Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:The purposes of this study were to determine why athletes did not return to play (RTP) following operative management of superior-labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears, compare these athletes to those who did RTP, and evaluate the SLAP-Return to Sport after Injury (SLAP-RSI) score to assess the psychological readiness of athletes to RTP after operative management of SLAP tears. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective review of athletes who underwent operative management of SLAP tears with a minimum of 24-month follow-up was performed. Outcome data, including visual analog scale (VAS) score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), American Shoulder & Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, patient satisfaction, and whether they would undergo the same surgery again was collected. Additionally, the rate and timing of return to work (RTW), the rate and timing of RTP, SLAP-RSI score, and VAS during sport were evaluated, with subgroup analysis among overhead and contact athletes. The SLAP-RSI is a modification of the Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport after Injury (SI-RSI) score, with a score >56 considered to be a passing score for being psychologically ready to RTP. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = .001) were all associated with greater likelihood of return to sports at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Following the operative management of SLAP tears, patients who are unable to RTP exhibit poor psychological readiness to return, which may be due to residual pain in overhead athletes or fear of reinjury in contact athletes. Lastly, the SLAP-RSI tool in combination with ASES proved to be useful in identifying patients' psychological and physical readiness to RTP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:Level IV, prognostic case series.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:To assess the preoperative and postoperative performance of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS-UE, version 2.0) outcome score in comparison to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) instruments in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:) between these tools was calculated at each time point. Correlations were graded as excellent (>0.7), excellent-good (0.61-0.7), good (0.4-0.6), or poor (<0.4). Responsiveness to change was assessed using the effect size and the standardized response mean. Floor and ceiling effects for each instrument were also assessed. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The PROMIS-UE instrument showed good to excellent correlation with the legacy instruments at all time points. There were variations in the measured effect sizes of the various instruments, with the PROMIS-UE instrument showing responsiveness to change at 3 and 12 months but the ASES and WORC instruments showing responsiveness at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months. Both PROMIS-UE and ASES scores displayed ceiling effects at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:The PROMIS-UE instrument shows excellent correlation with the ASES instrument and a rotator cuff-specific outcome instrument-the WORC instrument-preoperatively and at 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Variations in the measured effect sizes at different postoperative time points and high ceiling effects of the PROMIS-UE instrument at the 1-year time point may limit its utility in the early postoperative phase and at long-term follow-up after rotator cuff repair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:The performance of the PROMIS-UE outcome measure after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was investigated.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective analysis of outcomes in cervical spine and shoulder arthroscopy patients. OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study is to assess differential improvements in health-related quality of life for cervical spine surgery compared with shoulder surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:An understanding of outcome differences between different types of orthopedic surgeries is helpful in counseling patients about expected postoperative recovery. This study compares outcomes in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery with arthroscopic shoulder surgery using computer-adaptive Patient-reported Outcome Information System scores. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Patients undergoing cervical spine surgery (1-level or 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, cervical disc replacement) or arthroscopic shoulder surgery (rotator cuff repair±biceps tenodesis) were grouped. Patient-reported Outcome Information System scores of physical function, pain interference, and pain intensity at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months were compared using paired t tests. RESULTS:Cervical spine (n=127) and shoulder (n=91) groups were similar in sex (25.8% vs. 41.8% female, P=0.731) but differed in age (51.6±11.6 vs. 58.60±11.2, P<0.05), operative time (148.3±68.6 vs. 75.9±26.9 min, P<0.05), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASAs) (2.3±0.6 vs. 2.0±0.5, P=0.001), smoking status (15.7% vs. 4.4%, P=0.008), and length of stay (1.1±1.0 vs. 0.3±0.1, P=0.000). Spine patients had worse physical function (36.9 ±12.6 vs. 49.4±8.6, P<0.05) and greater pain interference (67.0±13.6 vs. 61.7±4.8, P=0.001) at baseline. Significant improvements were seen in all domains by 3 months for both groups, except for physical function after shoulder surgery. Spine patients had greater physical function improvements at all timepoints (3.33 vs. -0.43, P=0.003; 4.81 vs. 0.08, P=0.001; 6.5 vs. -5.24, P=<0.05). Conversely, shoulder surgery patients showed better 6-month improvement in pain intensity over spine patients (-8.86 vs. -4.46, P=0.001), but this difference resolved by 12 months. CONCLUSIONS:Cervical spine patients had greater relative early improvement in physical function compared with shoulder patients, whereas pain interference and intensity did not significantly differ between the 2 groups after surgery. This will help in counseling patients about relative difference in recovery and improvement between the 2 surgery types. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study was to identify prognostic factors that are associated with improvements in patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) related to upper extremity function and pain in those suffering from idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:value of < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = .002). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Patient-perceived improvements in PROMIS score during the natural history of adhesive capsulitis are likely multifactorial, with anxiety, hyperlipidemia, increased body mass index, and Hispanic heritage associated with reduced improvement in PROMIS scores.

BACKGROUND:Cervical spine pathology can affect the supporting muscles and function of the shoulder and contribute to shoulder and arm pain and hence may impact postoperative outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a history of cervical spine arthrodesis and its timing, before or after TSA, on the outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Our hypothesis is that a history of cervical arthrodesis will negatively impact patient outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on a prospectively collected cohort at a single institution. Anatomic and reverse TSA patients (aTSA, rTSA) with cervical arthrodesis (CA) were identified and compared to a cohort of patients without cervical arthrodesis (NCA) enrolled in an institutional registry from 2011 to 2020. Demographic characteristics, diagnoses, implant type, range of motion (ROM), adverse events and clinical outcome metric scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant, Shoulder Function Score, patient satisfaction) were recorded. Outcomes between cohorts were analyzed using conventional statistics as well as stratification by MCID and SCB thresholds where applicable. RESULTS:Of the 573 TSA evaluated, 48 (20a CA-aTSA and 28 CA-rTSA) had a history of and 425 (280 NCA-aTSA and 245 NCA-rTSA) had no history of cervical arthrodesis. The CA-TSA (aTSA and rTSA) had lower Constant, ASES and Shoulder Function, PROMs postoperatively as well as less improvement in active ER and an overall lower satisfaction rating (p<0.05 for all) compared to NCA-TSA. The adverse event rate in the CA-TSA cohort was higher compared to NCA-TSA cohort (25% vs. 6.5 [rTSA; p=0.004] and 24.5% vs 11% [aTSA; p=0.068]). Optimal cutoff analysis showed that a time from CA to TSA of greater than 1.33 years had a sensitivity of 75.0% and specificity of 75.0% in predicting achievement of SCB for ASES. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The current study demonstrates that patients with a history of cervical arthrodesis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty results in lower postoperative functional outcomes, lower patient satisfaction, and higher rates of postoperative adverse events requiring surgical revision when compared to a cohort without a history of cervical arthrodesis. Additionally, the current study demonstrates that a time interval of at least 16 months between cervical arthrodesis and shoulder arthroplasty optimizes chances of achieving SCB for ASES.

Anterior shoulder instability has been a common shoulder problem since the earliest of human civilizations. Over the course of thousands of years, our understanding regarding shoulder instability and treatment options have evolved tremendously. Specifically, over the past several decades we have seen a gradual but substantial development in our understanding of the natural history of anterior shoulder instability with and without surgical treatment. There is increasing recognition and improved understanding of the role of bone loss in the pathophysiology of shoulder instability, with ongoing emphasis on restoring native anatomy with minimally invasive techniques. The rich history of successes and failures of past surgical procedures forms the basis of the many innovative surgical techniques currently used, including both bony and soft tissue procedures. The purpose of this review is to highlight some of the most influential and important breakthroughs in the evolution of our understanding and management of anterior shoulder instability.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Instability is one of the leading causes of revision for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Closed reduction (CR) of a dislocated RTSA is recommended by many as initial treatment with varying degrees of success. In this study, we describe polyethylene liner dissociation from the humeral tray (PDH) as a cause of failure of CR of dislocated RTSA. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:In this retrospective study, patients who underwent revision RTSA for instability were identified through our institutional database review using specific International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Pertinent clinical information including demographics, details of instability event (early vs. late), traumatic vs. atraumatic, outcomes of CR (if performed), and intraoperative findings during revision surgery were collected and analyzed. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria with average follow-up of 2 years. CR was attempted in 12 (55%) patients, prior to revision surgery, and was successful in 5 (23%) patients. During the revision surgery polyethylene liner dissociation from the humeral tray (PDH) was identified in 10 patients (45%). Five of these 10 patients had failed CR and the other 5 patients did not undergo CR due to primary surgeon's preference. All patients with PDH event had onlay humeral tray RTSA system. Although not a consistent radiographic finding in our series, the presence of the metallic glenosphere in direct contact with the humeral tray on anteroposterior or axillary radiographs was diagnostic for PDH. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Dissociation of polyethylene liner from the humeral tray can be associated with an RTSA dislocation and is a contraindication for CR. A radiographic finding of the metallic humeral tray articulating directly with the glenosphere is an indication that the polyethylene liner is dissociated from the humeral tray.

BACKGROUND:The treatment of partially displaced radial head fractures is determined not only by the type of fracture but also by patient characteristics such as age, occupation, hand dominance, mechanism of injury, and concomitant injuries and comorbidities. The goal of this study was to employ the Delphi method to achieve consensus on the management of patients with radial head fractures, utilizing the experience of the ASES Elbow Fracture-Dislocation Multicenter Study Group and Mayo Elbow Club surgeons. METHODS:The initial survey was sent to participants, which included consent to participate in the study and questions about their experience, knowledge, and interest in participating in the Delphi method. We used both open-ended and category-based questions. The second questionnaire generated 76 variables, and individual questions with mean Likert ratings of <2.0 or >4.0 were deemed significant and merged to form multifactorial clinical scenarios relating to both nonoperative and operative management, respectively. RESULTS:Of the surgeons who responded to the questionnaire, 64% were from the United States, while the remainder were from overseas practices. Years in practice on average were 12.4 years (range, 1-40). Seven of the 76 factors met the criteria of a mean Likert score of <2.0 or >4.0. These factors were as follows: age, block to the range of motion (ROM) after aspiration/injection, crepitation with ROM, tenderness over the distal radioulnar joint and/or interosseous membrane (dorsal forearm), gap and/or displacement >2 mm on imaging, complete loss of contact of the head with the rest of the radius on imaging, and fracture head involvement 30% on imaging. Twenty-two (46%) of the 96 clinical scenarios gained >90% consensus in favor of surgical treatment, whereas 8 (17%) reached >90% consensus in favor of nonoperative treatment. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Obtaining expert consensus on the treatment of radial head fractures remains challenging. Certain factors such as gap/displacement ≥2 mm without complete loss of contact, ≥30% head involvement with a block to an ROM regardless of tenderness over distal radioulnar joint or interosseous membrane (dorsal forearm), or crepitation when the patient was <80 years of age led to a recommendation of operative treatment in 100% of the surveyed surgeons. Patients older than 80 years with no block to ROM after aspiration/injection, no crepitation with ROM, and no tenderness on distal radioulnar joint/interosseous membrane (dorsal forearm) were recommended for nonoperative treatment regardless of the size of the radial head involvement on imaging.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Although on-field performance metrics are useful in measuring overall success of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction (UCLR) in professional baseball pitchers, they may not comprehensively quantify athletic performance after returning to playing in the league. To utilize fantasy baseball score (FBS) as a novel and objective outcome to assess the quality of return to play in major league baseball (MLB) pitchers who went back to professional pitching after UCLR. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This is a retrospective observational cohort study of 216 established MLB pitchers who underwent UCLR while in the MLB between the years 1974 and 2018. Pitchers who either started in at least 45 games or pitched 90 relief games in the 3 years leading up to injury were included. FBS was calculated using 3 different scoring methods: ESPN (Entertainment and Sports Programming Network) (FBS-ESPN), Yahoo (FBS-Yahoo), and CBS (Columbia Broadcasting System) (FBS-CBS). Return to play, games played, innings pitched, earned runs, strikeouts, walks, hits allowed, hit batsman, and quality starts were also collected. Performance records were compiled for 3 years prior to and after the return to MLB. Players' pre-injury performance was used as a historic control group. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to detect trends between seasons, controlling for year of surgery, and number of games. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: < .001) after their injury. Also pitchers played in fewer games, pitched fewer innings, and had a decline in all measured on-field performance statistics. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:FBS may represent a useful outcome measure to objectively assess the quality of return to play in a professional baseball pitcher who returned to play in MLB after UCLR.