Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To validate radiation safety instructions to patients and to evaluate the potential radiation doses to members of the public after (125)I or (103)Pd prostate implantation. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:Radiation dose rate measurements were made in the immediate postoperative period on 636 consecutive patients with stage T1-T2 prostate cancer who underwent transperineal (125)I or (103)Pd implantation at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center during the period from August 1995 through January 2003. RESULTS:The mean radiation dose rate at the anterior skin surface following a prostate implant was 37 microSv/hr for (125)I and 8 microSv/hr for (103)Pd. At 30 cm from the anterior skin surface, these dose rates were reduced to 6 microSv/hr for (125)I and 3 microSv/hr for (103)Pd. At 1 m from the anterior skin surface the dose rates from both types of implants were reduced to less than 1 microSv/hr. The effect of body weight on dose rates from (125)I sources was examined for a select sub-group of patients and the measured dose rate was found to decrease with increasing body weight. In another group of patients, dose rate measurements were made on both lateral skin surfaces and were less than 16.8 microSv/hr in all cases. Assuming a 33% occupancy factor and utilizing the mean measured dose rate for (125)I, the time required to reach an effective dose equivalent limit of 5 mSv for caregivers was estimated to be 19 days on contact with the skin surface. Using a similar calculation, the lifetime doses for (125)I at a distance of 30 cm from the anterior skin surface, as well as the lifetime doses for (103)Pd on contact with the skin surface and at 30 cm from the anterior skin surface can be shown to be less than 5 mSv. CONCLUSIONS:The large number of cases available for this study permits a validation of radiation safety recommendations and provides concrete information from which the permitted exposure times following implantation can be estimated. The data support the conclusion that patients treated with these implants do not represent a radiation risk to members of the public.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:There are several nomograms for the patient considering radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Because of the questionable clinical implications of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence, its use as an end point has been criticized in several of these nomograms. The goal of this study was to create and to externally validate a nomogram for predicting the probability that a patient will develop metastasis within 5 years after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:We conducted a retrospective, nonrandomized analysis of 1,677 patients treated with three-dimensional CRT at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) from 1988 to 2000. Clinical parameters examined were pretreatment PSA level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason sum. Patients were followed until their deaths, and the time at which they developed metastasis was noted. A nomogram for predicting the 5-year probability of developing metastasis was constructed from the MSKCC cohort and validated using the Cleveland Clinic series of 1,626 patients. RESULTS:After three-dimensional CRT, 159 patients developed metastasis. At 5 years, 11% of patients experienced metastasis by cumulative incidence analysis (95% CI, 9% to 13%). A nomogram constructed from the data gathered from these men showed an excellent ability to discriminate among patients in an external validation data set, as shown by a concordance index of 0.81. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:A nomogram with reasonable accuracy and discrimination has been constructed and validated using an external data set to predict the probability that a patient will experience metastasis within 5 years after three-dimensional CRT.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To assess the merit of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition of biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer by testing alternative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure definitions against the "gold standard" of clinical failure and to study the effect of backdating the time of failure. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:Nine participating institutions agreed to submit follow-up results for all patients with clinically localized prostatic cancer (Stage T1b, T1c, T2, N0M0) treated between 1986 and 1995 by external beam radiotherapy only, to doses of >or=60 Gy, with no androgen deprivation before treatment. A total of 4839 men met the study criteria, with a median follow-up time of 6.3 years. The prediction of clinical failure by 102 definitions of biochemical failure was assessed using various quantitative measures. RESULTS:Four definitions were superior as measured by the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and hazard of clinical failure after biochemical failure: two rises of at least 0.5 ng/mL backdated, PSA level at or greater than the absolute nadir plus 2 ng/mL at the call date, and PSA level at or greater than the current nadir plus 2 or 3 ng/mL at the call date. The absolute nadir was the lowest measured PSA level during all of follow-up, and the current nadir was the lowest PSA measured previous to a particular PSA measurement during follow-up. With the possible exception of patients in the low-risk group, the likelihood of ultimate clinical failure decreased as the time of biochemical failure increased. Failure definitions based on PSA levels >0.2 or 0.5 ng/mL were inferior to other definitions. Backdating the failure time introduced bias into the estimate of freedom from biochemical failure, which was increasingly overestimated at shorter median follow-up times. This bias can be circumvented either by using a failure definition based on the call date or by backdating the censoring times of patients with one or two rises who could potentially have failure at a future (unobserved) time. A short follow-up time as such does not result in bias unless the failures are backdated; in the absence of backdating, it is the precision of failure-free survival that is increasingly compromised as the follow-up time is reduced. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The ASTRO failure definition ended the confusion resulting from different failure definitions that had been in use, and it did so accurately enough that it is probably not necessary to recalculate previously published results. Nevertheless, for the current pooled analysis of outcome in 4839 men with a 6.3-year median follow-up, other definitions of biochemical failure were superior as assessed by various quantitative measures of concordance of biochemical and ultimate clinical failure. An additional disadvantage of the ASTRO definition is the bias introduced by backdating failures, as well as the necessarily retrospective nature of its application. Some "current" definitions, but not those based on the PSA level rising above a fixed threshold, have significantly higher sensitivity and specificity, do not lead to biased estimations of biochemical disease-free survival, and are directly applicable during patient counseling. These are all issues that would play a role in replacing the ASTRO consensus definition.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To report the long-term outcome for patients with Stage T1-T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate definitively irradiated in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:Nine institutions combined data on 4839 patients with Stage T1b, T1c, and T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate who had a pretreatment PSA level and had received >or=60 Gy as definitive external beam radiotherapy. No patient had hormonal therapy before treatment failure. The median follow-up was 6.3 years. The end point for outcome analysis was PSA disease-free survival at 5 and 8 years after therapy using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) failure definition. RESULTS:The PSA disease-free survival rate for the entire group of patients was 59% at 5 years and 53% at 8 years after treatment. For patients who had received >or=70 Gy, these percentages were 61% and 55%. Of the 4839 patients, 1582 had failure by the PSA criteria, 416 had local failure, and 329 had distant failure. The greatest risk of failure was at 1.5-3.5 years after treatment. The failure rate was 3.5-4.5% annually after 5 years, except in patients with Gleason score 8-10 tumors for whom it was 6%. In multivariate analysis for biochemical failure, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, radiation dose, tumor stage, and treatment year were all significant prognostic factors. The length of follow-up and the effect of backdating as required by the ASTRO failure definition also significantly affected the outcome results. Dose effects were most significant in the intermediate-risk group and to a lesser degree in the high-risk group. No dose effect was seen at 70 or 72 Gy in the low-risk group. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:As follow-up lengthens and outcome data accumulate in the PSA era, we continue to evaluate the efficacy and durability of radiotherapy as definitive therapy for early-stage prostate cancer. Similar studies with higher doses and more contemporary techniques will be necessary to explore more fully the potential of this therapeutic modality.

BACKGROUND:The objective of the current study was to provide descriptive information on a representative national sample of patients with prostate carcinoma who were treated with prostate brachytherapy (PB) in calendar year 1999. METHODS:A random survey was conducted by the Patterns of Care Study in radiation oncology of 59 facilities (1 facility had no eligible patients) that treated patients with prostate carcinoma in 1999 in the United States. A weighted sample size of 36,496 patients with prostate cancer was included in the 1999 survey (unweighted sample size, 554 patients). The main measures were the clinical characteristics of men prior to treatment and the technical characteristics of PB. Patients were classified into three prognostic groups according to T stage, pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, and Gleason score. RESULTS:A weighted sample size of 13,293 patients (36%; unweighted sample size, 162 patients) was treated with PB. Compared with a weighted sample size of 23,203 patients (64%; unweighted sample size, 392 patients) was treated with external beam radiotherapy (EB), patients who received PB were significantly younger (mean age: PB group, 67.7 years; EB group, 70.8 years; P = 0.0006). The mean pretreatment PSA level for the PB group was lower compared with the EB group (9.9 ng/mL vs. 13.33 ng/mL; P = 0.0015). The prognostic groupings were more favorable for patients in the PB group compared with patients in EB group (P = 0.0365). The utilization of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the PB group was similar to the utilization of ADT in the EB group (40.4% vs. 51.3%; P = 0.2282). The vast majority of men who were treated with PB received low-dose-rate, permanent sources (89%). Fifty-four percent of men received PB monotherapy (PBM), and the remaining 46% were treated with EB in addition to PB (EBPB). The prognostic groupings were more favorable for patients in the PBM group compared with patients in the EBPB group (P = 0.0037). Of the men who were treated with low-dose-rate PB, 59% were treated with iodine-125 (I-125), and 41% were treated with palladium-103 (Pd-103). I-125 was used more frequently in men who were treated with PBM, and Pd-103 was used more frequently in men who were treated with EBPB. Postimplantation dosimetry was documented in 61.0% of men who were treated with low-dose-rate PB. Computed tomography imaging was used for 46.5% of men. CONCLUSIONS:PB was used in 36% of men who were treated with radiotherapy nationally. The mean age of men who were treated with PB was younger than the population of men who were treated with EB alone. Nearly 50% of men who received PB also received EB. EB was used more frequently in men with higher-risk disease. ADT was used in 40% of patients in the PB group. Techniques and prescription doses were consistent with published guidelines.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:We report the long-term prostate specific antigen relapse-free survival rates and predictors of biochemical outcome for patients 60 years or younger with prostate cancer treated with high dose conformal external beam radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed the records of 740 patients with prostate cancer treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated external beam radiotherapy. Patients who also received androgen deprivation therapy were excluded from this analysis. Median radiation dose was 75.6 Gy and median followup was 88 months with a minimum followup of 24 months. Median followup for patients 60 years or younger in this report was 54 months (range 24 to 132). Biochemical failure was defined according to the criteria recommended by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. RESULTS:Biochemical failure developed in 20 (21%) of the 96 men 60 years or younger, which was similar to the 22% failure rate observed in 644 patients older than 60. The 5 and 7-year biochemical disease-free survival rates were 82% and 79% in younger men, and 79% and 78% in older men, respectively (p = 0.48). For younger patients who received 81 Gy or greater, the 7-year prostate specific antigen relapse-free survival rates for favorable, intermediate and unfavorable risk patients were 96%, 87% and 50%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that among patients 60 years or younger the most important predictor of biochemical relapse was radiation doses less than 75.6 Gy followed by Gleason score greater than 7. CONCLUSIONS:Men with prostate cancer 60 years or younger treated with high dose radiotherapy have an excellent biochemical outcome and fare as well as older patients. The use of conventional dose levels in patients 60 years or younger was associated with an 8-fold increase in the biochemical relapse rate and these doses should not be considered appropriate for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

The relative inability of conventional radiotherapy to control localized prostate cancer results from resistance of subpopulations of tumor clonogens to dose levels of 65 to 70 Gy, the maximum feasible with traditional two-dimensional (2D) treatment planning and delivery techniques. Several technological advances have enhanced the precision and improved the outcome of external-beam radiotherapy. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) approach has permitted significant increases in the tumor dose to levels beyond those feasible with conventional techniques. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), an advanced form of conformal radiotherapy, has resulted in reduced rectal toxicity, permitting tumor dose escalation to previously unattainable levels with a concomitant improvement in local tumor control and disease-free survival. The combination of androgen deprivation and conventional-dose radiotherapy, tested mainly in patients with locally advanced disease, has also produced significant outcome improvements. Whether androgen deprivation will preclude the need for dose escalation or whether high-dose radiotherapy will obviate the need for androgen deprivation remains unknown. In some patients, both approaches may be necessary to maximize the probability of cure. In view of the favorable benefit-risk ratio of high-dose IMRT, the design of clinical trials to resolve these critical questions is essential.

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate intraoperative prostatic edema during prostate brachytherapy with real-time ultrasound imaging and assess its impact upon the postimplant dosimetry of computer-optimized intraoperatively planned patients. Fifty consecutive patients with early-stage favorable risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate underwent transperineal ultrasound-guided I125 brachytherapy. Ultrasound volume studies of the prostate were performed immediately before and after placement of brachytherapy needles in the operating room. Twenty-five patients underwent intraoperative computer-optimized treatment planning using a genetic algorithm. Twenty-five patients underwent preimplant ultrasound studies for preimplant treatment planning. Postimplant dosimetry was performed on computed tomography scans obtained after the implant. Statistical analysis was performed taking into account patient age, preneedle volume, increase in intraoperative edema, use of hormonal therapy, type of isotope, number of needles or seeds used, and seed activity. For the intraoperatively planned patients, a median increase of 30% in intraoperative volume was found for the entire group. No correlation between the extent of intraoperative edema and %D90 (percentage of prescribed dose that covers 90% of the target volume) was found. None of the other analyzed variables correlated with %D90. Patients whose treatment was planned preoperatively experienced a median increase of 18.4% in target volume. A negative correlation between the amount of edema and the %D90 was found to be statistically significant (-0.55, P = 0.0047). All patients who underwent prostate brachytherapy experienced intraoperative prostatic edema. When planned intraoperatively, the amount of edema had no impact on the %D90. This may be because of the ability of intraoperative computer-optimized treatment planning to account for edema related to the procedure. Preplanned patients who encountered a greater degree of intraoperative edema had less %D90 target coverage.