Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Historically, patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) who fail to achieve remission at the end of induction (EOI) have had poor long-term survival. The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of contemporary therapy, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first remission (CR1). METHODS:Induction failure (IF) was defined as the persistence of at least 5% bone marrow (BM) lymphoblasts and/or extramedullary disease after 4-6 weeks of induction chemotherapy. Disease features and clinical outcomes were reported in 325 of 6,167 (5%) patients age 21 years and younger treated in 14 cooperative study groups between 2000 and 2018. RESULTS:= .10, respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Outcomes for patients age 21 years and younger with T-ALL and IF have improved in the contemporary treatment era with a DFS benefit among those undergoing HSCT in CR1. However, outcomes still lag considerably behind those who achieve remission at EOI, warranting investigation of new treatment approaches.

Cure rates for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most common childhood cancer have steadily improved over the past five decades. This is due to intensifying systemic therapy, recognizing and treating the central nervous system as a sanctuary site, and implementing modern risk stratification to deliver varying intensities of therapy based on age, presenting white blood count, sentinel somatic genetics, and therapy response. Recently, numerous Children's Oncology Group trials have demonstrated the lack of benefit of intensifying traditional chemotherapy, providing evidence that new approaches are needed to cure the patients for whom cure has been elusive. Distinguishing those who require intensive or novel therapeutic approaches from others who will be cured with minimal therapy is key for future trials. Incorporating new genomic biomarkers and more sensitive measures of minimal/measurable residual disease provide opportunities to achieve these goals.

Hematologic malignancy is a risk factor for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults; however, data specific to children with leukemia are limited. High-quality infectious adverse event data from the ongoing Children's Oncology Group (COG) standard-risk B acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL/LLy) trial, AALL1731, were analyzed to provide a disease-specific estimate of SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes in pediatric ALL. Of 253 patients with reported infections, the majority (77.1%) were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic (CTCAE grade 1/2) and there was a single COVID-19-related death. These data suggest SARS-CoV-2 infection does not confer substantial morbidity among young patients with B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-ALL/LLy).

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy, is efficacious in relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL (B-ALL) and has a favorable toxicity profile. One aim of the Children's Oncology Group AALL1331 study was to compare survival of patients with low-risk (LR) first relapse of B-ALL treated with chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus blinatumomab. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:After block 1 reinduction, patients age 1-30 years with LR first relapse of B-ALL were randomly assigned to block 2/block 3/two continuation chemotherapy cycles/maintenance (arm C) or block 2/two cycles of continuation chemotherapy intercalated with three blinatumomab blocks/maintenance (arm D). Patients with CNS leukemia received 18 Gy cranial radiation during maintenance and intensified intrathecal chemotherapy. The primary and secondary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS:= .53). Blinatumomab was well tolerated and patients had low adverse event rates. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:For children, adolescents, and young adults with B-ALL in LR first relapse, there was no statistically significant difference in DFS or OS between the blinatumomab and standard chemotherapy arms overall. However, blinatumomab significantly improved DFS and OS for the two thirds of patients with BM ± EM relapse, establishing a new standard of care for this population. By contrast, similar outcomes and poor DFS for both arms were observed in the one third of patients with IEM; new treatment approaches are needed for these patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02101853).

We measured minimal residual disease (MRD) by multiparameter flow cytometry at three time points (TP) in 117 infants with KMT2A (lysine [K]-specific methyltransferase 2A)-rearranged and 58 with KMT2A-germline acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) on Children's Oncology Group AALL0631 study. For KMT2A-rearranged patients, 3-year event-free survival (EFS) by MRD-positive (≥0.01%) versus MRD-negative (<0.01%) was: TP1: 25% (±6%) versus 49% (±7%; p = .0009); TP2: 21% (±8%) versus 47% (±7%; p < .0001); and TP3: 22% (±14%) versus 51% (±6%; p = .0178). For KMT2A-germline patients, 3-year EFS was: TP1: 88% (±12%) versus 87% (±5%; p = .73); TP2: 100% versus 88% (±5%; p = .24); and TP3: 100% versus 87% (±5%; p = .53). MRD was a strong independent outcome predictor in KMT2A-rearranged, but not KMT2A-germline infant ALL.

BACKGROUND:The outcome of children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph-positive) acute lymphoblastic leukaemia significantly improved with the combination of imatinib and intensive chemotherapy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of dasatinib, a second-generation ABL-class inhibitor, with intensive chemotherapy in children with newly diagnosed Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. METHODS:orally once daily from day 15 of induction. Patients with minimal residual disease of at least 0·05% after induction 1B or who were positive for minimal residual disease after the three consolidation blocks were classified as high risk and allocated to receive haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in first complete remission. The remaining patients were considered standard risk and received chemotherapy plus dasatinib for 2 years. The primary endpoint was the 3-year event-free survival of dasatinib plus chemotherapy compared with external historical controls. The trial was considered positive if one of the following conditions was met: superiority over chemotherapy alone in the AIEOP-BFM 2000 high-risk group; or non-inferiority (with a margin of -5%) or superiority to imatinib plus chemotherapy in the EsPhALL 2010 cohort. All participants who received at least one dose of dasatinib were included in the safety and efficacy analyses. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01460160, and recruitment is closed. FINDINGS/RESULTS:Between March 13, 2012, and May 27, 2014, 109 patients were enrolled at 69 sites (including 51 COG sites in the USA, Canada, and Australia, and 18 EsPhALL sites in Italy and the UK). Three patients were ineligible and did not receive dasatinib. 106 patients were treated and included in analyses (49 [46%] female and 57 [54%] male; 85 [80%] White, 13 [12%] Black or African American, five [5%] Asian, and three [3%] other races; 24 [23%] Hispanic or Latino ethnicity). All 106 treated patients reached complete remission; 87 (82%) were classified as standard risk and 19 (18%) met HSCT criteria and were classified as high risk, but only 15 (14%) received HSCT in first complete remission. The 3-year event-free survival of dasatinib plus chemotherapy was superior to chemotherapy alone (65·5% [90% Clopper-Pearson CI 57·7 to 73·7] vs 49·2% [38·0 to 60·4]; p=0·032), and was non-inferior to imatinib plus chemotherapy (59·1% [51·8 to 66·2], 90% CI of the treatment difference: -3·3 to 17·2), but not superior to imatinib plus chemotherapy (65·5% vs 59·1%; p=0·27). The most frequent grade 3-5 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (n=93) and bacteraemia (n=21). Nine remission deaths occurred, which were due to infections (n=5), transplantation-related (n=2), due to cardiac arrest (n=1), or had an unknown cause (n=1). No dasatinib-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:Dasatinib plus EsPhALL chemotherapy is safe and active in paediatric Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. 3-year event-free survival was similar to that of previous Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia trials despite the limited use of HSCT in first complete remission. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:Bristol Myers Squibb.

The benefit associated with the incorporation of vincristine-corticosteroid pulses into maintenance therapy for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is unclear, particularly in the context of modern intensive therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of reducing frequency of vincristine-steroid pulses during maintenance for newly diagnosed pediatric patients with B-cell ALL. Two authors reviewed all eligible studies identified through a comprehensive search, extracted data from the 25 included publications (12 513 patients), and assessed risk of bias. We created historical and contemporary subgroups; the latter included trials providing a version of Protocol III from early Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster trials and eliminating routine prophylactic cranial radiation. Meta-analysis of event-free survival data suggested no benefit between more frequent or less frequent pulses in contemporary trials (HR 0.96, 95%CI 0.85-1.09) which differs significantly from historical trials (HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.68-0.91, p=0.04). We found no significant impact of reduced pulse frequency on overall survival or relapse risk. There was however an increased odds of Grade 3+ non-hepatic toxicity in the high pulse frequency group (OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.12-1.52). This systematic review suggests that the previous benefit conferred by frequent pulses of vincristine-steroids in maintenance therapy for pediatric B-cell ALL in historical trials no longer applies in contemporary trials but is associated with toxicity. These results will help guide development of the next phase of clinical trials in the field of pediatric ALL and question the continued use of pulses in maintenance for patients not on clinical trials, particularly those experiencing toxicity.