Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:To determine the impact of clinical nodal stage on distant metastasis (DM) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx (SCCL). METHODS:Six hundred sixty-two previously untreated SCCL patients treated at a tertiary care cancer center from January 1984 to December 1998 were eligible for analysis. The end point of interest was development of DM following treatment. Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method; predictors of outcome were identified by univariate and multivariate analysis. The primary tumor site was glottic in 55%, supraglottic in 40%, and trans/sub glottic in 5%; 40% had locoregionally advanced (stage III/IV) tumors. At initial presentation, 25% of patients (12% N1, 11% N2, and 2% N3) had clinically metastatic nodes. RESULTS:DM were recorded in 67 patients (10%; lung, 45%; soft tissue, 13%; bone, 10%; multiple sites, 28%). The median time to DM was 18 months (range, 1-109). With a median follow-up of 60 months, the 5-year DMFS was 88%. Even after accounting for the type of index treatment, the only significant predictor of worse DMFS on multivariate analysis was a higher clinical N stage (P < 0.0001). The relative risk for DM was 0.5 (95% CI, 0.2-1.4; P = NS) for cN1, 3.2 (95% CI, 1.7-5.9; P < 0.0001) for cN2, and 7.5 (95% CI, 3.1-17.9; P < 0.0001) for cN3 disease compared with clinically N0 patients. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Regardless of the index treatment modality, primary tumor site, or T stage, a higher clinical N stage at the time of presentation independently and significantly increases the risk of DM in patients with SCCL.

PURPOSE: Treatment of extremity sarcomas occasionally requires tissue transfer in the form of pedicle flaps, free flaps, or skin grafts to repair surgical defects. These tissues are often subject to radiation (RT) and are therefore at risk for wound breakdown requiring reoperation. This study reviews a single center's experience with tissue transfer and postoperative RT. METODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1983 and 2000, 43 adult patients (>16 years old) with primary high-grade soft tissue extremity sarcomas underwent limb-sparing surgery and reconstruction of their surgical defects, followed by adjuvant RT. The reconstructions were as follows: pedicle flaps (n = 14), free flaps (n = 10), skin grafts (n = 4), or a combination (n = 15). Postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (median dose: 63 Gy) alone was given to 27 patients (63%). Adjuvant brachytherapy (BRT) was given to 16 patients (37%); BRT alone (median dose: 45 Gy) was given to 12 patients and combined with EBRT for 4 patients (EBRT: 45 Gy; BRT: 20 Gy). Comorbid conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, tobacco use, and obesity (calculated using body mass index >or=30) were present in 30 patients (70%). Tumor characteristics were as follows: 26 were >5 cm in size, 37 were deep, and 30 were in the lower extremity. The median follow-up time, calculated from the date of operation, was 32 months. Five of 43 patients suffered wound complications necessitating reoperation; however, 3 patients developed complications before initiation of RT and were therefore excluded from the analysis. Two of 43 patients (5%) required reoperation for wound complications after RT; 1 of these patients ultimately required amputation for necrosis. The 5-year overall wound reoperation rate was 6% (95% confidence interval: 0-14%). The influence of patient and tumor characteristics, as well as the type of RT, on the wound reoperation rates is as follows: BRT vs. EBRT (17% vs. 0%, p = 0.06); upper vs. lower extremity (0% vs. 8%, p = 0.41); 5 cm (8% vs. 4%, p = 0.9); comorbidity vs. no comorbidity (3% vs. 13%, p = 0.8); age 50 (8% vs. 4%, p = 0.8). CONCLUSION: Based on this review, most tissue transfers (95%) tolerated subsequent adjuvant radiation therapy well. Although more wound complications necessitating reoperation were seen in patients who received BRT, whether this is because of the inherent susceptibility of flaps and skin grafts to breakdown in the immediate postoperative period vs. the direct result of BRT needs further investigation.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:We have developed an intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) conformal treatment planning system for permanent prostate implantation in an effort to reduce toxicity further and improve the accuracy of this procedure. We report the preliminary outcome of patients with localized prostate cancer treated with this approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:Two hundred forty-eight patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with transperineal ultrasound-guided permanent prostate implantation using a real-time intraoperative 3D conformal technique (I-3D) between 1997 and 2001. A genetic algorithm optimization program intraoperatively evaluated the dose deposited throughout the entire 3D volume for multiple seed configurations to identify which seed-loading pattern adhered best to the predetermined target, urethral and rectal dose constraints. The median follow-up time in these patients was 27 months (range 12-51). The dosimetric outcome and acute toxicity profile of these 248 patients were compared with those of patients who were treated between 1988 and 1996 at our institution with a preplanned transperineal implantation technique (PP). RESULTS:Postimplantation dosimetric analysis of the I-3D group demonstrated that the median value of the percentage of the target volume treated to at least the prescription dose (V(100)) was 96%, and the target coverage with the prescription dose (PD) was </=90% in only 3% of these patients. In contrast, among patients treated with the PP method, the median V(100) was 88% and the target coverage with the PD was </=90% in 60% of these patients (p < 0.001). For the I-3D patients, the median and maximal dose to the urethra was 140% and 170% of the PD, respectively, compared with 263% and 532%, respectively, for patients treated with the PP technique. The percentage of urinary symptom resolution at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months for the I-3D cohort was 39%, 72%, 90%, and 97%, respectively. In contrast, the percentage of symptom resolution at the same intervals for patients treated with the PP technique was 12%, 20%, 31%, and 42% (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the I-3D technique was an independent predictor of improved target coverage, reduced urethral dose, and more rapid resolution of urinary-related symptoms. The improved dosimetric conformity with the I-3D technique did not compromise the biochemical outcome, as the 4-year actuarial prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival rate for this group was 97%. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The integration of an intraoperative optimization program with 3D dose evaluation throughout the target volume for prostate brachytherapy has consistently achieved excellent target coverage with the PD, and the dose levels to normal tissues were effectively restricted to tolerance ranges. These changes have led to a more favorable acute toxicity profile for patients treated with this technique without compromising biochemical control.

PURPOSE: Delivering high dose to prostate with external beam radiation has been shown to improve local tumor control. However, it has to be carefully performed to avoid partial target miss and delivering excessive dose to surrounding normal tissues. One way to achieve safe dose escalation is to precisely localize prostate immediately before daily treatment. Therefore, the radiation can be accurately delivered to the target. Once the prostate position is determined with high confidence, planning target volume (PTV) safety margin might be reduced for further reduction of rectal toxicity. A rapid computed tomography (CT)-based online prostate localization method is presented for this purpose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Immediately before each treatment session, the patient is immobilized and undergoes a CT scan in the treatment position using a CT scanner situated in the treatment room. At the CT console, posterior, anterior, left, and right extents of the prostate are manually identified on each axial slice. The translational prostate displacements relative to the planned position are estimated by simultaneously fitting these identified extents from this CT scan to a template created from the finely sliced planning CT scan. A total of 106 serial CT scans from 8 prostate cancer patients were performed immediately before treatments and used to retrospectively evaluate the precision of this daily prostate targeting method. The three-dimensional displacement of the prostate with respect to its planned position was estimated. RESULTS: Five axial slices from each treatment CT scan were sufficient to produce a reliable correction when compared with prostate center of gravity (CoG) displacements calculated from physician-drawn contours. The differences (mean +/- SD) between these two correction schemes in the right-left (R/L), posterior-anterior (P/A), and superior-inferior (S/I) directions are 0.0 +/- 0.4 mm, 0.0 +/- 0.7 mm, and -0.4 +/- 1.9 mm, respectively. With daily CT extent-fitting correction, 97% of the scans showed that the entire posterior prostate gland was covered by PTV given a margin of 6 mm at the rectum-prostate interface and 10 mm elsewhere. In comparison, only 74% and 65% could be achieved by the corrections based on daily and weekly bony matching on portal images, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that daily CT extent fitting provides a precise correction of prostate position in terms of CoG. Identifying prostate extents on five axial CT slices at the CT console is less time-consuming compared with daily contouring of the prostate on many slices. Taking advantage of the prostate curvature in the longitudinal direction, this method also eliminates the necessity of identifying prostate base and apex. Therefore, it is clinically feasible and should provide an accelerated localization of the prostate immediately before daily treatment

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To assess the effect of internal organ motion on the dose distributions and biological indices for the target and non-target organs for three different conformal prostate treatment techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We examined three types of treatment plans in 20 patients: (1) a six field plan, with a prescribed dose of 75.6 Gy; (2) the same six field plan to 72 Gy followed by a boost to 81 Gy; and (3) a five field plan with intensity modulated beams delivering 81 Gy. Treatment plans were designed using an initial CT data set (planning) and applied to three subsequent CT scans (treatment). The treatment CT contours were used to represent patient specific organ displacement; in addition, the dose distribution was convolved with a Gaussian distribution to model random setup error. Dose-volume histograms were calculated using an organ deformation model in which the movement between scans of individual points interior to the organs was tracked and the dose accumulated. The tumor control probability (TCP) for the prostate and proximal half of seminal vesicles (clinical target volume, CTV), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the rectum and the percent volume of bladder wall receiving at least 75 Gy were calculated. RESULTS:The patient averaged increase in the planned TCP between plan types 2 and 1 and types 3 and 1 was 9.8% (range 4.9-12.5%) for both, whereas the corresponding increases in treatment TCP were 9.0% (1.3-16%) and 8.1% (-1.3-13.8%). In all patients, plans 2 and 3 (81 Gy) exhibited equal or higher treatment TCP than plan 1 (75.6 Gy). The maximum treatment NTCP for rectum never exceeded the planning constraint and percent volume of bladder wall receiving at least 75 Gy was similar in the planning and treatment scans for all three plans. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:For plans that deliver a uniform prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) (plan 1), current margins are adequate. In plans that further escalate the dose to part of the PTV (plans 2 and 3), in a fraction of the cases the CTV dose increase is less than planned, yet in all cases the TCP values are higher relative to the uniform dose PTV (plan 1). Doses to critical organs remain within the planning criteria.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To identify predictors of biochemical outcome following radiotherapy in patients with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:One hundred fifteen patients with a rising PSA after radical prostatectomy received salvage three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) alone or with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation. Tumor-related and treatment-related factors were evaluated to identify predictors of subsequent PSA failure. RESULTS:The median follow-up time after 3D-CRT was 42 months. The 4-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival rates were 46%, 83%, and 95%, respectively. Multivariate analysis, which was limited to 70 patients receiving radiation without androgen deprivation therapy, showed that negative/close margins (P =.03), absence of extracapsular extension (P <.01), and presence of seminal vesicle invasion (P <.01) were independent predictors of PSA relapse after radiotherapy. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation did not improve the 4-year PSA relapse-free survival in patients with positive margins, extracapsular extension, and no seminal vesicle invasion (P =.24). However, neoadjuvant androgen deprivation did improve PSA relapse-free survival when one or more of these variables were absent (P =.03). CONCLUSIONS:Salvage 3D-CRT can provide biochemical control in selected patients with a rising PSA after radical prostatectomy. Among patients with positive margins and no poor prognostic features, 77% achieved PSA control after salvage 3D-CRT. Salvage neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy may improve short-term biochemical control, but it requires further study.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of intraoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (IOHDR) in the management of pediatric solid tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:The records of 66 pediatric patients who underwent IOHDR for a solid tumor from February 1993 through December 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. The median age was 7 years (range 9 months to 24 years). Thirty-five patients (53%) were treated for recurrent disease and 24 (36%) had documented metastatic disease. Twenty-nine patients (44%) received both EBRT and IOHDR. The IOHDR dose was prescribed to a depth of 0.5 cm from the surface of a multichannel tissue-equivalent applicator. The median prescription dose was 12 Gy (range, 4-15 Gy). RESULTS:After a median follow-up of 12 months, the 2-year actuarial rates of local control and overall survival were 56% and 54%, respectively, with a median survival of 29 months. Post-operative EBRT significantly improved (p=0.002) 2-year local control (83% v. 29%). Perioperative complications occurred in 8 of 66 patients while late complications occurred in only 3. The actuarial 2-year late complication rate was 12%. Late events that occurred in or near the IOHDR treatment site included small bowel obstruction, broncho-esophageal fistula, and bone growth retardation. CONCLUSIONS:IOHDR is emerging as an integral part of multimodality therapy for pediatric solid tumors as an adjunct to EBRT for local control. IOHDR alone may not be appropriate in the majority of patients. Subacute toxicities occurred rarely and may be related to the combination of extensive surgery, EBRT, and multi-agent chemotherapy in this population.

Interest in intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for breast cancer is increasing as the possible benefits of this technique for the patient become apparent. The rationale for the use of this segmental radiation therapy in place of whole-breast irradiation is based on the finding that approximately 85% of breast relapses are confined to the same quadrant of the breast as the primary tumor. Phase I and II trials have demonstrated no increase in postsurgical complication rates following the use of single-dose IORT in localized breast cancers. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the cosmetic outcome. Clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of IORT in the treatment of breast cancer are currently under way at the European Institute of Oncology (EIO) at the University of Milan, Italy, and at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in New York. Here we report the two different techniques in use in these trials.