Faculty Bibliography

Background: Factors contributing to recurrent instability and revision stabilization procedures after isolated arthroscopic stabilization of anterior glenohumeral instability have not been examined in a Statewide cohort. Additionally, practice patterns of the management of the failed Bankart repair are unclear. We sought to identify the type, rate and risk factors associated with subsequent ipsilateral shoulder procedures in a large cohort of individuals undergoing arthroscopic stabilizations for anterior shoulder instability. Methods: The New York State Department of Health's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative Systems (SPARCS) database was examined from 2003 to 2011 to identify all patients with a primary diagnosis of anterior shoulder instability (ICD-9-CM codes 831.01, 718.81 and 718.31) undergoing outpatient arthroscopic capsulorraphy (CPT code 29806). Patients younger than 10 or older than 60 years of age, and entries with missing data, were excluded. Patients were longitudinally followed for a minimum of three years (through 2014). Baseline demographics and all subsequent ipsilateral outpatient shoulder procedures were collected. SAS version 9.3 (Cary, NC) was used for data collection and statistical analysis. Results: We identified 5,719 unique patients who met the inclusion criteria. Mean patient age was 24.9 + /- 9.3 years, and 70.2% of the sample was male. A total of 461 (8.1%) patients underwent subsequent ipsilateral shoulder instability interventions a mean of 31.5 + /- 23.8 months after the initial stabilization procedure (2.1% had closed reduction alone; 6.0% had repeat instability surgery + /- closed reduction). Repeat arthroscopic capsulorraphy was the most common subsequent procedure (48.8%). Patients undergoing procedures for subsequent shoulder instability were younger (22.6 + /- 8.6 vs. 25.1 + /- 9.4 years of age, P < .001). Evidence of additional instability following arthroscopic Bankart was independently associated with age 19 years or younger (HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.50-2.21; P < .001), Caucasian ethnicity (HR 1.38; 95% CI 1.11-1.71; P = .003), evidence of bilateral shoulder instability (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.06-2.23; P = .023) and a history of closed reduction(s) prior to initial arthroscopic Bankart repair (HR 2.45; 95% CI 1.90-3.15 P = < .001). Gender and surgeon volume was not associated with subsequent instability procedures. When followup was normalized to three years to allow for between year comparisons, year of surgery did not predict subsequent shoulder instability. Conclusion: Patients undergoing arthroscopic stabilization of anterior glenohumeral instability in New York State had an 8.1% chance of undergoing subsequent ipsilateral instability procedures. Younger age, Caucasian race, bilateral glenohumeral instability and closed reduction prior to initial Bankart repair were independent risk factors for additional instability procedures. The most common second surgical procedure was a repeat arthroscopic stabilization (Table 1). (Table Presented)

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 3 patients (3 knees) with a delayed type hypersensitivity reaction following Dermabond exposure after an orthopaedic knee procedure. Delayed hypersensitivity reactions are mediated by CD4+ helper T cells. The use of skin adhesives in place of traditional sutures is increasing in popularity given Dermabond's potential benefits of decreased wound infection rate and better wound approximation. However, hypersensitivity reactions to the cyanoacrylate material in Dermabond have been described. Differentiating hypersensitivity reactions from post-operative infections is important as septic arthritis is a potentially devastating complication. This case series presents the challenge of properly diagnosing and managing hypersensitivity reactions. Consultation with allergists and dermatologists may be appropriate for ascertaining the nature of the surgical site complication and proper management. The recommended management of hypersensitivity-type reactions is a course of topical steroids and infection work up if needed.

Following a failed course of conservative management, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) has become the gold standard treatment for patients presenting with symptomatic rotator cuff (RC) tears. Traditionally, the single-row repair technique was used. Although most patients enjoy good to excellent clinical outcomes, structural healing to bone remains problematic. As a result, orthopaedic surgeons have sought to improve outcomes with various technological and technical advancements. One such possible advancement is the double-row technique. We present a method for repairing an RC tear using double-row suture anchors in a transosseous equivalent suture bridge technique. The double-row technique is believed to more effectively re-create the anatomic footprint of the tendon, as well as increase tendon to bone surface area, and apposition for healing. However, it requires longer operating times and is costlier. This report highlights this technique for ARCR in an adult by using a double-row transosseous equivalent suture bridge.

PURPOSE: To quantify the incidence of and identify the risk factors for subsequent shoulder procedures after isolated SLAP repair. METHODS: New York's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was searched between 2003 and 2014 to identify individuals with the sole diagnosis of a SLAP lesion who underwent isolated arthroscopic SLAP repair. Patients were longitudinally followed up for a minimum of 3 years to analyze for subsequent ipsilateral shoulder procedures. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2014, 2,524 patients met our inclusion criteria. After 3 to 11 years of follow-up, 10.1% of patients (254 of 2,524) underwent repeat surgical intervention on the same shoulder as the initial SLAP repair. The mean time to repeat shoulder surgery was 2.3 +/- 2.1 years. Subsequent procedures included subacromial decompression (35%), debridement (26.7%). repeat SLAP repair (19.7%), and biceps tenodesis or tenotomy (13.0%). After isolated SLAP repair, patients aged 20 years or younger were more likely to undergo arthroscopic Bankart repair (odds ratio [OR], 2.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-6.21; P = .005), whereas age older than 30 years was an independent risk factor for subsequent acromioplasty (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.7; P < .001) and distal clavicle resection (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1-5.5; P = .030). The need for a subsequent procedure was significantly associated with Workers' Compensation cases (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7-3.2; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a 10.1% incidence of subsequent surgery after isolated SLAP repair, often related to an additional diagnosis, suggesting that clinicians should consider other potential causes of shoulder pain when considering surgery for patients with SLAP lesions. In addition, the number of isolated SLAP repairs performed has decreased over time, and management of failed SLAP repair has shifted toward biceps tenodesis or tenotomy over revision SLAP repair in more recent years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

PURPOSE: To quantify the incidence and risk factors associated with subsequent shoulder procedures in individuals undergoing outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). METHODS: We examined the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative Systems outpatient database from 2003 through 2014 to identify patients undergoing isolated ARCR with or without concomitant acromioplasty. Patients were longitudinally followed up for a minimum of 2 years to determine the incidence of subsequent ipsilateral shoulder surgery. The impact of age, sex, insurance, concomitant acromioplasty, and tobacco use on reoperation was explored. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2012, 30,430 patients underwent isolated ARCR. The mean age was 56.6 +/- 11.5 years, and 55.1% were male patients. A total of 1,826 patients (6.0%) underwent subsequent ipsilateral outpatient shoulder surgery a mean of 24.3 +/- 27.1 months after the initial ARCR. Of patients who underwent repeat surgery, 57.3% underwent a revision cuff repair. Patients who underwent additional outpatient shoulder surgery were significantly younger (53.7 +/- 10.9 years v 56.8 +/- 11.5 years, P < .001). Tobacco use was associated with an increased rate of subsequent surgery (7.3% v 5.9%, P = .044) and accelerated time to reoperation (16.9 months v 24.7 months, P < .001). Independent risk factors for subsequent ipsilateral surgery after initial ARCR were presence of a Workers' Compensation claim (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.89-2.36; P < .001) and initial ARCR without acromioplasty (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.34; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a 6.0% incidence of repeat ipsilateral surgery after isolated ARCR. Although reasons for reoperation are likely multifactorial, younger age, Workers' Compensation claim, and absence of acromioplasty at the time of initial ARCR remained independent predictors of subsequent outpatient procedures, whereas a history of tobacco use was associated with accelerated time to subsequent surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Anterior shoulder dislocation in the athlete may result in an assortment of injuries that often benefit from surgical stabilization procedures. These injury patterns can be complex, requiring a multimodal approach to treatment. We present a rare case of a traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in a teenage athlete that resulted in humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament, rotator cuff tear, and axillary nerve palsy. Surgical treatment enabled return to football within 1 year of injury, and full function was restored.

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the capitellum is an articular cartilage lesion commonly affecting young adolescents. The exact mechanism for the development of these lesions is still uncertain; however, both traumatic and vascular etiologies have been described. Careful physical examination in conjunction with appropriate diagnostic studies helps the surgeon to classify these lesions as stable or unstable and leads to proper management. There is a diverse array of treatments available for OCD lesions of the capitellum, including fragment excision or fixation, bone marrow stimulation, and osteochondral autograft transplantation. This review helps the orthopaedic surgeon understand the diagnosis and management options available for OCD lesions of the capitellum.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) can provide excellent clinical results for patients who fail to respond to conservative management of symptomatic rotator cuff tears. ARCR, however, can be associated with severe postoperative pain and discomfort that requires adequate analgesia. As ARCR continues to shift toward being performed as an outpatient procedure, it is incumbent on physicians and ambulatory surgical centers to provide appropriate pain relief with minimal side effects to ensure rapid recovery and safe discharge. Although intravenous and oral opioids are the cornerstone of pain management after orthopedic procedures, they are associated with drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, and increased length of hospital stay. As health care reimbursements continue to become more intimately focused on quality, patient satisfaction, and minimizing of complications, the need for adequate pain control with minimal complications will continue to be a principal focus for providers and institutions alike. We present a review of alternative modalities for pain relief after ARCR, including cryotherapy, intralesional anesthesia, nerve blockade, indwelling continuous nerve block catheters, and multimodal anesthesia. In choosing among these modalities, physicians should consider patient- and system-based factors to allow the efficient delivery of analgesia that optimizes recovery and improves patient satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries of the elbow that require surgical management are uncommon. There is growing evidence, however, suggesting that the incidence of UCL reconstruction (UCLR) procedures is rapidly increasing. We sought to quantify the incidence of age-related trends for UCLR from 2003 to 2014 and subsequently to project future trends through 2025. We hypothesized that as the total number of UCLRs performed increased, a disproportionate incidence among younger patients would be observed. METHODS: New York State's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried from 2003 to 2014 to identify individuals between 10 and 40 years old undergoing UCLR. Poisson regression was used to develop future projections for UCLR and New York State population through 2025, and incidence estimates per 100,000 people were calculated. RESULTS: In New York State between 2003 and 2014, there were 890 patients who underwent UCLR, with average annual incidence per 100,000 people equaling 6.3 +/- 2.8 for ages 15 to 19 years, significantly greater than for all other age groups (P < .001). Projections from 2015 through 2025 suggest that incidence in 15- to 19-year-olds and 20- to 24-year-olds will continue to rapidly increase while rates for other age groups will remain relatively stable. CONCLUSIONS: The number of UCLRs performed between 2003 and 2014 increased by 343%, and a disproportionate trend in average annual incidence for patients between 15 and 19 years old was observed. As our review of the literature questioned outcomes in adolescent athletes after UCLR, continued attempts at preventing these injuries in the young throwing athlete remain paramount.

Purpose: To see if failure of arthroscopic shoulder stabilization can be predicted by the evaluation of bipolar bone loss on MRI Methods: A retrospective review of 39 consecutive patients (40 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for recurrent, traumatic, anterior shoulder instability was performed. There were a total of 40 MRIs from 39 patients (31males, 8 females, mean age 31.7 yrs.). Mean follow-up was 19 months. Pre-operative plain radiographs, MRI scans, operative reports, arthroscopic photos, and post-operative records were reviewed for each patient. Surgical failure was defined as recurrent shoulder dislocation and/or persistent apprehension during normal range of motion. Each preoperative MRI scan was evaluated for bipolar bone loss by one musculoskeletal radiologist using the on-track/off-track (OOT) method in which the glenoid track (GT) and Hill-Sachs interval (HSI) aremeasured. According to this technique, the GT is calculated as 0.83D-d in which "D" represents the diameter of the intact glenoid and "d" corresponds to the amount of glenoid bone loss. The HSI represents the width of the Hill-Sachs lesion plus the width of the intact bone bridge between the rotator cuff attachment and the lateral aspect of the Hill-Sachs lesion. All measurements were in millimeters. Lesions were considered "off-track" if the HSI exceeded the GT and "on-track" if the HSI was less than the GT. These findings were then compared to the corresponding post-operative outcomes. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Fisher exact test.
Result(s): Of the 40 shoulders evaluated, 6 were considered surgical failures (3 with recurrent dislocation and 3 with persistent apprehension). The OOT method correctly predicted 1 of these failures and falsely predicted 6 failures in shoulders that were clinically stable. There was no significant difference when comparing stable to unstable shoulders with regards to age, size of GTand HSI. Overall, the OOT method sensitivity was 16.7% (1/6), specificity 82.4% (28/34), positive predictive value 14.3% (1/7), negative predictive value 84.9% (28/33) and overall accuracy 72.5% (29/40).
Conclusion(s): MRI evaluation of bipolar (humeral and glenoid) bone loss using the on-track/off-track method is a moderately accurate and specific, but insensitive technique to predict surgical failure after arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for shoulder instability