Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To determine the expected time to serum testosterone normalization after short-course neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NAAD) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for patients with localized prostate cancer and to identify pretreatment predictors that correlated with the time to testosterone normalization. METHODS:Between 1993 and 1999, 88 patients with localized prostate cancer, treated with NAAD and external beam radiotherapy, were prospectively monitored after treatment with sequential testosterone levels. NAAD was administered before and during the entire course of radiotherapy and discontinued at the end of treatment. The median duration of NAAD was 6 months. The actuarial rate of serum testosterone normalization from the end of treatment was evaluated, and the presence or absence of androgen deprivation-related symptoms was correlated with serum testosterone levels. Symptoms assessed included weight gain, loss of libido, breast tenderness, breast enlargement, hot flashes, and fatigue. RESULTS:Serum testosterone levels returned to the normal range in 57 (65%) of the 88 patients and failed to normalize in 31 patients (35%). The median time to normalization was 18.3 months. The actuarial rate of normalization at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was 10%, 26%, 38%, and 59%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, a pretreatment testosterone level in the lower range of normal was the only variable that predicted for delayed testosterone normalization after NAAD (p = 0.00047). Among 45 patients with information concerning androgen deprivation-related symptoms recorded 1 year after cessation of NAAD, 24 (53%) had normalized testosterone levels, but in 21 patients (47%), the levels had not yet returned to normal. At 1 year, only 1 (4%) of 24 patients whose testosterone level had returned to normal experienced NAAD-related symptoms compared with 14 (67%) of 21 patients who did not have normal testosterone levels (p <0.001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Testosterone levels often remain depressed for extended periods after cessation of short-course NAAD. Lower baseline testosterone levels predict for a delay in testosterone normalization, and the persistence of symptoms related to androgen deprivation correlates with low testosterone levels.

Bryostatin-1 is a macrocyclic lactone that has been shown to modulate Protein Kinase C activity and has demonstrated antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo. Fifteen patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with bryostatin-1 at a dose of 25 mcg/m2 by continuous intravenous infusion over 24 hours once weekly for three weeks followed by a break week to complete a four-week cycle. There were no major objective responses in the 14 evaluable patients. One patient with nasopharynx cancer had disease stabilization for 4 months prior to being removed from the study due to medical issues. This clinical benefit corresponded to a radiographic decrease in metabolic activity on positron emission tomograpy (PET) scan as well as molecular evidence of tumor apoptosis in a poly[ADP-ribose] polymerase (PARP) cleavage assay. Bryostatin-1 is not recommended for use as a single agent for the treatment of squamous cell head and neck cancer. Further investigation is warranted to determine the strength of the correlation between bryostatin-1 activity and PARP cleavage as a surrogate molecular marker of apoptosis.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy represents a recent advancement in conformal radiotherapy. It employs specialized computer-driven technology to generate dose distributions that conform to tumor targets with extremely high precision. Treatment planning is based on inverse planning algorithms and iterative computer-driven optimization to generate treatment fields with varying intensities across the beam section. Combinations of intensity-modulated fields produce custom-tailored conformal dose distributions around the tumor, with steep dose gradients at the transition to adjacent normal tissues. Thus far, data have demonstrated improved precision of tumor targeting in carcinomas of the prostate, head and neck, thyroid, breast, and lung, as well as in gynecologic, brain, and paraspinal tumors and soft tissue sarcomas. In prostate cancer, intensity-modulated radiotherapy has resulted in reduced rectal toxicity and has permitted tumor dose escalation to previously unattainable levels. This experience indicates that intensity-modulated radiotherapy represents a significant advancement in the ability to deliver the high radiation doses that appear to be required to improve the local cure of several types of tumors. The integration of new methods of biologically based imaging into treatment planning is being explored to identify tumor foci with phenotypic expressions of radiation resistance, which would likely require high-dose treatments. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy provides an approach for differential dose painting to selectively increase the dose to specific tumor-bearing regions. The implementation of biologic evaluation of tumor sensitivity, in addition to methods that improve target delineation and dose delivery, represents a new dimension in intensity-modulated radiotherapy research.

BACKGROUND:We reviewed single-institution experience using brachytherapy alone for primary high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity. METHODS:Between July 1982 and September 1997, 202 adult patients with primary high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity were treated with limb-sparing surgery and adjuvant brachytherapy. All patients underwent complete gross resection, but the margin of resection was microscopically positive in 18% of patients. The median dose of brachytherapy was 45 Gy delivered over 5 days. Tumors located in the shoulder or groin were defined as central location. Complications were assessed in terms of wound complications, bone fracture, and peripheral nerve damage. RESULTS:With a median follow-up of 61 months, the 5-year local control, distant relapse-free survival, and overall survival rates were 84%, 63%, and 70%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, poor local control correlated with shoulder location, positive microscopic margins of resection, and nonshoulder upper extremity site. The 5-year actuarial rates of wound complications requiring reoperation, bone fracture, and grade > or = 3 nerve damage were 12%, 3%, and 5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Adjuvant brachytherapy provides adequate local control and acceptable morbidity that compares favorably with data reported for external beam radiation. Shoulder tumor location was identified as an independent prognostic factor for poor local control, mandating further improvement in the local management of these tumors.

PURPOSE: The preplanned technique used for permanent prostate brachytherapy has limitations that may be overcome by intraoperative planning. The goal of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) project was to assess the current intraoperative planning process and explore the potential for improvement in intraoperative treatment planning (ITP). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Members of the ABS with expertise in ITP performed a literature review, reviewed their clinical experience with ITP, and explored the potential for improving the technique. RESULTS: The ABS proposes the following terminology in regard to prostate planning process: *Preplanning--Creation of a plan a few days or weeks before the implant procedure. *Intraoperative planning--Treatment planning in the operating room (OR): the patient and transrectal ultrasound probe are not moved between the volume study and the seed insertion procedure. * Intraoperative preplanning--Creation of a plan in the OR just before the implant procedure, with immediate execution of the plan. *Interactive planning--Stepwise refinement of the treatment plan using computerized dose calculations derived from image-based needle position feedback. *Dynamic dose calculation--Constant updating of dose distribution calculations using continuous deposited seed position feedback. Both intraoperative preplanning and interactive planning are currently feasible and commercially available and may help to overcome many of the limitations of the preplanning technique. Dosimetric feedback based on imaged needle positions can be used to modify the ITP. However, the dynamic changes in prostate size and shape and in seed position that occur during the implant are not yet quantifiable with current technology, and ITP does not obviate the need for postimplant dosimetric analysis. The major current limitation of ITP is the inability to localize the seeds in relation to the prostate. Dynamic dose calculation can become a reality once these issues are solved. Future advances can be expected in methods of enhancing seed identification, in imaging techniques, and in the development of better source delivery systems. Additionally, ITP should be correlated with outcome studies, using dosimetric, toxicity, and efficacy endpoints. CONCLUSION: ITP addresses many of the limitations of current permanent prostate brachytherapy and has some advantages over the preplanned technique. Further technologic advancement will be needed to achieve dynamic real-time calculation of dose distribution from implanted sources, with constant updating to allow modification of subsequent seed placement and consistent, ideal dose distribution within the target volume