Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF TAVR) can be performed under general anesthesia (GA) or moderate sedation (MS). Despite observational studies suggesting a shorter length of stay (LOS), shorter procedural time and a similar mortality rate with MS, only 5% of patients undergoing TF TAVR in the United States are done with this type of anesthesia. We reviewed the implementation of a MS for TF TAVR protocol at a single institution with no previous experience with this technique. METHODS Patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), likely difficult intubation, inability to tolerate supine position due to musculoskeletal disease, or barriers to communication including altered mental status were performed under GA with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. All others received MS with an ilioinguinal nerve block and intraoperative transthoracic echocardiography. The MS for TF TAVR protocol was implemented on October 9th, 2014. The records of patients undergoing TF TAVR 6 months before and after protocol implementation were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS In the pre protocol group 33 patients underwent TF TAVR under GA and no patients received MS. In the post protocol group, 97 underwent TF TAVR, 81 (83.5%) of which received MS. OSA was the most common reason for GA (N=10, 62.5%). Conversion from MS to GA occurred in 2 cases (2.5%) due to procedural complications, of which 1 resulted in death. All other cases involving MS were tolerated well and there were no anesthesia related complications. Post procedural LOS (3.2 days vs. 5.0 days, p=0.002) and procedure time (144.0 minutes vs. 96.1 minutes, p<0.001) were both significantly shorter in post protocol group. The post protocol group was also significantly less likely to require a skilled nursing facility upon discharge (24.2% vs. 8.2%, p=0.027). In hospital mortality was similar between groups (N=2 6.1% vs. N=3, 3.1%, p=0.601). (Table Presented) CONCLUSIONS The MS for TF TAVR protocol appears safe and can be rapidly implemented at institutions with no previous MS experience. This technique is feasible in the majority of patient undergoing TF TAVR. Post procedural LOS and procedural time are multifactorial, but this data further suggests MS may be beneficial in select patients

A number of atherectomy devices were developed in the last few years. Among them, the DiamondBack 360 degrees Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System (Cardiovascular Systems, Inc) was specifically designed to work in severely calcified plaque. This article reviews the history, mechanism of action, evolution, clinical data, and future applications of this particular atherectomy device.

Transradial access for coronary interventions has grown substantially in the last few years. Currently, there is an increased interest in applying this approach to peripheral vascular interventions. This report reviews the current status of transradial peripheral interventions, and offers advice in terms of feasibility, equipment use, and technical challenges. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Vascular and bleeding complications are a known risk of cardiac catheterization. In this article, we report a neck hematoma after left-sided transradial cardiac catheterization, which is a known but rarely reported complication of this procedure.

BACKGROUND: Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is the onset of acute heart failure without demonstrable cause during the last month of pregnancy or within five months after delivery. The purpose of this study was to create a prospective registry of PPCM patients with the assistance of the internet and identify clinical factors predictive of ejection fraction (EF) recovery. METHODS: Patients with PPCM were identified by novel web-based methods. Subjects were categorized as recovered (EF>50) or nonrecovered (EF<50) and compared on the basis of demographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: Fifty-five subjects met criteria for inclusion. There was a statistically significant association between diagnosis during third trimester and persistent systolic dysfunction (25% vs. 4.7%, p=0.03). Gestational hypertension and breastfeeding were significantly associated with EF recovery (48.8% vs. 16.7%, p=0.046, and 39.5% vs. 8.3%, p=0.04, respectively). EF normalization occurred in all patients with EF(1)>/=35%. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of gHTN, EF>/=35% at diagnosis, breastfeeding, and postpartum diagnosis were all significantly associated with recovery of systolic function. Internet recruitment may be a valuable tool for studying PPCM

PURPOSE: Revascularization of lower extremity chronic total occlusions (CTOs) is technically challenging. The Crosser(R) recanalization catheter was designed to facilitate distal vessel intraluminal entry that is both rapid and safe. We present our experience with the Crosser device as primary therapy for peripheral CTOs. METHODS: Subjects undergoing evaluation for arterial insufficiency at our institution between 2008-2010 who were noted to have a CTO in the lower extremity by duplex ultrasonography and who subsequently underwent Crosser recanalization were enrolled. Clinical characteristics, ankle-brachial indices, Rutherford-Becker symptom category, and angiographic CTO parameters were collected. Primary technical success was intraluminal delivery of the guidewire into the distal vessel solely by the Crosser device. Secondary technical success was assisted delivery using the Outback LTD(R) re-entry device. Safety endpoints were the occurrence of dissections, thromboembolism, and perforations related to the Crosser device. Statistical analysis was performed to find independent predictors for failure to achieve Crosser recanalization. RESULTS: Fifty-six subjects with 73 CTOs were enrolled. The mean Crosser use time was 17.6 +/- 12.7 minutes. The overall primary and secondary technical success rates for Crosser recanalization were 76.7% and 87.7%, respectively. Technical success was highest for CTOs located in the aorto-iliac (90.0%) and tibial (95.2%) arterial segments. There were no perforations related to the Crosser device. For successful cases, the mean ABI improved significantly from pre- to post-intervention (0.57 +/- 0.13 to 0.89 +/- 0.15, p < 0.001). The only predictors for failure were lesion length longer than 100 mm (p = 0.04) and calcification within 10 mm of the exit cap (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The Crosser device is safe and shows excellent efficacy in facilitating guidewire distal lumen entry, especially for aorto-iliac and tibial occlusions. The technical success rate for the femoral and popliteal occlusions is comparable to those reported with other recanalization techniques