Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: Adequate pain control is essential following lung transplantation to reduce patient stress and minimize perioperative complications. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have demonstrated improvements in patient experience and reduced length of stay. However, the implementation of these protocols has not yet extended to the lung transplant population.
METHOD(S): We retrospectively reviewed all lung transplant recipients (LTR) at our institution from February 2018 to August 2019. An opioid-sparing, multimodal pain regimen was implemented that included preemptive analgesia with gabapentin and acetaminophen (APAP) pre-transplant; liposomal bupivacaine intercostal nerve block (INB) in the operating room; and a combination of APAP, gabapentin, and methocarbamol post-op with opioids given as indicated. Serratus anterior plane block was used for refractory pain.
RESULT(S): In total, we reviewed 48 LTR. The mean LAS was 43.74 and 21% were on mechanical ventilation or ECMO pre-transplant. Frequency of protocol adherence for each agent was as follows: liposomal bupivacaine INB (71%), APAP (100%), gabapentin (98%), methocarbamol (27%), and ketorolac (33%). Seven patients (15%) required a serratus plane block for refractory pain. Pain scores peaked at a median of 5 on postoperative day (POD) 1 and declined to a median of 3 by POD 3. By POD 4 only 54% of patients were still receiving opioids at a median of 15 mg oral morphine equivalents per day (IQR, 0-59). Only 3 patients were discharged on opioids and they were all on opioids pre-transplant. The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 1 day (IQR, 0.64-1.69) and 81% were extubated before 48 hours. The median hospital length of stay was 8 days (IQR, 6-15) and 30-day mortality was 0%.
CONCLUSION(S): Enhanced recovery and opioid-sparing pain protocols are feasible in LTR leading to minimal opioid use and acceptable pain scores. Outcomes with ERAS protocols should be compared to standard-of-care postoperative management.
Copyright

BACKGROUND:COVID-19 is a worldwide pandemic, with many patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Tracheostomy is not recommended by current guidelines as it is considered a super-spreading event due to aerosolization that unduly risks healthcare workers. METHODS:Patients with severe COVID-19 that were on mechanical ventilation ≥ 5 days were evaluated for percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. We developed a novel percutaneous tracheostomy technique that placed the bronchoscope alongside the endotracheal tube, not inside it. This improved visualization during the procedure and continued standard mechanical ventilation after positioning the inflated endotracheal tube cuff in the distal trachea. This technique offers a significant mitigation for the risk of virus aerosolization during the procedure. RESULTS:From March 10 to April 15, 2020, 270 patients with COVID-19 required invasive mechanical ventilation at New York University Langone Health Manhattan's campus of which 98 patients underwent percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. The mean time from intubation to the procedure was 10.6 days (SD ±5 days). Currently, thirty-two (33%) patients do not require mechanical ventilatory support, 19 (19%) have their tracheostomy tube downsized and 8 (8%) were decannulated. Forty (41%) patients remain on full ventilator support, while 19 (19%) are weaning from mechanical ventilation. Seven (7%) died as result of respiratory and multiorgan failure. Tracheostomy related bleeding was the most common complication (5 patients). None of health care providers have developed symptoms or tested positive for COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS:Our percutaneous tracheostomy technique appears to be safe and effective for COVID-19 patients and safe for healthcare workers.

Implementing uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death (uDCDD) in the United States could markedly improve supply of donor lungs for patients in need of transplants. Evidence from U.S. pilot programs suggests families support uDCDD, but only if they are asked permission for using invasive organ preservation procedures prior to initiation. However, non-invasive strategies that confine oxygenation to lungs may be applicable to the overwhelming majority of potential uDCDD donors that have airway devices in place as part of standard resuscitation. We propose an ethical framework for lung uDCDD by: (1) initiating post mortem preservation without requiring prior permission to protect the opportunity for donation until an authorized party can be found; (2) using non-invasive strategies that confine oxygenation to lungs; and (3) maintaining strict separation between the healthcare team and the organ preservation team. Attempting uDCDD in this way has great potential to obtain more transplantable lungs while respecting donor autonomy and family wishes, securing public support, and enabling authorized persons to affirm or cease preservation decisions without requiring evidence of prior organ donation intent. It ensures prioritization of life-saving, the opportunity to allow willing donors to donate, and respect for bodily integrity while adhering to current ethical norms.

BACKGROUND:Several studies have described improved survival with double lung transplantation (DLT) compared to single lung transplantation (SLT) in pulmonary fibrosis. To avoid the innate selection bias of including patients exclusively listed for SLT or DLT, this study analyzed those deemed appropriate for either procedure at time of listing. METHODS:All consecutive adult lung transplants for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients were retrospectively reviewed (2007-2017). Isolated lobar transplants (N=11), or patients listed only for SLT (N=1834) or DLT (N=2372) were excluded. Group stratification was based on the ultimate procedure (SLT vs DLT). Group propensity matching was performed based on 24 recipient/donor characteristics. Recipient demographics, donor demographics, and outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS:During the study period, 45% (974/2179) and 55% (1205/2179) of patients ultimately received SLT and DLT, respectively. After propensity matching, 466 matched patients remained in each group. SLT patients were less likely to require prolonged (>48 hours) ventilator support than DLT patients. There was also a trend towards reduced rates of post-transplant renal failure and hospital length of stay in SLT recipients. Whether analyzed by time of listing or time of transplant, survival was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS:In recipients concurrently listed for SLT and DLT, overall survival was similar regardless of the eventual procedure. These data suggests that the previously purported survival advantage for DLT may purely represent selection bias, and should not preclude the use of SLT in appropriately-selected IPF patients.

Objective: Anastomotic complications occur in 77%-18% of lung transplants, but no large multi-institutional analyses to determine risk factors for airway dehiscence (AD) exist. Using national registry data, we compared pre-operative recipient/donor risk factors and post-operative outcomes in patients with and without AD.
Method(s): Data on adult lung transplants between 2007 and 2017 were provided by the Scientifc Registry of Transplant Recipients. Recipient/donor demographics were compared with regards to AD, and multivariable logistic regression identifed independent risk factors for AD. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests described mortality and graft survival.
Result(s): Two hundred and seventy-fve/18,122 recipients (1.5%) experienced AD. These recipients were more often male (71.6% vs. 59.6%, P < 0.001), obese (20.1% vs. 15.6%, P = 0.041), transplanted from intensive care unit (17.5% vs. 1 1 . 0 % , P = 0.001), and mechanically ventilated (11.6% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.002). AD was not associated with recipient steroid use (51.9% vs. 47.7%, P = 0.194) or lung disease diagnosis group. Donor diabetes (8.0% vs. 7.0%, P = 0.482) and donor smoking (7.4% vs. 9.0%, P = 0.449) were also not associated with AD. Patients with AD were more likely to have received bilateral lungs (78.5% vs. 68.3%, P < 0.001) and less likely to have received a single left lung (6.5% vs. 17.3%, P < 0.001). Cold ischemia time between 2 and 4 hours was less common in the AD group (17.2% vs. 23.7%, P = 0.013). Multivariable analysis revealed recipient obesity and donor gunshot death as independent predictive factors for AD, while donor age >40 and single left lung transplant were negative predictive factors (Table SA10-1). Mortality and graft failure were both signifcantly higher in the AD group (Fig. SA10-1).
Conclusion(s): We identifed independent risk factors for AD and confrmed poor post-operative outcomes. However, many known impediments to wound healing such as chronic steroid use, diabetes, and smoking did not appear to be associated with AD

Introduction: Our institution's Adult ECMO Program started in 2015 and continues to see exponential growth with an average of 89% annual increase in volume. When demand for ECMO exceeds available resources, the multiple teams, resources and processes involved in the care of these patients are challenged to provide excellent outcomes. Our program made specific changes to accommodate increased volume while maintaining quality. Our growth directly impacted staff exposure and expertise, locations of ECMO care, emergent bedside cannulations, and utilization of equipment and supplies.
Result(s): Our team coordinated comprehensive training courses to increase the number of ECMO-credentialed physicians and advanced practice providers. We then focused on improving bedside cannulations. We provided cannulation didactic and simulation training for a cohort of critical care nurses, created a single ECMO Perfusion activation number, and increased available primed circuits. We also rebuilt our cannulation carts, using an exchange process for immediate replenishment of supplies. All carts were streamlined to one lay out and were expanded across the hospital in five different locations. We increased our equipment inventory from 9 to 15 consoles and introduced a more cost-effective ECMO system. Last, we implemented ECMO safety rounds, a biweekly bedside audit of existing safety measures that also allowed for real-time staff education.
Conclusion(s): Our patient outcomes continue to meet the national ELSO benchmarks for survival rates. As our growth continues, all areas require ongoing assessment and evaluation to maintain best practices. With proper planning and resources, quality patient outcomes can be maintained

Introduction: Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome (HPS) is a rare autosomal recessive hereditary disorder characterized by oculocutaneous albinism and bleeding diathesis. Transplantation is often conducted to treat lung fibrosis, which is the most fatal complication of this disease. While the literature discusses the diagnosis of HPS based on genetic testing, radiology, and electron microscopic (EM) findings of platelet granules, there is a paucity of images in the literature illustrating the pulmonary histopathologic and EM features of HPS. Case Report: Here we present striking histopathologic and EM images from a case of pulmonary fibrosis due to HPS in a 48-year-old female. The patient presented with restrictive lung disease and bilateral decreased breath sounds with diffuse crackles. She was clinically diagnosed with HPS and underwent bilateral lung transplant. On histopathology, both pneumonectomy specimens showed diffuse interstitial fibrosing and cellular pneumonitis with end-stage remodeling and type II pneumocyte (PC-II) hyperplasia. The PC-IIs had abundant foamy cytoplasm and compressed scalloped nuclei. Alveolar macrophages contained fine brown granules positive for PAS-D stain. EM analysis revealed that the PC-IIs contained numerous lamellated myelin bodies (so-called giant lamellar body degeneration) suggestive of surfactant admixed with lipid and luminal microvilli. The pigmented alveolar macrophages also contained lamellated myelin bodies, as well as clusters of single membrane-bound structures with varying size and electron density admixed with vacuolar and granular debris suggestive of ceroid deposits.
Conclusion(s): Based on light microscopy, histochemical analysis, EM, and clinical presentation, it was concluded that our findings were consistent with pulmonary changes as seen in HPS

BACKGROUND:Anastomotic complications occur in 7% to 18% of lung transplant recipients, among which airway dehiscence (AD) is particularly catastrophic. Using multi-institutional registry data, this study compared preoperative recipient/donor risk factors and outcomes in patients with and without AD and analyzed the effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on the incidence of AD. METHODS:Data on adult lung transplants from 2007 to 2017 were provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Patients receiving isolated lobar transplantation and patients with unknown AD status were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors for AD. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests describe mortality and graft survival. RESULTS:Of 18 122 lung transplants, 275 (1.5%) experienced AD. While the incidence of ECMO steadily increased from 0.7% to 5.9% over the study period, the incidence of AD remained relatively constant. Multivariable analysis revealed recipient male gender and prolonged ( > 48 hours) posttransplant mechanical ventilation as independent predictive factors for AD, while advanced donor age and single left lung transplant were protective factors. Recipient chronic steroid use, recipient diabetes, donor diabetes, and donor smoking history were not predictive of AD. Mortality and graft failure were significantly worse in the AD group. CONCLUSIONS:Despite increased ECMO utilization, the incidence of AD has remained stable. Multiple independent risk factors for AD were identified and poor postoperative outcomes confirmed. However, many known impediments to wound healing such as recipient chronic steroid use, recipient and donor diabetes, and donor smoking were not identified as risk factors for AD, reinforcing the critical role of technical performance.

BACKGROUND:The national opioid epidemic may have expanded the donor pool for lung transplantation, but concerns remain regarding infectious risks and allograft function. This study compared donor/recipient characteristics, outcomes, and reasons for organ discard between overdose death donors (ODD) and all other mechanism-of-death donors. METHODS:Data on adult lung transplants from 2000-2017 were provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Pulmonary allografts used in multiple organ transplantations were excluded. Donor/recipient demographics, outcomes, and organ discard were analyzed with regards to ODD since 2010. Discard analysis was limited to donors who had at least one organ transplanted but their pulmonary allografts discarded. RESULTS:From 2010-2017, 7.3% (962/13,196) of lung transplantations were from ODD, over a 3-fold increase from the 2.1% (164/7,969) in 2000-2007. ODD were younger but more likely to have a history of smoking, hepatitis C, or an abnormal bronchoscopy finding. Overall survival was similar between ODD and non-ODD groups. ODD of discarded pulmonary allografts were younger and more likely to be hepatitis C positive, but were less likely to have a history of smoking than their non-ODD counterparts. CONCLUSIONS:Rates of ODD utilization in lung transplantation have increased in accordance with the opioid epidemic, but there remains a significant pool of ODD pulmonary allografts with favorable characteristics that are discarded. With no significant difference in survival between ODD and non-ODD recipients, further expansion of this donor pool may be appropriate and pulmonary allografts should not be discarded based solely on ODD status.

Purpose: Controversy remains over the mortality benefit of single (SLT) versus double lung transplantation (DLT) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Independent of this controversy, hesitancy to perform SLT in this population exists on the basis of unclear one year functional status. We compared functional status at one year between IPF patients listed for both who ultimately received SLT or DLT. Method(s): All consecutive adult lung transplants for IPF provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients were retrospectively reviewed (2007-2017). Isolated lobar transplants (n=4), patients listed only for SLT (n=1834) or DLT (n=2372), and patients with missing functional status data (n=715) were excluded. Group stratification was based on the ultimate procedure (SLT or DLT). Group propensity matching was performed based on 25 recipient/donor characteristics. We compared 'good functional status' defined as >70%, at one year. Result(s): During the study period, 45% (660/1464) and 55% (804/1464) of patients listed for both procedures ultimately received SLT and DLT, respectively. After propensity matching, 341 matched patients remained in each group. Donor and recipient characteristics were similar (Table). There was no statistically significant difference in 'good functional status' at one year between SLT (77%, 264/341) and DLT (81%, 275/341) (p=0.301). The same trend is present for patients younger than 50 who receive SLT (82%, 23/28) versus DLT (94%, 34/36) (p=0.225), and patients between 50 and 60 who receive SLT (78%, 86/110) versus DLT (84%, 97/115) (p=0.305). The opposite trend is noted in patients older than 70 who receive SLT (72%, 13/18) versus DLT (61%, 11/18) (p=0.725). Conclusion(s): In this cohort of lung transplant recipients listed for both SLT and DLT, functional status was statistically similar between groups, even in younger recipients. This data suggests that SLT should not be precluded in IPF patients on the basis of expected functional status at one year.