Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:oktayk01
Fertility Preservation Success Subsequent to Concurrent Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment and Ovarian Stimulation in Women With Breast Cancer
Oktay, Kutluk; Turan, Volkan; Bedoschi, Giuliano; Pacheco, Fernanda S; Moy, Fred
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:We have previously reported an approach to ovarian stimulation for the purpose of fertility preservation (FP) in women with breast cancer via embryo freezing with the concurrent use of letrozole. The aim of this study was to provide the pregnancy and FP outcomes when embryos generated with the same protocol are used. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:In all, 131 women with stage ≤ 3 breast cancer underwent ovarian stimulation and received concurrent letrozole 5 mg per day before receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and cryopreserving embryos. RESULTS:Thirty-three of the 131 women underwent 40 attempts to transfer embryos to their own uterus (n = 18) or via the use of a gestational carrier (n = 22) at a mean age of 41.5 ± 4.3 years with a median 5.25 years after embryo cryopreservation. The overall live birth rate per embryo transfer was similar to the US national mean among infertile women of a similar age undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (45.0 v 38.2; P = .2). Seven (38.8%) of the 18 pregnancies were twins with no higher-order pregnancies being encountered. No fetal anomalies or malformations were reported in 25 children after a mean follow-up of 40.4 ± 26.4 months. Seventeen of the 33 women attempting pregnancy had at least one child, translating into an FP rate of 51.5% per attempting woman. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Embryo cryopreservation after ovarian stimulation with the letrozole and follicle-stimulating hormone protocol preserves fertility in women with breast cancer and results in pregnancy rates comparable to those expected in a noncancer population undergoing in vitro fertilization.
PMID: 26101247
ISSN: 1527-7755
CID: 5022022
Ovarian protection during adjuvant chemotherapy [Comment]
Oktay, Kutluk; Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny; Munster, Pamela
PMID: 26039611
ISSN: 1533-4406
CID: 5022012
Author's response [Comment]
Oktay, Kutluk; Turan, Volkan
PMID: 25134624
ISSN: 1744-764x
CID: 5022002
Estimates of young breast cancer survivors at risk for infertility in the U.S
Trivers, Katrina F; Fink, Aliza K; Partridge, Ann H; Oktay, Kutluk; Ginsburg, Elizabeth S; Li, Chunyu; Pollack, Lori A
BACKGROUND:Standard treatments for breast cancer can impair fertility. It is unknown how many U.S. survivors are at risk for infertility. We estimated the population at risk for infertility secondary to treatment among reproductive-aged breast cancer survivors. METHODS:We combined data from three sources: the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry data on incident breast cancers diagnosed in women aged 15-44 years between 2004 and 2006; treatment data from NPCR's 2004 Breast and Prostate Cancer Data Quality and Patterns of Care (PoC) study; and data on women's intentions to have children from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). RESULTS:In the cancer registry data, an average of 20,308 women with breast cancer aged <45 years were diagnosed annually. Based on estimates from PoC data, almost all of these survivors (97%, 19,416 women) were hormone receptor positive or received chemotherapy and would be at risk for infertility. These women need information about the impact of treatments on fertility. Estimates based on NSFG data suggest approximately half of these survivors (9,569 women) might want children and could benefit from fertility counseling and fertility preservation. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Nearly all young breast cancer survivors in the U.S. are at risk for infertility. Physicians should discuss the potential impact of treatment on fertility. A smaller but sizeable number of at-risk survivors may be interested in having children. Given the magnitude of potential infertility and its quality-of-life implications, these survivors should have access to and potential coverage for fertility services.
PMCID:4122477
PMID: 24951610
ISSN: 1549-490x
CID: 5021992
Triggering final oocyte maturation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) versus human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation: an extended experience
Reddy, Jhansi; Turan, Volkan; Bedoschi, Giuliano; Moy, Fred; Oktay, Kutluk
PURPOSE: To analyze the cycle outcomes and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), when oocyte maturation was triggered by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) versus human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation. METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine women aged = 45 years, diagnosed with stage = 3 breast cancer, with normal ovarian reserve who desired fertility preservation were included in the retrospective cohort study. Ovarian stimulation was achieved utilizing letrozole and gonadotropins. Oocyte maturation was triggered with GnRHa or hCG. Baseline AMH levels, number of oocytes, maturation and fertilization rates, number of embryos, and the incidence of OHSS was recorded. RESULTS: The serum AMH levels were similar between GnRHa and hCG groups (2.7 +/- 1.9 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.8; p = 0.327). There was one case of mild or moderate OHSS in the GnRHa group compared to 12 in the hCG group (2.1 % vs. 14.4 %, p = 0.032). The maturation and fertilization rates, and the number of cryopreserved embryos were significantly higher in the GnRHa group. CONCLUSIONS: GnRHa trigger improved cycle outcomes as evidenced by the number of mature oocytes and cryopreserved embryos, while significantly reducing the risk of OHSS in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation.
PMCID:4096878
PMID: 24854484
ISSN: 1573-7330
CID: 2633872
Sexual and fertility adverse effects associated with chemotherapy treatment in women
Turan, Volkan; Oktay, Kutluk
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Earlier diagnosis and novel chemotherapy strategies have resulted in a considerable improvement in cancer survival, but the quality of that survival is influenced by late effects of chemotherapy. Premature ovarian failure is a common consequence of chemotherapy in reproductive-aged women, and, as a result, fertility issues and sexual dysfunction occur frequently in women who have undergone chemotherapy. AREAS COVERED/METHODS:This article reviews what is known about the effects of chemotherapy on fertility and sexuality. We also discuss risk factors for premature ovarian failure, fertility preservation options in patients willing to have a child after treatment, and sexual changes associated with estrogen withdrawal and psychological factors. EXPERT OPINION/CONCLUSIONS:Chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure in young women is associated with poorer quality of life, decreased sexual functioning, psychosocial distress related to fertility concerns, and infertility. Fertility preservation options should be considered in women at risk of premature ovarian failure caused by chemotherapy. Sexual dysfunction associated with estrogen withdrawal and psychological stress is common in cancer survivors. Women who suffer from sexual dysfunction may benefit from brief counseling and targeted intervention.
PMID: 24784147
ISSN: 1744-764x
CID: 5021982
Age-related decline in DNA repair function explains diminished ovarian reserve, earlier menopause, and possible oocyte vulnerability to chemotherapy in women with BRCA mutations [Comment]
Oktay, Kutluk; Moy, Fred; Titus, Shiny; Stobezki, Robert; Turan, Volkan; Dickler, Maura; Goswami, Sumanta
PMID: 24550421
ISSN: 1527-7755
CID: 4134392
Sphingosine-1-phosphate prevents chemotherapy-induced human primordial follicle death
Li, Fang; Turan, Volkan; Lierman, Sylvie; Cuvelier, Claude; De Sutter, Petra; Oktay, Kutluk
STUDY QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:Can Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a ceramide-induced death pathway inhibitor, prevent cyclophosphamide (Cy) or doxorubicin (Doxo) induced apoptotic follicle death in human ovarian xenografts? SUMMARY ANSWER/CONCLUSIONS:S1P can block human apoptotic follicle death induced by both drugs, which have differing mechanisms of cytotoxicity. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY/BACKGROUND:S1P has been shown to decrease the impact of chemotherapy and radiation on germinal vesicle oocytes in animal studies but no human translational data exist. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION/METHODS:Experimental human ovarian xenografting to test the in vivo protective effect of S1P on primordial follicle survival in the chemotherapy setting. The data were validated by assessing the same protective effect in the ovaries of xenografted mice in parallel. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS/METHODS:Xenografted mice were treated with Cy (75 mg/kg), Cy+S1P (200 μM), Doxo (10 mg/kg), Doxo+S1P or vehicle only (Control). S1P was administered via continuous infusion using a mini-osmotic pump beginning 24 h prior to and ending 72 h post-chemotherapy. Grafts were then recovered and stained with anti-caspase 3 antibody for the detection of apoptosis in primordial follicles. The percentage of apoptotic to total primordial follicles was calculated in each group. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE/RESULTS:Both Cy and Doxo resulted in a significant increase in apoptotic follicle death in human ovarian xenografts compared with controls (62.0 ± 3.9% versus 25.7 ± 7.4%, P < 0.01 and 76.7 ± 7.4% versus 25.7 ± 7.4%, P < 0.01, respectively). This chemotherapy-induced apoptotic death was reduced both in the Cy+S1P (32.7 ± 4.4%, P < 0.01) and the Doxo+S1P group (27.1 ± 7.6%, P < 0.01) compared with Cy and Doxo groups, respectively. In the Doxo+S1P and Cy+S1P groups, the percentages of apoptotic follicles were similar to those of vehicle-treated controls (P > 0.05). The findings from the ovaries of the severe combined immunodeficient mice mirrored the findings with human tissue. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION/CONCLUSIONS:The functionality of the rescued human ovarian follicles needs to be evaluated in future studies though the studies in rodents showed that rescued oocytes can result in healthy offspring. In addition, the impact of S1P on cancer cells should be further studied. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS:S1P and its future analogs hold promise for preserving fertility by pharmacological means for patients undergoing chemotherapy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)/BACKGROUND:This research is supported by NIH's NICHD and NCI (5R01HD053112-06 and 5R21HD061259-02) and the Flemish Foundation for Scientific Research (FWO-Vlaanderen, grant number FWO G0.065.11N10). The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
PMCID:3860896
PMID: 24221908
ISSN: 1460-2350
CID: 5021942
Fertility preservation during cancer treatment: clinical guidelines
Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny A; Oktay, Kutluk
The majority of children, adolescents, and young adults diagnosed with cancer today will become long-term survivors. The threat to fertility that cancer treatments pose to young patients cannot be prevented in many cases, and thus research into methods for fertility preservation is developing, aiming at offering cancer patients the ability to have biologically related children in the future. This paper discusses the current status of fertility preservation methods when infertility risks are related to surgical oncologic treatments, radiation therapy, or chemotherapy. Several scientific groups and societies have developed consensus documents and guidelines for fertility preservation. Decisions about fertility and imminent potentially gonadotoxic therapies must be made rapidly. Timely and complete information on the impact of cancer treatment on fertility and fertility preservation options should be presented to all patients when a cancer treatment is planned.
PMCID:3949560
PMID: 24623991
ISSN: 1179-1322
CID: 5021962
Utility of GnRH-agonists for Fertility Preservation in Women With Operable Breast Cancer: Is It Protective?
Bedoschi, Giuliano; Turan, Volkan; Oktay, Kutluk
Breast cancer is the most common type of malignancy in reproductive-age women. Breast cancer chemotherapy is associated with premature ovarian failure, infertility and negative psychosocial effects related to these reproductive changes. As a result of this, fertility preservation becomes highly critical in this group of women. Besides the fertility preservation methods that utilize assisted reproductive technologies such as embryo, oocyte, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation, another suggested strategy for fertility preservation is suppression of ovarian ovulatory function by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administration before and during chemotherapy. However, both the efficacy and safety of GnRH agonists for prevention of ovarian damage are unproven and the preponderance of evidence indicates that this is an ineffective strategy. This review details the most recent information and studies on this controversial topic.
PMCID:3972621
PMID: 24707345
ISSN: 1943-4588
CID: 5021972