Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION: Tumor grade plays a critical role in the management of papillary non-invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC). Since grading of UC relies on morphologic criteria, variability in interpretation exists among pathologists. The objective of this study was to examine inter-observer variability in the grading of papillary non-invasive UC at a single academic medical center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One general pathologist and two genitourinary pathologists were blinded to patient identity and graded 98 consecutive UC specimens using the 1973 and 2004 classification systems. Kappa statistics (kappa) were used to measure inter-observer reproducibility to account for agreement expected purely by chance. By convention, varkappa values from 0.21-0.4 represent "fair", from 0.41-0.6 represent "moderate", and > 0.6 represent "substantial" agreement. RESULTS: Raw percentage agreement among all three pathologists was only 26% using the 1973 system and 47% using the 2004 system. When measured by kappa, overall agreement was only "fair" for both systems and while higher for the 2004 system than the 1973, this was not significant (: 0.38 versus 0.26, respectively). There were no significant differences in agreement when comparing the specialists agreement between themselves with agreement between each specialist and the generalist (varkappa: 0.31-0.37 versus varkappa: 0.18-0.46). CONCLUSIONS: The current grading system continues to demonstrate challenges in reproducibility among general and specialized pathologists. The degree of variability has significant implications on management decisions for non-invasive UC. Our findings underscore the need to identify molecular markers that can provide a more objective and reliable risk stratification system to guide patient management.

AIM: To compare the size and shape of the prostate between in-vivo and fresh ex-vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in order to quantify alterations in the prostate resulting from surgical resection. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Ten patients who had undergone 3 T prostate MRI using a phased-array coil and who were scheduled for prostatectomy were included in this prospective study. The ex-vivo specimen underwent MRI prior to formalin fixation or any other histopathological processing. Prostate volume in vivo and ex vivo was assessed using planimetry. Prostate shape was assessed by calculating ratios between the diameters of the prostate in all three dimensions. RESULTS: Mean prostate volume was significantly smaller ex vivo than in vivo (39.7 +/- 18.6 versus 50.8 +/- 26.8 cm3; p = 0.008), with an average change in volume of -19.5%. The right-to-left (RL)/anteroposterior (AP) ratio of the prostate, representing the shape of the prostate within its axial plane, was significantly larger ex vivo than in vivo (1.33 +/- 0.14 versus 1.21 +/- 0.12; p = 0.015), with an average percent change in RL/AP ratio of the prostate of +12.2%. There was no significant difference between in-vivo and ex-vivo acquisitions in terms of craniocaudal (CC)/AP (p = 0.963, median change = -2.1%) or RL/CC (p = 0.265, median change = +1.3%) ratios. CONCLUSION: The observed volume and shape change following resection has not previously been assessed by comparison of in-vivo and fresh ex-vivo MRI and likely represents loss of vascularity and of connective tissue attachments in the ex-vivo state. These findings have implications for co-registration platforms under development to facilitate improved understanding of the accuracy of MRI in spatial localization of prostate tumours.