Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Patients with prior stroke represent a substantial proportion of patients presenting with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the impact of prior stroke on prognosis has not been rigorously examined in the reperfusion era. METHODS: The baseline characteristics, treatments, and clinical outcomes of patients with prior stroke enrolled in the Magnesium in Coronaries (MAGIC) trial were evaluated and compared to those of patients without prior stroke. RESULTS: MAGIC enrolled 6213 patients with STEMI, of whom 558 (9.0%) had prior stroke. Patients with prior stroke were more likely to have a history of hypertension (88.0% vs 70.3%), diabetes (19.9% vs 14.5%), myocardial infarction (38.2% vs 25.1%), and congestive heart failure (15.6% vs 9.7%). The mean Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score was higher in patients with prior stroke compared to those without prior stroke (4.37 vs 3.93, P < .0001). Patients with prior stroke were less likely to receive reperfusion therapy, even among those considered eligible at presentation (66.3% vs 80.6%, P < .0001). Compared to patients without prior stroke, inhospital stroke (3.0% vs 1.0%, P < .0001), severe congestive heart failure (23.3% vs 18.2%, P = .003), and 30-day mortality (21.0% vs 14.7%, P < .0001) were higher among patients with prior stroke. On multivariable analysis, prior stroke was independently associated with a significantly higher risk of death at 30 days (odds ratio 1.44, P = .0023). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with prior stroke who present with STEMI are at very high risk for short-term morbidity and mortality. Aggressive treatment of these patients appears warranted

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters as predictors of 1-year mortality in patients developing cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and to document associations between these ECG parameters and the survival benefit of emergency revascularization versus initial medical stabilization. BACKGROUND: Emergency revascularization reduces the risk of mortality in patients developing cardiogenic shock after AMI. The prognostic value of ECG parameters in such patients is unclear, and it is uncertain whether emergency revascularization reduces the mortality risk denoted by ECG parameters. METHODS: In a prospective substudy of 198 SHOCK (SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK) trial patients, ECGs recorded within 12 hours of shock were interpreted by personnel blinded to the patients' treatment assignment and outcome. RESULTS: The baseline heart rate was higher in non-survivors than in survivors (106 +/- 20 versus 95 +/- 24 beats/minute, P = .001). There was a significant association between the QRS duration and 1-year mortality in medically stabilized patients (115 +/- 28 ms in non-survivors versus 99 +/- 23 ms in survivors, P = .012), but not in emergently revascularized patients (110 +/- 31 versus 116 +/- 27 ms respectively, P = .343). The interaction between the QRS duration, mortality and treatment assignment was significant (P = .009). Among patients with inferior AMI, a greater sum of ST depression was associated with higher 1-year mortality in medically stabilized patients (P = .029), but not in emergently revascularized patients (P = .613, treatment interaction P = .025). On multivariate analysis, the independent mortality predictors were increasing age, elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, heart rate, sum of ST depression in medically stabilized patients, and interaction (P = .016) between a prolonged QRS duration and treatment assignment. The adjusted hazard ratio for 1-year mortality per 20 ms increase in the QRS duration was 1.19 (95% CI 0.98-1.46) in medically stabilized patients and 0.81 (95% CI 0.63-1.03) in emergently revascularized patients. CONCLUSION: ECG parameters identified patients with cardiogenic shock who were at high risk. Emergency revascularization eliminated the incremental mortality risk associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with a prolonged QRS duration, or inferior AMI accompanied by precordial ST depression. Prospective assessments of the magnitude of the treatment effect based on ECG parameters are required

CONTEXT: The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for the management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) recommend early invasive management for high-risk patients, given the benefits with this approach demonstrated in randomized clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the use and predictors of early invasive management strategies (cardiac catheterization <48 hours following presentation) in high-risk patients with NSTE ACS and to examine the association of early invasive management with mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines) Quality Improvement Initiative evaluated care patterns and outcomes for 17,926 high-risk NSTE ACS patients (positive cardiac markers and/or ischemic electrocardiographic changes) based on ACC/AHA guidelines recommendations at 248 US hospitals with catheterization and revascularization facilities between March 2000 and September 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of early invasive management within 48 hours of presentation, predictors of early invasive management, and in-hospital mortality. Results Of the 17,926 patients analyzed, 8037 (44.8%) underwent early cardiac catheterization less than 48 hours following presentation. Predictors of early invasive management included cardiology care, younger age, lack of prior or current congestive heart failure, lack of renal insufficiency, ischemic electrocardiographic changes, positive cardiac markers, white race, and male sex. Patients treated with early invasive management were more likely to be treated with medications and interventions recommended by the ACC/AHA guidelines and had a lower risk of in-hospital mortality after adjusting for differences in clinical characteristics and after comparing propensity-matched pairs (2.5% vs 3.7%, P<.001). Conclusions An early invasive management strategy is not utilized in the majority of high-risk patients with NSTE ACS. This strategy appears to be reserved for patients without significant comorbidities and those cared for by cardiologists and is associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality

This chapter about antithrombotic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (MI) is part of the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients with ischemic symptoms characteristic of acute MI of < 12 h in duration, and ST-segment elevation or left bundle-branch block (of unknown duration) on the ECG, we recommend administration of any approved fibrinolytic agent (Grade 1A). We recommend the use of streptokinase, anistreplase, alteplase, reteplase, or tenecteplase over placebo (all Grade 1A). For patients with symptom duration < 6 h, we recommend the administration of alteplase over streptokinase (Grade 1A). For patients with known allergy or sensitivity to streptokinase, we recommend alteplase, reteplase, or tenecteplase (Grade 1A). For patients with acute posterior MI of < 12 h duration, we suggest fibrinolytic therapy (Grade 2C). In patients with any history of intracranial hemorrhage, closed head trauma, or ischemic stroke within past 3 months, we recommend against administration of fibrinolytic therapy (Grade 1C+). For patients with acute ST-segment elevation MI whether or not they receive fibrinolytic therapy, we recommend aspirin, 160 to 325 mg p.o., at initial evaluation by health-care personnel followed by indefinite therapy, 75 to 162 mg/d p.o. (both Grade 1A). In patients allergic to aspirin, we suggest use of clopidogrel as an alternative therapy to aspirin (Grade 2C). For patients receiving streptokinase, we suggest administration of either i.v. unfractionated heparin (UFH) [Grade 2C] or subcutaneous UFH (Grade 2A). For all patients at high risk of systemic or venous thromboembolism (anterior MI, pump failure, previous embolus, atrial fibrillation, or left ventricular thrombus), we recommend administration of IV UFH while receiving streptokinase (Grade 1C+)

INTRODUCTION: The target activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) range of 1.5 to 2.5 times the control value or 45 to 75 seconds recommended by the ACC/AHA for patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is vulnerable to variation in test reagents. Rather than use the standard target aPTT range, it has been recommended that each institution establish its own target aPTT range based upon anti-factor Xa heparin levels. As a quality assurance project, we evaluated our institution's therapeutic aPTT range by examining the correlation between aPTTs and anti-factor Xa heparin levels and established a new target aPTT range with a new thromboplastin reagent based upon the therapeutic anti-factor Xa heparin levels. METHODS: Sixty-two plasma samples from 26 consecutive patients receiving UFH for ACS were analyzed. Plasma aPTTs measured with a thromboplastin reagent and a new thromboplastin reagent and anti-factor Xa heparin levels were obtained on each plasma sample. Linear regression analysis was performed to establish a new target aPTT range from corresponding therapeutic anti-factor Xa heparin levels. RESULTS: Thirty-two percent of patients with our institution's target range aPTTs of 61 to 100 seconds had anti-factor Xa heparin levels below 0.35 to 0.7 U/mL while 68% of patients had therapeutic anti-factor Xa heparin levels (positive predictive value = 68%). When the same blood was tested with a new thromboplastin reagent lot, only 9% of patients with target range aPTTs had anti-factor Xa heparin levels below 0.35 U/mL while 91% of patients had therapeutic anti-factor Xa heparin levels (positive predictive value = 91%). The Pearson correlation coefficient ( r ) for the new thromboplastin reagent lot was 0.93. The target aPTT range established with the new thromboplastin reagent lot was 61 to 100 seconds. CONCLUSION: Monitoring aPTTs without standardizing the thromboplastin reagent may not adequately reflect therapeutic heparin levels. Despite apparently target aPTTs, patients treated with UFH may be under-anticoagulated. Our new anti-Xa-adjusted target aPTT range shows an increase in the positive predictive value of aPTTs. Large-scale clinical studies are needed to determine the optimal anti-factor Xa range for ACS patients treated with UFH, with further refinements if glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are concomitantly used and to show a benefit in clinical outcomes for monitoring plasma heparin levels with anti-factor Xa heparin levels. Institutional standardization of the aPTT is necessary to ensure optimal patient care when changing thromboplastin reagents