Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Increased load bearing across the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral articulations has been associated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) complications. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify the biomechanical characteristics of the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joints and simulate varying weight-bearing demands after posterior cruciate ligament-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) TKAs. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (average age, 68.4 years; range, 40-86 years) were tested using a custom knee system with muscle-loading capabilities. The TKA knees were tested with a CR and then a PS TKA implant and were loaded at 6 different flexion angles from 15° to 90° with progressively increasing loads. The independent variables were the implant types (CR and PS TKA), progressively increased loading, and knee flexion angle (KFA). The dependent variables were the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral kinematics and contact characteristics. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The results showed that at higher KFAs, the position of the femur translated significantly more posterior in CR implants than in PS implants (36.6 ± 5.2 mm and 32.5 ± 5.7 mm, respectively). The patellofemoral contact force and contact area were significantly greater in PS than in CR implants at higher KFAs and loads (102.4 ± 12.5 N and 88.1 ± 10.9 N, respectively). Lastly, the tibiofemoral contact force was significantly greater in the CR than the PS implant at flexion angles of 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90° KFA, the average at these flexion angles for all loads tested being 246.1 ± 42.1 N and 192.8 ± 54.8 N for CR and PS implants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:In this biomechanical study, CR TKAs showed less patellofemoral contact force, but more tibiofemoral contact force than PS TKAs. For higher loads across the joint and at increased flexion angles, there was significantly more posterior femur translation in the CR design with a preserved posterior cruciate ligament and therefore significantly less patellofemoral contact area and force than in the PS design. The different effects of loading on implants are an important consideration for physicians as patients with higher load demands should consider the significantly greater patellofemoral contact force and area of the PS over the CR design.

BACKGROUND:Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) occurs in 4% of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Anti-inflammatory medications may target arthrofibrosis pathogenesis, but the data are limited. This multicenter randomized clinical trial investigated the effect of adjuvant anti-inflammatory medications with MUA and physical therapy on range of motion (ROM) and outcomes. METHODS:There were 124 patients (124 TKAs) who developed stiffness after primary TKA for osteoarthritis enrolled across 15 institutions. All received MUA when ROM was < 90° at 4 to 12 weeks postoperatively. Randomization proceeded via a permuted block design. Controls received MUA and physical therapy, while the treatment group also received one dose of pre-MUA intravenous dexamethasone (8 mg) and 14 days of oral celecoxib (200 mg). The ROM and clinical outcomes were assessed at 6 weeks and 1 year. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. RESULTS:The ROM significantly improved a mean of 46° from a pre-MUA ROM of 72 to 118° immediately after MUA (P < .001). The ROM was similar between the treatment and control groups at 6 weeks following MUA (101 versus 99°, respectively; P = .35) and at one year following MUA (108 versus 108°, respectively; P = .98). Clinical outcomes were similar at both end points. CONCLUSIONS:In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, the addition of intravenous dexamethasone and a short course of oral celecoxib after MUA did not improve ROM or outcomes. However, MUA provided a mean ROM improvement of 46° immediately, 28° at 6 weeks, and 37° at 1 year. Further investigation in regards to dosing, duration, and route of administration of anti-inflammatory medications remains warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level 1, RCT.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The influence of prior colostomy or ileostomy on patients undergoing joint arthroplasty remains poorly understood. Our study aimed to assess whether patients with an ostomy undergoing hip and knee arthroplasties have worse postoperative outcomes and increased rates of revisions. METHOD/METHODS:A single-center, retrospective review of patients with a history of bowel ostomy who underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from 2012 to 2021. A total of 24 THAs, 11 HAs, and 25 TKAs in patients with open small or large bowel stoma were identified. A ten-to-one propensity score match was utilized to establish cohorts with comparable demographics but no prior ostomy procedure. RESULTS:Patients with stomas undergoing elective THA showed greater 90-day ED visits (20.0 vs. 5.0%, P = 0.009), 90-day all-cause readmissions (20.0 vs. 5.0%, P = 0.009), 90-day non-orthopedic readmissions (10.0 vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001), 90-day readmissions for infection (5.0 vs. 0.5%, P = 0.043), all-cause revisions (15.0 vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001), revisions for PJI (5.0 vs. 0%, P = 0.043), and revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (10.0 vs. 0%, P < 0.001). Patients with stomas undergoing non-elective hip arthroplasties exhibited a longer mean LOS (12.1 vs. 7.0 days, P < 0.001) and increased 90-day all-cause readmissions (40.0 vs. 17.3%, P = 0.034), 90-day orthopedic readmissions (26.7 vs. 6.0%, P = 0.005), all-cause revisions (13.3 vs. 2.0%, P = 0.015), revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (6.7 vs. 0%, P = 0.002), and revisions for aseptic loosening (6.7 vs. 0%, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in readmission or revision rates between ostomy patients undergoing TKA and a matched control group. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing hip arthroplasties with an open stoma are at an increased risk of hospital encounters and revisions, whereas TKA patients with stomas are not at increased risk of complications. These findings emphasize the importance of recognizing and addressing the unique challenges associated with this patient population.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of orthopaedics has been a topic of increasing interest and opportunity in recent years. Its applications are widespread both for physicians and patients, including use in clinical decision-making, in the operating room, and in research. In this study, we aimed to assess the quality of ChatGPT answers when asked questions related to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS:ChatGPT prompts were created by turning 15 of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Clinical Practice Guidelines into questions. An online survey was created, which included screenshots of each prompt and answers to the 15 questions. Surgeons were asked to grade ChatGPT answers from 1 to 5 based on their characteristics: 1) Relevance; 2) Accuracy; 3) Clarity; 4) Completeness; 5) Evidence-based; and 6) Consistency. There were eleven Adult Joint Reconstruction fellowship-trained surgeons who completed the survey. Questions were subclassified based on the subject of the prompt: 1) risk factors, 2) implant/Intraoperative, and 3) pain/functional outcomes. The average and standard deviation for all answers, as well as for each subgroup, were calculated. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) was also calculated. RESULTS:All answer characteristics were graded as being above average (i.e., a score > 3). Relevance demonstrated the highest scores (4.43±0.77) by surgeons surveyed, and consistency demonstrated the lowest scores (3.54±1.10). ChatGPT prompts in the Risk Factors group demonstrated the best responses, while those in the Pain/Functional Outcome group demonstrated the lowest. The overall IRR was found to be 0.33 (poor reliability), with the highest IRR for relevance (0.43) and the lowest for evidence-based (0.28). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:ChatGPT can answer questions regarding well-established clinical guidelines in TKA with above-average accuracy but demonstrates variable reliability. This investigation is the first step in understanding large language model (LLM) AIs like ChatGPT and how well they perform in the field of arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND:Sleep impairment following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is common and may decrease patient satisfaction and recovery. Standardized postoperative recommendations for sleep disturbances have not been established. We aimed to assess whether melatonin use could promote healthy sleep and reduce sleep disturbance in the acute period following TKA. METHODS:Patients undergoing primary, elective TKA between July 19, 2021 and January 4, 2024 were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either 5 mg of melatonin nightly or placebo for 14 days postoperatively. Participants recorded their nightly pain on the visual analog scale, the number of hours slept, and the number of nighttime awakenings in a sleep diary starting the night of surgery (postoperative day [POD] 0). Sleep disturbance was assessed preoperatively and on POD 14 using the patient-reported outcome measurement information system sleep disturbance form. Epworth Sleepiness Scores were collected on POD 14 to assess sleep quality. RESULTS:Of the 138 patients enrolled, 128 patients successfully completed the study protocol, with 64 patients in each group. Melatonin patients trended towards more hours of sleep on POD 2 (placebo: 5.0 ± 2.4, melatonin: 5.8 ± 2.0, P = 0.084), POD 3 (placebo: 5.6 ± 2.2, melatonin: 6.3 ± 2.0, P = 0.075), and averaged over POD 1 to 3 (placebo: 4.9 ± 2.0, melatonin: 5.6 ± 1.8, P = 0.073), though no differences were observed on POD 4 or after. Fewer nighttime awakenings in the melatonin group were observed on POD 1 (placebo: 4.4 ± 3.9, melatonin: 3.6 ± 2.4, P = 0.197), although this was not statistically significant. Preoperative and postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance (PROMIS-SD) score increases were comparable for both groups (placebo: 4.0 ± 8.4, melatonin: 4.6 ± 8.2, P = 0.894). The melatonin (65.4%) and placebo (65%) groups demonstrated similar rates of increased sleep disturbance. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Melatonin may promote longer sleep in the immediate postoperative period after TKA, though these benefits wane after POD 3. Disturbances in sleep should be expected for most patients, though melatonin may have an attenuating effect. Melatonin is safe and can be considered for TKA patients experiencing early sleep disturbances postoperatively.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has predominantly been utilized to treat older patients with primary osteoarthritis. However, recent improvements in surgical technique and implant materials have increased implant longevity, making THA a viable option for younger patients (< 30 years old). While trend analyses indicate an expanding utilization of THA in younger patients with non-OA diagnoses, current data on mid- and long-term THA outcomes in this population are limited. This study aims to describe the demographics, perioperative data, and implant survivorship of patients younger than 30 years undergoing THA. METHODS:A retrospective study across two large urban academic medical institutions identified 135 patients aged < 30 years who underwent 155 primary THAs between 2012 and 2017, with up to 10-year clinical follow-up. Baseline demographics, surgical indications, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS:The mean age at surgery was 24.9 years (range 18-29). Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (55.5%), developmental hip dysplasia (28.3%), and arthritis (15.5%) were the primary indications. Most surgeries utilized the posterior approach (64.5%), manual technique (65.8%), and Ceramic-on-Polyethylene articulation (71.6%). Seven patients (4.5%) were readmitted within 90-days of surgery, including three non-orthopedic-related readmissions (1.9%) and four orthopedic-related readmissions (2.6%). Dislocations were reported in two patients (1.3%). There were six all-cause revisions (3.9%), four aseptic (2.6%) and two septic (1.3%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed 10-year survival from implant retaining reoperation was 98.7%, 10-year survival from all-cause revision was 96.1%, and 10-year survival from aseptic revision was 97.4%. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:With a 10-year aseptic implant survivorship rate of 97.4%, THA is a reliable surgical intervention for patients younger than 30 years of age who have severe hip pathology. Further studies are warranted for a more comprehensive understanding of mid- and long-term survivorship risk factors in this demanding population, facilitating improved risk assessment and informed surgical decisions.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Following removal of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the inpatient only (IPO) list by the Center for Medicare Services (CMS), arthroplasty surgeons face increased pressure to perform procedures on an outpatient (OP) basis. The purposes of the present study were to compare patients booked for THA as OP who required conversion to IP status postoperatively, to patients who were booked as, and remained OP, and to identify factors predictive of conversion from OP to IP status. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent a primary THA at our institution between January 1, 2020 and April 26, 2022. All patients included were originally scheduled for OP surgery and were separated based on conversion to IP status postoperatively. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine the significance of all perioperative variables. Modeling via binary logistic regressions were used to determine factors predictive of status conversion. RESULTS:Of 1,937 patients, 372 (19.2%) designated as OP preoperatively required conversion to IP status postoperatively. These patients had significantly higher facility discharge rates (P < 0.001) and 90-day readmission rates (P = 0.024). Patients aged 65 and older (P < 0.001), females (P < 0.001), patients with Black/African American race (P = 0.027), with a recovery room arrival time after 12 pm (P < 0.001), with a BMI > 30 kg/m2 (P = 0.001), and with a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 4 (P = 0.013) were Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation more likely to require conversion to IP designation. Marital status and time of procedure were also significant factors, as patients who were married (P < 0.001) and who were the first case of the day (P < 0.001) were less likely to be converted to IP. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Several factors were identified which could help determine appropriate hospital designation status at the time of surgical booking to ultimately avoid insurance claim denials. These included BMI, certain demographic factors, CCI ≥ 4, and patients 65 or older. LEVEL III EVIDENCE/METHODS:Retrospective Cohort Study.

Culture-positive (CP) and culture-negative (CN) periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) remain a crucial area of research; however, current studies comparing these infections rely on unstandardized outcome reporting tools. Our study aimed to compare the outcomes of two-stage revision of CP and CN PJI using the standardized Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) outcome reporting tool. We retrospectively reviewed 138 patients who were diagnosed with PJI and indicated for two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The majority of patients in both CP and CN cohorts achieved infection control without the need for reoperation (54.1% and 62.5%, respectively). There was a significant difference in the overall distribution of MSIS outcomes (p = 0.043), with a significantly greater rate of CN patients falling into Tier 1 (infection control without the use of suppressive antibiotics) (52.5% versus 29.6%, p = 0.011). There was also a significant difference in the distribution of septic versus aseptic reoperations after 2nd stage (p = 0.013), with more CP reoperations being septic and more CN reoperations being aseptic. The duration from first to second stage was significantly shorter in the CN cohort (p = 0.002). While overall infection control was similar between cohorts, these data suggest that the outcomes of two-stage rTKA are favorable in cases of CN PJI.

BACKGROUND:Financial analyses of simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty versus staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (simBTKA and staBTKA, respectively) have shown improved cost-effectiveness of simBTKA, though revenue and contribution margin (CM) for these procedures have not been investigated. Our analyses compared surgical outcomes, revenues, and CMs between simBTKA and staBTKA. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent simBTKA (both procedures done on the same day) and staBTKA (procedures done on a different day within one year) between 2012 and 2021. Patients were 1:1 propensity matched based on baseline characteristics. Surgical outcomes, as well as revenue, cost, and CM of the inpatient episode were compared between groups. Of the 2,357 patients evaluated (n = 595 simBTKA, n = 1,762 staBTKA), 410 were included in final matched analyses (205 per group). RESULTS:Total (P < .001) and direct (P < .001) costs were significantly lower for simBTKA procedures compared to overall costs of both staBTKA procedures. Significantly lower revenue for simBTKA procedures (P < .001), resulted in comparable CM between groups (P = .477). Postoperative complications including 90-day readmission (P = 1.000), 90-day revision (P = 1.000) and all-cause revision at latest follow-up (P = .083) were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS:In our propensity-matched cohort, lower costs for simBTKA compared to staBTKA were matched by lower revenues, with a resulting similar CM between procedures. Given that postoperative complication rates were similar, both procedures had comparable cost-effectiveness. Future research is needed to identify patients for whom simBTKA may represent a better surgical intervention compared to staBTKA with respect to clinical and patient reported outcomes.