Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:Vascular surgery training and practice have been constantly evolving in the last two decades.The goal of this study is to report the changing trends in perspectives of vascular surgery trainees on current training program and issues that need redressal in vascular training and practice. METHODS:Vascular surgery trainees in the US who attended the Society of Clinical Vascular Surgery meeting from 2004-2015 were surveyed annually with an anonymous questionnaire during the meet. Questions pertaining to their endovascular and open surgical learning experience,independent performance of procedures, challenges of job search, starting an independent practice and their perception of issues in vascular surgery training were analyzed. Responses from the first half of the decade (2004-2009) were compared to the second half (2010-2015) to identify evolving trends in trainee perception. RESULTS:Among the 908 vascular surgery trainees who attended the annual meeting from 2004-2015, 670 (74%) trainees responded to the questionnaire. The mean age of vascular trainees was 32.5 years. In the latter half of the decade, there was a two-fold increase in female trainees, from 12.3% to 23.6% (p=0.002), and the integrated program trainees also increased from 0% to 12% of respondents (p=0.0023). Trainee satisfaction with endovascular training improved from 78% to 90% (p=0.0001) and satisfaction with open surgical experience was unchanged at 83% over the ten-year period (p=0.16) . The perception of vascular laboratory experience improved with only 35% vs. 27% (p=0.016) of respondents dissatisfied, despite only a third of respondents actually performing the non-invasive tests in both the former and the latter half of the decade respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Although the quality of vascular cases during training has improved, vascular trainees desire shorter training paradigms and vascular laboratory education is still viewed as deficient These findings can be used by training programs to reexamine their curricula and implement changes to improve the quality of training the next generation of vascular surgeons.

Objective An increasing emphasis on preventive medicine has been supported by the recent reforms in United States health care system. Majority of the patients seen in vascular surgery clinics are elderly with more extensive medical comorbidities compared to the general population. Thus, these patients would be expected at higher risk for common malignant pathologies such as colon, breast and cervical cancer, and nonmalignant diseases such as diabetic retinopathy. This study looked at the screening compliance of vascular patients compared to data provided by Centers for Disease Control on the national and state levels. Methods The office records of 851 consecutive patients seen in Brooklyn and Staten Island vascular clinics were examined. We queried patients regarding their last colonoscopy, diabetic eye exams, recent mammograms, and Pap smears. Our patient screening compliance was compared between the two clinics as well as to the national and New York state data provided by Centers for Disease Control. Compliance with regard to patient's age was also examined. Results Patients referred to the Staten Island office have a better colonoscopy compliance compared to the Brooklyn office ( P = .0001) and the national Centers for Disease Control average ( P = .026). Compliance for mammography and cervical cancer screening was higher in Staten Island office compared to the Brooklyn office ( P = .0001, P < .0001), respectively. Compliance was lower for Pap smear ( P = .0273) in Brooklyn when compared to the national average. Compliance for colonoscopy increased with age for both clinics ( P = .001, P < .001), while Pap smear decreased ( P < .001, P = .004). Conclusion Patients in vascular clinics in an urban setting had better adherence to screening protocol than the national and state average, with the exception of female patients for colonoscopy in our Brooklyn vascular office. There exists variability in both patient populations based on sub-specific locality and demographics including socioeconomic status. Overall, however patients in Staten Island had better compliance and adherence to the screening protocol than Brooklyn vascular clinic.

OBJECTIVE:We hypothesized that there may be significant differences between academic productivity of the vascular training programs in the United States (US) and Europe. In an effort to explore theory, we reviewed the number of vascular publications listed in PubMed from 2010 to 2015 for US and European directors in vascular surgery. METHODS:The list of program directors from the Association of Program directors in Vascular Surgery (APDVS) and the European Union of Medical Specialists (EUMS) were queried for the names of the directors of vascular surgical training programs at the end of 2015. PubMed listed 5474 citations published from 2010 - 2015. 3561 were from Europe while 1912 were from the US. UK and German programs did not list their directors' names in the EUMS website and were thus not included in the European data. RESULTS:The average number of citations in PubMed per program director was 2.36 per year. In Europe, each of the 273 program directors averaged 2.17 publications per year while each of the 114 US program directors averaged 2.80 publications per year (P=.37). Journal of Vascular Surgery publications made up 24.0% (12.7% in Europe and 45.0% in the US). In the US, the top third produced 69% of the publications and 77% of the JVS publications while in Europe, the top third produced 87% of the publications and 98% of the JVS publications. In the US, 5 program directors (4.4%) had no publications and 21 (18.4%) had no JVS publications. In Europe, 82 program directors (30.0%) had no publications while 180 (65.9%) had no JVS publications. Abstracts were categorized by topic for comparison. CONCLUSIONS:In both Europe and the US, the top third produced more than two-thirds of the publications, with the disparity being even more pronounced in Europe where the top third produced almost 90% of the total publications. Comparing the topics of the publications from Europe and the US, it was found that the US program directors published a great deal more on Endo Lower Extremity, Open Lower Extremity, Education, TEVAR, Open Carotid, and Endo Venous while their European counterparts published more in the areas of Vascular Medicine, Replies, and Not Vascular.

OBJECTIVE:It has been a widely accepted practice that a previous placed pacemaker, automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators, or central line can be a contraindication to placing a hemodialysis catheter in the ipsilateral jugular vein. Fear of dislodging pacing wires, tunneling close to the battery site or causing venous obstruction has been a concern for surgeons and interventionalists alike. We suggest that this phobia may be unfounded. METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted of patients in whom hemodialysis catheters were placed over a period of 10 years. For each hemodialysis catheter that was placed, perioperative chest X-ray performed was used to evaluate for pre-existing pacemakers and central lines. The position and laterality of placement of the hemodialysis catheter along with presence of arteriovenous fistula with functional capacity for access were noted. RESULTS:A total of 600 hemodialysis catheters were placed in patients over the period of 10 years. The mean age of the patients was 73.6 ± 12 years with a median age of 76 years. We found 20 pacemakers or automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators and 19 central lines on the same side of the neck as the hemodialysis catheter that was placed in the ipsilateral jugular vein. No patient exhibited malfunction or dislodgment of the central line, the pacemaker, or automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator or evidence of upper extremity venous obstruction based upon signs symptoms or duplex exams. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Based on our experience, we suggest that placement of hemodialysis catheter in the internal jugular vein ipsilateral to the pre-existing catheter/leads is safe and spares the contralateral limb for arteriovenous fistula creation.

OBJECTIVE:Midterm patency results of iliac vein stents placed for nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVLs) are not widely known. Previously published studies involving large series of patients with iliac vein stent placement have failed to clearly demonstrate the outcomes for patients with NIVLs and advanced disease. To further study this issue, we reviewed our series of 268 iliac vein stents placed for NIVLs. METHODS:Retrospective analysis was performed of 210 patients who underwent common or external iliac vein angioplasty and stent placement procedures between January 2013 and December 2014. Only patients with Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology classification scores of C3, C4, or C5 were included. Patients were excluded if they had either active ulcer disease or signs of post-thrombotic lesions at initial venography or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Ultrasound-guided puncture was performed of the femoral or common femoral vein at the discretion of the surgeon. This was followed by ascending venography. IVUS was used in cases in which a definite stenosis was not appreciated on initial ascending venography. Balloon angioplasty and stents were applied across lesions. After the procedure, patients were instructed to use clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Patency of the stents was assessed during a follow-up visit with abdominal venous duplex ultrasound scans. The length of the patients' follow-up and stent patency rates were based on the last previous duplex ultrasound scan available. RESULTS:A total of 268 procedures were performed in 210 patients. Bilateral lower extremity stent placements were required in 58 patients; 173 (64.6%) procedures were performed in women. The average age of our patients was 72 ± 15 (standard deviation) years. Of the 268 procedures, 144 (53.7%) were performed in the left lower extremity. The Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology classification of lower extremity venous disease was 58%, 30%, and 12% for C3, C4, and C5, respectively. Our average follow-up period was 437 days (median, 499 days; range, 1-1060 days). Patients were observed for >6 months, 1 year, and 2 years in 71.3%, 57.1%, and 28.7% of cases, respectively. During this period, 4 of the 268 (1.5%) limbs experienced in-stent thrombosis. Primary stent patency of 98.7%, 98.3%, and 97.9% was noted at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years of follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Our midterm patency rates for iliac vein stents placed in patients with advanced chronic venous disease demonstrated excellent (98.5%) results. Furthermore, with IVUS assistance, we have clearly documented the average area of iliac venous segments as well as the most common locations of the stenoses.

Objective With the implementation of the K-DOQI guidelines, more patients are in need of long-term dialysis catheters until maturation of the arteriovenous fistula. However, on occasion, when placing a tunneled cuffed catheter for hemodialysis, we have encountered difficulty with passing the guidewire in spite of demonstration of a patent cervical portion of the internal jugular vein on duplex. Herein, we review our experience with intraoperative venoplasty for placement of Tesioâ„¢ catheters (Medcomp Harleysville, PA). Methods Of the 1147 Tesioâ„¢ catheters placed since 1997 by our service, 35 venograms were performed due to difficulty encountered with placement of the guidewire. Patent veins were all crossed with the use of angle-guiding catheters, angled glidewires, and a torque vise. If chronically occluded intrathoracic veins were identified, an alternate site was selected for the placement of the Tesioâ„¢ catheter. Results Of the 35 cases with difficulty in catheter placement, venogram demonstrated a patent but tortuous vein in 9, chronically occluded intrathoracic veins in 6, and severe stenosis of the intrathoracic veins in 20. In 19 cases with severe stenosis of the intrathoracic veins, balloon angioplasty with an 8-mm balloon was successfully performed, which allowed successful placement of a functional Tesioâ„¢ catheter. In the additional one case, the catheter was not able to be placed despite angioplasty. Seven lesions that underwent balloon angioplasty were in the innominate vein, 11 were in the proximal internal jugular vein, and two were in the superior vena cava. Conclusion Venous balloon angioplasty can be used to maintain options for the site of access for tunneled cuffed catheters and may be necessary to assist with placement of long term cuffed dialysis catheters.

Background Dialysis access-associated steal syndrome is a major complication of arteriovenous fistula creation whereby the low-resistance venous conduit shunts arterial inflow through the anastomosis, resulting in clinically significant distal artery insufficiency. Herein, we describe a case of severe steal phenomenon with gangrene of a digit following placement of an arteriovenous fistula that was treated with a novel, entirely endovascular technique. To our knowledge, this was the first totally endovascular approach to dialysis access-associated steal syndrome. Methods Catheterization of the right subclavian, axillary, and brachial arteries was performed. A short 5-Fr sheath was exchanged for a long destination 6-Fr sheath and placed in the proximal brachial artery. An arteriogram showed no stenosis of the arterial system, but did show substantial steal phenomenon with inflow to the arteriovenous fistula, instead of the forearm. We placed a stent graft in the brachial artery across the anastomosis such that the graft covered 3/4 of the length of the opening of the anastomosis. Results Immediately after placement of the stent graft the clinical picture improved dramatically. Patient was followed for 15 months after this procedure until her demise for unrelated causes without ever experiencing dialysis access-associated steal syndrome and with a patent and functional arteriovenous fistula. Conclusion We present a patient with severe dialysis access-associated steal syndrome complicated by third fingertip gangrene, which was successfully treated using a completely endovascular technique. This novel endovascular approach enabled a high-risk patient to avoid open surgery, preserve her limb, and maintain the function of her arteriovenous fistula.

Objectives The use of postoperative anticoagulation is not uncommon for patients undergoing lower extremity arterial procedures as adjunctive therapy. Longer postoperative length of stay is necessary to achieve adequate therapeutic international normalized ratio with traditional protocols that call for the use of unfractionated heparin and warfarin therapy. We hypothesized the direct oral anticoagulants are an attractive alternative to provide adequate anticoagulation in patients who undergo lower extremity arterial procedures. Methods We retrospectively studied patients who had lower extremity arterial procedures between 2012 and 2015 to examine the safety and efficacy of the direct oral anticoagulants in a single institution. Patency, freedom from re-intervention, and major adverse limb event were evaluated. The direct oral anticoagulant agents used included dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. The primary patency, adverse effects and freedom from re-intervention were then compared to a control group of patients who were treated with traditional heparin-warfarin therapy after lower extremity bypass procedures. Results Direct oral anticoagulants were utilized in a total of 23 patients (48% men; mean age 69 ± 11 years) during the study period. Indication for use of direct oral anticoagulant after procedure included use of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bypass graft below the knee joint or after lower extremity angioplasty with disadvantaged runoff. Mean follow-up of the drugs was 23 months (SD ± 16 months). At the end of follow-up, the direct oral anticoagulants have been discontinued in four patients, who are currently only on plavix. Among 82.6% of patients who were given direct oral anticoagulants for PTFE bypasses, graft patency, freedom from re-intervention, and major adverse limb event were 100%, 100%, and 0%, respectively. Patients (17.4%) treated with direct oral anticoagulants for disadvantaged runoff after balloon angioplasty of the lower extremity, patency, freedom from re-intervention, and major adverse limb event were 100%, 100%, and 0%, respectively. For the patients who underwent direct oral anticoagulant administration for disadvantaged runoff primary patency was 100%. One patient developed wound dehiscence which was unrelated to direct oral anticoagulant administration. Our control group consisted of 100 patients who were treated with heparin-warfarin therapy for 30 days after lower extremity bypass procedures. The graft patency, freedom from intervention, and major adverse limb event were 93%, 12%, and 0%, respectively. There was however no statistically significant difference in graft patency rate ( P = .34) or freedom from intervention ( P = .07) between the two groups. Conclusions The preliminary data suggest that there may be a role for using the direct oral anticoagulants with patients who undergo lower extremity arterial procedures for prevention of thrombosis and warrants further investigation.

OBJECTIVE:The purpose of the study was to aggressively salvage acutely occluded arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) using duplex imaging as the sole imaging modality for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of acutely thrombosed AVF. METHODS:Over a period of 12 months, 14 patients with acute thrombosis of their AVFs underwent 18 procedures in a single center for AVF salvage. All 14 patients presented with chronic renal failure, and six were diabetic. All patients were treated under duplex guidance alone. Treatment included simple balloon dilation and maceration (group A; n =10 procedures [56%]) for subacute thrombosis or pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (group B; n = 8 procedures [44%]) for more hypoechoic thrombus. A successful procedure was defined as immediate restoration of flow through the AVF. RESULTS:Of the 18 procedures, 13 (72%) were successful. Of the 14 patients, thrombus was located at the perianastomotic AVF in 6 (43%), proximal-mid AVF in 6 (43%), mid AVF in 1 (7%), and distal AVF in 1 (7%). From group A, six (60%) were successful. From group B, seven (88%) were successful. Among the unsuccessful procedures, one group B patient was hypercoagulable (polycythemia vera). Of the 18 procedures, 16 (89%) were treated within 2 weeks from when duplex revealed the presence of thrombus. Early rethrombosis (<1-month patency) occurred in three cases (17%), and these patients received new fistulas. Full restoration of the fistula flow was established in 14 cases (78%). Of these 14 patients, 8 (57%) are currently on hemodialysis via fistula, 3 patients (21%) had newly placed fistulas after failed interventions, 2 patients (14%) are not on dialysis yet, and 1 patient (7%) with polycythemia vera disorder is on dialysis via a Tesio catheter (MedComp, Harleysville, Pa). CONCLUSIONS:The sole use of duplex ultrasound imaging to salvage acutely occluded AVFs using percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is a safe and effective alternative to traditional treatment of thrombosed failing/maturing AVF.