Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Cost effective implant selection in orthopedic trauma is essential in the current era of managed healthcare delivery. Both locking and non-locking plates have been utilized in the treatment of displaced fractures of the olecranon. However, locking plates are often more costly and may not provide superior clinical outcomes. The primary aim of the present study is to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of olecranon fractures treated with locked and non-locking plate and screw constructs while providing insight into the cost of various implants. METHODS:We performed a retrospective chart review of a single institution database identifying Mayo IIB type olecranon fractures treated surgically from 2003 to 2012. All fractures were treated with either a locked plate or a one-third tubular hook plate construct. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated. Minimum 6-month follow-up was required. Outcomes were compared between fixation constructs, including rate of union, early failure, postoperative range of motion, and complication rates. Statistical analysis included Pearson's Chi-squared and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, and the Student's ttest for continuous variables. RESULTS:The one-third tubular construct was equivalent to locking plate constructs with respect to union, post-operative range of motion, and rates of complications. There were no early or late failures. Locking plates were associated with a relative cost increase of $1,263.50 compared to the one-third tubular hook plate per case. CONCLUSION:Surgeons should consider the cost of implants when treating Mayo IIB olecranon fracture. In this cohort, one-third tubular plates provided equivalent outcomes to locked plates with a notable decrease in cost.

The orthopaedic match is one of the most competitive among medical subspecialties. Many factors are taken into account in the ranking of potential candidates. Resources are limited to guide medical students through this process. Practicing orthopaedic surgeon mentors and resident advisors often are asked to provide counseling and advice to enhance the applicant's portfolio with limited information. This paper reviews the existing quantifiable data to assist orthopaedic surgery residency applicants. A literature review of articles written in English, which were either Pubmed or non-Pubmed indexed, was performed. The authors completed the review to concisely delineate factors that are often associated with a successful matching into an orthopaedic residency. Orthopaedic surgery continues to increase in competitiveness for the medical student residency match. While there is no one specific factor associated with success in the match, studies demonstrate that institutions often look favorably on students who rotate at that particular institution; this also is reflected in clinical performance scores if those rotators become residents at that particular program. Multiple factors are considered when matching orthopaedic surgery residency applicants. The information presented in this paper can help form the groundwork for discussions between mentors and students to maximize their chances for a successful match.

BACKGROUND: Digital templating systems have been promoted due to their ability to reduce costs, facilitate preoperative planning, and maintain surgical accuracy. The implementation of a templating system at a large institution is complicated and has not been fully described. PURPOSE: We aim to explain the requisite collaboration between orthopaedic surgery, radiology, and information technology needed to implement a successful orthopaedic templating system at a large institution. METHODS: A search of the PubMed database was performed to provide a comprehensive review of digital templating. Furthermore, we offer the organizational and technical details needed to implement an institutional templating system. RESULTS: We have provided a strategic plan to describe the collaboration between orthopaedic surgery, musculoskeletal radiology, and information technology required for a successful templating system. CONCLUSIONS: The transition to digital templating requires planning, training, and communication between multiple disciplines. Digital templating systems have the potential to foster preoperative planning, improve trainee education, and reduce departmental costs. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Preoperative digital templating is a means to reduce the risk of intraoperative fracture, decrease overall surgical time, and plan for implant size prior to surgery.

AIMS: To evaluate whether an ultra-low-dose CT protocol can diagnose selected limb fractures as well as conventional CT (C-CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 40 consecutive patients with a limb fracture in whom a CT scan was indicated. These were scanned using an ultra-low-dose CT Reduced Effective Dose Using Computed Tomography In Orthopaedic Injury (REDUCTION) protocol. Studies from 16 selected cases were compared with 16 C-CT scans matched for age, gender and type of fracture. Studies were assessed for diagnosis and image quality. Descriptive and reliability statistics were calculated. The total effective radiation dose for each scanned site was compared. RESULTS: The mean estimated effective dose (ED) for the REDUCTION protocol was 0.03 milliSieverts (mSv) and 0.43 mSv (p < 0.005) for C-CT. The sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the REDUCTION protocol to detect fractures were 0.98, 0.89, 0.98 and 0.89 respectively when two occult fractures were excluded. Inter- and intra-observer reliability for diagnosis using the REDUCTION protocol (kappa = 0.75, kappa = 0.71) were similar to those of C-CT (kappa = 0.85, kappa = 0.82). Using the REDUCTION protocol, 3D CT reconstructions were equivalent in quality and diagnostic information to those generated by C-CT (kappa = 0.87, kappa = 0.94). CONCLUSION: With a near 14-fold reduction in estimated ED compared with C-CT, the REDUCTION protocol reduces the amount of CT radiation substantially without significant diagnostic decay. It produces images that appear to be comparable with those of C-CT for evaluating fractures of the limbs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1668-73.

BACKGROUND: In order to compare open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locked plating to hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures, we compared two groups of patients treated during the same time period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients who underwent repair of a three- or four-part proximal humerus fracture with locked plates (Group A) were identified in a prospective database and were compared to 29 patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty for similar injuries (Group B). Data was collected for both groups. Shoulder motion was measured and functional outcomes were obtained using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean length of follow-up for the ORIF group was 16 months compared to 44 months for the hemiarthroplasty group. The average postoperative forward flexion for patients in Group A was 131.1 degrees and 110.4 degrees for Group B (p < 0.047). There were no differences in DASH scores at latest follow-up (p = 0.64). Two patients in Group A had radiographic signs of osteonecrosis but had elected for no further surgery. One patient in Group A and two patients in Group B underwent a conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty. There was no difference in the rate of secondary surgery (p = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that ORIF using locked plates leads to similar postoperative function compared to hemiarthroplasty. Patients who underwent ORIF did achieve greater forward shoulder flexion. Neither strategy leads to a higher reoperation rate.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this investigation were to report temporal trends in resident performed upper extremity fracture procedures and analyze case volume variability. METHODS: Orthopaedic resident case logs from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education were reviewed for graduating years 2007 to 2014. The mean number of wrist, forearm, elbow, humerus, and shoulder fracture-dislocation procedures performed by residents was analyzed. The median number of procedures reported by the top 30% and bottom 30% of residents (by case volume) was also recorded. Linear regression modeling was used to assess temporal trends. RESULTS: The mean number of wrist and forearm fracture cases performed per resident fell from 55.3 in 2007 to 46.7 in 2014 (p = 0.325) while the number of elbow and humerus fracture procedures remained relatively constant (45.6 to 45.4; p = 0.224). The mean number of shoulder fracture cases increased significantly (14.7 to 22.5; p < 0.001). Over the 8-year period, residents in the 70th percentile of caseload performed significantly more wrist and forearm (62.6 versus 39.5; p < 0.001), elbow and humerus (55 versus 34.9; p < 0.001), and shoulder (23 versus 12.9; p < 0.001) fracture procedures than residents in the 30th percentile. CONCLUSION: Resident case volume for wrist, forearm, elbow, and humerus fractures is constant or falling. However, shoulder fracture caseloads are increasing. Regardless, there is substantial disparity in upper extremity fracture case volume among residents. Further investigation is needed to assess possible educational effects of resident caseload disparity.

The Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education requires that residency programs teach and assess trainees in six core competencies. Assessments are imperative to determine trainee competence and to ensure that excellent care is provided to all patients. A structured, direct observation program is feasible for assessing nontechnical core competencies and providing trainees with immediate constructive feedback. Direct observation of residents in the outpatient setting by trained faculty allows assessment of each core competency. Checklists are used to document residents' basic communication skills, clinical reasoning, physical examination methods, and medical record keeping. Faculty concerns regarding residents' professionalism, medical knowledge, fatigue, or ability to self-assess are tracked. Serial observations allow for the reinforcement and/or monitoring of skills and attitudes identified as needing improvement. Residents who require additional coaching are identified early in training. Progress in educational milestones is recorded, allowing an individualized educational program that ensures that future orthopaedic surgeons excel across all domains of medical and surgical competence.

BACKGROUND: Nonunion of long bone fractures is a serious complication for many patients leading to considerable morbidity. The purpose of this study is to elucidate factors affecting continued pain following long bone nonunion surgery and offer better pain control advice to patients. METHODS: Patients presenting to our institutions for operative treatment of long bone fracture nonunion were enrolled in a prospective data registry. Enrolled patients were followed at regular intervals for 12 months using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), visual analog scale (VAS), physical examination, and radiographic examination. The registry was reviewed to identify patients with a tibial or femoral nonunion that went on to union with complete follow up. Univariate analyses were conducted to identify patient characteristics associated with postoperative pain. Identified patient factors with univariate p-values <0.1 were included in multivariate linear regression models in order to identify risk factors for pain 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after nonunion surgery. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients with tibial or femoral nonunion who went on to union and had complete follow-up were identified. A Friedman test revealed mean pain score decreased significantly by 3 months postoperatively (p<0.0005). Univariate analyses demonstrated age (p=0.016), days from injury to nonunion surgery at our institution (p=0.067), smoking status (p<0.0005), wound status at time of injury (p=0.085), anesthesia (p=0.045), and nonunion location in the bone (p=0.047) were associated with postoperative pain in at least one time point postoperatively. These were included in multivariate models that revealed nonunion location (p=0.035) was predictive of pain 3 months postoperatively, smoking status was predictive of pain 3 months (p=0.012) and 6 months (p<0.0005) postoperatively, and days from injury to nonunion surgery at our institution was predictive of pain 6 months (p=0.024) and 12 months (p=0.004) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Healed patients have improved pain levels after lower extremity nonunion surgery. Orthopedic surgeons should stress smoking cessation programs and minimize delay to nonunion surgery, in order to maximize pain relief in this patient cohort.

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate whether the total number of radiographic malalignments after distal radial fracture was associated with poor clinical outcome. Methods: Over a 7-year period, 382 patients who sustained a distal radial fracture were enrolled in a prospectively collected database and met our inclusion criteria. Patients were followed for a mean of 11 mo. Radiographs were taken and analyzed at each follow-up interval. Patients were divided in three groups, those with normal radiographic alignment (group 1), those with one abnormal measurement (group 2), and those with two or more abnormal measurements (group 3). Each patient was assessed for the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Short Form-36 (SF36) clinical outcome scores, along with functional parameters. Results: Thirty-four percent of patients had at least one abnormal radiographic measurement after initial reduction, 21% at short-term, and 24% at long-term follow-up. The long-term DASH was low (18.17 and 12.12 in groups 2 and 3, respectively) and the SF36 was correspondingly high (77.36 and 80.45 in groups 2 and 3, respectively). No individual radiographic measurement of wrist deformity or a combination of these was significantly correlated to any of the clinical outcome scores or functional parameters. Conclusions: Our data confirm reports from previous studies that no single radiographic measurement was correlated with clinical or functional outcomes. Moreover, if analyzed in combination, malalignment in multiple planes did not result in a higher association with worse outcomes