Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Neither the concept nor the formal application of unacceptable antigens is new. However, identification of unacceptable antigens is now sufficiently accurate to be used as a virtual crossmatch, which can both prevent the unnecessary shipment of organs and increase the access for sensitized patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Desensitization protocols and an increasing array of cell-depleting agents can overcome the immunological barriers to transplantation for some patients, reducing the risk of graft rejection to an acceptable level. Increasingly sensitive and specific assays for identifying HLA antigens and antibodies are providing more accurate definition of incompatibilities. Additionally, tests of various biomarkers may permit characterization of responder types. SUMMARY: The definition of unacceptable antigens is determined by the clinical protocols and the physiological and immunological characteristics of the recipient and donor. These data should be integrated to maximize the opportunity for transplantation. The development of additional tests to assess a patient's capacity for recognizing and responding to a transplant will improve the identification of incompatible donor-recipient pairs.

When considering advocacy of split-liver transplantation, it is important to understand whether comparable outcomes can be achieved. The goal of this study was to identify donor and transplant characteristics predictive of comparable outcomes by risk factor analysis. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing/ Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data base between January 1996 and May 2006, first time adult/child split cases (568 adults, 508 children) were examined. In multivariate analysis, recipient medical condition (hospitalization), status 1 assignment, ABO incompatibility, donor age (>40 years), donor body weight (< or = 40 kg), calculated whole graft volume to recipient body weight ratio (cGRWR < or = 1.5%) and no sharing between centers were significant risk factors in adult recipients. Recipient diagnosis of tumor, dialysis prior to transplant, recipient body weight (< or = 6 kg), donor age (>30 years), donor history of cardiac arrest after declaration of death and cold ischemia time (CIT > 6 h) increased the risk of graft failure in pediatric recipients. The livers from young donors showed comparable outcomes to whole deceased liver transplantation (LT) when other transplant-related risk factors were minimized in adult recipients. Reducing CIT is important to obtain comparable outcomes to living donor LT in pediatric recipients.

Steroid use after liver transplantation (LT) has been associated with diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and hepatitis C (HCV) recurrence. We performed meta-analysis and meta-regression of 30 publications representing 19 randomized trials that compared steroid-free with steroid-based immunosuppression (IS). There were no differences in death, graft loss, and infection. Steroid-free recipients demonstrated a trend toward reduced hypertension [relative risk (RR) 0.84, P = 0.08], and statistically significant decreases in cholesterol (standard mean difference -0.41, P < 0.001) and cytomegalovirus (RR 0.52, P = 0.001). In studies where steroids were replaced by another IS agent, the risks of diabetes (RR 0.29, P < 0.001), rejection (RR 0.68, P = 0.03), and severe rejection (RR 0.37, P = 0.001) were markedly lower in steroid-free arms. In studies in which steroids were not replaced, rejection rates were higher in steroid-free arms (RR 1.31, P = 0.02) and reduction of diabetes was attenuated (RR 0.74, P = 0.2). HCV recurrence was lower with steroid avoidance and, although no individual trial reached statistical significance, meta-analysis demonstrated this important effect (RR 0.90, P = 0.03). However, we emphasize the heterogeneity of trials performed to date and, as such, do not recommend basing clinical guidelines on our conclusions. We believe that a large, multicenter trial will better define the role of steroid-free regimens in LT.

Although prolonged cold ischemia time (PCIT) is generally associated with worse outcomes following liver transplantation, evidence suggests that some recipients and some donors might be more sensitive to PCIT than others. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that predict a higher risk of graft loss after a transplant with PCIT when compared with a similar transplant with average CIT (ACIT). 14 637 recipients reported to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) in the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) era were studied by interaction term analysis in proportional hazards models. Recipient diabetes, obesity and donor African American (AA) ethnicity were found to significantly amplify the adverse effects of PCIT. Graft loss was 1.85-fold higher in diabetic or obese PCIT recipients compared with diabetic or obese ACIT recipients, (vs. 1.17 for the same comparison in non-diabetic non-obese recipients). Similarly, graft loss was 1.80-fold higher in AA PCIT donors compared with AA ACIT donors, (vs. 1.31 for the same comparison in non-AA donors). Other factors may also exist, but current clinical practices might already mitigate the risks from those factors. As such, we recommend expanding clinical practice to include our findings, but not abandoning current judgment based on factors already perceived to amplify the adverse effects of PCIT.