Faculty Bibliography

The incidence of hip fractures worldwide is expected to almost quadruple in the next 60 years. Increased cost-containment pressures will focus attention not only on improvements in hip fracture treatment but also on prevention. Three approaches that can prevent hip fractures--preventing falls, preventing and treating bone fragility, and using external hip protectors--are reviewed. Although it is impossible to prevent all hip fractures, these methods may significantly reduce the annual incidence of these fractures

The Medoff sliding plate has a dual side capability along both the femoral shaft and neck to increase theoretically interfragmentary compression and load-sharing in hip fractures. We studied intertrochanteric fracture fixation in cadaveric bone to determine whether this device has a mechanical advantage over a standard sliding hip screw. 2-part and 4-part fractures were created in 12 cadaver femurs. The fractures were fixated and sequentially destabilized; bone and plate strains and fragment displacements were determined during testing, as a function of applied physiological loads before and after short-term cycling. The Medoff sliding plate imposed a higher mean medial cortex strain than the sliding hip screw in all fracture models and at all loading levels, and the difference was statistically significant in the 2-part and in the unstable 4-part fracture models. The loading of the medial cortex region after cycling was approximately 50% higher in the Medoff samples than in the sliding hip screw samples. There were no significant differences in plate strains, fracture displacements or load to failure between the 2 devices. These observations favor the dual sliding principle as regards providing fracture compression and load-sharing, which may explain low failure rates in clinical series of unstable intertrochanteric fractures, treated with the Medoff sliding plate

Sixty patients who had had operative treatment of a fracture of the femoral neck or an intertrochanteric fracture were allowed to bear weight as tolerated on the injured limb. The average age was seventy-seven years. Computerized gait-testing was performed at one, two, three, six, and twelve weeks postoperatively to quantify weight-bearing. For the purpose of analysis, the patients were divided into three groups according to whether they had internal fixation of a stable fracture, internal fixation of an unstable fracture, or a primary hemiarthroplasty. Thirty-two patients completed the entire twelve-week study. The average amount of weight that these patients placed on the injured limb increased progressively with time. The average load supported by the injured limb was 51 per cent that of the uninjured limb at one week, and it gradually increased to 87 per cent at twelve weeks. During the first three weeks, the patients who had had internal fixation bore substantially less weight than those who had had a hemiarthroplasty. By six weeks, we could detect no significant differences, with the numbers available, among the groups with regard to weight-bearing or other measured gait parameters. We concluded that elderly patients who are allowed to bear weight as tolerated after operative treatment of a fracture of the femoral neck or an intertrochanteric fracture appear to voluntarily limit loading of the injured limb

Four hundred twenty humeri were measured to determine humeral head retroversion and its relation to the location of the bicipital groove. Average head retroversion was found to be 28.3 degrees (+/- 13.2 degrees), and the angular orientation of the bicipital groove referenced to the transepicondylar axis was 55.5 degrees (+/- 13.8 degrees). The average difference between these angular orientations was 27.3 degrees (+/- 14.2 degrees). This result implies that the bicipital groove can be used as a landmark for prosthetic stem positioning in shoulder arthroplasty if the center of the lateral aspect of the stem is posteriorly offset approximately 30 degrees from the center of the groove. However, because of the appreciable variation in these averages, the use of the bicipital groove as a reference can result in a significant error of humeral stem alignment, which should be considered when determining the retroversion for a particular patient

A prospective analysis was performed on 832 patients to determine the circumstances surrounding falls leading to hip fracture within a homogeneous, elderly urban population. Special emphasis was placed on the season of year, time of day, location of fall, and other circumstances in which the fracture occurred. All patients were community dwelling, cognitively intact, previously ambulatory elderly who sustained a femoral neck or intertrochanteric fracture. Most fractures occurred at home, particularly in patients who were older, less healthy, and poorer ambulators. More than 75% of fractures resulted from a fall while the patient was standing or walking. Most falls occurred during daylight hours with a peak seen in the afternoon. No seasonal variation in the incidence of hip fractures was observed

Three hundred thirty-eight community dwelling, ambulatory, elderly patients who sustained a hip fracture were observed prospectively to determine which patient and fracture characteristics at hospital admission predicted functional recovery at 3, 6, and 12 months. Multiple logistic regression was performed to estimate the simultaneous contributions of the predictor variables to failure of functional recovery. Before sustaining a fracture, 16% of patients were dependent on basic activities of daily living and 46% were dependent on instrumental activities of daily living. By 1 year after fracture, 73% of the patients had recovered to their basic activities of daily living status before fracture whereas only 48% had recovered to their instrumental activities of daily living status before fracture. Patients who were age 85 years or older, who lived alone before sustaining a fracture, and who had one or more comorbidities were at increased risk of delay or failure in recovering basic activities of daily living. Only instrumental activities of daily living independence before fracture predicted failure to recover instrumental activities of daily living function by 3 and 6 months after fracture. At 1 year, patient age 85 years or older was the only predictor of failure to recover instrumental activities of daily living function that existed before fracture. Based on characteristics at admission, a group of patients at high risk for failure to recover basic activities of daily living function within 1 year of sustaining a hip fracture can be identified

The effect of anesthetic technique on ambulation and functional recovery after hip fracture was studied in a series of 631 community dwelling, elderly patients. Functional recovery at followup was determined by an 11-item functional rating scale. In univariate analysis, recovery of ambulatory ability and percent functional recovery were significantly higher at 6 months for patients who had general anesthesia. When controlling for potential confounding variables, however, no differences were observed in recovery of ambulatory ability or percent functional recovery between the two groups at 3, 6, or 12 months after hip fracture

A study was performed to assess the impact of intensive inpatient rehabilitation on the outcome after a fracture of the femoral neck or an intertrochanteric fracture. Before 1990, our hospital did not have an inpatient rehabilitation program. On January 1, 1990, a diagnosis-related-group-exempt (DRG-exempt) acute rehabilitation program was initiated. Patients were discharged to this program after evaluation by a staff physiatrist. Before 1990, twenty-seven (9.0 per cent) of 301 patients were discharged to an outside rehabilitation facility. After January 1990, the percentage of patients who were discharged to the DRG-exempt program increased yearly, from nineteen (17 per cent) of 113 patients in 1990 to forty-one (64 per cent) of sixty-four patients in 1993; this difference was significant (p < 0.01). Before 1990, the average duration of the stay in the hospital was 21.9 days. After January 1990, the average duration for the patients who did not enter the rehabilitation program was 20.0 days whereas the average duration for those who did was 31.4 days (16.1 days for acute care and 15.6 days for the rehabilitation program). There were no differences in the hospital discharge status or in the walking ability, place of residence, need for home assistance, or independence in basic and instrumental activities of daily living at the six and twelve-month follow-up examinations between patients who had been managed before initiation of the rehabilitation program and those managed after it or between patients who had been discharged to this program after its initiation and those who had not. These results raise serious questions regarding the global cost-effectiveness of these programs for patients who have had a fracture of the femoral neck or an intertrochanteric fracture