Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: This study compares clinical and functional outcomes of patients with displaced olecranon fractures treated with either tension band wiring (TBW) or a hook plate construct. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of olecranon fractures operatively treated with either TBW or plate fixation (PF) using a hook plate over a 7-year period. Patient demographics, injury information, and surgical management were recorded. Fractures were classified according to the Mayo system. Measured outcomes included range of elbow motion, time to union, and development of postoperative complications. Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) scores were obtained for all patients. All patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included in this study, 23 treated with TBW and 25 treated with hook PF. Groups did not differ with respect to patient demographics, Mayo fracture type, or duration of follow-up. Patients undergoing PF had less terminal extension than TBW patients (-8.6 degrees +/- 7 degrees vs. -3.5 degrees +/- 9.3 degrees , p = 0.036) and a longer time to radiographic union (19 +/- 8 vs. 12 +/- 6 weeks, p = 0.001). There were no differences in rates of symptomatic hardware, MEPI scores, or other clinical outcomes. Two patients in each group required a second surgery. CONCLUSIONS: TBW and PF of olecranon fractures had similarly excellent functional outcomes in this study. Patients undergoing PF had a longer time to union and slightly worse extension at final follow-up. TBW remains an effective treatment for appropriately selected olecranon fractures and in this cohort outperformed plate osteosynthesis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of post-traumatic humeral shaft malalignment on the ability to position the hand in space. METHODS: Two unique models were created: a cadaver model and a computerized 3-dimensional model. In the cadaveric model, a midshaft transverse osteotomy of the humerus was created to simulate fracture. The osteotomy was fixed in varying degrees of coronal and sagittal malalignment. The hand's ability to reach six different bony landmarks was assessed as a surrogate measure of function. Subsequently, a healthy male volunteer underwent full body magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent 3D skeletal recreation. A 'virtual' midshaft transverse osteotomy was created. The osteotomy was angulated in various degrees of coronal and sagittal malalignment and the hand's ability to reach the same six bony landmarks was measured. RESULTS: In the cadaver model, varus angulation was better tolerated than valgus and sagittal deformity. Varus deformity less than 25 degrees did not have a negative influence. Valgus angulation of 20 degrees resulted in a more severe deficit. Estimated function of the upper extremity was most sensitive to sagittal deformity. These trends were confirmed in the 3D model. CONCLUSIONS: The direction and magnitude of post-traumatic humeral shaft malalignment independently affect the ability to position the hand in space, a surrogate measure of function. Upper extremity function may be more sensitive to post-traumatic humeral shaft malalignment than previously reported. Clinical studies investigating the impact of humeral shaft malalignment on functional use of the upper extremity are warranted to clinically confirm these findings.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to summarize the recent developments in the field of tissue engineering as they relate to multilayer scaffold designs in musculoskeletal regeneration. METHODS: Clinical and basic research studies that highlight the current knowledge and potential future applications of the multilayer scaffolds in orthopaedic tissue engineering were evaluated and the best evidence collected. Studies were divided into three main categories based on tissue types and interfaces for which multilayer scaffolds were used to regenerate: bone, osteochondral junction and tendon-to-bone interfaces. RESULTS: In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that the use of stratified scaffolds composed of multiple layers with distinct compositions for regeneration of distinct tissue types within the same scaffold and anatomic location is feasible. This emerging tissue engineering approach has potential applications in regeneration of bone defects, osteochondral lesions and tendon-to-bone interfaces with successful basic research findings that encourage clinical applications. CONCLUSIONS: Present data supporting the advantages of the use of multilayer scaffolds as an emerging strategy in musculoskeletal tissue engineering are promising, however, still limited. Positive impacts of the use of next generation scaffolds in orthopaedic tissue engineering can be expected in terms of decreasing the invasiveness of current grafting techniques used for reconstruction of bone and osteochondral defects, and tendon-to-bone interfaces in near future.

There is no consensus on surgical fixation and treatment of proximal humerus fractures, even though they are common fractures with several fixation techniques. This retrospective study quantifies the outcomes of patients who sustained a proximal humerus fracture and were treated with open reduction and internal fixation by at a single academic center between December 2010 and December 2014 using the Equinoxe® proximal humerus locking plate. Following enrollment, injury and surgical data was recorded. Forty-nine patients (31 female, 18 male) with 50 fractures were identified who met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up period was 16.8 months (range: 6 to 44 months). Mean age was 60.7 years with no significant difference in mean age by gender. Mean age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 2.9 (range: 0 to 6). The overall complication rate was 10% (N = 5) with the most common complication being osteonecrosis (N = 3). Four patients required reoperation. At final follow-up, mean active forward flexion for the cohort was 140.8º ± 30.1º, mean passive forward flexion was 155.7º ± 25.2º, and mean active external rotation was 50.1º ± 17.9º. For patients with postoperative complications, mean active forward flexion was 106.0º ± 23.0º, mean passive forward flexion was 136.7º ± 23.1º, and mean active external rotation was 34.2º ± 24.4. Active forward flexion and external rotation were significantly different in the presence of a complication (p = 0.005 and p = 0.038, respectively). Mean DASH score for the cohort was 19.1 ± 20.9. Mean DASH score for patients who developed complications or underwent reoperations was 34.2 ± 24.3. This study demonstrates that the Equinoxe® proximal humerus locking plate provides stable fracture treatment with excellent clinical results and a low complication rate when performed by experienced orthopaedic traumatologists.

BACKGROUND: To compare 30-day outcomes in patients treated for a distal femur (DF) fracture with plate fixation (PF) or intramedullary nail (IMN). METHODS: Differences in rates of any adverse events (AAE), serious adverse events (SAE), infectious complications, and mortality were explored between groups in the ACS-NSQIP database. RESULTS: There were 511 PF and 44 IMN patients. The PF group and IMN groups had similar rates of AAEs (p = 0.35), SAEs (p = 0.46), infectious complications (p = 1.00), and mortality (p = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: DF fractures treated with IMN have equivalent short-term outcomes compared to those treated with PF.

OBJECTIVE: There continues to be controversy over whether operative delay is necessary for patients on antiplatelet therapy, particularly for elderly patients with hip fractures. This study sought to assess current clinical practices of orthopedic surgeons regarding perioperative management of these patients. METHODS: A 12-question, Web-based survey was distributed to orthopedic surgeons via e-mail. Questions regarding timing of surgery assumed patients were on antiplatelet therapy and assessed attitudes toward emergent and nonemergent orthopedic cases as well as operative delay for specific closed fracture types. Responses were compared using unpaired, 2-tailed Student t tests for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square tests with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for categorical variables. Statistical significance was defined as a P value <.05. RESULTS: Overall 67 orthopedic surgeons responded. Fifty-two percent (n = 35) of the respondents described their practice as academic. Thirty-nine percent (n = 25) of the surgeons indicated that no delay was acceptable for urgent but nonemergent surgery, and 78% (n = 50) reported no delay for emergent surgery was acceptable. Sixty-eight percent (n = 46) of respondents felt patients on antiplatelet therapy with closed hip fractures did not require operative delay. Surgeons who opted for surgical delay in hip fractures were more likely to delay surgery in other lower extremity fracture types (OR = 16.4, 95% CI 4.48-60.61, P < .001). Sixty-four percent (n = 41) of the surgeons indicated there was no protocol in place at their institution. CONCLUSIONS: There continues to be wide variability among orthopedic surgeons with regard to management of patients with fracture on antiplatelet therapy. Over a quarter of surgeons continue to opt for surgical delay in patients with hip fracture. This survey highlights the need to formulate and better disseminate practice management guidelines for patients with fracture on antiplatelet therapy, particularly given the aging population in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity injuries secondary to low-energy gunshot wounds are frequently seen in the civilian populations of urban areas. Although these wounds have fewer complications than high-energy gunshot injuries, the functional and psychological damage is still significant making appropriate timely orthopaedic treatment and follow-up imperative. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to present our outcomes in the treatment of low-energy gunshot wounds in a civilian population at an urban, level one trauma center in patients treated by a standard protocol. METHODS: One hundred and thirty three patients who sustained 148 gunshot wound injuries were treated at our level one trauma center between January 1(st), 2009 and October 1(st), 2011. Following IRB approval, we extracted information from medical records regarding hospital course, length of stay and type of operative or non-operative treatment. If available, injury and post-operative radiographs were also reviewed. Patients were contacted by telephone to obtain Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) surveys, pain on a scale of 0-10 and for the determination of any adverse events related to their shooting. RESULTS: There were 125 men (94.0%) and 8 women (6.0%) with an average age of 27.1 years (range 15.2-56.3). Seventy-six patients (57.1%) did not have any health insurance upon admission. The average length of stay in the hospital was 4.5 days (range 0.0-88.0). Fifty-one gun shots (34.5%) resulted in fractures of the lower extremities. Patients underwent a total of 95 lower extremity-related procedures during their hospitalization. Twenty-two patients (16.5%) experienced a complication related to their gunshot wounds. 38% of the cohort was available for long-term functional assessment At a mean 23.5 months (range 8-48) of follow up, patients reported mean Functional and Bothersome SMFA scores of 19.6 (SD 15.9) and 10.9 (SD 15.6) suggesting that these patients have poorer function scores than the general population. These patients still had pain related to their gunshot injury with an average pain score of 2.16 (range 0-8). CONCLUSIONS: Gunshot injuries to the extremities may involve bone, soft tissue, and neurovascular structures. Execution of appropriate therapeutic methods in such situations is critical for treating surgeons given the potential for complications. At our level one trauma center, gunshot victims were predominantly young, uninsured adult men. Complications included infection, compartment syndrome, and arterial injuries. Functional data collected demonstrated that patients continued to have difficulties with ADL's at long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: To compare and contrast postoperative complications in the geriatric population following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for (DF) fractures relative to femoral neck (FN) fractures. METHODS: Patients aged 65 years and older in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent ORIF for FN fractures or DF fractures from 2005 to 2012 were identified. Differences in rates of any adverse events (AAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), infectious complications, and mortality between groups were explored using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The DF cohort had a higher proportion of females (81.95% vs 71.35%, P < .001), were younger (79.41 +/- 7.93 vs 82.11 +/- 7.26 years old, P < .001), and had a lower age adjusted modified Charlson comorbidity index score (4.22 +/- 1.32 vs 4.49 +/- 1.35, P = .02). Cases with DF and FN did not differ in AAE (20.05% vs 20.20%, P = .94), SAE (12.03% vs 13.19%, P = .51), infectious complication (4.26% vs 4.22%, P = .97), hospital length of stay (7.32 +/- 6.73 days vs 7.02 +/- 10.67 days, P = .59), or mortality rates (4.51% vs 5.99%, P = .23). Multivariate analyses revealed that fracture type did not impact AAE (P = .28), SAE (P = .58), infectious complications (P = .83), or mortality (P = .85) rates. CONCLUSION: Postoperative morbidity and mortality of geriatric patients who sustain DF and FN fractures treated operatively were comparable. This information can be used when risk stratifying and prognosticating for elderly patients undergoing these procedures.