Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Operative treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) can be very challenging with high complication rates. Despite these challenges it's well established that pts benefit from such treatment. However, the surgical outcomes for pts with mild scoliosis and age appropriate sagittal alignment have not been reported. PURPOSE: To determine if patients (pts) with mild scoliosis and age appropriate sagittal alignment have favorable outcomes following surgical correction. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter ASD database. PATIENT SAMPLE: ASD patients: operative pts age>=18, and all preoperartive pelvic tilt (PT), mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) within established age adjusted parameters with minimum 2-year follow up. A subanalysis for pts with max coronal cobb angle 10-30degree (mild scoli) was done. OUTCOME MEASURES: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short form-36(SF36), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS22), back/leg pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and minimum clinically important difference (MCID)/substantial clinical benefit (SCB). Radiographic values: max coronal cobb angle, coronal C7 plumb line, PT, PI-LL, thoracic kyphosis (TK), SVA. Demographic, frailty, surgical and complications data were collected.
METHOD(S): Two-year and baseline HRQOL/radiographic data were compared.
RESULT(S): A total of 103 pts were included from 667 operative patients (89.3% female, avg age 59.8+/-13.1yrs). Of the 103 pts, 29 (28.2%) had max preop coronal cobb angle 10-30degree. Two-year max coronal cobb angle and C7 coronal plumb were significantly improved compared to baseline (p<0.001 for both the overall cohort and mild scoli). All 2yr HRQOL measures were significantly improved compared to baseline(p<0.001) for both groups. 33.3-81.5%% of mild scoli pts met either MCID/SCB for all HRQOL. In mild scoli pts, 62.1% had min one complication, 27.6% had a major complication with 24.1% requiring a revision.
CONCLUSION(S): Pts with mild scoliosis and sagittal alignment within age appropriate parameters benefit from surgical correction at 2 years postop both radiographically and clinically including 81.5% meeting MCID for SRS pain despite having high complication rates. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Due to the complexity and invasiveness of deformity correction, poor outcomes are often associated. Currently, it is unknown what factors predict an outcome which operation may not be warranted (reoperation, major complications, clinical deterioration). PURPOSE: To investigate what patient factors justify determining a patient ineligible for a deformity correction. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of a prospective, consecutively enrolled adult spinal deformity (ASD) database. PATIENT SAMPLE: Operative patients with complete 2-year HRQL and radiographic data were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: HRQLs: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), complications; reoperations.
METHOD(S): Patients >18yrs undergoing surgery for ASD (scoliosis >=20degree, SVA >=5cm, PT >=25degree, or TK >=60degree). An unsatisfactory outcome was defined by the following categories met at 2Y: (1) clinical: deteriorating in ODI at 2Y follow-up (2) complications/reop: having a reoperation and major complication were deemed unacceptable for surgery (NoOp). Baseline demographic, clinical and radiographic information were utilized through univariate/multivariate analyses to assess predictive factors of NoOp patients in adult spinal deformity patients. Multivariate regression with backward model selection was employed to create a model for when not to operate.
RESULT(S): A total of 633 ASD patients (59.9 years, 79% F, 27.7 kg/m2, CCI: 1.74) were included. By approach, 0.6% were anterior, 69.7% posterior and 29.5% combined approaches, with a total number of levels fused as 7.5+/-2.1. Baseline severe Schwab modifier incidence (++): 39.2% PI-LL, 28.8% SVA, 28.9% PT. 15.5% of patients deteriorated in ODI by 2 years, while 7.6% underwent a reoperation and had a major complication. This categorized 11 (1.7%) of patients in the total cohort as NoOp. NoOp patients had were more comorbid in terms of arthritis (73%) heart disease (36%) and kidney disease (18%), p<0.001. Surgically, NoOp patients had an overall greater EBL (4431ccs), underwent more osteotomies (91%), specifically Ponte (36%) and Three Column Osteotomies (55%), which occurred more at L2(91%). NoOp patients underwent more PLIFs (45%) and had more blood transfusion units (2641ccs), all p<0.050. The multivariate regression predicting the NoOp ASD group determined a combination of a baseline DRAM score in the 75th percentile, having arthritis and kidney disease, a baseline right lower extremity motor score <=3, cSVA >65mm, C2 slope >30.2degree, CTPA >5.5degree for an R2 value of 0.535 (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION(S): When addressing adult spine deformities, a negative outcome of clinical deterioration, major complications, and reoperations are exceedingly rare, but do occur. This tends to occur in severely comorbid patients with major baseline psychological distress scores, severe neurologic dysfunction and concomitant cervical malalignment not addressed at surgery. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Substantial adult spinal deformity (ASD) research has focused on sagittal plane radiological assessment and emphasized the importance of sagittal correction on patient-reported outcomes. It seems less attention has been given to evaluation of ASD in the coronal plane. However, recent ASD studies have demonstrated baseline global coronal malalignment (GCM; substantial displacement of the C7 coronal plumb line from midsacrum) in up to 35% of patients. Moreover, GCM can worsen postoperatively or may occur as an iatrogenic complication in previously balanced patients. Collectively, this may suggest that the associated clinical impact of GCM on ASD surgical outcomes has been underestimated. Currently, few reports focus on surgical outcomes in ASD patients with GCM. PURPOSE: Our objective was to assess treatment outcomes and complication rates associated with ASD surgery in the subset of patients with severe GCM. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter consecutive case registry. PATIENT SAMPLE: Enrollment required: age >=18 years, scoliosis >=20degree, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) >=5cm, pelvic tilt >=25degree, and/or thoracic kyphosis >=60degree. OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic correction (both standard coronal and sagittal spinopelvic deformity measurements) and health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes, which included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) scores, and back/leg pain numerical rating scale (NRS) scores.
METHOD(S): Surgically treated ASD patients with severe GCM (coronal C7PL-midsacral offset magnitude >=1 SD above the mean) were identified. Baseline and follow-up radiographic and HRQL outcomes were analyzed. Percentages of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were assessed. Demographic, frailty, surgical, and complications data were collected. The primary focus for analysis was on patients who reached minimum 2-year follow-up.
RESULT(S): Of 691 potentially eligible operative patients (mean GCM = 4+/-3 cm), 80 met criteria for severe GCM >= 7cm. Of these 80 patients, 62 (78%, mean age 64 years, 81% women) had minimum 2-year follow-up. Baseline frailty score was 3.9+/-1.5 (indicating patients were frail) and 48% had prior spine fusion. Surgical data included: posterior-only (58%), mean fusion 13 levels, sacroiliac fixation (97%), and three-column osteotomy (36%). Postoperative biplane alignment improved significantly (p<0.001): GCM 11 to 4 cm, lumbar Cobb 30degree to 11degree, C7-S1 SVA 13 to 4 cm, and PI-LL 31degree to 5degree. Overall HRQL improved significantly (p<=0.003): ODI 51 to 37, SF-36 PCS 29 to 37, SRS-22r 2.6 to 3.5, and back/leg pain NRS 7 to 4 and 5 to 3, respectively. Thresholds for MCID/SCB were met in 43-83% of patients. A total of 89 complications were reported (34 minor/55 major), and 45 (73%) patients had >=1 complication (most commonly rod fracture [19%] and PJK [18%]). There were 34 reoperations in 22 (36%) patients (most common indications rod fracture/PJK). The 18 patients who did not achieve 2-year follow-up had a mean of 0.63 years follow-up, and the types of complications encountered in these 18 patients were comparable to those encountered in patients with 2-year follow-up.
CONCLUSION(S): ASD surgery for patients with severe GCM is associated with significant improvements in biplane alignment and HRQL outcome measures despite high complication rates. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: As the field of corrective cervical deformity (CD) surgery progresses, surgeons continue to take on more challenging cases. In order to minimize suboptimal postoperative outcomes it is important to develop a tool that allows for proper preoperative risk stratification. PURPOSE: Develop individualized predictive models for identification of risk-factors that lead to the development of major complications, revisions, and unplanned reoperation. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study of a prospective adult cervical deformity database. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 105 CD patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Major complications (prolonged hospitalization, invasive intervention, prolonged or permanent morbidity, death within 1 year[1Y]), unplanned revision or reoperation after CD surgery within 1Y, HRQOL (NDI, mJOA, EQ5D).
METHOD(S): CD patients (cervical kyphosis >10degree, coronal scoliosis >10degree, cSVA >4cm, TS-CL >10degree, or CBVA >25degree) >=18 years old with complete baseline (BL), 1Y HRQoL and radiographic data. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their outcome from surgery: revision (Rev) and major complication (MC). Descriptive analysis identified cohort demographics, radiographic parameters and surgical details. Univariate analysis of preoperative and surgical factors was conducted to determine associations with any of the two outcomes. Stepwise logistic regressions identified surgical, radiographic, and HRQL factors that were associated with Rev or MC. Decision tree analysis established cut-offs for predictive variables.
RESULT(S): A total of 105 CD patients were included (61.6yrs, 67%F, BMI: 28.4kg/m2, CCI: 0.96+/-1.3). Surgical details: 7.6+/- 3.7 levels fused; mean EBL of 816 mL. By surgical approach, 45.71% had a posterior approach, 35.24% combined approach, and 19.05% anterior approach. Radiographically at baseline, patients presented with: PT: 18.9+/- 11.3; PI: 53.0+/-11.2; PI-LL: -0.45+/-17.2; SVA: -4.3+/-66.8, TS-CL: 37.9 +/-20.2; cSVA: 38.4+/-19.9. Postoperatively, 20 patients experienced a MC and 17 patients underwent a subsequent rev. instrumentation location (LIV: 1.1[1.0-1.3] and UIV: 1.5[1.1-2.1]) was significantly associated with undergoing a rev after index surgery (all p<0.05). The development of a postoperative MC was significantly associated with BL radiographic pelvic parameters (all <0.05). Predictive modeling incorporating preoperative and surgical factors identified development of a Rev to include: UIV>C3, LIV>T3, C2-T3 SVA<46.7degree, C2-C7 SVA>57.6degree, CTPA>7.8degree, and C2S<60.4 (AUC:0.80). For developing a MC, a model consisting of preoperative and surgical factors included BL EQ5D-VAS<30, TS-CL>59.2degree, C2-C7 SVA > 69.1degree, C2-T3 SVA < 18.6, Apex C2-C7 SVA >4.25, surgical invasiveness and posterior osteotomies (AUC:0.83).
CONCLUSION(S): Major adverse events were not uncommon following adult cervical deformity correction. Risk stratification models were developed to predict with high accuracy the occurrence of these common significant postoperative events. Revisions were predicted with an accuracy of 80% using a predominance of radiographic variables, while the occurrence of other major complications was also predicted with high reliability utilizing additional baseline HRQoL data and surgical factors. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Vascular stenting is a common intervention for patients afflicted with coronary artery disease. For elective spine fusion patients with a history of coronary artery disease, a stent provides a less invasive surgical intervention allowing patients to move forward with spinal surgery. However, the impact of an initially less invasive cardiac intervention on outcomes of future surgical spine procedures has been understudied. PURPOSE: Investigate effect of coronary stents on postoperative outcomes in an elective spine fusion cohort. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of the PearlDiver database between the years 2006-2013. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 726,061 elective spine fusion patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Comorbidity burden, 30-day and 90-day complications (myocardial infarction, pneumonia, sepsis, death, would complications, transfusions), length of stay.
METHOD(S): Elective spine fusion patients were isolated with ICD-9 and CPT procedures codes in the PearlDiver database. Patients were stratified by number of coronary stents: (1) 1-2 stents (ST12); (2) 3-4 stents (ST34); (3) no stents. Means comparison tests compared differences in demographics, diagnoses, comorbidities, 30-day and 90-day complication outcomes. Logistic regression assessed the odds of complication associated with coronary stents, controlling for levels fused, age, sex, and comorbidities (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]). Statistical significance was set p<0.05.
RESULT(S): A total of 726,061 elective spine fusion patients were isolated; 707,396 patients had no stent, 17,087 ST12 and 1,578 ST34. At BL, ST12 patients had higher rates of morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, CHF, COPD, and diabetes mellitus compared to no stent and ST34 (all p<0.001). Relative to no stent patients, ST12 patients had a greater LOS and at 30 days, significantly higher complication rates including pneumonia, myocardial infarction, sepsis, AKI, UTI, wound complications, transfusions, and 30-day readmission (p<0.05). Controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, and levels fused ST12 was a significant predictor of MI within 30 days (OR: 2.15[1.7-2.7], p<0.001) and 90-days postop (OR:1.87[1.6-2.2], p<0.001). ST34 patients compared to no stent at 30 days presented with increased complication rates such as pneumonia, MI, sepsis, UTI, wound complications, and 30-day readmissions. Regression analysis show no significant differences in complications between ST12 vs ST34 at 30 days, but at 90 days ST34 was associated with significantly increased rate and odds of death (1.1% vs 0.3%, p=0.021; OR:1.94 [1.13-3.13],p=0.01).
CONCLUSION(S): Cardiac stents failed to normalize risk profile of patients with coronary artery disease. Postoperatively at 90 days, elective spine fusion patients with 3 or more stents were significantly at risk of mortality compared to patients with fewer or no stents. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patient-specific, pre-contoured rods are increasingly used in the surgical treatment of spinal pathologies. Previous studies show that pre-contoured rods help to achieve desired postoperative alignment goals, though it is unclear whether these benefits differ by fusion length. PURPOSE: Assess how preoperative planning and patient-specific rods affect the outcomes of patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of single-center cases of multilevel posterior cervical surgeries from 2014-2018. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study included 65 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sagittal alignment: cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical lordosis (CL), T1 Slope (T1S) minus CL (TS-CL), and cervical-thoracic pelvic angle (CTPA).
METHOD(S): Patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion with available pre- and postop (3-month, 6-month, or 1-year) cervical radiographs were stratified: those whose surgeries involved preoperative planning and patient-specific, pre-contoured rods (PLAN), and those whose surgeries did not (NON). Independent samples t-tests assessed differences between PLAN and NON groups in alignment, and pre- to postop changes in alignment. Secondary analysis assessed differences in alignment between PLAN and NON groups for patients with lower-most instrumented vertebrae (LIV) above C7-T1, and below.
RESULT(S): Included: 65 patients (55.1+/-9.9 years, 61% female) undergoing posterior cervical fusion (6.2+/-3.7 levels). Mean follow-up was 8.4+/-4.1 months. By group, 47.7% of patients had pre-contoured rods (PLAN, N=31), 53.3% did not (NON, N=34). Preoperatively, PLAN patients presented with greater cervical malalignment (CTPA: 4.0degree vs 2.7degree, p=0.015) and T1 Slope (33degree vs 22degree, p=0.013), but not global (SVA, TPA), or lumbopelvic alignment (PT, PI-LL, all p>0.05). Postoperatively, PLAN patients had greater C2-C7 lordosis than NON patients (18degree vs 7degree, p=0.001), and a trend of superior TS-CL alignment (19degree vs 23degree, p=0.075), but did not differ in any other cervical, global, or lumbopelvic parameters (all p>0.05). PLAN patients also showed superior pre- to postop changes in TS-CL (-7degree vs 2.1degree, p=0.026). Overall, 25% of patients had LIVs above C7-T1 (mean fusion length: 4.8+/-1.1 levels), while 75% had fusions extending lower (10.0+/-5.5 levels). For cases in which fusion extended below C7-T1, PLAN patients showed a trend of greater pre- to postop TS-CL correction (-3degree vs 3degree, p-0.076), more postop CL (14degree vs 6degree, p=0.007), and less lumbopelvic malalignment (PI-LL:-7.1degree vs 0.1degree, p=0.029) and (PT: 14degree vs 19degree, p=0.087), though this result is confounded by greater preop PI-LL and PT deformity for NON patients (both p<0.03). No such differences were observed between PLAN and NON groups for cases in which the LIV was above C7-T1 (all p>0.05).
CONCLUSION(S): For posterior cervical fusion cases, the use of preoperative planning and patient-specific, pre-contoured rods was associated with superior correction of cervical sagittal alignment. For cases in which fusion extended below C7-T1, use of contoured rods was associated with superior postop reciprocal alignment in the lumbopelvic spine, though this may be confounded by differences in preop alignment. For longer fusions, pre-planned and contoured rods may offer greater utility. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Prior studies have demonstrated potential benefits of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, but less outcomes data exist for operative ASD patients with severe scoliotic curves (thoracic [TH] curve >=75degree, thoracolumbar [TL] curve >=50degree, or lumbar [LL] curve >=50degree). Also, the surgical complication profile is less clear for this subset of patients with severe scoliotic deformity and warrants focused investigation. PURPOSE: The objective of the current study was to assess treatment outcomes and complication rates associated with ASD surgery in patients with severe scoliosis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter consecutive case registry PATIENT SAMPLE: Enrollment required: age >=18 yrs, scoliosis >=20degree, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) >=5cm, pelvic tilt >=25degree, and/or thoracic kyphosis >=60degree. OUTCOME MEASURES: Standard coronal and sagittal spinopelvic deformity measurements and health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes, which included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) scores.
METHOD(S): Using a prospective multicenter database, we identified surgically treated ASD patients with severe scoliosis (TH Cobb >=75degree or TL/LL Cobb >=50degree) and minimum 2-yr follow-up. Demographic data, surgical characteristics, radiographic alignment measurements, HRQL outcomes and associated complications were analyzed.
RESULT(S): Of 178 patients, 146 (82%, mean age 54 yrs, 92% women, 88 TL, 50 LL, 8 TH) had minimum 2-yr follow-up (mean=3.1 yrs). Almost 30% had prior spine fusion, 6% were active or past smokers, 16% had osteoporosis and 77% had at least 1 comorbidity. Surgical details included: posterior-only (58%) or anterior-posterior approach (42%), SPO (65%), 3CO (14%), TLIF (23%), ALIF (37%), sacropelvic fixation (76%), upper thoracic UIV (64%) and mean posterior fusion length of 13.2 levels. Postoperative coronal alignment improved significantly for all patients (global coronal alignment 3.8 to 2.8 cm, p< 0.001; TH Cobb 38degree to 24degree, p<0.001; TL Cobb 61degree to 30degree, p<0.001; LL Cobb 50degree to 24degree, p<0.001; Fractional Cobb 20degree to 7degree, p<0.001). Overall sagittal alignment also improved significantly (p<0.05), most notably for severe lumbar curves (C7-S1 SVA 6.7 to 2.5 cm, p<0.001; PI-LL 18degreeto 3degree, p<0.001). Overall HRQL improved significantly, including ODI (39 to 26, p<0.001), SF-36 PCS (35 to 41, p<0.001) and SRS-22r (2.9 to 3.8, p<0.001). A total of 191 complications were reported (92 minor/99 major), and 94 (64%) patients had at least one complication. The most common complications included dural tear (12%), pleural effusion (12%), rod fracture (11%), radiculopathy (8%) and proximal junctional kyphosis (7%). 34 reoperations were performed in 27 (18%) patients, with most common indications of rod fracture/pseudarthrosis (8), deep wound infection (6) and neurological deficit (5).
CONCLUSION(S): Surgery for severe adult scoliosis is associated with significant improvement in radiographic alignment and HRQL measures. Although associated complication rates are high, these appear to be comparable to reports of less severe scoliosis. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The age-adjusted alignment ideal alignment was proposed in order reduce the occurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in an adult spinal deformity (ASD) population. The normative postoperative age ideal value for the mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) has yet to be related to the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score postop proportionality. PURPOSE: To assess the impact of normative age-adjusted PI-LL and proportionality via GAP score on postoperative patient-reported outcomes. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of single-surgeon adult spinal deformity (ASD) database PATIENT SAMPLE: 140 ASD patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Health-related quality-of-life (HRQLs); SRS-22r; PJK.
METHOD(S): ASD patients with baseline (BL) and 2-year postoperative (2Y) radiographic and HRQL data were included. Age-adjusted correction groups generated at postoperative follow-up for actual alignment compared to age-adjusted values for PI-LL-adjusted ideal values (matched, overcorrected, undercorrected). GAP Score in the literature includes the four parameters, and an age factor to formulate a sagittal plane score out of 13 (proportional, moderately disproportional [MD], severely disproportional [SD]). GAP improvement scores were noted as less at 2Y compared to BL. Patients were grouped by age-adjusted and 2Y GAP results: Match PI-LL/Proportional GAP, Match PI-LL/Disproportional GAP, Unmatch PI-LL/Proportional GAP, Unmatch PI-LL/Disproportional GAP. Means comparison and chi-squared ANOVA analyses assessed the outcomes between age-adjusted and GAP groups.
RESULT(S): Included: 140 ASD patients (55.5+/-16.4 years, 81% female, 25.2+/-4.7kg/m2). At BL, mean sacral slope: 30.7degree, pelvic tilt: 23degree, pelvic incidence: 53.5degree, PI-LL: 13.3degree, SVA: 61.6 mm, and L1-S1: 40.4degree. BL GAP proportionality: 17.8% proportional, 27.1% MD, 55% SD. PI-LL by baseline GAP proportionality groups: -6.4degree Proportional, -4.6degree MD, 26.8degree SD, p<0.001. Baseline ODI increased significantly with GAP proportionality: 27.3 Proportional, 32.3 MD, 37.4 SD, p=0.050. Assessment of 2Y age-adjusted PI-LL alignment found that 20.3% of patients Matched, 45.1% Overcorrected, and 34.6% Undercorrected. By 2Y GAP results, 32.3% were proportional, 38.5% MD, 29.5% SD (40.5% of patients improved, while 48.5% remained the same, and 11.1% deteriorated in their GAP proportionality). Categorized by the PI-LL age-adjusted/GAP groups: 2.3% Match PI-LL/Proportional GAP, 13.1% Match PI-LL/Disproportional GAP, 30% Unmatch PI-LL/Proportional GAP, 54.6% Unmatch PI-LL/Disproportional GAP. Patients who Unmatched PI-LL/Disproportional in GAP had significantly worse postoperative SRS-Pain scores (1.80 vs 3.53-3.86), SRS-Appearance (3.30 vs 3.69-4.29) and SRS-22 Total scores (2.84 vs 3.80-4.12), all p<0.050. Unmatch PI-LL/Disproportional patients developed PJK at a significantly higher rate by 6-months (66.7% vs 11.8-15.4%), p<0.050. Outcomes were not different between Match PI-LL/Disproportional GAP and Unmatch PI-LL/Proportional GAP groups.
CONCLUSION(S): Collectively over or undercorrecting in age-adjusted mismatch pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis and becoming disproportional in spinal shape at 2 years led to increased postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis and significantly worse patient-reported outcomes. Surgeons should be wary of the double mal-correction when utilizing these complex realignment schemas. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Revision surgery is often necessary for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. Satisfaction with management is an important component of HRQOL. PURPOSE: We hypothesized that patients who underwent multiple revision surgeries following adult spinal deformity correction would exhibit lower satisfaction scores. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected multicenter database of ASD patients. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 668 patients undergoing ASD surgery and eligible for minimum 2-year follow-up were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: SRS-22r satisfaction score.
METHOD(S): Visits were stratified by occurrence prior to the index surgery (period 0), after the index surgery only (period 1) (ie, never underwent revision or had not yet undergone revision), after first revision only (period 2), and after second revision only (period 3). Patients were further stratified by prior spine surgery before their index surgery. SRS-22r satisfaction scores were evaluated at all periods using multiple linear regression adjusting for age, gender, and CCI.
RESULT(S): In total, 46.6% had prior spine surgery before their index surgery. The overall revision rate was 21.3%. among patients with no spine surgery prior to the index surgery, satisfaction increased from period 0 to 1 (2.8 to 4.3, p<0.0001), decreased after one revision from period 1 to 2 (4.3 to 3.9, p=0.0004), and decreased after a second revision from period 2 to 3 (3.9 to 3.3, p=0.0437). Among patients with spine surgery prior to the index procedure, satisfaction increased from period 0 to 1 (2.8 to 4.2, p<0.0001), and decreased from period 1 to 2 (4.2 to 3.8, p=0.0011). No differences in follow-up time from last surgery were observed between visits in periods 1, 2, and 3 (all p>0.3). among patients with multiple revisions, 40% experienced rod fracture, 40% PJK, and 33% pseudarthrosis.
CONCLUSION(S): ASD patients exhibit decreased satisfaction with subsequent revision. Among patients undergoing primary surgery in our database, this effect is additive for multiple revisions. These results have important implications for surgeons, patients, insurers, hospital administrators, and policymakers. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Hospital acquired conditions (HACs) were established in the Affordable Care Act, and are defined as reasonably preventable complications that are nonreimbursable. In high risk patient populations for HACs, such as frail surgical spine patients, preoperative evaluation should consider modifiable factors. PURPOSE: To identify if optimizing the modifiable factors in the frailty index reduce the risk of developing HACs in population of surgical spine patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study included 196,523 elective spine surgery patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). OUTCOME MEASURES: Modifiable patient frailty factors: hypertension and diabetes mellitus; rates of HACs, superficial or deep surgical site infection (SSI), deep venous thromboembolism (VTE) and urinary tract infection (UTI), across frailty scores.
METHOD(S): Patients >18 years who underwent elective spine surgery were identified in ACS-NSQIP database from 2005-2016. HACs identified: SSI, VTE, and UTI. Patient frailty was assessed utilizing the modified NSQIP 5-factor frailty index. The modified frailty score (mFI-5) is assessed on a scale between 0 and 1 (no frailty [NF] <0.3, mild frailty [MF] 0.3-0.5, severe frailty [SF] >0.5). Descriptive analysis quantified rates of patient characteristics, operative details, and HAC prevalence. Stepwise linear regression models determined significant predictors of baseline frailty using controllable patient factors. HACs were compared between 'optimized' and 'non-optimized' frailty status in the cohort. Level of significance was set to P<0.05.
RESULT(S): A total of 196,523 patients (57+/-14.2 years, 30.4 kg/m², 48%F) met inclusion criteria. Overall, 5,720 (2.9%) of patients developed an HAC, the most common was an SSI (1.3%), followed by UTI (1.1%). When stratified by the mFI-5 frailty severity groups at baseline, 83.6% of patients were categorized NF, 15.1% MF and 1.3% SF. Within the frailty severity groups, prevalence of overall HACs increased significantly (NF: 2.64%, MF: 4.17%, 5.93%, p<0.001). Rates of all individual postoperative HACs assessed also increased with greater baseline frailty severity: SSI (NF: 1.14%, MF: 1.93%, SF: 2.39%, p<0.001), UTI (NF: 0.91%, MF: 1.66%, SF: 2.85%, p<0.001), VTE (NF: 0.68%, MF: 0.80%, SF: 1.16%, p=0.002). Stepwise linear regression models determined that diabetes mellitus (beta = 0.493) and hypertension (beta = 0.679) were the most significant predictors for increased baseline frailty by way of the mFI-5 NSQIP index (Final model: R2= 0.897). Of total patients, 47.2% had the optimal modifiable frailty factors (no history of diabetes or hypertension). The optimal frailty patients had significantly less overall incidence of SSI (2.03% vs 2.5%, p<0.001), UTI (0.65% vs 1.4%, p<0.001), DVT (0.56% vs 0.84%, p<0.001), and any overall HAC (2.18% vs 3.56%, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION(S): Stepwise linear regression models determined that hypertension and diabetes account for 89.7% of variance in baseline mFI-5 score. Patients with these optimal controllable factors had reduced incidence of all hospital acquired conditions. In order to optimize hospital resources and treatment outcomes, physicians and patients should be aware of the modifiable factors that contribute to a patient's frailty that can ultimately impact acquiring HACs. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright