Faculty Bibliography

Approximately one in six men in the United States will develop prostate cancer during their lifetime. Genetic and environmental variables play a role in determining prostate cancer risk. This article highlights the latest evidence regarding the risk factors for prostate cancer. The current screening strategies using prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination are also discussed, as well as the limitations of these protocols and potential methods for improving early detection.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes between patients with stage T1a/b with those of patients with T1c cancer of the prostate treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), as the appropriate management of clinical stage T1a/b prostate cancer is subject to debate; although many patients are managed expectantly, some have adverse pathological features suggesting that more active treatment might be beneficial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1983 to 2003, 3478 men had RRP by one surgeon. From this group, we retrospectively identified 29 men with clinical stage T1a and 83 with clinical stage T1b disease. Using statistical analysis we compared the treatment outcomes of these patients with those of 1774 men with clinical stage T1c disease. RESULTS: Men with T1a/b disease had a significantly lower preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, a greater proportion with organ-confined disease, and a lower mean/median prostatectomy Gleason score than those with T1c disease. Also, men with T1a/b disease were less likely to be potent before surgery, although the frequency of recovery of potency was similar among all groups. On multivariate analysis with age, year of surgery, PSA level and Gleason score, there was no statistical difference in the rates of biochemical recurrence and the 10-year overall survival rates. However, patients with T1b disease had a significantly lower cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: T1a and T1b prostate cancer can be associated with aggressive pathological features and have a similar rate of progression as clinical stage T1c disease. That notwithstanding, most patients in the study were cured with RRP and had favourable long-term functional outcomes.

PURPOSE: Prostate specific antigen is used for prostate cancer screening but its specificity is limited. Specificity might be increased by considering genotype associated prostate specific antigen levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms on chromosomes 10 and 19 (previously shown to be associated with prostate specific antigen) with prostate specific antigen and prostate cancer in 505 men from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. RESULTS: In a model with age and date the risk ratio for prostate cancer was 1.18 (95% CI 1.13-1.23) per unit increase in prostate specific antigen. Including the interaction between alleles and prostate specific antigen significantly altered the risk ratio for prostate cancer (Cox proportional hazards p <0.001). Specifically prostate cancer risk per unit increase in prostate specific antigen was significantly different in carriers than in noncarriers of a minor allele (1.28 vs 1.10, respectively, Cox proportional hazards p <0.001), whereas men with a minor allele had a significantly higher risk of prostate cancer at prostate specific antigen levels greater than 6 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that genotype influences the risk of prostate cancer per unit increase in prostate specific antigen. Prostate cancer risk stratification using prostate specific antigen and genotype could improve prostate specific antigen test performance.

PURPOSE: Recent studies have identified 2 distinct genetic variants along chromosome 17, including allele T of single nucleotide polymorphism rs4430796 on 17q12 and allele G of single nucleotide polymorphism rs1859962 on 17q24, that have been linked to prostate cancer risk. Less is known about tumor pathological features in carriers of these variants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Genotypes for regions 17q12 and 17q24 were determined in 759 white men with prostate cancer and compared to those in 790 healthy control volunteers using logistic regression. In patients with prostate cancer the Fisher exact or Kruskal-Wallis test was used as appropriate to assess the relationship(s) between clinical and pathological characteristics with 17q carrier status. RESULTS: The frequency of the 17q12 and 17q24 genetic variants was significantly higher in patients with prostate cancer compared to that in controls (OR 1.32, 1.15, respectively). Of patients with prostate cancer 83% and 77% were carriers of the 17q12 and 17q24 variants as well as 75% and 75% of controls, respectively. Carriers of 17q12 risk variants were significantly more likely to have high grade disease using an additive best fit genetic model. In addition, there were trends toward adverse pathological features associated with 17q12 independent of the best fit genetic model. CONCLUSIONS: Sequence variants along 17q12 and 17q24 were present in a significantly higher proportion of our prostate cancer cases than in our controls. Adverse pathological features, including higher Gleason grade and pathological stage, were more frequent in 17q12 carriers. Since these alleles may act in conjunction with variants on other chromosomes to influence prostate cancer risk, additional research is required to determine the cumulative associations of genetic risk variants with prognosis.

PURPOSE: The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial reported that 15% of men with a prostate specific antigen less than 4 ng/ml and a normal digital rectal examination have biopsy detectable prostate cancer. However, limited published data describe the tumor features of prostate cancer detected at low prostate specific antigen levels (less than 2.5 ng/ml). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,278 men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy by 1 surgeon between 2003 and 2008. We describe the clinicopathological features of 77 patients with a preoperative prostate specific antigen of less than 2.5 ng/ml. RESULTS: Of the men with a low prostate specific antigen (less than 2.5 ng/ml) tumor 51 (66%) had findings suspicious for prostate cancer on digital rectal examination. Indications for prostate biopsy in the remainder of men included an increased prostate specific antigen velocity, hematospermia and abnormal transrectal ultrasound findings. Prostate cancer was detected at transurethral resection of the prostate in the remaining 8% of men. Despite having a low prostate specific antigen at diagnosis 8 (10.4%) and 20 (26%) men, respectively, had biopsy and radical retropubic prostatectomy Gleason grade 7 disease or greater, while 7 (9%) and 6 (7.8%), respectively, had extracapsular tumor extension or positive surgical margins. Compared to men with a normal digital rectal examination mean tumor volume was significantly higher in those with a suspicious digital rectal examination (3.3 vs 1.7 cc, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Despite having a prostate specific antigen of less than 2.5 ng/ml at diagnosis, a considerable proportion of men had aggressive pathological features at radical retropubic prostatectomy. Digital rectal examination remains an important component of early prostate cancer detection.

When a patient presents for assessment of prostate cancer risk, do serial measurements of PSA provide more-useful information than determination of a single PSA concentration? The authors of a new systematic review contend that the answer to this question is 'no'. Stacy Loeb cautions against hasty abandonment of PSA kinetics.

PURPOSE: Prostate specific antigen testing is common in the elderly despite evidence that older men without aggressive prostate cancer are unlikely to benefit from diagnosis and treatment. We evaluated the relationship between prostate specific antigen and the risk of aggressive prostate cancer developing in men of various ages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This longitudinal cohort study consisted of 849 men (122 with and 727 without prostate cancer) with serial prostate specific antigen measurements participating in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of men by prostate specific antigen and age who died of prostate cancer or in whom aggressive prostate cancer developed (death from prostate cancer, a prostate specific antigen 20 ng/ml or greater, or Gleason score 8 or greater). RESULTS: No participants between 75 and 80 years old with a prostate specific antigen less than 3.0 ng/ml died of prostate cancer. In contrast, men of all ages with a prostate specific antigen of 3.0 ng/ml or greater had a continually increasing probability of death from prostate cancer (Fisher's exact test p <0.001). The time to death or diagnosis of aggressive prostate cancer after age 75 years was not significantly different between the prostate specific antigen categories of 3 to 3.9 and 4 to 9.9 ng/ml (p = 0.634), whereas the time to death or diagnosis of high risk prostate cancer was significantly longer for the prostate specific antigen category of less than 3 vs 3 ng/ml or greater (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Men 75 to 80 years old with a prostate specific antigen less than 3 ng/ml are unlikely to die of or experience aggressive prostate cancer during their remaining life, suggesting that prostate specific antigen testing might be safely discontinued for these men.