Faculty Bibliography

Patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma have varied clinical courses, even in patients with similar disease characteristics. We examine the impact of initial stage of melanoma diagnosis, BRAF status of primary melanoma, and receiving adjuvant therapy on postmetastatic overall survival (pmOS). We studied melanoma patients presenting to Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University and prospectively enrolled in New York University melanoma biospecimen database and followed up on protocol-driven schedule. Patients were stratified by stage at initial melanoma diagnosis as per AJCC 7th ed. guidelines. pmOS was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox's proportional hazards models were used to assess hazard ratios (HRs). Three hundred and four out of 3204 patients developed metastatic disease over the time of follow-up (median follow-up 2.2 years, range: 0.08-35.2 years). Patients diagnosed with stage I (n=96) melanoma had longer pmOS (29.5 months) than those diagnosed with stage II (n=99, pmOS 14.9 months) or stage III (n=109, pmOS 15.1 months) melanoma (P=0.036). Initial stage of diagnosis remained significant in multivariate analysis when controlling for lactate dehydrogenase and site of metastases [primary diagnosis stage II (HR 1.44, P=0.046), stage III (HR 1.5, P=0.019)]. Adjuvant treatment was associated with better survival but BRAF mutation status did not show an association. Our data challenge the general assumption that primary melanomas converge upon diagnosis of metastatic disease and behave uniformly. Primary stage of melanoma at the time of diagnosis may be prognostic of outcome, similar to lactate dehydrogenase and metastatic disease sites.

Detecting mutations in the plasma of patients with solid tumors is becoming a valuable method of diagnosing and monitoring cancer. The TERT promoter is mutated at high frequencies in multiple cancer types, most commonly at positions -124 and -146 (designated C228T and C250T, respectively). Detection of these mutations has been challenging because of the high GC content of this region (approximately 80%). We describe development of novel probe-based droplet digital PCR assays that specifically detect and quantify these two mutations, along with the less common 242-243 CC>TT mutation, and demonstrate their application using human tumor and plasma samples from melanoma patients. Assay designs and running conditions were optimized using cancer cell line genomic DNAs with the C228T or C250T mutations. The limits of detection were 0.062% and 0.051% mutant allele fraction for the C228T and C250T assays, respectively. Concordance of 100% was observed between droplet digital PCR and sequencing-based orthogonal methods in the detection of TERT mutant DNA in 32 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded melanoma tumors. TERT^mutant DNA was also identified in 21 of 27 plasma samples (78%) from patients with TERT^mutant tumors, with plasma mutant allele fractions ranging from 0.06% to 15.3%. There were no false positives in plasma. These data demonstrate the potential of these assays to specifically detect and quantify TERT^mutant DNA in tumors and plasma of cancer patients.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Two primary histologic subtypes, superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) and nodular melanoma (NM), comprise the majority of all cutaneous melanomas. NM is associated with worse outcomes, which have been attributed to increased thickness at presentation, and it is widely expected that NM and SSM would exhibit similar behavior once metastasized. Herein, we tested the hypothesis that primary histologic subtype is an independent predictor of survival and may impact response to treatment in the metastatic setting. Methods/UNASSIGNED:We examined the most recent Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cohort (n = 118 508) and the New York University (NYU) cohort (n = 1621) with available protocol-driven follow-up. Outcomes specified by primary histology were studied in both the primary and metastatic settings with respect to BRAF-targeted therapy and immunotherapy. We characterized known driver mutations and examined a 140-gene panel in a subset of NM and SSM cases using next-generation sequencing. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results/UNASSIGNED:NM was an independent risk factor for death in both the SEER (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.41 to 1.70, P < .001) and NYU (HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.05, 2.07, P = .03) cohorts, controlling for thickness, ulceration, stage, and other variables. In the metastatic setting, NM remained an independent risk factor for death upon treatment with BRAF-targeted therapy (HR = 3.33, 95% CI = 1.06 to 10.47, P = .04) but showed no statistically significant difference with immune checkpoint inhibition. NM was associated with a higher rate of NRAS mutation (P < .001), and high-throughput sequencing revealed NM-specific genomic alterations in NOTCH4, ANK3, and ZNF560, which were independently validated. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Our data reveal distinct clinical and biological differences between NM and SSM that support revisiting the prognostic and predictive impact of primary histology subtype in the management of cutaneous melanoma.

This article, co-authored by a patient diagnosed with acral melanoma, discusses the patient's experience of being diagnosed with and treated with surgery for this disease. The physician discusses the epidemiology, genetics, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of acral melanoma. Follow-up care plans are also discussed.

Background: During their lifetime about 8% of patients with single primary cutaneous melanoma (SPM) will develop multiple primary melanomas (MPM), which are associated with significantly higher mortality compared to patients with SPM. Based on the evidence that the immune system plays a role in regulating melanoma progression we explored whether germline genetic variants controlling the expression of immunomodulatory genes (immunomodulatory quantitative trait loci, eQTLs) discern risk of MPMcompared to patients with SPM or healthy controls.
Method(s): Previously, we identified 50 eQTLs significantly associated with the expression of 265 immunomodulatory genes using the MuTHer twin cohort. These 50 SNPs were genotyped in 837 SPM and 104MPM individuals using MassARRAY system. 1047 healthy controls were obtained from a publically available GWAS on CMascertained at MDAnderson (phs000187.v1.p1). We employed multivariate logistic regression to test the association of SNPs withMPM vs cancer-free controls andMPMvs SPM.
Result(s): When comparing MPMvs SPM, rs2071304, previously linked to expression of SPI1 in MuTHer data, showed a strong association with reduction ofMPM risk (OR=0.60; 95% CI=0.45-0.81; p=0.0007). Intriguingly, this variant also trended toward significance when comparing MPM vs controls (OR=0.61; 95% CI: 0.44-0.85; p=0.003). Finally, our most significant association when comparingMPM to controls was for rs2276645 (OR=0.60; 95% CI=0.45-0.81; p=0.0008), an eQTL associated with Zap-70 expression.
Conclusion(s): Our data, for the first time, indicate that the inherited host immunity impacts risk ofMPMin individuals with SPM, highlighting an importance of immune involvement in melanoma progression. The MPMrisk-predicting genetic variants identified here or in expanded efforts, currently underway, may eventually lead to a diagnostic tool allowing for enhanced screening and clinical management of patients at risk of MPM, hence reducing elevated MPM-associated mortality. Additionally, our results further support thatMPM and SPM may have different genetics underpinnings and should be treated as separate clinical entities

The clinically atypical nevus (CAN) has long been a contentious entity in the dermatologic community, largely owing to its ability to clinically and histologically resemble melanoma. This has led some to assert that CAN are melanoma precursors. While studies have indicated that CAN mark persons at increased risk for melanoma, the lifetime risk of transformation of an individual nevus into a melanoma has been estimated to be far less than 1 in 1,000, with at least half of melanomas suggested to arise de novo rather than within a preexisting nevus. Despite this evidence, differing attitudes toward the biologic significance and malignant potential of CAN have resulted in substantial variation in management among clinicians. We conducted an IRB-approved survey to assess differences in the attitudes and practices among newly trained dermatologists compared with pigmented lesion specialists regarding the management of CAN. We surveyed 295 specialists from the International Dermoscopy Society (IDS) and 139 U.S. dermatology chief residents, with response rates of 57% (n = 168/295) and 59% (n = 82/139), respectively. Sixty-one percent of chief residents believe dermoscopy helps differentiate melanomas from benign lesions, yet only 39% believe they perform fewer biopsies with dermoscopy. Lacking evidence-based guidelines, most chief residents (68%) use <=1-mm margins in the initial biopsy of CAN, which may be suboptimal, while most IDS members (60%) use >=2-mm margins. There were substantial differences between IDS members and chief residents with respect to management of CAN after biopsy. For biopsies in which the margins came back free, 67% of chief residents would reexcise the site depending on the degree of histologic atypia, in contrast to only 11% of IDS members who would reexcise. The results of our survey noted considerable variability in the clinical management of CAN among specialist and novice dermatologists. The use of educational guidelines may assist in narrowing these practice gaps.
Copyright

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Biopsies of atypical melanocytic nevi are among the most commonly performed procedures by dermatologists. Margin assessment is often used to guide re-excision, but can be a point of confusion as negative margins reported in the planes of sections examined do not always reflect complete removal of a lesion. This study investigates the rates of false negative margins after both punch and shave biopsies. METHODS:We performed a retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive punch and shave biopsy specimens (1) diagnosed as DN, and (2) reported as having clear margins in the planes of section examined. Identified specimen blocks were then sectioned through to examine true margin involvement. RESULTS:Of the 50 specimens identified, 20% (n = 10) were found to have positive margins upon additional sectioning. We found no difference between the groups with respect to biopsy technique, type of nevus, degree of atypia, or gender. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study observed false negative peripheral margin status in a sizeable proportion of biopsy specimens, which did not vary significantly based on biopsy technique or pathologic characteristics. This finding reflects a limitation of standard tissue processing, in which a limited proportion of the true margin is evaluated, and may be of note to many dermatologists who base their decision to re-excise on the reporting of margin involvement. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(7):810-812.