Faculty Bibliography

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is highly associated with inflammation. Myeloid cells, including tumor-associated macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, are abundant in the HCC microenvironment and are often associated with poor prognosis. Myeloid cells in HCC play a vital role in supporting tumor initiation, progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance. Here, we summarize our current knowledge about myeloid cells in HCC and focus on their immune-suppressive activities and tumor-promoting functions, as well as the relevance to potential new therapies in HCC.

BACKGROUND: There is no standard of care for adjuvant therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. This trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of sorafenib versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection or local ablation. METHODS: We undertook this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with a complete radiological response after surgical resection (n=900) or local ablation (n=214) in 202 sites (hospitals and research centres) in 28 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 400 mg oral sorafenib or placebo twice a day, for a maximum of 4 years, according to a block randomisation scheme (block size of four) using an interactive voice-response system. Patients were stratified by curative treatment, geography, Child-Pugh status, and recurrence risk. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival assessed after database cut-off on Nov 29, 2013. We analysed efficacy in the intention-to-treat population and safety in randomly assigned patients receiving at least one study dose. The final analysis is reported. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00692770. FINDINGS: We screened 1602 patients between Aug 15, 2008, and Nov 17, 2010, and randomly assigned 1114 patients. Of 556 patients in the sorafenib group, 553 (>99%) received the study treatment and 471 (85%) terminated treatment. Of 558 patients in the placebo group, 554 (99%) received the study treatment and 447 (80%) terminated treatment. Median duration of treatment and mean daily dose were 12.5 months (IQR 2.6-35.8) and 577 mg per day (SD 212.8) for sorafenib, compared with 22.2 months (8.1-38.8) and 778.0 mg per day (79.8) for placebo. Dose modification was reported for 497 (89%) of 559 patients in the sorafenib group and 206 (38%) of 548 patients in the placebo group. At final analysis, 464 recurrence-free survival events had occurred (270 in the placebo group and 194 in the sorafenib group). Median follow-up for recurrence-free survival was 8.5 months (IQR 2.9-19.5) in the sorafenib group and 8.4 months (2.9-19.8) in the placebo group. We noted no difference in median recurrence-free survival between the two groups (33.3 months in the sorafenib group vs 33.7 months in the placebo group; hazard ratio [HR] 0.940; 95% CI 0.780-1.134; one-sided p=0.26). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction (154 [28%] of 559 patients in the sorafenib group vs four [<1%] of 548 patients in the placebo group) and diarrhoea (36 [6%] vs five [<1%] in the placebo group). Sorafenib-related serious adverse events included hand-foot skin reaction (ten [2%]), abnormal hepatic function (four [<1%]), and fatigue (three [<1%]). There were four (<1%) drug-related deaths in the sorafenib group and two (<1%) in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: Our data indicate that sorafenib is not an effective intervention in the adjuvant setting for hepatocellular carcinoma following resection or ablation.

BACKGROUND: Biliary complications are a leading source of surgical morbidity following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). METHODS: We examined how prophylactic internal biliary stent placement during OLT affected post-transplant morbidity and mortality in a single-center retrospective cohort study of 513 recipients (2006-2012). Recipient and donor covariates were collected. Biliary complications included major and minor anastomotic leaks, strictures, or stenoses. Multivariate regression models were created to estimate how operative biliary stents affected outcomes. RESULTS: About 87.3% (n = 448) of recipients had a duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis, and 43.1% (n = 221) had biliary stents placed. The biliary complication rate was <15% at five yr, and 44.8% (n = 230) overall. Stenting was not protective from anastomotic biliary complications (p = 0.06). Stenting was associated with a 74% higher adjusted risk of needing multiple endoscopic retrograde cholangiographies (ERCs; odds ratio [OR] 1.74, p = 0.011), and trended toward a lower adjusted risk for repetitive percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTCs; OR 0.56, p = 0.063). Stenting had no effect on the cumulative freedom from biliary complications (p = 0.94). Biliary complications were associated with mortality (HR 1.86, p = 0.014) and was unaffected by stenting (aHR = 0.72, p = 0.246). CONCLUSIONS: Biliary stenting during OLT does not deter biliary complications and is associated with higher risk of multiple invasive biliary interventions, particularly ERCs. Surgeons should evaluate the utility of biliary stents at OLT within this context.