Faculty Bibliography

We describe a case of West Nile virus encephalitis in a 54-year-old kidney transplant recipient. The clinical course was rapid and fatal. Serial CSF samples showed an evolving mononuclear pleiocytosis and serial MRIs showed increasing signs of cytotoxic edema in her basal ganglia. Seroepidemiological testing indicated that the infection was most likely acquired from transfusion of fresh frozen plasma at the time of transplantation.

ABO incompatibility and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization remain the two largest barriers to optimal utilization of kidneys from live donors. Here we describe the first successful transplantation of patients who were both ABO incompatible and crossmatch positive with their only available donor. A preconditioning regimen of plasmapheresis (PP) and low-dose CMV hyperimmune globulin (CMVIg) was delivered every other day until donor-specific antibody (DSA) titers were reduced to a safe level and isoagglutinin titers were < or =16. Each patient received quadruple sequential immunosuppression, splenectomy and three protocol post-transplant PP/CMVIg treatments. There was no hyperacute rejection. Two of the three patients had a persistent positive cytotoxic crossmatch on the day of transplant and eliminated their DSA subsequently. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in one patient was reversed by reinitiating PP/CMVIg and anti-CD20. The patients are more than 9 months post-transplant with excellent graft function. Preconditioning with PP/CMVIg results in a durable suppression of DSA and permits accommodation of the allograft to a discordant blood type. The ability to cross these two barriers simultaneously is clinically important as sensitized patients have often exhausted their blood type compatible living donors during previous transplants.

Since its introduction in 1995, laparoscopic nephrectomy has become the preferred technique at many medical centers for the harvesting of kidneys from living donors for transplantation. Because the field of view at laparoscopic surgery is limited, preoperative radiologic evaluation of the donor's anatomy---the renal veins and arteries, collecting system, and parenchyma--is critical. Spiral computed tomographic (CT) angiography is a fast, safe, minimally invasive, and generally accepted method for preoperative evaluation of the renal vessels. Multi-detector row CT scanners offer shorter image acquisition time, narrower collimation, better spatial resolution, and less tube heating than do single-detector row CT scanners. Multi-row scanners also provide more complete anatomic coverage, increased contrast enhancement of the arteries, and greater longitudinal spatial resolution--all of which are important both for accurate imaging of the renal vasculature and for three-dimensional postprocessing of image data. Dual-phase multi-detector row CT angiography combined with three-dimensional postprocessing enables minimally invasive and highly accurate depiction of the preoperative donor anatomy. To make the most effective use of this method, radiologists must be familiar with its technical aspects, advantages, and potential pitfalls. They also must be able to identify variations in vasculature and in renal and extrarenal anatomy that are important for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Many facets of accommodation have been explored since this process was first observed in ABO-incompatible renal allografts over 17 years ago. Intriguing new pieces of the puzzle have emerged to be fitted into the picture in several places. For example, vascular endothelial cells can be stimulated to secrete substantial amounts of blood group A and B antigens linked to von Willebrand factor; the antibody response to A and B antigens stimulated by ABO-incompatible renal allografts can show epitope spreading; complement can inhibit inflammation through actions of some complement split products, particularly iC3b and C3a; endothelial cells can upregulate various cytoprotective mechanisms; and clinically, new protocols for achieving accommodation have been implemented with improved results.

During the past few decades, much of the experimental and clinical effort in solid-organ transplantation has been directed toward ameliorating or abrogating T-cell-mediated responses. As a result, universally understood and accepted nomenclature and diagnostic criteria have evolved. Humoral immunity in transplantation has yet to undergo a similar renaissance. Readers of transplant journals regularly find it difficult and often impossible to interpret data on the diagnosis and management of antibody-mediated rejection. The Antibody Working Group was assembled in an attempt to provide guidelines for the standardization of nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, reporting, antibody profiling, and risk assessment.