Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:Iliac vein stenting has been an evolving treatment option in the management of CVI secondary to iliac vein obstruction. Historically, treatment of CVI has been focused on the elimination of saphenous vein disease; however, the effect of reduction of iliac vein obstruction on superficial venous reflux remains largely unknown. This study aimed to identify the effect of iliac vein stenting on saphenous vein reflux. METHODS:In this retrospective study spanning course of five years, we performed 2681 venograms with venoplasties and stenting of the iliac veins. Pre-operative and post-operative venous mapping was performed via duplex ultrasonography. Patients who received any lower extremity vascular intervention between "pre-" and "post-stenting" duplex ultrasonography examination, other than iliac vein stenting, were excluded from analysis. RESULTS:(18%). Bilateral iliac vein stenting significantly reduced reflux in the bilateral great saphenous and small saphenous veins by 363.8 ms ( p < 0.0001) and 345.4 ms ( p < 0.0002), respectively, but had no effect on ASV reflux. Unilateral stenting did not produce significant reductions in reflux, besides an average reduction of 573.2 ms ( p = 0.004) in the left great saphenous vein. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Bilateral iliac vein stenting decreased great saphenous vein and small saphenous vein reflux. Unilateral stenting did not demonstrate a significant reduction in saphenous reflux. Bilateral reduction in stenosis of the iliac veins may influence superficial venous reflux.

Vascular complications secondary to acute pancreatitis carry a high morbidity and mortality, often because of their hemorrhagic or thrombotic effects. When thrombosis presents, it is typically localized to the splanchnic venous system. In this report, we present a case of acute superior mesenteric artery thrombosis secondary to necrotizing pancreatitis after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patient was successfully treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been promoted as an alternative to the traditional non-drug eluting stents (nDES), and offer the potential for improved patency rates. However, DES are more expensive than nDES, and results comparing these stents outside of clinical trials have been limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:A retrospective review was performed on all in patient infrainguinal lower extremity endovascular procedures between January 2014 and September 2016, which involved stent implantation. Procedures involving the common femoral artery, superficial femoral artery, and above knee popliteal artery were included. Procedures involving iliac, below knee popliteal, tibial, peroneal, and pedal arteries were excluded. The type of stent, number of stents, length of each stent, and location of stent were recorded for each procedure. Data on each patients Trans-Atlantic Inter Society Consensus II class were collected. End-points included stent thrombosis, restenosis, re-intervention, and limb loss. Post-operative arterial duplexes were obtained every three months to determine stent patency during follow-up visits. In-stent stenosis was defined as >60% narrowing on arterial duplex. Thrombosis was defined as in-stent occlusion, and limb loss involved only major amputations in the treated extremity. Bivariate analysis and Students two-sample T-test were used to analyze the data. IBM-SPSS - 22 was used for all analyses. RESULTS:Two hundred and twelve patients underwent at total of 252 procedures during the study period. Of this group, 191 procedures met inclusion criteria. There were 21 lesions that were treated with both nDES and DES and they were excluded from further analysis. The average patient age was 73.2 ± 11.6 years; 68.6% had hypertension, and 58.1% had diabetes. Mean follow-up was 7.18 ± 7.96 months. The most common indication for intervention was claudication (53%), followed by critical limb threatening ischemia (47%); 124 procedures involved only nDES (Lifestent®)(Bard, Tempe, AZ), 46 procedures involved only DES (Zilver®) (Cook, Bloomington, IN). Comparison of nDES and DES showed the overall rate of thrombosis (11.1% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.81), overall rates of re-stenosis (48.2% vs. 46%, p = 1.0), re-intervention (13.7% vs. 14.3%, p = 1.0), and limb loss (9.7% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.38) was equivalent between the groups. The six-month primary patency rate for nDES and DES (41.9% vs. 40.0%, p = 1.0) was also equivalent. On average, the average lengths of nDES were longer than DES (19.2 ± 14.3 cm vs.11.4 ± 5.7 cm) ( p < .0001). DES results showed overall rates of 33% re-stenosis, 7.1% thrombosis, and no limb loss. There were no statistical differences between the nDES or DES groups with respect to gender, age, laterality, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, gangrene, ulcers, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis, claudication, critical limb-threatening ischemia, ipsilateral bypass, re-stenosis, thrombosis, limb loss, or ipsilateral amputation. Bivariate analysis showed a higher incidence of hypertension for nDES patients ( p = .001). There was no statistical difference between Trans-Atlantic Inter Society Consensus II classes and type of stent used ( p = .95). CONCLUSIONS:In this retrospective analysis from one institution, the use of an nDES or DES did not result in a statistically significant difference in the rate of thrombosis, re-stenosis, ipsilateral re-intervention, or ipsilateral amputation over a two-year period when involving the CFA, SFA, and above knee popliteal artery.

OBJECTIVE:Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is currently the gold standard in the operative management of carotid artery stenosis. While eversion and patch CEAs vary greatly in technique, various studies have determined equivalence with regard to clinical outcomes. However, the hemodynamic differences following each procedure are not known. This study aimed to investigate any early hemodynamic differences between eversion and patch CEAs. METHODS:All CEAs performed at our institution from March 2012 to June 2018 were aggregated in a retrospective database by querying the 35301 CPT code from the electronic medical record system. Variables collected included gender, age, laterality of CEA, type of procedure, and pre- and post-operative duplex ultrasound (DUS) date and quantitative findings. Exclusion criteria included any procedure with incomplete data, a post-operative DUS > 90 days following the procedure, CEAs with concomitant bypass(es), isolated external carotid artery (ECA) endarterectomies, and re-do CEAs. RESULTS:One hundred and seventy-one CEAs were performed in 161 unique patients. There were 101 males and 60 females, with an average age of 69.7 (38-96; ± 9.36). 63 CEAs were excluded from analysis: 51 due to incomplete data, eight with a > 90 day post-operative DUS, 2 isolated ECA endarterectomies, 1 CEA with a carotid-subclavian bypass, and 1 re-do CEA secondary to an infected patch. Twenty-seven eversion and 81 patch CEAs were included in analysis. There was no difference in procedure laterality or gender between the two cohorts (p > 0.05); however, patients who received an eversion CEA were older on average (73.3 vs 67.5; p = 0.002). Pre-operative peak systolic velocities (PSV) of the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA), distal ICA, and distal common artery (CCA) were all similar (p > 0.05). Post-operative DUS was performed at 17.0 and 12.9 days in the eversion and patch CEA cohorts, respectively (p = 0.12). Post-operative PSV and change in PSV were similar for all three aforementioned segments (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Although eversion and patch CEAs vary greatly in technique and post-procedure anatomy, there was no significant difference in post-operative PSV or change in PSV at or around the carotid bifurcation.

OBJECTIVE:While placement of tunneled dialysis catheters for hemodialysis access is considered a routine procedure, it is associated with a small chance of mechanical complications. Because the literature examining these issues is not recent and our impression of the incidence of these postprocedural complications is at variance with the existing literature, we decided to review our experience. METHODS:Since 1998, our vascular service has placed 1766 tunneled hemodialysis catheters in 1065 patients for hemodialysis access. All catheters were placed with ultrasound guidance for the puncture, with selective use of a micropuncture set for patients with low-volume status. All patients underwent chest radiography at the end of each procedure. RESULTS:The average age of the patients was 61 ± 21 (standard deviation) years. Among the 1065 patients, 44% were female; 93% of catheters were placed in the right internal jugular vein and 7% in the left internal jugular vein. The prevalence of diabetes and hypertension in our population of patients was 52% and 72%, respectively. In this consecutive series, no case of postprocedure hemothorax or pneumothorax was encountered. Two cutdowns had to be performed because of injury to branches of the external carotid artery. Three patients had to have a subsequent revision because of malpositioning of the catheter. CONCLUSIONS:Using modern-day techniques, the incidence of mechanical complications during placement of tunneled catheters can be diminished. Hence, routine use of ultrasound guidance for insertion of tunneled dialysis catheters should become the standard of care.

OBJECTIVE:Descending thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (D-TEVAR) is often performed by vascular surgeons. At many institutions, cardiothoracic surgery support is required for an elective TEVAR to take place. Oftentimes, this means a dedicated cardiopulmonary bypass team must be available. This study aims to investigate that TEVAR is a safe procedure that does not require such a resource-intensive "back-up plan." METHODS:(range 16.8-35; SD ±4.67). Nine were never smokers, four were former smokers, and five were currently smoking at the time of the procedure. The most common presenting symptom prior to intervention was chest pain ( n = 10), followed by cough/dyspnea ( n = 5), back pain ( n = 3), and trauma ( n = 2). RESULTS:The average maximum diameter of the thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) treated with TEVAR was 5.49 cm ( n = 7; range 4.3-6.7; SD ± 0.855). Six patients had Stanford Type B aortic dissections. Two patients with TAAs had concomitant, rapidly expanding aortic ulcers. Two patients had traumatic pseudoaneurysms, one of which ruptured prior to TEVAR. One patient had an expanding 1.9 × 1.8 cm saccular pseudoaneurysm of the aortic arch. The mean follow-up time was 69.2 weeks ( n = 17; range 3-166; SD ± 62.67), and one patient did not follow up following their initial TEVAR procedure. Of the 18 patients who received TEVAR, there were no major complications. Two patients experienced a type II endoleak. No patients required conversion to an open procedure, nor did any patients necessitate intervention by cardiothoracic surgery or cardiopulmonary bypass support. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These data suggest that cardiothoracic surgery support is not required for descending thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (D-TEVAR). Further research is warranted on the risk factors associated with open conversion during these procedures.

Isolated celiac artery vasculitis is an uncommon disease rarely reported in the Western literature. In this case report, we describe a 52-year-old Chinese male presenting with abdominal pain who was diagnosed with nonspecific celiac artery vasculitis and was successfully treated with a short course of oral corticosteroids.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair is a minimally invasive alternative to major open surgery for the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms that results in reduced recovery times and early survival rates. METHODS:The TriVascular Ovation® Abdominal Stent Graft System is a low-profile endovascular device with active fixation used for endovascular aneurysm repair. The stent graft is designed to reline the diseased vasculature, providing an endovascular blood conduit for isolating the aneurysm from the high-pressure flow of blood, thereby reducing the risk of rupture. The stent graft is a modular configuration comprised of an aortic body section, iliac limbs, and iliac extensions as required. Results and Conclusion: We present a case of symptomatic aortic body graft stenosis in the unsupported segment below the O-rings, 26 months after the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm with Ovation® Abdominal Stent Graft System. The successful repair was performed by ballooning the stenotic area which resulted in complete resolution of the symptoms.