Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: Obesity is a coronary disease risk factor, but its independent effect on clinical outcomes following acute coronary syndromes has not been quantified. We evaluated the relationship between elevated body mass index (BMI) and 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year clinical outcomes postacute coronary syndromes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Using 15 071 patients (normal weight [BMI = 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)], overweight [BMI = 25-29.9 kg/m(2)], obese [BMI = 30-34.9 kg/m(2)] or very obese [BMI > or =35 kg/m(2)]) randomized from 1997-1999 in the SYMPHONY (Sibrafiban vs aspirin to Yield Maximum Protection from ischemic Heart events postacute cOroNary sYndromes) and 2nd SYMPHONY trials, we evaluated the relationships between BMI and 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality and 30-day and 90-day death or myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Increasing BMI was associated with younger age, multiple comorbidities, and greater cardiac medication and procedure use; however, systolic function and coronary disease extent were similar for all BMI categories. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier mortality estimates were higher for normal-weight patients than for all other BMI groups. After multivariable adjustment, the 30-day mortality hazard ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) were: overweight, 0.66 (95% CI: 0.47 to 0.94); obese, 0.61 (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.97); very obese, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.48 to 1.64). Adjusted hazard ratios were similar for 90-day and 1-year mortality. There were no statistically significant differences among BMI groups in 30-day and 90-day death or myocardial infarction (unadjusted or adjusted). CONCLUSION: Overweight and obese BMI classifications were associated with better intermediate-term survival after acute coronary syndromes than normal weight and very obese, but death or myocardial infarction rates were similar. Further study is required to understand the apparent association of overweight and moderate obesity with better intermediate-term outcomes

BACKGROUND: We studied the potential interaction between baseline risk of death and treatment with either standard fibrinolytic monotherapy or combination fibrin and platelet lysis with respect to outcome of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) enrolled in the Global Utilization of Strategies To open Occluded arteries (GUSTO) V trial. METHODS: Using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score (0-14 points) for STEMI, we analyzed the 30-day and 1-year mortality according to treatment assignment and risk category. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify the potential interactions between treatment and baseline risk. RESULTS: The TIMI risk score could be calculated in 16256 patients (98% of patients enrolled). The median score was 2 (1-4) in each treatment group (P = .07). The risk score was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52; 95% CI 1.47-1.56, P < .001, for each additional 1 point), as well as with 1-year mortality (HR 1.51, CI 1.47-1.55, P < .001). The treatment allocation was not significantly related to mortality, and there was no significant interaction between baseline risk score and treatment with respect to either end point. Although combination therapy significantly reduced death or reinfarction at 7 days (HR 0.69, CI 0.54-0.89, P < .01), independent of the risk score, there was no significant statistical interaction between the two (P = .29). CONCLUSION: The TIMI risk score accurately predicted early and 1-year mortality in patients with STEMI treated with pharmacological reperfusion. We did not identify any heterogeneity in the response of patients to combination therapy according to their TIMI risk score

BACKGROUND: The role of inflammation in patients with coronary artery disease is emerging. We sought to assess the profile and outcomes of patients with a clinical syndrome of severe systemic inflammation that led to a diagnosis of suspected sepsis in the setting of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS). METHODS: Patients enrolled in the randomized SHOCK (SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK) trial (n = 302) were divided into those with clinical signs of severe systemic inflammation (eg, fever [94%] or leukocytosis [72%]) that led to a diagnosis of suspected sepsis (n = 54 [18%]) and those without suspected sepsis (controls; n = 243 [80%]). The patients with suspected sepsis were then further subdivided into those who were considered to be potentially infectious (positive culture result ['culture-positive']; n = 40) and those who were not (negative culture result ['culture-negative']; n = 14). RESULTS: Severe systemic inflammation was diagnosed 4 and 2 days after the onset of CS in culture-positive and culture-negative patients, respectively. Patients who developed systemic inflammation tended to be younger (P = .05) and to have lower systemic vascular resistance (SVR) near the onset of CS (P = .006). Many culture-positive patients (40%) had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery. However, the lower the initial SVR, the higher the risk of developing culture-positive systemic inflammation (P = .01), even after controlling for age and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A time-dependent model, adjusted for age, showed that culture-positive patients were at significantly higher risk for death than were controls (hazard ratio, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-3.76; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Almost one fifth of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS showed clinical signs of severe systemic inflammation, and those who were culture-positive for sepsis had twice the risk of death. The observation of lower SVR at the onset of shock in patients who subsequently had culture-positive systemic inflammation suggests that inappropriate vasodilation may play an important role in the pathogenesis and persistence of shock and in the risk of infection

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent in patients with cardiovascular disease. We explored the associations of CKD with outcomes using combined data from two large acute coronary syndrome (ACS) trials. We also explored the associations of CKD with prescription patterns for common cardiovascular medications and the association of these prescription patterns with clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients were stratified by CKD stage using creatinine clearance (CrCl, ml/min) estimated by the modified MDRD equation using baseline core laboratory creatinine measures. Serum creatinine > or =1.5 mg/dl was an exclusion criterion for the SYMPHONY trials. Baseline characteristics and outcomes across CKD categories were compared and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the relationship of renal insufficiency with clinical outcomes after adjusting for previously identified outcome predictors. Interactions between the use of specific medications and calculated CrCl were tested in the final Cox proportional hazards model predicting time to mortality. RESULTS: Of 13 707 patients analysed, 6840 had CKD stage I (CrCl > or =90 ml/min), 5909 stage II (CrCl 60-89 ml/min), 955 stage III (CrCl 30-59 ml/min) and three stage IV (CrCl <30 ml/min). Patients with more advanced CKD (III) were older, more often female, non-smokers and more likely to have co-morbid diseases including diabetes mellitus, hypertension and congestive heart failure. Cardiovascular medications were used less frequently in patients with CKD. Unadjusted survival was poorer in patients with CKD stages > or =II. In adjusted analyses, for those with CrCl < or =91, each 10 ml/min increase in CrCl was associated with a significantly decreased risk of mortality (hazards ratio 0.897, 95% confidence interval 0.815-0.986) (P = 0.024). The interaction between use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and CrCl was significantly associated with outcomes; the benefit of drug therapy was greater among patients with CKD. CONCLUSIONS: CKD is an independent predictor of risk among ACS patients, and is associated with less frequent use of proven medical therapies. More aggressive use of conventional cardiovascular therapies in patients with CKD and ACS may be warranted

INTRODUCTION: Ventricular remodeling starts very early after the onset of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and can be prevented by ACE-inhibitors. However, very limited data are available on the effect of acute (< 9 hours) treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors after an AMI on mortality, heart failure and re-infarction. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of acute ACE-inhibitor treatment. METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis of three very similar randomized, placebo-controlled multi-center trials. In 845 thrombolysed patients with mainly first anterior MI, patients were randomised to acute ACE-inhibitor treatment (< 9 hours after MI) or placebo. RESULTS: After acute ACE-inhibitor treatment we observed similar 3-months mortality rates, and a significant reduction in the incidence of 3-months heart failure (26.1 vs. 19.3%; RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.45-1.0) as compared to placebo. In contrast, acute ACE-inhibitor treatment was associated with a significant 2.0 times increased 3-months re-infarction risk (7.0 vs. 3.6%; RR 2.0; 95% CI 1.1 to 3.8). Subgroup-analysis showed that patients with small infarct sizes treated with acute ACE-inhibitor (peak CPK < 1000 IU) had a 7.6 times higher re-infarction risk (95% CI 1.7 to 33) than patients with small infarctions treated with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Acute ACE-inhibitor treatment in thrombolysed patients with mainly first anterior AMI resulted in a reduction of heart failure and similar mortality, but an increase in re-infarction rates, especially in patients with small infarct sizes. These results warrant caution for the very early use of ACE-inhibitors in smaller infarctions, although this needs to be confirmed in a larger prospective randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to describe the functional status of cardiogenic shock survivors, identify the correlates of cardiogenic shock, and compare global quality of life and functional status of patients randomly assigned to treatment with emergency revascularization (ERV) versus initial medical stabilization (IMS). BACKGROUND: Historically, the hospital survival rate of patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been very low. Shock survivors are salvaged from a critically ill state, and their later functional status is not well documented. The SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK (SHOCK) trial showed significantly improved one-year survival after ERV compared with IMS. METHODS: The SHOCK trial survivors completed interviews at 2 weeks after discharge and at 6 and 12 months after MI. Functional status assessment included the Multidimensional Index of Life Quality and New York Heart Association (NYHA) congestive heart failure functional class. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of one-year survivors of the SHOCK trial were in NYHA functional class I or II. Between two weeks after discharge and one year after MI, improvement was similar in the two treatment groups (18% overall), but fewer patients remained stable (44% vs. 71%), and more patients worsened or died (34% vs. 15%) in the IMS group compared with those assigned to ERV. Assignment to ERV was the only independent predictor of outcome at one year. CONCLUSIONS: Although one-year mortality after ERV is still high (54%), most survivors have good functional status. The ERV patients have a lower rate of deterioration than IMS patients. The level of recovery for shock patients undergoing ERV is similar to that of historical controls not in cardiogenic shock undergoing elective revascularization

BACKGROUND: In the SHOCK trial, the group of patients aged >or=75 years did not appear to derive the mortality benefit from early revascularization (ERV) versus initial medical stabilization (IMS) that was seen in patients aged <75 years. We sought to determine the reason for this finding by examining the baseline characteristics and outcomes of the 2 treatment groups by age. METHODS: Patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) secondary to left ventricular (LV) failure were randomized to ERV within 6 hours or to a period of IMS. We compared the characteristics by treatment group of patients aged >or=75 years and of their younger counterparts. RESULTS: Of the 56 enrolled patients aged >or=75 years, those assigned to ERV had lower LV ejection fraction at baseline than IMS-assigned patients (27.5% +/- 12.7% vs 35.6% +/- 11.6%, P = .051). In the elderly ERV and IMS groups, 54.2% and 31.3%, respectively, were women ( P = .105) and 62.5% and 40.6%, respectively, had an anterior infarction (P = .177). The 30-day mortality rate in the ERV group was 75.0% in patients aged >or=75 years and 41.4% in those aged <75 years. In the IMS group, 30-day mortality was 53.1% for those aged >or=75 years, similar to the 56.8% for patients aged <75 years. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the elderly randomized to ERV did not have better survival than elderly IMS patients. Despite the strong association of age and death post-CS, elderly patients assigned to IMS had a 30-day mortality rate similar to that of IMS patients aged <75 years, suggesting that this was a lower-risk group with more favorable baseline characteristics. The lack of apparent benefit from ERV in elderly patients in the SHOCK trial may thus be due to differences in important baseline characteristics, specifically LV function, and play of chance arising from the small sample size. Therefore, the SHOCK trial overall finding of a 12-month survival benefit for ERV should be viewed as applicable to all patients, including those >or=75 years of age, with acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS

OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics and prognostic importance of right ventricular (RV) dilatation and dysfunction in patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction enrolled in the Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock (SHOCK) trial. METHODS: LV and RV size and function were quantified by echocardiography in 99 patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to predominant LV dysfunction. RESULTS: For all patients, RV dysfunction was not associated with a poor 1-year survival. When the 59 patients with RV dysfunction were stratified into two morphologic groups based upon LV-to-RV end-diastolic area ratio (LV/RV) < or >or=2, the presence of disproportionate RV enlargement (LV/RV <2) was associated with inferior myocardial infarction (80%) and right coronary artery culprit disease (79%). In contrast, the index myocardial infarction in patients with predominant LV enlargement (LV/RV >or=2) was anterior (69%) and associated with left anterior descending artery disease (64%). Patients with LV/RV <2 had significantly higher right atrial pressures (20.1+/-5.2 compared with 14.5+/-8.9 mmHg, P=0.001) and lower RV fractional area change (20.4+/-8.7 compared with 33.5+/-11.0%, P=0.0001), heart rate (87+/-21 compared with 106+/-23 beats/min, P=0.006) and cardiac index (1.5+/-0.5 compared with 2.0 +/-0.9 l/min per m, P=0.007) than patients with LV/RV >or=2. Despite the hemodynamic profile and severity of RV dysfunction in the LV/RV <2 group, 12-month survival was significantly greater in these patients (70% LV/RV <2 compared with 34% LV/RV >or=2, P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to predominant LV failure, the presence of RV dilatation and dysfunction identifies a subgroup of patients with predominant inferior myocardial infarction and an improved long-term prognosis

AIMS: Pexelizumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting C5, reduced 90 day mortality and shock in the COMplement inhibition in Myocardial infarction treated with Angioplasty (COMMA) trial without apparent reductions in infarct size. Inflammation is a critical component of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); this substudy examines prognostic values of selected markers and treatment effects. METHODS AND RESULTS: C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) serum levels were assessed in 337 patients enrolled in either the placebo or the pexelizumab 24 h infusion group. Higher C-reactive protein and IL-6 levels at baseline, 24 h, and 72 h were strongly associated with increased subsequent death (P<0.002 at baseline and 24 h, P<0.02 at 72 h); and all baseline marker levels with death or cardiogenic shock (P<0.03) within 90 days. C-reactive protein and IL-6 levels were similar at baseline, but significantly lower 24 h later with pexelizumab, when compared with placebo (17.1 vs. 25.5 mg/L, P=0.03 and 51.0 vs. 63.8 pg/mL, P=0.04, respectively). At 72 h, corresponding levels were similar, whereas TNF-alpha was slightly higher (P=0.04) in the treated group. CONCLUSION: Inflammation markers and their serial changes predict death and shock in patients with STEMI undergoing primary angioplasty. Pexelizumab reduced C-reactive protein and IL-6, suggesting treatment benefits mediated through anti-inflammatory effects