Faculty Bibliography

Therapeutics for patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are urgently needed during the pandemic. Bamlanivimab is a potent neutralizing monoclonal antibody that blocks severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) attachment and entry into human cells, which could potentially lead to therapeutic benefit. J2W-MC-PYAA was a randomized, double-blind, sponsor unblinded, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose first-in-human trial (NCT04411628) in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. A total of 24 patients received either placebo or a single dose of bamlanivimab (700 mg, 2,800 mg, or 7,000 mg). The primary objective was assessment of safety and tolerability, including adverse events and serious adverse events, with secondary objectives of pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic analyses. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates were identical in the placebo and pooled bamlanivimab groups (66.7%). There were no apparent dose-related increases in the number or severity of TEAEs. There were no serious adverse events or deaths during the study, and no discontinuations due to adverse events. PKs of bamlanivimab is linear and exposure increased proportionally with dose following single i.v. administration. The half-life was ~ 17 days. These results demonstrate the favorable safety profile of bamlanivimab, and provided the initial critical evaluation of safety, tolerability, and PKs in support of the development of bamlanivimab in several ongoing clinical trials.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at risk of developing COVID-19 due to underlying immune abnormalities and regular use of immunosuppressant medications. We aimed to evaluate the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in patients with SLE with or without previous COVID-19-related symptoms or RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods/UNASSIGNED:For this analysis, we included patients with SLE from two cohorts based in New York City: the Web-based Assessment of Autoimmune, Immune-Mediated and Rheumatic Patients during the COVID-19 pandemic (WARCOV) study; and the NYU Lupus Cohort (a prospective registry of patients at NYU Langone Health and NYC Health + Hospitals/Bellevue). Patients in both cohorts were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies via commercially available immunoassays, processed through hospital or outpatient laboratories. Patients recruited from the NYU Lupus Cohort, referred from affiliated providers, or admitted to hospital with COVID-19 were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies as part of routine surveillance during follow-up clinical visits. Findings/UNASSIGNED:67 [24%] of 278). Other demographic variables, SLE-specific factors, and immunosuppressant use were not associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Of the 29 patients with COVID-19 previously confirmed by RT-PCR, 18 (62%) were on immunosuppressants; 24 (83%) of 29 patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Of 17 patients who had symptoms of COVID-19 but negative concurrent RT-PCR testing, one (6%) developed an antibody response. Of 26 patients who had COVID-19-related symptoms but did not undergo RT-PCR testing, six (23%) developed an antibody response. Of 83 patients who had no symptoms of COVID-19 and no RT-PCR testing, four (5%) developed an antibody response. Among 36 patients who were initially SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive, the majority maintained reactivity serially (88% up to 10 weeks, 83% up to 20 weeks, and 80% up to 30 weeks). Seven (70%) of ten patients with confirmed COVID-19 had antibody positivity beyond 30 weeks from disease onset. Interpretation/UNASSIGNED:Most patients with SLE and confirmed COVID-19 were able to produce and maintain a serological response despite the use of a variety of immunosuppressants, providing reassurance about the efficacy and durability of humoral immunity and possible protection against re-infection with SARS-CoV-2. Funding/UNASSIGNED:National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, and Bloomberg Philanthropies COVID-19 Response Initiative Grant.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the usefulness of biomarkers to predict the evolution of patients suspected of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), designated as probable SLE (pSLE), into classifiable SLE according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria. METHODS:Patients suspected of SLE were enrolled by lupus experts if they fulfilled three ACR criteria for SLE and were followed for approximately 1-3 years to evaluate transition into ACR-classifiable SLE. Individual cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs), serum complement proteins (C3 and C4), and autoantibodies were measured by flow cytometry, turbidimetry, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Blood levels of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) were measured by mass spectrometry. A multianalyte assay panel (MAP), which includes CB-CAPs, was also evaluated. A MAP of greater than 0.8 reflected the optimal cutoff for transition to SLE. Time to fulfillment of ACR criteria was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS:Of the 92 patients with pSLE enrolled, 74 had one or two follow-up visits 9-35 months after enrollment for a total of 128 follow-up visits. Overall, 28 patients with pSLE (30.4%) transitioned to ACR-classifiable SLE, including 16 (57%) in the first year and 12 (43%) afterwards. A MAP score of greater than 0.8 at enrollment predicted transition to classifiable SLE during the follow-up period (hazard ratio = 2.72; P = 0.012), whereas individual biomarkers or fulfillment of Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria did not. HCQ therapy was not associated with the prevention of transition to SLE. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Approximately one-third of patients with pSLE transitioned within the study period. MAP of greater than 0.8 predicted disease evolution into classifiable SLE.

OBJECTIVE:To assess the safety, mechanism of action, and preliminary efficacy of rituximab followed by belimumab in the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS:In a multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial, 43 patients with recurrent or refractory LN were treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide (CYC), and glucocorticoids followed by weekly belimumab infusions until week 48 (RCB group) or with rituximab and CYC but no belimumab infusions (RC group). Patients were followed up until week 96. Percentages of total and autoreactive B cell subsets in the patients' peripheral blood were analyzed by flow cytometry. RESULTS:Treatment with belimumab did not increase the incidence of adverse events in patients with refractory LN. At week 48, a complete or partial renal response occurred in 11 (52%) of 21 patients receiving belimumab, compared to 9 (41%) of 22 patients in the RC group who did not receive belimumab (P = 0.452). Lack of improvement in or worsening of LN was the major reason for treatment failure. B cell depletion occurred in both groups, but the percentage of B cells remained lower in those receiving belimumab (geometric mean number of B cells at week 60, 53 cells/μl in the RCB group versus 11 cells/μl in the RC group; P = 0.0012). Percentages of total and autoreactive transitional B cells increased from baseline to week 48 in both groups. However, percentages of total and autoreactive naive B cells decreased from baseline to week 48 in the belimumab group compared to the no belimumab RC group (P = 0.0349), a finding that is consistent with impaired maturation of naive B cells and enhanced censoring of autoreactive B cells. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The addition of belimumab to a treatment regimen with rituximab and CYC was safe in patients with refractory LN. This regimen diminished maturation of transitional to naive B cells during B cell reconstitution, and enhanced the negative selection of autoreactive B cells. Clinical efficacy was not improved with rituximab and CYC in combination with belimumab when compared to a therapeutic strategy of B cell depletion alone in patients with LN.

OBJECTIVE:To investigate long-term safety and tolerability of anifrolumab, a human monoclonal antibody to the type I interferon (IFN) receptor subunit 1, in patients with moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS:This 3-year, multinational, open-label extension (OLE) enrolled adult patients who completed treatment (48 weeks anifrolumab or placebo; 12-week follow-up) in the MUSE phase 2b randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients initially received intravenous anifrolumab 1000 mg every 4 weeks, reduced to 300 mg every 4 weeks based on the benefit/risk profile established in MUSE. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed monthly. Exploratory endpoints included SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), SLICC Damage Index (SDI), pharmacodynamics, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RESULTS:Of 246 patients who completed the RCT, 218 (88.6%) enrolled in the OLE; 139/218 (63.8%) completed 3 years of treatment. Approximately 69.7% of patients reported ≥1 AE during the first year of OLE treatment. Frequency and patterns of serious AEs and AEs of special interest over 3 years were consistent with those reported for 1 year of treatment in the RCT. Few patients (6.9%) discontinued treatment because of AEs. No new safety signals were identified. Improvement in SLEDAI-2K was sustained over 3 years. SDI and Short Form 36 Health Survey scores remained stable. Neutralization of type I IFN gene signatures was maintained in the IFN-high population, and C3, C4, and anti-dsDNA showed numeric trends toward sustained improvement. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Long-term anifrolumab treatment demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with sustained improvement in disease activity, HRQoL, and serologies.

Background/Purpose: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) represent a unique population in considering risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with biologic, genetic, demographic, clinical and treatment issues all at play. By the nature of their chronic inflammatory autoimmune condition and regular use of immunosuppressive medications, these individuals would traditionally be considered at high risk of contracting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and having a worse prognosis. Accordingly, we aimed to characterize patients with SLE affected by COVID-19 in New York City (NYC) and analyze associations of comorbidities and medications on outcomes.
Method(s): Patients with SLE and COVID-19 (confirmed by RT-PCR testing), were identified through a longitudinal survey of an established NYU lupus cohort, query of New York University Langone Health and Bellevue Hospitals systems and referrals from rheumatologists at those institutions. All patients were age 18 or older and met SLE classification criteria or carried a rheumatologist's diagnosis of SLE. Only English-, Spanish- or Mandarin-speaking patients were included in the study. Data were prospectively collected via a web-based questionnaire and review of electronic medical records. Baseline characteristics and medications were compared between the hospitalized and ambulatory patients with COVID-19. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of hospital admission.
Result(s): A total of 41 SLE patients were confirmed COVID-19 positive by RT-PCR. The patients were predominantly female and encompassed the major racial/ethnic demographics seen in NYC. The most common symptoms of COVID-19+ patients were cough (78.4%), fever (64.9%), and shortness of breath (64.9%). Of those SLE patients with COVID-19, 24 (59%) were hospitalized, 4 required ICU level of care, and 4 died, all of hypoxic respiratory failure, Table 1. Hospitalized patients tended to be older, non-white, Hispanic, and have higher BMI, antiphospholipid syndrome, a history of lupus nephritis and at least one medical comorbidity, Table 2. There was no difference between the groups in use of hydroxychloroquine, systemic steroids or immunosuppressants. Logistic regression analysis identified the following independent predictors of being hospitalized with COVID-19: race (OR = 7.78 for non-white vs. white; 95% CI: 1.13 to 53.58; p=0.037), the presence of at least one comorbidity (OR=4.66; 95% CI: 1.02 to 21.20; p=0.047), and BMI (OR = 1.08 per increase in kg/m2; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.18; p=0.096).
Conclusion(s): Patients with SLE and COVID-19 have a high rate of hospitalization but similar mortality rate to the general population in NYC. Risk factors such as non-white race, higher BMI, and the presence of one or more comorbidities were identified as independent predictors of hospitalization in SLE patients who develop COVID-19. The use of hydroxychloroquine and immunosuppressants did not appear to influence the outcomes of patients with SLE in the setting of COVID-19. Further studies are needed to understand additional risk factors for poor COVID-19 outcomes in patients with SLE

Background/Purpose: We reported previously (Ramsey-Goldman et al., Arthritis Rheumatol 2020) that score > 0.8 of a multianalyte assay panel (MAP) with algorithm predicts fulfillment of a 4th ACR criterion 9-18 months (median 12) after enrollment in patients with probable systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE). We continued to follow pSLE to better evaluate transition to classifiable SLE.
Method(s): pSLE, defined as fulfilling 3 ACR criteria, were followed at academic lupus centers. At enrollment, 35 (38%) of the 92 pSLE fulfilled SLICC criteria. CB-CAPs - C4d bound to erythrocytes (EC4d) and B-cells (BC4d) - were measured by quantitative flow cytometry, serum C3 and C4 by turbidimetry, and autoantibodies by ELISA. Anti-dsDNA positivity was confirmed by immunofluorescence (IFA). MAP index consists of an algorithm with CB-CAPs and autoantibodies (Dervieux et al., J Immunol Methods 2017). Initial decision analysis with Youden index showed that MAP > 0.8 and EC4d > 20 mean fluorescence intensity units (MFI) reflected the optimal cutoffs for transition to ACR classifiable SLE; the same cutoffs were used for analysis of all follow-up visits. Time to fulfillment of ACR criteria was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis; associations were analyzed by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model and are expressed as hazards ratio (HR).
Result(s): Of the 92 pSLE, 74 had 1 or 2 follow-up visits 9-35 months after enrollment for a total of 128 visits. Overall, 28 pSLE (30.4%) transitioned to ACR classifiable SLE: 16 (57%) in the 1st year and 12 (43%) in the 2nd. The clinical or laboratory features that defined fulfillment of ACR criteria are in Table 1. Use of hydroxychloroquine and immunosuppressants was similar in those who did and did not transition to SLE. Of the 17 subjects who accrued hematological criteria during the study (11 as the sole criterion and 6 as one of the new criteria), a minority were on immunosuppressants: 6 at enrollment, 5 at the 1st visit, and 3 at the 2nd. Neither SLICC criteria nor individual biomarkers were significantly associated with transition to SLE (Table 2). Only MAP > 0.8 had significantly high HR for transition to SLE; EC4d > 20 MFI, low complement, and anti-dsDNA were not significant (Table 2).
Conclusion(s): The majority of pSLE transitioned within a year. MAP > 0.8 predicted disease evolution into classifiable SLE better than other biomarkers or fulfillment of SLICC criteria

Background/Purpose: Disparities have been reported during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients represent a unique group that is affected by clinical, treatment, demographic, and socioeconomic (SES) risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease. The Neighborhood Deprivation Index has been associated with non-communicable disease as well as communicable disease outcomes. We conducted this study to identify neighborhood SES factors influencing SLE COVID-19 outcomes.
Method(s): Patients with SLE and COVID-19 (confirmed by RT-PCR testing), were identified through a longitudinal survey of an established NYU lupus cohort, query of NYU Langone Health and Bellevue Hospitals systems and referrals from rheumatologists at those institutions. All patients were age 18 or older and met SLE classification criteria or carried a clinical diagnosis of SLE. Baseline characteristics along with zip code neighborhood data including COVID-19 case rates and neighborhood characteristics were obtained using the Hopkins COVID database and the American Community Surveys (ACS 2014-2018) respectively. A principal component analysis was performed to identify contributory neighborhood characteristics. Then a logistic regression analysis identified predictors of testing positive for COVID-19 and COVID-19 hospitalization.
Result(s): A total of 59 SLE patients (41+ and 18-) were tested for COVID-19 by RT-PCR. The patients were predominantly female, aged 46+/-16, and racially/ethnically diverse. Roughly 140 neighborhood data points were recorded and categorized as follows: population density, race and ethnicity, household type, household size, education level, employment type and status, income and poverty, transportation method, and insurance status. COVID-19 positive patients tended to live in neighborhoods with more single parent households, households with >4 residents, higher unemployment rate, higher high school dropout rate, more public transit use, and more employment in retail, construction, and personal care services. These variables were directly proportional to principal component 1 (PC1) and accounted for 88% of the variance in neighborhood characteristics. A logistic regression model identified that PC1 (OR= 1.3; 95% CI: 1.0-1.8) and taking immune suppressants (IS) (taking vs not taking OR= 2.1; 95% CI: 1.5 to 23.3) independently correlated with having a positive COVID-19 test when controlling for hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), glucocorticoids (GC), and previous lupus nephritis (LN). Only PC1 independently correlated with COVID-19 hospitalization (OR= 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1-1.9) upon controlling for taking IS, HCQ, GCs, and LN. PC1 associated with African American (AA) or Hispanic patient race/ethnicity (OR= 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2-2.2).
Conclusion(s): In addition to SLE disease, neighborhood characteristics and SES are important risk factors both for contracting COVID-19 and developing severe disease. Neighborhood deprivation may mediate the reported relationship between AA and Hispanic race/ethnicity and COVID-19. Given that a plurality of SLE patients are of AA and/or Hispanic backgrounds, care teams must formulate strategies to address socioeconomic stress in our patients

Background/Purpose: Neonatal Lupus (NL) is a model of passively acquired autoimmunity conferred by exposure to maternal anti-Ro antibodies with major manifestations being congenital heart block (CHB) and/or cutaneous disease. This study was initiated to address the development of de novo autoimmunity in these children and identify associated clinical and genetic risk factors.
Method(s): In a retrospective cohort study of enrollees in the Research Registry for Neonatal Lupus (RRNL), 511 children exposed to anti-Ro in utero responded to a follow up questionnaire focused on symptoms of autoimmunity. Self-reported diseases were confirmed via medical record review. Bivariate analyses were performed with potential risk factors for the development of autoimmune disease (AD) and included the NL status per se, a disease severity score based on mortality risk factors, and maternal AD (inclusive of lupus, Sjogren's syndrome, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, or thyroid disease). A subset of 99 CHB, 9 cutaneous, and 55 unaffected anti-Ro exposed RRNL individuals were genotyped at Class II HLA DRB1 and DQB1 four-digit alleles, which were assigned by imputation (HIBAG) or sequencing. Generalized estimating equations (logit link, exchangeable correlation) were used to test for associations between HLA alleles and the development of AD.
Result(s): Of the respondents, 182 offspring had CHB, 95 had cutaneous only NL and 234 were siblings without NL. Females comprised 53% and 80% were Caucasian. The mean age was 14.2+/-9.7; 4% age 0-2 years, 48% 2-13 years, and 47% > 13 years. An AD developed in 38 offspring (20 CHB, 7 cutaneous NL, 11 non-NL siblings; Table 1). The most prevalent AD was thyroid disease. The development of an AD was significantly associated with presence of CHB vs. cutaneous only or non-NL siblings (11% vs. 5%, p=0.033). The maternal health status did not influence the development of an AD in the child (7% mothers with AD vs. 6% asymptomatic mothers, p=0.67). Mean NL severity score was higher in offspring with AD (3.8+/-4.8 vs. 2.2+/-4.0, p= 0.031). Other markers of fetal CHB disease severity were associated with subsequent AD development, including in-utero exposure to fluorinated steroids (15% vs. 6%, p=0.088) and beta agonists such as terbutaline (23% vs. 9%, p=0.043). In the study of 163 RRNL cases with HLA data (20 with AD, 143 without), HLA DRB1*03:01 (OR 3.4, CI 1.46-7.90, p=0.0045), DQA1*05:01 (OR 3.39, CI 1.16-9.92, p=0.0262), and DQB1*02:01 (OR 4.28, CI 1.73-10.62, p=0.0017) were associated with increased risk of AD (of note, these loci are in high linkage disequilibrium). In contrast, these alleles were not significantly associated with development of CHB (99 CHB vs. 64 without).
Conclusion(s): The development of an autoimmune disease was more common in anti-Ro exposed children with CHB, greater NL severity, and MHC Class II haplotypes. These factors may relate to an inherent susceptibility to inflammation and fibrosis, occuring in utero and later in life

Background/Purpose: Based on inhibition of viral replication and limited reports on clinical efficacy, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was initially considered as a prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. Despite this optimism, more extensive reports have significantly dampened the promise of efficacy, however cardiac toxicity has surfaced raising attention to this complication. Although HCQ is generally considered safe during pregnancy based on studies in patients with systemic lupus erythematous and other rheumatic conditions, this initiative leveraged a unique opportunity to evaluate neonatal electrocardiograms (ECGs) in the context of HCQ levels to address any potential cardiotoxicity.
Method(s): Neonatal ECGs and HCQ blood levels were available in a recently completed study evaluating the efficacy of HCQ 400mg daily to prevent the recurrence of congenital heart block associated with anti-SSA/Ro antibodies. The ECGs of affected newborns who met the primary outcome of advanced block were not included in this safety study so that the results only reflect those infants with no clinical cardiac disease. Using the Bazett formula to correct for heart rate, corrected QT (QTc) intervals were calculated and compared to age-matched normal values. For reference, the median (2nd percentile - 98th percentile) values for QTc were 413 (378-448) msec in males, and 420 (379-462) msec in females. QTc intervals were recorded in the absence of knowledge of the HCQ levels. Values exceeding 448 msec for males and 462 msec for females were considered abnormal. Levels of HCQ were assessed during each trimester of pregnancy and in the cord blood, providing unambiguous assurance of drug exposure.
Result(s): There were 45 ECGs available for interpretation within the first 4 months of life in unaffected infants. Overall, there was no correlation between cord blood levels of HCQ and the QTc (R = 0.02, P = 0.86) or the average value of HCQ levels obtained during each individual pregnancy and cord blood and the QTc (R = 0.04, P = 0.80), as shown in Figure 1A and Figure 1B. Likewise there was no correlation between the average of the maternal HCQ levels obtained at each trimester and delivery plus cord levels and the QTc on the ECGs of the 31 infants evaluated on day of life 1-4 (R = 0.08, P = 0.63) or those of the 14 children older than 4 days (R = 0.01, P = 0.95). Maternal values of HCQ were sustained throughout pregnancy and delivery (Figure 2). Mean QTc values were nearly identical between those in the highest and lowest quartiles of cord blood HCQ levels (P = 0.57) and between the highest and lowest quartiles of average HCQ levels during pregnancy (P = 0.54) (Figure 3A and 3B). Among these 45 infants, only 5 had prolongation of the QTc (11%; 95% CI: 4% - 24%), 2 marked and 3 marginal. No arrhythmias occurred in any neonate that was not known to have heart block.
Conclusion(s): In aggregate, these data provide reassurances that the maternal use of HCQ is not associated with a high incidence of QTc prolongation in the neonate