Faculty Bibliography

AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Although good clinical outcomes have been reported for monolithic tapered, fluted, titanium stems (TFTS), early results showed high rates of subsidence. Advances in stem design may mitigate these concerns. This study reports on the use of a current monolithic TFTS for a variety of indications. METHODS:(SD 6.5). Outcomes included intraoperative complications, one-year all-cause re-revisions, and subsidence at postoperative time intervals (two weeks, six weeks, six months, nine months, and one year). RESULTS:There were eight intraoperative complications (4.9%), six of which were intraoperative fractures; none occurred during stem insertion. Six hips (3.7%) underwent re-revision within one year; only one procedure involved removal of the prosthesis due to infection. Mean total subsidence at latest follow-up was 1.64 mm (SD 2.47). Overall, 17 of 144 stems (11.8%) on which measurements could be performed had >5 mm of subsidence, and 3/144 (2.1%) had >10 mm of subsidence within one year. A univariate regression analysis found that additional subsidence after three months was minimal. A multivariate regression analysis found that subsidence was not significantly associated with periprosthetic fracture as an indication for surgery, the presence of an extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO), Paprosky classification of femoral bone loss, stem length, or type of procedure performed (i.e. full revision vs conversion/primary). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:2020;102-B(2):191-197.

BACKGROUND:Perioperative pain management for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves patient outcomes and facilitates recovery. In this study, we compared the effects of preoperative oral acetaminophen vs intravenous (IV) acetaminophen administered once intraoperatively and once postoperatively. METHODS:Two standardized, multimodal analgesia protocols were compared in patients undergoing primary, unilateral TKA. The oral acetaminophen cohort (OA) received doses of oral acetaminophen preoperatively and an as-needed basis postoperatively (n = 698). The IV acetaminophen cohort (IA) received 2 doses of IV acetaminophen, one intraoperative and one 6 hours postoperatively, with no oral acetaminophen given (n = 318). No other variables were significantly changed during the study period. RESULTS:The IV acetaminophen group demonstrated less narcotic usage on postoperative day 0 (OA: 13.3 mme [morphine mg equivalents], IA: 6.2 mme, P < .001) and overall usage (OA: 66.1 mme, IA: 48.5 mme, P < .001). Pain scores were statistically and clinically significantly decreased in the immediate postoperative (the first 8 hours) for the IA group (OA: patient-reported pain scores of 4.0; IA: patient-reported pain scores of 2.0, P < .001). Both groups progressed and completed their physical therapy similarly for each postoperative day. Length of stay and percent discharge home were slightly improved in the IA group as well, however did not reach statistical difference. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:An iterative approach to multimodal pain management after TKA led to improvements in narcotic usage, pain scores, and several quality measures. IV acetaminophen is an integral and effective part of our opioid-sparing multimodal pain regimen in TKA.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Perioperative opioid use is becoming an increasingly concerning topic in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The current study aims to add to the paucity of prior studies that have detailed perioperative opioid use patterns and the effects of preoperative chronic opioid use among a cohort of total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective analysis of 256 consecutive patients who underwent a THA at our institution between February 2016 and June 2016 was performed. Two cohorts were compared: patients deemed 1) preoperative chronic opioid users, and 2) non-chronic users. Variables compared included baseline characteristics, quality metrics, and patients' opioid use histories 3 months prior to surgery and 6 months following surgery. Results/UNASSIGNED:Of the 256 patients, 54 (21.1%) patients were identified as preoperative chronic opioid users. Baseline characteristics including age, gender, BMI, and ASA scores were similar between both cohorts. Discharge disposition, value-based purchasing (VBP) costs, length of stay (LOS), emergency room visits, and postoperative office visits were similar between the two cohorts. Readmission rates (30-day, 90-day, and 6-month) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the chronic opioid users cohort. By the 6-month postoperative time period, chronic opioid users were consuming approximately 100-times the morphine equivalents than non-chronic users. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:The current study demonstrates that a substantial proportion of preoperative chronic opioid users continue to consume large amounts of opioids up to 6-months following THA surgery. Furthermore, preoperative chronic use is significantly associated with poorer quality outcomes, specifically with respect to readmission rates. Level of evidence/UNASSIGNED:Level II, Prognostic Study.

Introduction/UNASSIGNED:The epidemiology of re-revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not yet well-understood. We aim to investigate the epidemiology and risk-factors that are associated with re-revision THA. Methods/UNASSIGNED:288 revision THA were analyzed between 1/2012 and 12/2013. Patients who underwent two or greater revision THA were included. Hips with first-revision due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were excluded. Failure was defined as reoperation. Results/UNASSIGNED:51 re-revision patients were available. Mean age was 59.6 (±14.2 years), 32 (67%) females, average BMI of 28.8 (±5.4), and median ASA 2 (23; 55%). The most common re-revision indications were acetabular component loosening (15; 29%), PJI (13; 25%) and instability (9; 18%). The most common indications for first revision in the re-revision population were acetabular component loosening (11; 27%), polyethylene wear (8; 19%) and instability (8; 19%). There was an increased risk of re-revision failure if the re-revision involved exchanging only the head and polyethylene liner (RR = 1.792; p = 0.017), instability was the first-revision indication (RR = 3.000; p < 0.001), and instability was the re-revision indication (RR = 1.867; p = 0.038). If isolated femoral component revision was indicated during the re-revision, there was a decreased risk of failure (RR = 0.268, p = 0.046). 1-year re-revision survival was 54% (23/43). Discussion/UNASSIGNED:Acetabular component loosening, instability, and PJI were the most common indications for re-revision. Revision due to instability is a recurrent problem that leads to re-revision failure. There was a higher infection rate in the re-revision population compared to published revision PJI. A better understanding of the indications and patient factors that are associated with re-revision failures can help align surgeon and patient expectations in this challenging population.

Much attention has recently been focused on the relationship between the hip and spine and its contribution to postoperative instability following total hip arthroplasty. However, the terminology can be confusing. Through an understanding of spinopelvic parameters, spinopelvic motion, and the interplay between the spine and pelvis, the surgeon can plan for and decrease the risk of instability after total hip arthroplasty. This review details spinopelvic parameters that predispose to instability and guides readers in understanding spinopelvic motion as it relates to THA instability.

Limb alignment is a critically important factor to consider in the management of the patient with knee arthritis. Abnormal alignment is associated with the accelerated progression of osteoarthritis and, if not addressed at the time of surgery, may contribute to early failure of knee replacement implants. The contribution of the hindfoot to overall limb alignment has received limited attention in the context of deformity correction in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this review, we present evidence supporting the inclusion of the hindfoot in the consideration of overall limb alignment for TKA and propose a management algorithm.

BACKGROUND:Previous reports establish that infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) predisposes total joint arthroplasty (TJA) recipients to poor postoperative outcomes. The purpose of the present study is to assess whether variation in HCV VL influences perioperative outcomes following TJA. METHODS:A multicenter retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with HCV who underwent primary TJA between January 2005 and April 2018 was conducted. Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts: (1) patients with an undetectable VL (U-VL) and (2) patients with a detectable VL (D-VL). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was calculated with revision TJA as the end point. Subanalysis on the VL profile was done. RESULTS:A total of 289 TJAs were included (U-VL:118 TJAs; D-VL:171 TJAs). Patients in the D-VL cohort had longer operative times (133.9 vs 109.2 minutes), higher intraoperative blood loss (298.4 vs 219.5 mL), longer inpatient hospital stays (4.0 vs 2.9 days), more postoperative infections (11.7% vs 4.2%), and an increased risk for revision TJA (12.9% vs 5.1%). Kaplan-Meier demonstrated that the U-VL cohort trended toward better survivorship (P = .17). On subanalysis of low and high VL, no difference in outcomes was appreciated. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:TJA recipients with a detectable HCV VL have longer operative times, experience more intraoperative blood loss, have longer hospital length of stay, and are more likely to experience infection and require revision TJA. The blood loss, hospital length of stay, and revision rate findings should be interpreted with caution, however, as there are confounding factors. Our findings suggest that HCV VL is a modifiable risk factor that, can reduce the risk of infection and revision surgery. Additionally, serum HCV VL was not correlated with outcomes.

BACKGROUND:Total hip arthroplasty is increasingly being performed as a same day procedure. Additionally, greater emphasis is being placed on patient satisfaction surveys such as the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS)® Survey. This study aims to assess if patients who undergo THA through a same day discharge program respond with higher HCAHPS scores. METHODS:Patients undergoing THA through our same day surgery (SDD) program at our institution from January 1, 2015, to September 2016 and completed HCAHPS surveys were compared to a cohort of patients who underwent THA as a standard inpatient and completed the HCAHPS survey during the same period. Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain demographic data and improvement in validated patient reported outcomes measures. RESULTS:Patientsin our SDD program were significantly more likely to rate the hospital as "top box" on eight of 11 HCAHPS domains. The remaining three domains that did not reach statistical significance all showed a trend toward increased likelihood of rating the hospital in the "top box" level. For willingness to recommend, 91% of SDD patients vs. 77% of non-SDD patients (p = 0.045) rated our hospital as "top box." We had no significant difference between the groups in change from pre- to postoperative EQ-5D score or Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (HOOS). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:A same day surgery program can significantly improve patient satisfaction with THA as measured by the HCAHPS survey.

BACKGROUND:Opioid prescriptions and subsequent opioid-related deaths have increased substantially in the past several decades. Orthopedic surgery ranks among the highest of all specialties with respect to the amount of opioids prescribed. We present here the outcomes of our opioid-sparing pain management pilot protocol for total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS:A retrospective study was conducted to assess outcomes before and after the implementation of an opioid-sparing pain management protocol for THA. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts for comparison: (1) traditional pain management protocol and (2) opioid-sparing pain management protocol. The Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, pain severity using a Visual Analog Scale, and inpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) per day were compared between the 2 cohorts. RESULTS:No statistically significant difference was observed in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement between the 2 cohorts at any time point (P > .05). Although there was a significant decrease in pain scores over time (P < .01), there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of change between the 2 pain management protocols at any time point (P = .463). Inpatient opioid consumption was significantly lower for the opioid-sparing cohort in comparison to the traditional cohort (14.6 ± 16.7 vs 25.7 ± 18.8 MME/d, P < .001). Similarly, the opioid-sparing cohort received significantly less opioids than the traditional cohort during the post discharge period (13.9 ± 24.2 vs 80.1 ± 55.9 MME, P < .001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The results of this study suggest that an opioid-sparing protocol reduces opioid consumption and provides equivalent pain management and patient-reported outcomes during the 90-day THA episode of care relative to a traditional opioid-based regimen. These findings may help decrease the risk of adverse events associated with postoperative opioid use and provide a means of decreasing the opioid footprint in clinical practice.