Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: To compare tumor detection on acquired diffusion-weighted (DW) images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, obtained using b-values of 1000 s/mm(2) and 2000 s/mm(2) , using radical prostatectomy as the reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 29 prostate cancer patients who underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including DW imaging using b-values of 1000 s/mm(2) and 2000 s/mm(2) were included. Two radiologists independently evaluated four image sets during different sessions and recorded the location and diameter of the dominant lesion: DW images acquired using b-values of 1000 s/mm(2) and 2000 s/mm(2) and ADC maps calculated using maximal b-values of 1000 s/mm(2) and 2000 s/mm(2) . Findings were correlated with the location and diameter of the dominant lesion at prostatectomy. Tumor-to-PZ contrast was also calculated, unblinded to pathology. RESULTS: Both readers achieved significantly higher sensitivity for DW images obtained using a b-value of 2000 s/mm(2) than 1000 s/mm(2) (P < 0.001), although there was no difference in sensitivity between ADC maps calculated using the two b-values (P >/= 0.309). Tumor-to-PZ contrast was higher for DW images using a b-value of 2000 s/mm(2) (P = 0.067), although it was not different between the two corresponding ADC maps (P = 0.544). For both readers, correlations with tumor diameters were higher for either ADC map (r = 0.59-0.73) than for either acquired DW image set (r = 0.03-0.57). CONCLUSION: Use of a b-value of 2000 s/mm(2) compared with a b-value of 1000 s/mm(2) resulted in improved tumor sensitivity and higher tumor-to-PZ contrast on the acquired DW images, although performance of the ADC maps corresponding with the two b-values was similar. Correlation with tumor size was greater for either ADC map than for either acquired DW image set. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

AIM: To identify retrospectively potential associations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and tumour grade as well as other pathological features, using histopathological assessment from the Whipple procedure as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging with b-values of 0 and 500 s/mm before the Whipple procedure. Two radiologists independently recorded the ADC values of the tumour and benign pancreas for all cases. ADC values were compared with histopathological findings following the Whipple procedure. RESULTS: The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.689 for benign pancreas and 0.695 for tumours, indicating good inter-reader agreement for ADC values. The mean ADC value was significantly lower in tumours than in benign pancreas for both readers (reader 1: 1.74 +/- 0.34 x 10 mm/s versus 2.08 +/- 0.48 x 10 mm/s, respectively, p = 0.006; reader 2: 1.69 +/- 0.41 x 10 mm/s versus 2.11 +/- 0.54 x 10 mm/s, respectively, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in mean ADC between poorly and well/moderately differentiated tumours for either reader (reader 1: 1.69 +/- 0.36 x 10 mm/s versus 1.78 +/- 0.33 x 10 mm/s, respectively, p = 0.491; reader 2: 1.62 +/- 0.33 x 10 mm/s versus 1.75 +/- 0.49 x 10 mm/s, respectively, p = 0.405). The area under the curve (AUC) for differentiation of poorly and well/moderately differentiated tumours was 0.611 and 0.596 for readers 1 and 2, respectively, and was not significantly better than an AUC of 0.500 for either reader (p >/= 0.306). In addition, ADC was not significantly different for either reader between tumours with stage T3 versus stage T1/T2, between tumours with and without metastatic peri-pancreatic lymph nodes, or between tumours located in the pancreatic head versus other pancreatic regions (p >/= 0.413). CONCLUSION: No associations between ADC values of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and tumour grade or other adverse pathological features were observed.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic implications of the MRI appearance and pathological features of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC). METHODS: A total of 128 pRCC in 115 patients who underwent preoperative MRI were characterised in terms of pathological type (type 1 vs. type 2), MRI appearance (focal vs. infiltrative) and additional MRI features. Patients were classified on the basis of the presence or absence of metastatic disease. RESULTS: There were 65 focal type 1, 54 focal type 2 and 9 infiltrative pRCC. All infiltrative pRCC were of histopathological type 2. Renal vein thrombus was present in 89 % of infiltrative pRCC and no cases of focal pRCC. Metastatic disease was observed in 3.7 % of focal type 1, 7.5 % of focal type 2 and 75.0 % of infiltrative type 2 pRCC. Infiltrative MRI appearance was a significant predictor of metastatic disease, independent of pathological type, size and T stage (P 0.5). CONCLUSION: Infiltrative MRI appearance and renal vein thrombus identify a subset of pathological type 2 pRCC at a significantly increased risk of metastatic disease.

OBJECTIVE: Numerous prior studies have shown the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values in cervical cancer assessment, particularly in differentiation from benign cervix. This article will discuss histogram-based analysis for detection of adverse histologic features of cervical cancer. CONCLUSION: The study by Downey et al. in this issue investigates histogram-based analysis for detection of adverse histologic features of cervical cancer, including subtype and grade. This approach offers a more complete assessment of tumor texture and heterogeneity. Given the potential utility suggested by the results of this study, additional larger studies are warranted.