Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION: Participants who sustain a fragility fracture are at increased risk for subsequent fractures. Despite the consequences of recurrent fractures, bone mineral density (BMD) testing and treatment rates for osteoporosis after a fracture remain low. The New York University (NYU) Langone Osteoporosis Model of Care was developed to identify women at increased risk for recurrent fractures and to reduce the rates of subsequent fracture through patient and physician education. METHODS: Women aged 50 years and older who had a fracture and received their care at NYU affiliated hospitals were contacted via mail after discharge. Participants were provided educational materials explaining decreased bone strength and its possible relationship to their fracture and were asked to complete a questionnaire. One year postfracture, participants were sent follow-up questionnaires requesting their most recent fracture treatment and BMD information. Educational material was also provided to the treating orthopedic surgeons. RESULTS: Overall, 524 patients were contacted and 210 (40%) enrolled. By the end of 24 months, 92 participants completed their 1-year questionnaire (44% of the enrollees). Forty-two (46%) participants had undergone new BMD testing and 37 (40%) were receiving antiresorptive medications, including 6 (6%) who had not been prescribed these medications before enrolling in the program. CONCLUSIONS: The Osteoporosis Model of Care is a simple and cost-effective educational program, which improved comprehensive fracture care in an actual clinical setting. Patient enrollment remains a challenge in implementing the program. Our program highlights difficulties in providing community-dwelling participants with appropriate postfracture care. With increasing concern among the public regarding the use of bone strengthening medications and continued low postfracture treatment rates, educating patients with high fracture risk is critical to reducing the rate of subsequent fracture. Our Model of Care Program demonstrates both the success and limitations of a postfracture educational approach using discharge diagnosis data to identify patients with fracture.

OBJECTIVE: There continues to be controversy over whether operative delay is necessary for patients on antiplatelet therapy, particularly for elderly patients with hip fractures. This study sought to assess current clinical practices of orthopedic surgeons regarding perioperative management of these patients. METHODS: A 12-question, Web-based survey was distributed to orthopedic surgeons via e-mail. Questions regarding timing of surgery assumed patients were on antiplatelet therapy and assessed attitudes toward emergent and nonemergent orthopedic cases as well as operative delay for specific closed fracture types. Responses were compared using unpaired, 2-tailed Student t tests for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square tests with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for categorical variables. Statistical significance was defined as a P value <.05. RESULTS: Overall 67 orthopedic surgeons responded. Fifty-two percent (n = 35) of the respondents described their practice as academic. Thirty-nine percent (n = 25) of the surgeons indicated that no delay was acceptable for urgent but nonemergent surgery, and 78% (n = 50) reported no delay for emergent surgery was acceptable. Sixty-eight percent (n = 46) of respondents felt patients on antiplatelet therapy with closed hip fractures did not require operative delay. Surgeons who opted for surgical delay in hip fractures were more likely to delay surgery in other lower extremity fracture types (OR = 16.4, 95% CI 4.48-60.61, P < .001). Sixty-four percent (n = 41) of the surgeons indicated there was no protocol in place at their institution. CONCLUSIONS: There continues to be wide variability among orthopedic surgeons with regard to management of patients with fracture on antiplatelet therapy. Over a quarter of surgeons continue to opt for surgical delay in patients with hip fracture. This survey highlights the need to formulate and better disseminate practice management guidelines for patients with fracture on antiplatelet therapy, particularly given the aging population in the United States.

There is no consensus on surgical fixation and treatment of proximal humerus fractures, even though they are common fractures with several fixation techniques. This retrospective study quantifies the outcomes of patients who sustained a proximal humerus fracture and were treated with open reduction and internal fixation by at a single academic center between December 2010 and December 2014 using the Equinoxe® proximal humerus locking plate. Following enrollment, injury and surgical data was recorded. Forty-nine patients (31 female, 18 male) with 50 fractures were identified who met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up period was 16.8 months (range: 6 to 44 months). Mean age was 60.7 years with no significant difference in mean age by gender. Mean age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 2.9 (range: 0 to 6). The overall complication rate was 10% (N = 5) with the most common complication being osteonecrosis (N = 3). Four patients required reoperation. At final follow-up, mean active forward flexion for the cohort was 140.8º ± 30.1º, mean passive forward flexion was 155.7º ± 25.2º, and mean active external rotation was 50.1º ± 17.9º. For patients with postoperative complications, mean active forward flexion was 106.0º ± 23.0º, mean passive forward flexion was 136.7º ± 23.1º, and mean active external rotation was 34.2º ± 24.4. Active forward flexion and external rotation were significantly different in the presence of a complication (p = 0.005 and p = 0.038, respectively). Mean DASH score for the cohort was 19.1 ± 20.9. Mean DASH score for patients who developed complications or underwent reoperations was 34.2 ± 24.3. This study demonstrates that the Equinoxe® proximal humerus locking plate provides stable fracture treatment with excellent clinical results and a low complication rate when performed by experienced orthopaedic traumatologists.

Increasing attention has been placed on providing higher quality and safer patient care. This requires the development of a new set of competencies to better understand and navigate the system and lead the orthopaedic team. While still trying to learn and develop these competencies, the academic orthopaedist is also expected to model and teach them.The orthopaedic surgeon must understand what is being measured and why, both for purposes of providing better care and to eliminate unnecessary expense in the system. Metrics currently include hospital-acquired conditions, "never events," and thirty-day readmission rates. More will undoubtedly follow.Although commitment and excellence at the individual level are essential, the orthopaedist must think at the systems level to provide the highest value of care. A work culture characterized by respect and trust is essential to improved communication, teamwork, and confidential peer review. An increasing number of resources, both in print and electronic format, are available for us to understand what we can do now to improve quality and safety.Resident education in quality and safety is a fundamental component of the systems-based practice competency, the Next Accreditation System, and the Clinical Learning Environment Review. This needs to be longitudinally integrated into the curriculum and applied parallel to the development of resident knowledge and skill, and will be best learned if resident learning is experiential and taught within a genuine culture of quality and safety.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the within-day and between-day measurement reproducibility of in vivo 3D MRI assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture of the proximal femur. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA)-compliant, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved study was conducted on 11 healthy subjects (mean age = 57.4 +/- 14.1 years) with written informed consent. All subjects underwent a 3T MRI hip scan in vivo (0.234 x 0.234 x 1.5 mm) at three timepoints: baseline, second scan same day (intrascan), and third scan 1 week later (interscan). We applied digital topological analysis and volumetric topological analysis to compute the following microarchitectural parameters within the femoral neck: total bone volume, bone volume fraction, markers of trabecular number (skeleton density), connectivity (junctions), plate-like structure (surfaces), plate width, and trabecular thickness. Reproducibility was assessed using root-mean-square coefficient of variation (RMS-CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The within-day RMS-CVs ranged from 2.3% to 7.8%, and the between-day RMS-CVs ranged from 4.0% to 7.3% across all parameters. The within-day ICCs ranged from 0.931 to 0.989, and the between-day ICCs ranged from 0.934 to 0.971 across all parameters. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate high reproducibility for trabecular bone microarchitecture measures derived from 3T MR images of the proximal femur. The measurement reproducibility is within a range suitable for clinical cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in osteoporosis. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;42:1339-1345.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of the Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia (RUST) score and a new modified RUST score in quantifying healing and to define a value for radiographic union in a large series of metadiaphyseal fractures treated with plates or intramedullary nails. DESIGN: Healing was evaluated using 2 methods: (1) evaluation of interrater agreement in a series of radiographs and (2) analysis of prospectively gathered data from 2 previous large multicenter trials to define thresholds for radiographic union. INTERVENTION: Part 1: 12 orthopedic trauma surgeons evaluated a series of radiographs of 27 distal femur fractures treated with either plate or retrograde nail fixation at various stages of healing in random order using a modified RUST score. For each radiographic set, the reviewer indicated if the fracture was radiographically healed. Part 2: The radiographic results of 2 multicenter randomized trials comparing plate versus nail fixation of 81 distal femur and 46 proximal tibia fractures were reviewed. Orthopaedic surgeons at 24 trauma centers scored radiographs at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively using the modified RUST score above. Additionally, investigators indicated if the fracture was healed or not healed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals was determined for each cortex, the standard and modified RUST score, and the assignment of union for part 1 data. The RUST and modified RUST that defined "union" were determined for both parts of the study. RESULTS: ICC: The modified RUST score demonstrated slightly higher ICCs than the standard RUST (0.68 vs. 0.63). Nails had substantial agreement, whereas plates had moderate agreement using both modified and standard RUST (0.74 and 0.67 vs. 0.59 and 0.53). UNION: The average standard and modified RUST at union among all fractures was 8.5 and 11.4. Nails had higher standard and modified RUST scores than plates at union. The ICC for union was 0.53 (nails: 0.58; plates: 0.51), which indicates moderate agreement. However, the majority of reviewers assigned union for a standard RUST of 9 and a modified RUST of 11, and >90% considered a score of 10 on the RUST and 13 on the modified RUST united. CONCLUSIONS: The ICC for the modified RUST is slightly higher than the standard RUST in metadiaphyseal fractures and had substantial agreement. The ICC for the assessment of union was moderate agreement; however, definite union would be 10 and 13 with over 90% of reviewers assigning union. These are the first data-driven estimates of radiographic union for these scores.

OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate the ability of surgeons to determine if the fibula is reduced in the sagittal plane in relation to the tibia based upon fluoroscopic images by comparison with the known normal for both the ipsilateral and contralateral ankles. METHODS:: Perfect lateral radiographs of both ankles were obtained in seven cadaveric specimens. The fibula was translated 2.5mm and 5mm in the anterior and posterior directions. Four orthopedic trauma-trained surgeons were presented with a fictitious case consisting of a "normal" image, followed by 10 randomly selected images from both ankles, and were asked to determine if the fibula was reduced, or displaced anteriorly or posteriorly. The ability of the surgeons to identify displacement and inter-observer reliability were assessed. RESULTS:: The surgeons were better able to identify malreduction than reduction (NPV 95% ipsilateral, 85% contralateral). The overall sensitivity for reduction was 94% for the ipsilateral ankle, but only 68% for the contralateral ankle. Anterior displacement and greater magnitudes of displacement were most easily diagnosed. All reviewers had the most difficulty with 2.5mm of posterior displacement. The intraobserver agreement was excellent for anterior displacement and 5mm of displacement in either direction (kappa .71/.75). Surgeons who routinely used the contralateral lateral radiograph were more accurate. CONCLUSIONS:: While it is unknown how much translational displacement of the syndesmosis is acceptable, it seems that the experienced surgeon will be able to reduce the joint within 2.5mm and that fluoroscopic comparisons to the normal ankle are helpful in determining malreduction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of syndesmotic disruption on the functional outcomes of Weber B, SE4 ankle fractures treated operatively. SETTING: Multicenter trauma hospitals. PATIENTS: Data were prospectively gathered during a previous, multicenter randomized trial including 242 patients (136 women, 106 men) from 9 trauma centers with operatively treated Weber B SE4 ankle fractures. There were 81 patients (35%) with syndesmotic instability confirmed intraoperatively after fibula fixation. INTERVENTION: Functional evaluations were performed postoperatively at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. The presence of symptomatic hardware and peroneal tendon discomfort was evaluated with 9-12 months of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional outcomes evaluated included Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), Bother index, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores. The recovery curve of the 2 groups was analyzed using a mixed linear regression analysis for repeated measures and included gender and race in the model. Symptomatic hardware and peroneal tendon discomfort were compared between the 2 groups with a chi analysis. RESULTS: The adjusted mean linear regression analyses demonstrated that patients without a syndesmotic injury had better functional outcomes for some outcome measures. SMFA scores at 12 weeks were statistically lower in patients without syndesmotic injury (P = 0.02), but not at other visits. AOFAS scores were significantly higher (P = 0.0006), and Bother index trended toward lower results (P = 0.07) in patients without syndesmotic injury at all time points. Isolated analyses (T-tests) at 1 year demonstrated a difference in the SMFA (P = 0.04) and Bother index (P = 0.05), but not the AOFAS (P = 0.21). Men consistently demonstrated better recovery than women for all outcomes, whereas race was not significant for any measure. Symptomatic hardware and peroneal tendon irritation was not statistically different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The recovery curves after ankle fractures were different based on syndesmotic injury. However, the difference was at the limit of clinical significance. Syndesmotic injury has a slightly detrimental effect on outcomes of operatively treated Weber B SE4 fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine if nutritional screening could be used as a predictor for the development of complications and hospital readmissions. METHODS: A variation of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) score was collected for all inpatients with orthopaedic trauma on admission to our hospital from 2009 to 2011. We retrospectively compared each patient's MUST score with the subsequent development of infection, venous thromboembolism, respiratory failure, ulceration, or readmission. Finally, a chart review was performed to collect comorbidity data and evaluate Charlson comorbidity indexes to estimate the overall health of each patient with an available MUST. RESULTS: Of the 796 consecutive patients in our total cohort, 57.7% (n = 459) were of normal nutritional status and 42.3% (n = 337) exhibited at least 1 sign of malnutrition. In patients with normal nutrition, 2.8% developed at least one of the specified complications, and we observed a complication-to-patient ratio of 0.033. In patients with signs of malnutrition, 8.0% developed at least 1 complication with a complication-to-patient ratio of 0.101. This difference was significant (P = 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that each additional point in a patient's nutrition score corresponded to a 49.5% increase in the odds of developing a complication when controlling for other factors (odds ratio = 1.495, confidence interval = 1.120-1.997, P = 0.006). Charlson comorbidity indexes were not significantly associated with total complications when MUST scores used were a covariant. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated for fractures and dislocations with any sign of malnutrition according to the MUST score were more than twice as likely to acquire some combination of infection, venous thromboembolism, respiratory failure, or other reason for readmission than those of normal nutritional status. Increasing levels of malnourishment corresponded with increasing risk for developing complications, whereas these complications were not necessarily associated with higher comorbidity. An assessment of a fracture patient's nutritional status should be considered a factor in evaluating risks related to fracture care. The MUST score is a predictive tool. These data have important implications for hospitals whose fiscal reimbursement is dependent on the maintenance of defined quality measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is a disease of weak bone. Our goal was to determine the measurement reproducibility of magnetic resonance assessment of proximal femur strength. METHODS: This study had institutional review board approval, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. We obtained images of proximal femur microarchitecture by scanning 12 subjects three times within 1 week at 3T using a high-resolution 3-D FLASH sequence. We applied finite element analysis to compute proximal femur stiffness and femoral neck elastic modulus. RESULTS: Within-day and between-day root-mean-square coefficients of variation and intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 3.5 to 6.6 % and 0.96 to 0.98, respectively. CONCLUSION: The measurement reproducibility of magnetic resonance assessment of proximal femur strength is suitable for clinical studies of disease progression or treatment response related to osteoporosis bone-strengthening interventions.