Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with foci of invasion measuring ≤ 1 mm (DCISM), represents < 1% of all invasive breast cancers. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been a standard component of surgery for patients with invasive carcinoma or extensive DCIS. We hypothesize that selective performance of SLNB may be appropriate given the low incidence of sentinel node (SN) metastasis for DCISM. We investigated the clinicopathologic predictors for SN positivity in DCISM, to identify which patients might benefit from SLNB. METHODS:A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database was performed for cases from 2012 to 2015. Clinical and tumor characteristics, including SN results, were evaluated, and Pearson's Chi square tests and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS:Of 7803 patients with DCISM, 306 (4%) had at least one positive SN. Patients with positive SNs were younger, more often of Black race, had higher-grade histology and larger tumor size, and were more likely to have lymphovascular invasion (LVI; all p < 0.001). In an adjusted model, the presence of LVI was associated with the highest odds ratio (OR) for node positivity (OR 8.80, 95% confidence interval 4.56-16.96). CONCLUSIONS:Among women with DCISM, only 4% had a positive SN. Node positivity was associated with more extensive and higher-grade DCIS, and the presence of LVI was strongly correlated with node positivity. Our data suggest that LVI is the most important factor in determining which patients with DCISM will benefit from SN biopsy.

BACKGROUND:Growing evidence suggests that the tumor immune microenvironment influences breast cancer development and prognosis. Density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) within invasive breast cancer is correlated with response to therapy, especially in triple-negative disease. The clinical relevance and outcomes of TILs within ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are less understood. METHODS:Our institutional database of 668 patients with pure DCIS from 2010 to 2018 was queried. TILs were evaluated by International TILs Working Group guidelines. Percentage of TILs was assessed from the densest focus (hotspot) in one high-power field of stroma touching the basement membrane. Statistical methods included cluster analyses (to define sparse versus dense TILs), logistic, and Cox regression models. RESULTS:Sixty-nine patients with DCIS and TILs were evaluated, of whom 54 (78%) were treated by breast-conserving surgery. Thirteen (19%) patients had ipsilateral recurrence. Each recurrence (n = 13) was matched to four controls (n = 56) based on date of surgery. Median follow-up was 6.7 years. TILs were defined as sparse (< 45%) or dense (≥ 45%). Dense TILs were associated with younger age (p = 0.045), larger tumor size (p < 0.001), high nuclear grade (p = 0.010), comedo histology (p = 0.033), necrosis (p = 0.027), estrogen receptor (ER) negativity (p = 0.037), and ipsilateral recurrence (p = 0.001). Nine patients with dense TILs had mean time to recurrence of 73.5 months compared with four patients with sparse TILs with mean time to recurrence of 97.9 months (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS:Dense TILs were significantly associated with age, tumor size, nuclear grade, comedo histology, necrosis, and ER status and was a significant predictor of recurrence in patients with pure DCIS.

Background/Objective: Growing evidence suggests that tumor immune-microenvironment influences breast cancer carcinogenesis and prognosis. Density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) within invasive breast cancer correlates with response to therapy, especially in triple-negative disease. The clinical relevance and outcomes of TILs within ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is less understood.
Method(s): Our institutional database was queried for pure DCIS from 2010-2018 (n=668). Local recurrences (n=13) were matched 1:4 to patients without recurrence. TILs were evaluated by the International TILs Working Group Guidelines. Percentage of TILs was assessed from the densest focus in 1 high-power field of stroma touching the basement membrane. Statistical methods included cluster analyses, logistic, and Cox regression models.
Result(s): Sixty-nine patients, including the 13 recurrences were evaluated. Fifty-four (78%) were treated by breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The median follow-up was 6.7 years. TILs were defined as sparse (<45%) and dense (>=45%). Dense TILs was associated with younger age (p=0.045), larger tumor size (p<0.001), high nuclear grade (p<0.001), comedo histology (p=0.016), necrosis (p=0.038), and recurrence (p=0.001). Nine patients with dense TILs had a mean time to recurrence of 74 months compared to 4 patients with sparse TILs who had a mean time to recurrence of 93 months (p=0.044) (Figure).
Conclusion(s): We found that dense TILs in DCIS was significantly associated with age, tumor size, grade, and histology. Most importantly, dense TILs are a significant predictor of recurrence in patients with DCIS, which underlies the prognostic importance of the immune microenvironment of early breast cancers. (Figure Presented)

BACKGROUND:A positive lumpectomy margin after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a significant predictor for ipsilateral cancer recurrence. The MarginProbe, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved device for intraoperative assessment of lumpectomy margins, is associated with a reduction in re-excision surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of mammographic breast density (MBD) and clinicopathologic characteristics with margin status in women undergoing BCS with the MarginProbe. METHODS:The institutional database was queried for patients with breast cancer who had BCS with the MarginProbe from 2013 to 2017. Clinicopathologic characteristics were collected. The study defined MBD as less dense (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] A and B) and more dense (BI-RADS C and D). A positive margin was defined as smaller than 1 mm. Pearson Chi square and uni- and multivariate logistic regression were performed. RESULTS:Of 1734 patients, 341 met the study criteria. The median patient age was 63 years. The patients with higher mammographic density were younger (p < 0.0001) and had a lower body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.0001). The patients with higher MBD were more likely to present with a palpable mass (p = 0.0360). Of the 341 patients, 135 (39.6%) had one or more positive margins on the main specimen, and 101 (74.8%) were converted to final negative margins after the MarginProbe directed re-excisions. Positive final margins were associated with larger tumor size (p = 0.0242) and more advanced stage of disease at diagnosis (p = 0.0255). CONCLUSIONS:In this study of patients undergoing BCS, breast density was not correlated with the likelihood of a positive margin. The presence of positive final lumpectomy margins was associated with older age and more extensive disease.

Disparities in breast cancer treatment have been documented in young and underserved women. This study aimed to determine whether surgical disparities exist among young breast cancer patients by comparing cancer treatment at a public safety-net hospital (BH) and private cancer center (PCC) within a single institution. This was a retrospective study of young women (<45) diagnosed with invasive breast cancer (stage I-III) from 2011-2016. Patient information was abstracted from the breast cancer database at BH and PCC. Demographic variables, surgery type, method of presentation, and stage were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square tests and binary logistic regression. A total of 275 patients between ages 25-45 with invasive breast cancer (Stage I-III) were included in the study. There were 69 patients from BH and 206 patients from PCC. At PCC, the majority of patients were Caucasian (68%), followed by Asian (11%), Hispanic (10%), and African American (8.7%). At BH, patients were mostly Hispanic (47.8%), followed by Asian (27.5%), and African American (10.1%). At PCC, 82% had a college/graduate degree versus 18.6% of patients at BH (P < 0.001). All patients at PCC reported English as their primary language versus 30% of patients at BH (P < 0.001). Patients at PCC were more likely to present with lower stage cancer (P = 0.04), and less likely to present with a palpable mass (P = 0.04). Hospital type was not a predictor of receipt of mastectomy (P = 0.5), nor was race, primary language, or education level. Of patients who received a mastectomy, 87% at BH and 76% at PCC had immediate reconstruction. Surgical management of young women with breast cancer in a public hospital versus private hospital setting was equivalent, even after controlling for race, primary language, stage, and education level.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Genomic assays, or tissue gene profiling tests, are widely used to predict recurrence of early stage invasive breast cancer and guide systemic therapy. The purpose of our study was to examine the current national trends of genomic testing in male breast cancer (MBC) and its association with systemic therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:The National Cancer Database (NCDB) includes 6227 cases of pathologic T1/T2 and N0/N1 MBC from 2008 to 2014 with known genomic testing status. Results of the tests were grouped as low, intermediate, and high risk of recurrence scores (RRS). Statistical analysis included multivariate logistic regression and Chi-square tests. A supplemental analysis in female breast cancer was provided as reference. RESULTS:Of the 6227 cases of MBC age 18-90, 1478 (23.74%) underwent genomic testing. Testing was significantly associated with age, race, tumor grade, year of diagnosis, receptor status, and nodal status. Distribution of RRS in MBC was 59.3% low, 27.4% intermediate, and 13.3% high. RRS in men were significantly associated with tumor grade and size, but not nodal status. Those with a low RRS were 7-times more likely to be treated with hormone therapy alone (AOR 7.18, CI 5.78-8.91, P < 0.001). Those with a high RRS were five times more likely to receive a combination of hormone and chemotherapy (AOR 5.16, CI 3.60-7.40, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Rates of testing and distribution of RRS in men and women with early stage invasive breast cancer are similar. Treatment patterns in MBC varied significantly based on genomic testing results, even when adjusted for other clinicopathologic features. Further investigation is required to determine the prognostic and predictive nature of genomic testing in male breast cancer.