 11 mm to 20 mm of anteroposterior axis distraction, concomitant secondary distraction was performed along the horizontal (mediolateral) axis at a rate of 5 degrees/day (50 degrees total). Cephalometric radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at the conclusion of both anteroposterior and combined anteroposterior-mediolateral distraction. Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained preoperatively and at the end of consolidation (28 days), after which all animals were sacrificed and the dry skulls examined. In all animals, distraction along the mediolateral or x-axis was found to change the anteroposterior projection of the mandible. Varus angulation of the device with respect to the midline of the mandible caused compression of the distracted segments and reduced the anteroposterior thrust of the mandible. In contrast, valgus positioning of the device, with respect to the midline of the mandible, created the opposite effect, increasing the distracted length in the anteroposterior direction. The bone (mandibular) segments being distracted assumed the orientation of the device only for valgus positioning of the device (producing a decrease in the bigonial distance). Conversely, there was no effect from the mediolateral angulation on the distracted segments during varus positioning of the device. A possible explanation for this finding may be a greater resistance to an increase in the bigonial distance (varus positioning of the device) posed by obstruction of lateral movement of the condyle. This stands in contrast to a decrease in the bigonial distance observed following valgus positioning of the device. These findings confirm the clinical impression that distraction along the anteroposterior or sagittal axis remains the critical or keystone therapeutic maneuver in distraction of the mandible. Mediolateral or horizontal axis distraction is best used only as a supplementary movement; in essence, it only affects the anteroposterior dimension with little impact on clinically relevant changes to the bigonial distance

The application of distraction osteogenesis to craniofacial surgery has altered the approach and treatment of congenital and acquired craniofacial defects. Although the histologic and ultrastructural changes associated with distraction osteogenesis have been described extensively, relatively little is known about the molecular regulation of this process. The elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of distraction osteogenesis has important clinical implications because it may facilitate the use of recombinant proteins or gene therapy to accelerate bone regeneration. Molecular analysis of distraction osteogenesis has been hindered by the use of large animal models in which only limited genetic information is available. In this study, a rat model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis is described. This report includes a pilot study (n = 50) to develop an appropriate distraction device and to determine the optimal placement of the osteotomy. The study subsequently included 80 animals, 35 of which were distracted at a rate of 0.25 mm per day for 6 days (1.5 mm total) and 35 that were distracted at a rate of 0.25 mm twice per day (3.0 mm total). These animals were killed at various time points (after latency and during the distraction and consolidation periods) and displayed histologic and radiographic findings of membranous bone distraction osteogenesis that were consistent with those in large ,animal and clinical models. In addition, five animals each were acutely lengthened 1.5 mm and 3.0 mm and demonstrated a fibrous nonunion. Furthermore, the utility of this model is demonstrated in the analysis of the molecular mechanisms of distraction osteogenesis by applying the polymerase chain reaction to total cellular RNA isolated from normal and distracted rat mandibles. In conclusion, it is believed that the rat model of distraction osteogenesis has significant advantages over traditional models, including decreased costs and facilitation of molecular analysis

The application of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery has significantly altered the treatment of congenital mandibular deficiencies. However, evaluation of results in both animal studies and clinical cases has revealed deficiencies, particularly in two areas. First, distraction using a uniplanar device in an anteroposterior direction can result in a persistent anterior open bite. Second, the lateralization of the distracted hemimandible was often limited, with insufficient incremental gain in the bigonial distance. To overcome these shortcomings, a multiplanar distraction device was developed and tested in the canine model. This report details canine studies addressing the first problem: combined anteroposterior or sagittal (z-axis) and superoinferior or vertical (y-axis) movements. Six dogs underwent bilateral mandibular distraction with an external (extraoral), multiplanar device and completed sagittal plus vertical distraction. Evaluation included clinical examination (facial form, jaw position, and occlusion), photography, cephalograms (posteroanterior, basilar, and lateral), three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions, and examination of dry skulls. The dogs averaged 18.5 mm (range, 15-20 mm) of sagittal distraction and 41.0 degrees (range, 21-50 degrees) of vertical distraction. Marked anterior open bites were produced after vertical distraction secondary to premature contact of the maxillary and mandibular molars. Distraction in the vertical direction also had the additive effect of increasing the sagittal gains by approximately 5% to 10%. In conclusion, a multiplanar distraction device (with the potential for distraction in three planes) was effective in increasing mandibular anteroposterior thrust (sagittal distraction) and also in creating an anterior open bite (vertical or superoinferior distraction). Vertical distraction probably requires bilateral osteotomies to obtain optimal results. The preliminary gains in sagittal length are modified (reduced or increased) after distraction in a second plane (vertical and horizontal). Specifically, vertical distraction in the inferior direction (creating an open bite) also leads to isolated increases in the anteroposterior plane. Conversely, vertical distraction in the superior direction (closing an open bite), as seen in a human malocclusion, may lead to isolated decreases in the anteroposterior plane, but this question remains to be investigated in the laboratory