Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES: : To compare postoperative pain control in patients treated surgically for ankle fractures who receive popliteal blocks with those who received general anesthesia alone. DESIGN: : Institutional Review Board approved prospective randomized study. SETTING: : Metropolitan tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: : All patients being treated with open reduction internal fixation for ankle fractures who met inclusion criteria and consented to participate were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: : Patients were randomized to receive either general anesthesia (GETA) or intravenous sedation and popliteal block. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: : Patients were assessed for duration of procedure, total time in the operating room, and postoperative pain at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: : Fifty-one patients agreed to participate in the study. Twenty-five patients received popliteal block, while 26 patients received GETA. There were no anesthesia-related complications. At 2, 4, and 8 hours postoperatively, patients who underwent GETA demonstrated significantly higher pain. At 12 hours, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to pain control. However, by 24 hours, those who had received popliteal blocks had significantly higher pain with no difference by 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: : Popliteal block provides equivalent postoperative pain control to general anesthesia alone in patients undergoing operative fixation of ankle fractures. However, patients who receive popliteal blocks do experience a significant increase in pain between 12 and 24 hours. Recognition of this "rebound pain" with early narcotic administration may allow patients to have more effective postoperative pain control. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BACKGROUND: Many institutions perform radiographic documentation following splint application even when no manipulation had been performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of post-splinting radiographs of acute non-displaced or minimally displaced fractures that did not undergo manipulation. Our hypothesis was that post-splinting radiographs do not demonstrate changes in fracture alignment or impact the management of the patient. METHODS: After institutional review board exemption had been granted, consultations performed by orthopaedic residents at a level-I trauma center from September 2008 to April 2010 were reviewed. Of 2862 consultations, 1321 involved acute fractures that were splinted. Radiographs revealed that 342 (25.9%) of the fractures were non-displaced or minimally displaced and angulated (defined as <5 mm and <10 degrees , respectively) and 204 of them had been assessed with radiographs after splinting. Consults were reviewed to ensure that the patients had not undergone manipulation prior to or during splinting. Consult notes and radiographs obtained in the emergency room (ER), as well as follow-up radiographs, were reviewed to assess ultimate outcome. RESULTS: None of the 204 fractures (134 non-displaced and seventy minimally displaced) changed alignment following splinting. Two splints were reapplied, and the fractures sites were reimaged for undocumented reasons. Patients were subjected to an average of ten radiographs (range, four to twenty-five radiographs) of their extremities in the acute setting. On average, three post-splinting radiographs (range, one to ten radiographs) were obtained. The mean time between the initial and post-splinting radiographs was three hours and thirty minutes (range, nine minutes to twenty-four hours). The most common injury was a fracture about the hand or wrist. The 122 patients with that type of injury waited an average of almost three hours for an average of three post-splinting radiographs, contributing to a total of nine radiographs performed acutely. ER visits tended to be longer for patients with post-splinting radiographs compared with those without them (p = 0.06). Follow-up radiographs were available for eighty-two patients. All fractures demonstrated maintained alignment. CONCLUSIONS: Post-splinting radiographs of non-displaced and minimally displaced fractures that do not undergo manipulation before or during immobilization are associated with longer ER waits, additional radiation exposure, and increased health-care costs without providing helpful information. While certain circumstances call for additional imaging, routine performance of post-splinting radiography of non-displaced or minimally displaced fractures should be discouraged. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVES: Because locked plates as a neutralization device for lag screw fracture fixation have different biomechanics than that of unlocked plates, we investigated how this would affect lag screw load at the fracture site. The purpose of this study was to assess the load at a fracture site compressed with a lag screw when both locked and unlocked plates are used as neutralization devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine cadaver femurs had a mid-shaft oblique fracture created and were fixed with a lag screw, incorporating load transducers at the fracture site and lag screw. Three neutralization plate constructs (a standard plate, a locked plate, and an offset locked plate) were sequentially applied and loaded. Loads at the fracture site and the lag screw were measured after sequential application of axial loads. RESULTS: Plate application to the lag screw fixations did not significantly change (P > 0.26) the load at the fracture site or on the lag screw that were approximately 200 N. The unlocked, locked, and offset locked plates behaved similarly. The addition of a load to the specimens did not change the lag screw loads but increased the average fracture loads by approximately 20% of the applied load. CONCLUSIONS: Unlocked and locked neutralization plates do not affect the initial compressive load across a fracture fixed by a lag screw, and both behave similarly in transferring the load when the fracture was loaded. For a well-fixed stable fracture fixed with a lag screw, there is no advantage in using a more expensive locked plate over a standard plate for neutralization purposes if adequate screw purchase can be achieved.

OBJECTIVE:: To compare the efficacy of anesthetic type on clinical outcomes after operative treatment of distal radius fractures. DESIGN:: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. SETTING:: Academic medical center. PATIENTS:: One hundred eighty-seven patients with a distal radius fracture (OTA type 23) were identified within a registry of 600 patients. INTERVENTION:: Patients with operative distal radius fractures underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a volarly applied plate and screws under regional or general anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:: Clinical, radiographic, and patient-based functional outcomes were recorded at routine postoperative intervals. Complications were recorded. RESULTS:: One hundred eighty-seven patients met inclusion criteria and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. There were no differences between the groups with regard to patient demographics or fracture types treated. At both 3 and 6 months post surgery, pain was diminished among those patients who received a regional block. Wrist and finger range of motion for patients who received regional versus general anesthesia was improved at all follow-up points. Patients who received regional anesthesia also had higher functional scores as measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand at 3 months (P = 0.04) and 6 months (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION:: Patients who are candidates should be offered regional anesthesia when undergoing repair of a displaced distal radius fracture.

A retrospective review of surgically treated lower-extremity long-bone fractures in wheelchair-bound patients was conducted. Between October 2000 and July 2009, eleven lower-extremity fractures in 9 wheelchair-bound patients underwent surgical fixation. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment, Short Form, and Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life questionnaires were used to assess functional outcome.Mechanism of injury for all patients was a low-energy fall that occurred while transferring. Four patients who sustained a distal femur fracture, 1 patient who sustained a distal femur fracture and a subsequent proximal tibia fracture, and 1 patient who sustained a proximal third tibia shaft fracture underwent open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws. Three patients with 4 midshaft tibia fractures underwent intramedullary nailing.At last follow-up, all 9 patients had returned to their baseline preoperative function. Quality of life was significantly higher (P<.01) than the Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life questionnaire's reference score. Self-reported visual analog scale pain scores improved significantly from time of fracture to last follow-up (P=.02). All fractures achieved complete union, and no complications were reported. This study's findings demonstrate that operative treatment in active, wheelchair-bound patients can provide an improved quality of life postinjury and a rapid return to activities.

We conducted a study to evaluate the outcomes and complications of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of 2-, 3-, and 4-part proximal humerus fractures using a standard management protocol with locking plates. Of 72 patients with acute proximal humerus fractures managed with ORIF and locking plates, 63 were available at the minimum follow-up of 1 year and met the inclusion criteria. At each follow-up, radiographs were reviewed for healing, hardware failure, osteonecrosis, shoulder range of motion, and DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) scores; any complications were recorded. Mean age was 62 years and mean follow-up was 19 months. There were 12 two-part fractures, 42 three-part fractures, and 9 four-part fractures. Thirteen patients had complications. Mean shoulder forward elevation was 135; patients with complications had a significantly lower mean forward elevation (P=.002). DASH scores were significantly lower in patients without complications than in those with complications (P=.01). Although excellent outcomes can be achieved when locking plates are used to manage proximal humerus fractures, complications are possible. Physicians must weigh the functional outcome data when considering management options for these types of injuries.

Both early and late complications following open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures have been reported extensively in the literature. Although orthopedic implants are known to cause irritation and inflammation, to our knowledge, this is the first case report to describe a patient with rice bodies secondary to an orthopedic implant. Although the etiology of rice bodies is unclear, histological studies reveal that they are composed of an inner amorphous core surrounded by collagen and fibrin. The differential diagnosis in this case included synovial chondromatosis, infection, and the formation of a malignant tumor. Additional imaging studies, such as magnetic resonance imaging, and more specific tests were necessary to differentiate the rice bodies due to bursitis versus neoplasm, prior to excision. The patient presented 5 years following open reduction and internal fixation of a displaced proximal humerus frature, with swelling in the area of the previous surgical site. Examination revealed a large, painless tumor-like mass on the anterior aspect of the shoulder. The patient's chief concern was the unpleasant aesthetic of the mass; no pain was reported. Upon excision of the mass, the patient's full, painless range of motion returned.

We compared standard and specialized plain radiographs with computed tomography (CT) for their ability to detect screw penetration of the articular surface of the distal radius in volar plating. Eight human cadaveric specimens were implanted with a fixed angle volar plate and 5 screws. Two groups were evaluated: (1) no articular screw penetration or (2) intra-articular screw penetration. Radiographs were obtained of each specimen. CT using 0.4 mm thickness slices were obtained and images were reconstructed in the sagittal and coronal planes. The radiographs and CTs were evaluated based on whether or not articular penetration occurred. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each radiographic modality were evaluated. CT was found to be much more sensitive and specific in detecting screw penetration than plain radiographs. The kappa (kappa) statistic demonstrated "almost perfect interobserver agreement" based on CT readings, but only "substantial interobserver agreement based on plain radiographs." CT is more sensitive and specific and achieves a higher kappa statistic than plain radiographs in detecting radiocarpal screw penetration after volar plating. CT should be used in detecting screw penetration when there is suspicion for radiocarpal joint penetration.

Mastering rapidly evolving orthopaedic surgical techniques requires a lengthy period of training. Current work-hour restrictions and cost pressures force trainees to face the challenge of acquiring more complex surgical skills in a shorter amount of time. As a result, alternative methods to improve the surgical skills of orthopaedic trainees outside the operating room have been developed. These methods include hands-on training in a laboratory setting using synthetic bones or cadaver models as well as software tools and computerized simulators that enable trainees to plan and simulate orthopaedic operations in a three-dimensional virtual environment. Laboratory-based training offers potential benefits in the development of basic surgical skills, such as using surgical tools and implants appropriately, achieving competency in procedures that have a steep learning curve, and assessing already acquired skills while minimizing concerns for patient safety, operating room time, and financial constraints. Current evidence supporting the educational advantages of surgical simulation in orthopaedic skills training is limited. Despite this, positive effects on the overall education of orthopaedic residents, and on maintaining the proficiency of practicing orthopaedic surgeons, are anticipated.

BACKGROUND: Two-part proximal humerus fractures are common orthopedic injuries for which surgical intervention is often indicated. Choosing a fixation device remains a topic of debate. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare two methods of fixation for two-part proximal humerus fractures, locking plate (LP) with screws versus intramedullary nailing (IMN), with respect to alignment, healing, patient outcomes, and complications. To our knowledge, a direct comparison of these two devices in treating two-part proximal humerus fractures has never before been studied. We hope that our results will help surgeons assess the utility of LP versus IMN. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 24 cases of displaced two-part surgical neck fractures of the humerus. Twelve shoulders were treated using IMN fixation and 12 others were fixated with LP. Data collected included sociodemographic, operative details, and postoperative care and function. RESULTS: Radiographic comparison of fixation demonstrated an average neck-shaft angle of 124 degrees and 120 degrees in the IMN group and LP group, respectively. Adjusted postoperative 6-month follow-up range of motion was 134 degrees of forward elevation in the IMN group and 141 in the LP group. The differences in range of motion and in complication rates were not found to be significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that either LP fixation or IMN fixation for a two-part proximal humerus fracture provides acceptable fixation and results in a similar range of shoulder motion. Although complication rates were low and insignificant between the two groups, a trend toward increased complications in the IMN group is noted.