Faculty Bibliography

Introduction: The treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial, and treatment approaches include surgery, post-lumpectomy radiation therapy (RT), and/or hormonal therapy for prevention of recurrent disease. These decisions may be particularly difficult for patients with minimal disease. There is a dearth of information regarding patients who have been diagnosed with DCIS on core-needle biopsy (CNB) who have no residual disease in the area at surgery. The purpose of this study was to explore the frequency of this presentation and short-term outcomes in these patients. Methods: Our institutional Breast Cancer Database was queried for all women who were diagnosed with pure DCIS from 2010-2016. Variables included age, method of presentation, risk factors, tumor characteristics and outcomes. Statistical analyses included Pearson's Chi Square and Fisher's Exact Tests. Results: Out of a total of 548 patients with pure DCIS, 55 (10%) had DCIS on CNB alone with no residual in the surgical specimen. The median age was 55 years (range 36-83). Of the patients with DCIS on CNB alone, 6 (11%) were treated with mastectomies. 14 (25%) had lumpectomy and RT, while 35 (64%) had lumpectomy without RT. The median follow up was 4 years. There were three ipsilateral recurrences in women who were treated by lumpectomy alone. One of these recurrences was invasive carcinoma, and the other two were recurrent pure DCIS. None of the patients who recurred had taken hormonal therapy. There were no contralateral second primaries detected in the study period in this cohort. Conclusions: Despite the minimal extent of disease exhibited in these cases, 3 of 35 patients with DCIS on CNB with no residual disease at surgery and no RT had ipsilateral recurrence at a median follow up of 4 years. These data suggest that even minimal DCIS represents a significant risk of recurrence to the patient. Additional information provided by genomic analysis may better stratify the risk for recurrence in this group and help identify the population that would most benefit from post-lumpectomy RT

Patients with thick (>4 mm) primary melanomas have highly variable outcomes. Current staging criteria for these patients are based primarily on the presence of nodal disease, which often serves as the basis for adjuvant trial eligibility. Identification of novel biomarkers could help identify patients who may benefit from promising, new adjuvant therapies or, alternatively, spare patients with good prognoses the cost and potential toxicity of these drugs. We examined patients with thick primary melanoma to determine whether proliferation markers (mitotic index and Ki- 67) and other clinicopatholgical features were associated with survival. We studied 171 patients with thick primary melanomas; median thickness was 6.0 mm (median follow-up, 3.0 years). In clinically node-negative patients, Ki-67 expression was an independent predictor of worse RFS (HR 2.19, P = 0.024) and OS (HR 2.49, P = 0.028). In a separate model, moderate (>1 to <5 per mm²) and many (>5 per mm²) mitoses were each significantly associated with RFS (HR = 9.97, P = 0.035 and HR = 11.93, P = 0.025, respectively); and OS (HR = 12.79, P = 0.033 and HR = 18.68, P = 0.017, respectively). In the same model, natural log-transformed tumor thickness was also significantly associated with worse OS (HR 2.37, P = 0.009). In sum, we identified cell proliferation markers Ki-67 and mitotic index as independent predictors of survival in clinically nodenegative patients with thick primary melanoma. Greater tumor thickness was also an independent predictor of survival in this cohort. With further investigation, these measures may improve risk-stratification for patients with thick primary melanoma

OBJECTIVES: Since 2011, metastatic melanoma treatment has evolved with commercial approval of BRAF- and MEK-targeted therapy and CTLA-4- and PD-1-blocking antibodies (immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICI). While novel therapies have demonstrated improved prognosis in clinical trials, few studies have examined the evolution of prognosis and toxicity of these drugs among an unselected population. We assess whether survival and toxicity reported in trials, which typically exclude most patients with brain metastases and poor performance status, are recapitulated within a commercial access population. METHODS: 182 patients diagnosed with stage IV melanoma from July 2006 to December 2013 and treated with BRAF- and/or MEK-targeted therapy or ICI were prospectively studied. Outcomes and clinicopathologic differences between trial and commercial cohorts were assessed. RESULTS: Patients receiving commercial therapy (vs. on trial) had poorer prognostic features (i.e., brain metastases) and lower median overall survival (mOS) when assessed across all treatments (9.2 vs. 17.5 months, p = 0.0027). While toxicity within trial and commercial cohorts did not differ, patients who experienced toxicity had increased mOS (p < 0.001), irrespective of stratification by trial status or therapy. CONCLUSION: Metastatic melanoma patients receiving commercial treatment may represent a different clinical population with poor prognostic features compared to trial patients. Toxicity may prognosticate treatment benefit.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the clinical characteristics of the triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-TNBC patients, with a particular focus on genetic susceptibility and risk factors prior to diagnosis. METHODS: Our institutional database was queried for all patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between January 2010 and May 2016. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1964 patients, 190 (10%) patients had TNBC. The median age for both TNBC and non-TNBC was 59 years. There was a significantly higher proportion of African American and Asian patients with TNBC (p = 0.0003) compared to patients with non-TNBC. BRCA1 and BRCA2 were significantly associated with TNBC (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0007). A prior history of breast cancer was significantly associated with TNBC (p = 0.0003). There was no relationship observed between TNBC and a history of chemoprevention or patients who had a history of AH or LCIS. CONCLUSIONS: We found that having Asian ancestry, a prior history of breast cancer, and a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation all appear to be positively associated with TNBC. In order to develop more effective treatments, better surveillance, and improved prevention strategies, it is necessary to improve our understanding of the population at risk for TNBC.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) is uncommon, biologically ill defined, and clinically understudied. MUP outcomes are seldom reported in clinical trials. In this study, we analyze responses of MUP patients treated with systemic therapy in an attempt to inform treatment guidelines for this unique population. METHODS: New York University (NYU)'s prospective melanoma database was searched for MUP patients treated with systemic therapy. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for MUP patients treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy reported in the literature, and their response and survival data were compared to the MUP patient data from NYU. Both groups' response data were compared to those reported for melanoma of known primary (MKP). RESULTS: The MUP patients treated at NYU had better outcomes on immunotherapy but worse on targeted therapy than the MUP patients in the literature. The NYU MUP patients and those in the literature had worse outcomes than the majority-MKP populations in 10 clinical trial reports. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that MUP patients might have poorer outcomes on systemic therapy as compared to MKP patients. Our cohort was small and limited data were available, highlighting the need for increased reporting of MUP outcomes and multi-institutional efforts to understand the mechanism behind the observed differences.

Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in primary melanomas are thought to represent the host anti-tumor immune response, but controversy exists over whether TILs offer independent prognostication of survival. We studied a cohort of 1241 primary melanoma patients to assess the association of absent, non-brisk, and brisk TIL grade with survival outcomes. We tested whether quantitative TIL counts using immunohistochemical lymphocyte markers CD3, CD45, and FOXP3 add prognostic value to TIL grading compared to histology alone in 15% of the cohort. To assess for inter-group immunologic heterogeneity among TIL grades, we investigated differential expression of 594 immunoregulatory genes in 67 primary melanomas. On histologic evaluation of 1241 primary melanomas, TILs were graded as absent (n=388, 31%), non-brisk (n=330, 27%), and brisk (n=523, 42%). Patients with brisk TILs had improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P=.025) and overall survival (OS) (P=.006) compared to patients with non-brisk and absent TILs, for which there were no differences in RFS (P=.40) or OS (P=.41). TIL quantitation by immunohistochemistry did not improve prognostication compared to TIL grading on hematoxylin and eosin stained sections. Melanomas with non-brisk and absent TILs share similar immunoregulatory gene expression profiles. In contrast, melanomas with brisk TILs demonstrate upregulation of T-cell activation pathways and inhibition of upstream immune checkpoint regulators. The presence of TILs in primary melanomas represents a heterogeneous group and caution in prognostic interpretation is warranted. Melanomas with brisk TILs are defined by an immunostimulatory gene expression profile and improved prognosis compared to melanomas with non-brisk or absent TILs.

PURPOSE: The identification of personalized germline markers with biological relevance for the prediction of cutaneous melanoma (CM) prognosis is highly demanded but to date it has been largely unsuccessful. As melanoma progression is controlled by host immunity, here we present a novel approach interrogating immunoregulatory pathways using the genome-wide maps of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) to reveal biologically relevant germline variants modulating CM outcomes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using whole genome eQTL data from a healthy population, we identified 385 variants -significantly impacting the expression of 268 immune-relevant genes. The 40 most significant eQTLs were tested in a prospective cohort of 1,221 CM patients for their association with overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival using Cox regression models. RESULTS: We identified highly significant associations with better melanoma OS for rs6673928, impacting IL19 expression (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.41-0.77; P= 0.0002) and rs6695772, controlling the expression of BATF3 (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.19-2.24; P= 0.0019). Both associations map in the previously suspected melanoma prognostic locus at 1q32. Furthermore, we show that their combined effect on melanoma OS is substantially enhanced reaching the level of clinical applicability (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.43-2.60; P= 2.38e-5). CONCLUSIONS: Our unique approach of interrogating lymphocyte-specific eQTLs reveals novel and biologically relevant immunomodulatory eQTL predictors of CM prognosis that are independent of current histopathological markers. The significantly enhanced combined effect of identified eQTLs suggests the personalized utilization of both SNPs in a clinical setting, strongly indicating the promise of the proposed design for the discovery of prognostic or risk germline markers in other cancers.

PURPOSE: The application of pan-cancer next generation sequencing panels in the clinical setting has facilitated the identification of low frequency somatic mutations and the testing of new therapies in solid tumors using the 'basket trial' scheme. However, little consideration has been given to the relevance of non-synonymous germline variants which are likely to be uncovered in tumors and germline and which may be relevant to prognostication and prediction -of treatment response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We analyzed matched tumor and normal DNA from 34 melanoma patients using an Ion Torrent cancer-associated gene panel. We elected to study the germline variant Q472H in the kinase insert domain receptor (KDR), which was identified in 35% of melanoma patients in both a pilot and an independent 1,223 patient cohort. Using patient-derived melanoma cell lines and human samples, we assessed proliferation, invasion, VEGF levels and angiogenesis by analyzing tumor microvessel density using anti-CD34 antibody. RESULTS: Serum VEGF levels and tumor microvessel density were significantly higher in Q472H versus KDR wild-type patients. Primary cultures derived from melanomas harboring the KDR variant were more proliferative and invasive than KDR wild-type. Finally, using a VEGFR2 antibody, we showed that KDR Q472H cells were sensitive to targeted inhibition of VEGFR2, an effect that was not observed in KDR WT cells. CONCLUSION: Our data support the integration of germline analysis into personalized treatment decision-making and suggest that patients with germline KDR variant might benefit from anti-angiogenesis treatment.

BACKGROUND: Chondroid syringoma (CS) is a rare benign adnexal tumor of the skin with a resemblance to pleomorphic adenoma of salivary gland, most commonly involving the head and neck region. In the present literature, reports of the cytologic appearance of CS are scarce as it is rarely encountered by fine needle aspiration (FNA). CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old woman presented with a 1 year history of a 1 cm subcutaneous nodule in the right axilla. FNA biopsy was performed revealing an epithelial-mesenchymal biphasic neoplasm suggesting CS. Surgical excision confirmed the diagnosis and demonstrated extensive ossification, an extremely rare feature, with only seven reported cases, all located on the head. CONCLUSION: CS is a rare benign adnexal tumor of the skin, often overlooked due to its unremarkable clinical presentation. FNA is a reliable tool for the diagnosis of CS and helps guide optimal surgical management. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.