Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:bangas01

Total Results:

818


Inferior antihypertensive efficacy with low dose hydrochlorothiazide [Meeting Abstract]

Bavishi, C; Messerli, F H; Pareek, A K; Chatterjee, S; Makani, H; Rimoldi, S; Bangalore, S
Hydrochlorthiazide (HCTZ) is one of the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive drugs worldwide. More than 97% of all HCTZ prescriptions are for 12.5 to 25 mg per day. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy ofHCTZby clinic blood pressure (BP) and ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring when compared to other anti-hypertensives. A systematic review was performed using Medline, Cochrane, Scopus and Embase databases for all randomized trials that assessed both clinic and 24-h ABP with HCTZ in comparison with other antihypertensive drugs. In addition, trials were selected only if they studiedHCTZas monotherapy and have trial duration of at least 4 weeks. Eleven studies (16 comparisons) with 918 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All the studies used HCTZ dose 12.5 to 25 mg/day except one study that used a dose of 25-50 mg/day. The decrease in clinic BP with HCTZ was systolic 12.1mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.0 to 18.3mmHg) and diastolic 6.3mmHg (95% CI: 2.8 to 9.9 mm Hg). The reduction in 24-h ABP with HCTZ was systolic 6.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 5.0 to 7.7 mm Hg) and diastolic 3.3 mm Hg (95% CI: 1.8 to 4.9 mm Hg). In head-to-head comparisons with other antihypertensive drug classes, compared to HCTZ, ACE inhibitors/ARBs resulted in significant greater reduction in systolic clinic andABPby 4.5/2.3mmHg, beta-blockers by 8.1/6.2 mm Hg, calcium antagonists by 3.2/2.5 mm Hg and thiazide-type diuretics by 7.8/5.3 mm Hg. Similarly, other anti-hypertensive drug classes resulted in significantly greater reduction of diastolic ABP and clinic
EMBASE:617812457
ISSN: 1878-7436
CID: 2682632

Blood pressure control and mortality in US and foreign-born hypertensive African Americans served by NYC HHC [Meeting Abstract]

Gyamfi, J; Butler, M; Williams, S; Seixas, A; Agyemang, C; Bangalore, S; Ogedegbe, G
Background: In the United States, 40% of African Americans are disproportionately affected by hypertension leading to severe comorbidity and eventual mortality. Ethnic differences in hypertension among the various African American groups are not well documented. We evaluated the blood pressure control rates of Caribbean and West African born African Americans compared to US born African Americans attending New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (NYC HHC) facilities. Methods: Data from NYC HHC clinical data warehouse were extracted for hypertensive patients seen between January 2004 and December 2009. Ethnic origin was based on self-reported country of birth (United States, the Caribbean, and West Africa). Blood pressure (BP) was scored by taking the average of 3 or more blood pressure measurements over the course of 3 months of HHC data. All BP measurements were made in the clinical setting and uncontrolled hypertension was defined as BP >140/90 mm Hg. All BPs were measured at least 4 months after hypertension diagnosis. We also extracted information regarding comorbid diagnoses, number of prescribed antihypertensive classes, number of medical visits, age, sex, BMI and mortality. We compared the groups using cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: The sample was composed of 25,142 African Americans of whom 13,778 (54.8%) were US born, 10,032 (39.9%) were Caribbean born, and 1,332 (5.3%) were West African born. The mean sample age was 51 (14.2) years, the mean BMI was 32.4 (11.0) and the sample was 61.4% (N=15,449) female. Compared to US born African Americans, Caribbean and West African born African Americans had higher levels of systolic blood pressure (3.8mmHg; p<.001 and 2.4mmHg; p<.001 respectively) and were more likely to have uncontrolled BP (OR=1.40;p<.001 and OR=1.21;p=.002, respectively). These differences were found in unadjusted models and after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, number of classes of antihypertensive medications prescribed, comorbidity, number of BP measurements, and length of HTN diagnosis. However, US born African Americans had higher rates of mortality (11.6%) compared to Caribbean born (6.0%) and West African born (2.5%) African Americans, which was confirmed by unadjusted and fully adjusted cox proportional hazards regression models. Conclusion: Ethnic differences in cardiovascular outcomes and mortality exist among hypertensive African Americans served by NYC HHC. US born African Americans have a lower survival rate despite lower BP and better BP control than Caribbean and West African born African Americans. Future studies on African Americans should take ethnic variations within these populations into account
EMBASE:617811947
ISSN: 1878-7436
CID: 2682652

Outcomes of </=6-month versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: A meta-analysis and meta-regression

Villablanca, Pedro A; Massera, Daniele; Mathew, Verghese; Bangalore, Sripal; Christia, Panagiota; Perez, Irving; Wan, Ningxin; Schulz-Schupke, Stefanie; Briceno, David F; Bortnick, Anna E; Garcia, Mario J; Lucariello, Richard; Menegus, Mark; Pyo, Robert; Wiley, Jose; Ramakrishna, Harish
BACKGROUND: The benefit of </=6-month compared with 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) placement remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis and meta-regression of 40 was identified, effects were obtained with random models. RESULTS: Nine RCTs were included with total n = 19,224 patients. No significant differences were observed between
PMCID:5207602
PMID: 28033306
ISSN: 1536-5964
CID: 2429992

Drug-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stents for Coronary Artery Disease [Letter]

Bangalore, Sripal
PMID: 28032959
ISSN: 1533-4406
CID: 2402432

Choosing between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery for nondiabetic patients with multivessel disease [Comment]

Dwivedi, Aeshita; Bangalore, Sripal
PMCID:5179468
PMID: 28066575
ISSN: 2072-1439
CID: 2400592

Introduction: Controversies in Hypertension [Editorial]

Messerli, Franz H; Bangalore, Sripal
PMID: 27978963
ISSN: 1873-1740
CID: 2363632

Complete vs Culprit-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI With Multivessel Disease: A Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Trials

Bainey, Kevin R; Welsh, Robert C; Toklu, Bora; Bangalore, Sripal
BACKGROUND: Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) most commonly are treated with culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, this has been recently challenged, suggesting benefit with complete revascularization (CR). Still, these latest findings are largely based on clinical trials powered for composite outcomes that frequently include "softer" end points. We performed a meta-analysis comparing routine culprit-only PCI vs CR in STEMI, with an emphasis on "hard" clinical end points. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, and CENTRAL were searched from 1996-May 2015. Studies included patients with STEMI and MVD who received primary PCI. The primary end point was long-term death/myocardial infarction (MI). Data were combined using a fixed-effects model. RESULTS: Seven randomized trials (2004 patients: 1065 CR and 939 culprit-only PCI procedures) were included. Compared with culprit-only PCI, CR reduced the composite of death/MI (odds ratio [OR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.96) but not death (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.53-1.15) or recurrent MI (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.58-1.24) alone. If CR was performed during the index catheterization, a reduction in death/MI was observed (death/MI: OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.25-0.65; death: OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.34-1.00; recurrent MI: OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18-0.69). If staged, no benefits were noted (death/MI: OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.67-1.45; death: OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.56-1.61; recurrent MI: OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.61-1.70). However, when trial sequential analysis was performed for the overall population, the cumulative z-curve did not cross the monitoring boundary, suggesting a lack of evidence for reducing death/MI with CR (similar for index catheterization). CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI with MVD, there is insufficient evidence to support a reduction in death/MI with CR. Our results reinforce the need for larger clinical trials powered for robust clinical end points.
PMID: 27378594
ISSN: 1916-7075
CID: 2357292

Use and Effectiveness of Bivalirudin Versus Unfractionated Heparin for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States

Secemsky, Eric A; Kirtane, Ajay; Bangalore, Sripal; Jovin, Ion S; Shah, Rachit M; Ferro, Enrico G; Wimmer, Neil J; Roe, Matthew; Dai, Dadi; Mauri, Laura; Yeh, Robert W
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe temporal trends and determine the comparative effectiveness of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: Several clinical trials have compared the safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin versus UFH during PCI for STEMI, but results have been conflicting. METHODS: Trends in anticoagulant use were examined among 513,775 PCIs for STEMI from July 2009 through December 2014 within the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry. We conducted an instrumental variable analysis comparing bivalirudin with UFH, using operator preference for bivalirudin as the instrument. We used a test of mediation to determine the extent to which differences in outcomes between anticoagulants were due to differences in use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI). Primary outcomes were in-hospital bleeding and mortality. RESULTS: Bivalirudin use increased from 2009 through 2013, followed by a new decline. GPIs were used in 74.7% of UFH PCIs versus 26.5% of bivalirudin PCIs. In unadjusted analyses, bivalirudin was associated with decreased bleeding (risk difference [RD]: -4.2%; p < 0.001) and mortality (RD: -0.84%; p < 0.001). After instrumental variable analyses, bivalirudin remained associated with less bleeding (RD: -3.75%; p < 0.001), but not mortality (RD: -0.10%; p = 0.280). The higher rate of GPI use with UFH was responsible for more than one-half of bivalrudin's bleeding reduction (GPI-adjusted RD: -1.57%; p < 0.001). Bleeding reductions were negligible for transradial PCI (RD: -0.11%; p = 0.842). CONCLUSIONS: The use of bivalirudin during STEMI has decreased. Bivalirudin was associated with reduced bleeding and no mortality difference. The bleeding reduction with bivalirudin was largely explained by the greater use of GPIs with UFH.
PMID: 27838271
ISSN: 1876-7605
CID: 2310812

Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System Inhibitors In Hypertension: Is There Evidence For Benefit Independent Of Blood Pressure Reduction?

Bavishi, Chirag; Bangalore, Sripal; Messerli, Franz H
The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of hypertension (HTN). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are first line anti-HTN drug classes that are potent, effective and largely safe. Direct renin inhibitors (DRIs) have shown similar blood pressure (BP) reduction but more side effects. The efficacy of ACEIs and ARBs (for cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and renal protection) has been promoted to extend beyond what could be explained by BP reduction alone. In the current review, we will briefly discuss theBromfield and Muntner (Jun 2013) pathophysiology of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) system,World Health Organization. A Global Brief on Hypertension: Silent Killer, Global Public Health Crisis (April 2013) clinical evidence for ACEIs, ARBs and DRIs in HTN,Bian et al. (Nov-Dec 2010) comparison of ACEIs vs ARBs and combination therapy,Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N. Engl. J. Med. Jan 20 (2000) role of RAAS inhibitors in specific patient populations,Group PC. Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6,105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet. Sep 29 (2001) safety profile of RAAS inhibitors, andPitt B, O'Neill B, Feldman R, et al. The QUinapril Ischemic Event Trial (QUIET): evaluation of chronic ACE inhibitor therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease and preserved left ventricular function. Am. J. Cardiol. May 1 (2001) guideline recommendations and future perspectives. Closer scrutiny of outcome data shows little, if any, evidence that the efficacy of RAAS blockers in HTN extends beyond BP reduction.
PMID: 27777044
ISSN: 1873-1740
CID: 2288632

Cognitive Decline, Blood Pressure Control and Variability: A Relentless Downward Spiral? [Letter]

Messerli, Franz H; Bangalore, Sripal
PMID: 27751802
ISSN: 1538-9375
CID: 2279882