Faculty Bibliography

Background/Purpose: Our tissue engineering laboratory has previously demonstrated that dipyridamole-coated, 3D printed bioceramic (3DPBC) scaffolds comprised of B-tricalcium phosphate generate significantly more bone compared to negative controls in short-term growing animal model studies. No detrimental effects to the cranial suture were observed in any experimental animals. The longterm osteogenic efficacy and safety of our 3DPBC scaffold for tissue engineering in growing calvaria was assessed by describing bone regeneration compared to autogenous bone graft, scaffold degradation kinetics, and the effects of the construct on cranial growth over time. Methods/Description: Twenty-two 1-month-old (immature) New Zealand white rabbits underwent unilateral 11-mm craniotomy within 2 mm of the coronal and sagittal sutures. Rabbits' calvarial defects were repaired by 1 of 2 interventions: 3DPBC scaffolds coated with 1000 mM dipyridamole (n = 14) or autogenous calvarial bone graft (n = 8). Six rabbits from the 3DPBC scaffold group were sacrificed at 8 weeks. The remaining rabbits (n = 8 each group) were observed until craniofacial growth was completed (6 months) and then euthanized. Bone regeneration, scaffold degradation, and cranial suture patency were analyzed in Amira software using reconstructed microcomputed tomography (muCT) images. Cranial growth was assessed by comparing bilateral cephalometric measurements based on muCT images. Bone growth and suture patency were qualitatively evaluated through histologic analysis.
Result(s): After 6 months of healing, animals with defects repaired with 3DPBC scaffolds regenerated an average of 53.9% +/- 3.6% (mean +/- SEM) bone, compared to 53.5% +/- 3.6% in defects repaired with bone graft (P = .95). Unoperated calvarial bone porosity was 49.4%+/-2.0%. Scaffolds showed significant degradation at 6 months (15.1% +/-0.7%) compared to 8 weeks (23.2% +/- 0.9%; P<=.001). Comparative measurements of operated and unoperated sides showed no significant differences in asymmetry between scaffold and bone graft animals (P > .24). Analysis of histologic sections revealed well-vascularized, organized bone formation within scaffold interstices with no evidence of ectopic bone formation, excess inflammatory cells, or suture fusion.
Conclusion(s): Dipyridamole-coated 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds bone regeneration is comparable to autogenous bone graft without showing signs of adverse events such as premature cranial suture fusion, or detrimental effects to facial growth. The scaffold demonstrates favorable absorption kinetics, highlighting the potential for this technology in pediatric bone tissue engineering

OBJECTIVE:The aim of this in vivo study is to compare the osseointegration of endosteal implants placed in atrophic mandibular alveolar ridges with alveolar ridge expansion surgical protocol via an experimental osseodensification drilling versus conventional osteotome technique. METHODS:Twelve endosteal implants, 4 mm × 13 mm, were placed in porcine models in horizontally atrophic mandibular ridges subsequent to prior extraction of premolars. Implants were placed with osseodensification drilling technique as the experimental group (n = 6) and osteotome site preparation as the control group (n = 6). After 4 weeks of healing, samples were retrieved and stained with Stevenel's Blue and Van Gieson's Picro Fuschin for histologic evaluation. Quantitative analysis via bone-to-implant contact (BIC%) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO%) were obtained as mean values with corresponding 95% confidence interval. A significant omnibus test, post-hoc comparison of the 2 drilling techniques' mean values was accomplished using a pooled estimate of the standard error with P-value set at 0.05. RESULTS:The mean BIC% value was approximately 62.5% in the osseodensification group, and 31.4% in the regular instrumentation group. Statistical analysis showed a significant effect of the drilling technique (P = 0.018). There was no statistical difference in BAFO as a function of drilling technique (P = 0.198). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The combined osseodensification drilling-alveolar ridge expansion technique showed increased evidence of osseointegration and implant primary stability from a histologic and biomechanical standpoint, respectively. Future studies will focus on expanding the sample size as well as the timeline of the study to allow investigation of long-term prognosis of this novel technique.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Surgical residencies have increasingly incorporated both digital and mannequin simulation into their training programs. The aim of our review was to identify all digital and mannequin maxillofacial simulators available for education and training, highlight their benefit, and critically assess the evidence in support of these educational resources. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We performed a comprehensive literature review of all peer-reviewed publications of digital and mannequin simulators that met the inclusion criteria, defined as any simulator used in education or training. All simulators used in surgical planning were excluded. Before the query, it was hypothesized that most studies would be descriptive in nature and supported by low levels of evidence. Literature search strategies included the use of multiple combinations of key search terms, review of titles and abstracts, and precise identification of the use of the simulator described. All statistics were descriptive. RESULTS:The primary search yielded 259 results, from which 22 total simulators published on from 2001 to 2016 were identified using the inclusion and exclusion criteria: 10 virtual reality haptic-based simulators, 6 physical model simulators, and 6 Web-based simulators used for a variety of procedures such as dental skills, instrument handling, orthognathic surgery (Le Fort I osteotomy, vertical ramus osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy), genioplasty, bone grafting, sinus surgery, cleft lip repair, orbital floor repair, and oral biopsy. Only 9 formalized studies were completed; these were classified as low-level evidence-based cohort studies (Levels IV and V). All other simulator reports were descriptive in nature. There were no studies with high levels of evidence completed (Level I to III). CONCLUSIONS:The results of this review suggest that, although seemingly beneficial to the trainee in maxillofacial surgery, simulation in education in this field is an underused commodity because of the significant lack of scientific and validated study designs reported on in the literature thus far. The maxillofacial and simulation communities would benefit from studies on utility and efficacy with higher levels of evidence.

Craniomaxillofacial congenital anomalies comprise approximately one third of all congenital birth defects and include deformities such as alveolar clefts, craniosynostosis, and microtia. Current surgical treatments commonly require the use of autogenous graft material which are difficult to shape, limited in supply, associated with donor site morbidity and cannot grow with a maturing skeleton. Our group has demonstrated that 3D printed bio-ceramic scaffolds can generate vascularized bone within large, critical-sized defects (defects too large to heal spontaneously) of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton. Furthermore, these scaffolds are also able to function as a delivery vehicle for a new osteogenic agent with a well-established safety profile. The same 3D printers and imaging software platforms have been leveraged by our team to create sterilizable patient-specific intraoperative models for craniofacial reconstruction. For microtia repair, the current standard of care surgical guide is a two-dimensional drawing taken from the contralateral ear. Our laboratory has used 3D printers and open source software platforms to design personalized microtia surgical models. In this review, we report on the advancements in tissue engineering principles, digital imaging software platforms and 3D printing that have culminated in the application of this technology to repair large bone defects in skeletally immature transitional models and provide in-house manufactured, sterilizable patient-specific models for craniofacial reconstruction.

BACKGROUND:Vascularized bone tissue transfer, commonly used to reconstruct large mandibular defects, is challenged by long operative times, extended hospital stay, donor-site morbidity, and resulting health care. 3D-printed osseoconductive tissue-engineered scaffolds may provide an alternative solution for reconstruction of significant mandibular defects. This pilot study presents a novel 3D-printed bioactive ceramic scaffold with osseoconductive properties to treat segmental mandibular defects in a rabbit model. METHODS:Full-thickness mandibulectomy defects (12 mm) were created at the mandibular body of eight adult rabbits and replaced by 3D-printed ceramic scaffold made of 100% β-tricalcium phosphate, fit to defect based on computed tomography imaging. After 8 weeks, animals were euthanized, the mandibles were retrieved, and bone regeneration was assessed. Bone growth was qualitatively assessed with histology and backscatter scanning electron microscopy, quantified both histologically and with micro computed tomography and advanced 3D image reconstruction software, and compared to unoperated mandible sections (UMSs). RESULTS:Histology quantified scaffold with newly formed bone area occupancy at 54.3 ± 11.7%, compared to UMS baseline bone area occupancy at 55.8 ± 4.4%, and bone area occupancy as a function of scaffold free space at 52.8 ± 13.9%. 3D volume occupancy quantified newly formed bone volume occupancy was 36.3 ± 5.9%, compared to UMS baseline bone volume occupancy at 33.4 ± 3.8%, and bone volume occupancy as a function of scaffold free space at 38.0 ± 15.4%. CONCLUSIONS:3D-printed bioactive ceramic scaffolds can restore critical mandibular segmental defects to levels similar to native bone after 8 weeks in an adult rabbit, critical sized, mandibular defect model.

WE43 Mg alloy, composed of Mg, Yttrium, Rare Earth elements, and Zirconium, has proved to be a suitable candidate for production of resorbable osteosynthesis implants in both clinical and experimental settings. In a previous study we tested biocompatibility and degradation properties of untreated (as-cast) and artificially aged (T-5) WE43 Mg-alloys as subperiosteal implants on a maxillofacial sheep model. Both the alloy compositions showed excellent biocompatibility, however, with respect to degradation rate, the as-cast form showed increased degradability compared with the T-5. In the present study, we tested the same alloy composition (i.e. as-cast and T-5) to assess their biological behavior and degradation pattern when implanted as endosteal implants on a calvarial bone sheep model. Six implants in form of cylindrical discs were tested in 6 sheep, one per composition of each disc was placed in two monocortical cranial defect created with high speed trephine bur in the parietal bone. After euthanasia at 6 weeks histomorphological analysis of the bone/implant specimens was performed. WE43-as cast showed higher degradation rate, increased bone remodeling, gas pockets formation and osteolysis compared with the T5 alloy. WE43-T5 showed greater bone/implant interface stability, and seemed to be more suitable for fabrication of endosteal bone screws.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to test the osteogenic capacity of dipyridamole-loaded, three-dimensionally printed, bioactive ceramic (3DPBC) scaffolds using a translational, skeletally mature, large-animal calvarial defect model. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Custom 3DPBC scaffolds designed to present lattice-based porosity only towards the dural surface were either coated with collagen (control) or coated with collagen and immersed in a 100 μM concentration dipyridamole (DIPY) solution. Sheep (n = 5) were subjected to 2 ipsilateral trephine-induced (11-mm diameter) calvarial defects. Either a control or a DIPY scaffold was placed in each defect, and the surgery was repeated on the contralateral side 3 weeks later. Following sacrifice, defects were evaluated through microcomputed tomography and histologic analysis for bone, scaffold, and soft tissue quantification throughout the defect. Parametric and non-parametric methods were used to determine statistical significance based on data distribution. RESULTS:No exuberant or ectopic bone formation was observed, and no histologic evidence of inflammation was noted within the defects. Osteogenesis was higher in DIPY-coated scaffolds compared to controls at 3 weeks (p = 0.013) and 6 weeks (p = 0.046) in vivo. When bone formation was evaluated as a function of defect radius, average bone formation was higher for DIPY relative to control scaffolds at both time points (significant at defect central regions at 3 weeks and at margins at 6 weeks, p = 0.046 and p = 0.031, respectively). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Dipyridamole significantly improves the calvarial bone regeneration capacity of 3DPBC scaffolds. The most significant difference in bone regeneration was observed centrally within the interface between the 3DPBC scaffold and the dura mater.