Faculty Bibliography

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a high rate of thrombosis. Prolonged activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT) and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are reported in COVID-19 patients. The majority of publications have not reported whether patients develop clinically relevant persistent aPL, and the clinical significance of new aPL-positivity in COVID-19 is currently unknown. However, the reports of aPL-positivity in COVID-19 raised the question whether common mechanisms exist in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In both conditions, thrombotic microangiopathy resulting in microvascular injury and thrombosis is hypothesized to occur through multiple pathways, including endothelial damage, complement activation, and release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETosis). APS-ACTION, an international APS research network, created a COVID-19 working group that reviewed common mechanisms, positive aPL tests in COVID-19 patients, and implications of COVID-19 infection for patients with known aPL positivity or APS, with the goals of proposing guidance for clinical management and monitoring of aPL-positive COVID-19 patients. This guidance also serves as a call and focus for clinical and basic scientific research.

BACKGROUND:Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by episodes of thrombosis, obstetric morbidity or both, associated with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Studying the profile of a rare disease in an admixed population is important as it can provide new insights for understanding an autoimmune disease. In this sense of miscegenation, Brazil is characterized by one of the most heterogeneous populations in the world, which is the result of five centuries of interethnic crosses of people from three continents. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical and laboratory characteristics of Brazilian vs. non-Brazilian primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) patients. METHODS:We classified PAPS patients into 2 groups: Brazilian PAPS patients (BPAPS) and PAPS patients from other countries (non-BPAPS). They were compared regarding demographic characteristics, criteria and non-criteria APS manifestations, antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) profile, and the adjusted Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (aGAPSS). RESULTS:We included 415 PAPS patients (88 [21%] BPAPS and 327 [79%] non-BPAPS). Brazilian patients were significantly younger, more frequently female, sedentary, obese, non-white, and had a higher frequency of livedo (25% vs. 10%, p < 0.001), cognitive dysfunction (21% vs. 8%, p = 0.001) and seizures (16% vs. 7%, p = 0.007), and a lower frequency of thrombocytopenia (9% vs. 18%, p = 0.037). Additionally, they were more frequently positive for lupus anticoagulant (87.5% vs. 74.6%, p = 0.01), and less frequently positive to anticardiolipin (46.6% vs. 73.7%, p < 0.001) and anti-ß2-glycoprotein-I (13.6% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001) antibodies. Triple aPL positivity was also less frequent (8% vs. 41.6%, p < 0.001) in Brazilian patients. Median aGAPSS was lower in the Brazilian group (8 vs. 10, p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, BPAPS patients still presented more frequently with livedo, cognitive dysfunction and sedentary lifestyle, and less frequently with thrombocytopenia and triple positivity to aPL. They were also less often white. CONCLUSIONS:Our study suggests a specific profile of PAPS in Brazil with higher frequency of selected non-criteria manifestations and lupus anticoagulant positivity. Lupus anticoagulant (not triple positivity) was the major aPL predictor of a classification criteria event.

Background/Purpose: The Manhattan Lupus Surveillance Program (MLSP) is a multi-racial/ ethnic population-based registry with the primary goal to determine the prevalence and incidence of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). In this study, we compare the three most commonly used classification criteria for SLE (1997 revised ACR, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) and the recent EULAR/ACR classification criteria) to identify cases that fulfilled only one of the classification criteria and explore each criteria set's unique cases. In addition, we used the EULAR/ACR criteria to determine the incidence and prevalence of SLE in Manhattan.
Method(s): MLSP cases were identified from Manhattan-based hospitals and rheumatologists, and state population databases. For this analysis, SLE cases were defined as fulfilling 1) the 1997 ACR classification criteria, 2) the SLICC criteria or 3) EULAR/ACR classification criteria. We quantified the number of cases that uniquely associated with each classification criteria and the number that fulfilled all three classifications. Prevalence (2007) and incidence rates (2007-2009) using the EULAR/ACR classification criteria and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using denominators obtained from the US Census data (revised 2000-2009 intercensal population files) for Manhattan.
Result(s): Overall 1,568 cases fulfilled at least one of the three classification criteria. Of those, 1008 (64.3%) cases fulfilled all three classification criteria, 166 (10.5%) fulfilled only the SLICC criteria, 50 (3.2%) fulfilled only the 1997 ACR criteria and 36 (2.3%) fulfilled the EULAR/ACR criteria with the remaining cases fulfilling a combination of two classification criteria. Cases that only met one of the classification criteria, and the reasons why they did not meet the other two classification criteria with example cases, are detailed in Tables 1-3. Based on the EULAR/ACR classification criteria, the age-adjusted overall prevalence and incidence rates of SLE in Manhattan were 59.8 (n=1,029, 95%CI:56.1-63.6) and 4.9 (n=245, 95%CI 4.3-5.5) per 100,000 population. Prevalence was 9 times higher and incidence was 6.9 times higher among females compared to males. The age-adjusted prevalence per 100,000 was highest among non-Hispanic Black females (198.9), followed by Hispanic females (133.1), non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander females (97.7) and non-Hispanic White females (59.8). Age-adjusted incidence rates per 100,000 were highest in non-Hispanic Black females (15.8), followed by Hispanic females (7.5), non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander females (7.3) and non-Hispanic White females (6.3). Prevalence and incidence rates for males followed a similar pattern.
Conclusion(s): Applying the three commonly used classification systems to a multi-racial/ ethnic population-based registry allowed for identifying unique cases of SLE who only fulfilled one classification system. The EULAR/ACR classification criteria revealed similar prevalence and incidence estimates and gender and racial/ethnic disparities to the previously published results from the MLSP using the 1997 revised ACR and SLICC classification criteria

Background/Purpose: The Accelerating Medicines Partnership (AMP) Lupus Network was established with the goal of applying novel technologies to the interrogation of blood and tissue samples from patients with lupus nephritis (LN). In contrast to global LN clinical trials, the AMP LN cohort affords an opportunity to generate outcome data representative of a US multicenter multi-ethnic real-world experience. In this analysis, the AMP clinical dataset was investigated to determine the percentages of patients who attained prespecified definitions of partial or complete responses at 52 weeks. In addition, incorporation of response rates at weeks 12 and 26 to the analysis provided longitudinal patterns of response to standard of care.
Method(s): Patients with LN who were undergoing kidney biopsies as part of standard of care were eligible to enroll in the AMP LN study. Response definitions were only applied to cases whose baseline spot urine protein/creatinine (UPCR) ratios were > 1.0. Complete response (CR) required: 1) UPCR < 0.5; and 2) normal creatinine (< 1.3 mg/dL) or, if abnormal at baseline, < 125% of baseline; and 3) prednisone < 10 mg/day at the time of the study visit. Partial response required: 1) >50% reduction in UPCR without meeting UPCR criterion for CR; and 2) normal creatinine (< 1.3 mg/dL) or, if abnormal, < 125% of baseline; and 3) prednisone dose < 15 mg/day at the time of the study visit. Patients who did not achieve a CR or PR at the specific timepoints were considered non-responders (NR). Only patients with renal biopsies that demonstrated ISN/RPS classes III, IV, V or combined III or IV with V and data available at all four timepoints (baseline, weeks 12, 26 and 52) were included in this analysis. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of responses were performed, and heat maps were generated to graphically display response patterns.
Result(s): Data on 121 patients with LN enrolled in AMP were included in this analysis. Cross-sectional response rates at 52 weeks were: CR: 28.1%; PR: 23.1%; NR: 48.8% (Table 1). Response rates at weeks 12 and 26 are additionally displayed in Table 1, and Figure 1 is a heat map demonstrating longitudinal responses of our patients. All patients were considered NR at baseline. Only 7.4% of patients had week 12 CR responses sustained through week 52, whereas 19% had attained PR or CR at all 3 visits. An additional 14.9% achieved a PR or CR at 26 weeks which was sustained at 52 weeks. Overall, 36.4% of patients were NR at all time points.
Conclusion(s): Clinical data from the AMP Lupus Network revealed rates of 52-week CR and PR that were consistent with placebo response data from recently conducted LN trials. Low sustained CR rates not only underscore the need for more efficacious therapies but highlight how critically important it is to understand the molecular pathways that are associated with response and non-response. (Figure Presented)

Background/Purpose: Data on fluctuation of antibodies against domain 1 (anti-D1) of beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) are scarce. Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and all three criteria tests for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) display higher titers of anti-D1, which correlate with abeta2GPI levels. This project aims at evaluating anti-D1 titers over time in a large international cohort of persistently aPL positive patients.
Method(s): AntiPhospholipid Syndrome Alliance For Clinical Trials and InternatiOnal Networking (APS ACTION) Registry was created to study the course of persistently aPL-positive patients with or without autoimmune disorders over at least 10 years. Inclusion criteria are positive aPL by Updated Sapporo Criteria tested within one year prior to enrolment. Patients are followed up every 12+/-3 months with clinical data and blood collection. Patients with available blood samples from at least three time points were included in this analysis. Anti-beta2 GPI and anti-D1 IgG were tested by chemiluminescence (BioFlash, INOVA Diagnostics) at APS ACTION core laboratories. Positive results were defined as >20 CU. Clinical data were retrieved from APS ACTION online database. Anti-D1 titers within the same subject were compared by Friedman's test. The association between categorical and continuous variables was assessed by chi-squared and Spearman's tests.
Result(s): In this longitudinal study, 1942 samples from 515 patients were tested for anti-D1 and abeta2GPI IgG; 230 patients with anti-D1 tested at >=3 time points were included (Table). Patients with thrombotic APS had anti-D1 titers significantly higher than those without thrombosis (p=0.022). Among 135 patients with at least one anti-D1 positive result, anti-D1 titers varied significantly over time (Friedman statistics: 508.5, p< 0.0001; anti-D1 geometric mean [95%CI] at baseline 189.0 [115.9-308.3]; T1 132.3 [81.1-215.8]; T2 113.8 [69.8-185.5]; T3 109.2 [66.9-178.1]. Anti-D1 titers were significantly higher at baseline compared to T3 (p=0.029). Over time, anti-D1 titers significantly decreased in 107 patients, and increased in 28 (p< 0.0001). In 11.3% of patients, anti-D1 results changed from positive to neg-ative (n: 20), or negative to positive (n: 6). (Mc Nemar's chi2=6.5; p=0.011). Anti-beta2GPI titers correlated with anti-D1 titers and significantly reduced at T3 compared to baseline (abeta2GPI at baseline 187.1 [14.5-1586.5]; T1 150.8 [11.1-1379.2]; T2 124.9 [12.2-1304]; T3 117.6 [8.7-1136.6]; Friedman statistics=11.32, p=0.010).
Conclusion(s): Anti-D1 antibodies vary significantly overtime and approximately 10% may become negative during follow up. Our future analysis of the registry will demonstrate the clinical relevance of this variation, and the impact of treatment. (Figure Presented)

Background/Purpose: Damage Index in APS (DIAPS) is a scoring system developed to assess long-term damage in thrombotic primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS), which also correlates with impaired quality of life (EuroQoL) in Latin Americans. DIAPS is not validated in aPL-positive patients without thrombosis. Our primary objective was to quantify damage accrual measured by DIAPS in aPL-positive patients with or without a history of thrombosis in an international cohort. Secondly, we aimed to identify clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with damage in aPL-positive patients.
Method(s): In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed the baseline damage, measured by DIAPS, in APS ACTION Registry patients. The inclusion criteria were positive aPL according to Updated Sapporo Classification Criteria tested within one year prior to enrollment. We excluded patients with other autoimmune diseases. We analyzed the demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of patients based on two subgroups: (1) thrombotic APS patients with high (DIAPS >=3) versus low damage (DIAPS < 3); and (2) non-thrombotic aPL-positive patients with damage (DIAPS >0) versus without damage (DIAPS=0). Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U and Student t test were used when applicable. In the multivariate analysis, our model included age, gender, race and variables with p< 0.10 in the univariate analysis.
Result(s): Of the 826 aPL-positive patients included in the registry as of April 2020, 576 with no other systemic autoimmune diseases were included in the analysis (412 thrombotic and 164 non-thrombotic [108 aPL only and 56 obstetric]). Baseline demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics are summarized in Table 1. For the thrombotic group, the most frequent domains contributing to damage were peripheral vascular (n=260, 63% -mainly deep vein thrombosis), neuropsychiatric (n=107, 30% -mainly ischemic stroke with sequelae) and cardiovascular (n=57, 14% -mainly heart valve disease). Older age, male gender, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and obesity were associated with high damage (Table 1). In the multivariate analysis, male gender (OR 1.73, 95%CI 1.10-2.71, p=.018) and hypertension (OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.21-2.99, p=.006) were independently correlated with high damage. For the non-thrombotic group, the most frequent domains contributing to damage were neuropsychiatric (n=25, 15% -mainly cognitive impairment) and cardiovascular (n=13, 8% -mainly heart valve disease). Hypertension and hyperlipidemia were independently associated with damage in the multivariate analysis (OR 2.72, 95%CI 1.09-6.80, p=.032 and OR 4.48, 95%CI 1.62-12.29, p=.004, respectively). There was no correlation between aPL profile (triple vs double vs single aPL) and damage in either group.
Conclusion(s): DIAPS was able to discriminate damage in a large multicenter cohort of aPL-positive patients. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors, namely older age, male gender, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and obesity, correlate with higher damage in thrombotic primary APS patients. Hypertension and hyperlipidemia also correlate with damage in aPL-positive patients without a history of thrombosis. (Figure Presented)

Background/Purpose: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an antimalarial drug used in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematous (SLE). There is limited data assessing cardiac toxicity as arrhythmias in association with HCQ exposure based on dose prescribed or pharmacy records and none relying on measured drug levels. Some of the risk factors associated with conduction abnormalities in the setting of hydroxychloroquine use include presence of chronic kidney disease, older age, underlying cardiomyopathy, and the use of concomitant prolonging QTc agents. In a retrospective study of 194 SLE patients on HCQ, the authors found that there was no significant difference in mean QTc based on HCQ use. Additionally, patients with CKD were more likely to have prolonged QTc when compared to those without CKD, but there was no significant difference in mean QTc based on HCQ use as well in this subset. Severe prolongation of QTc was rare in all groups and no episodes of serious tachyarrhythmia or Torsade de Pointes were observed. The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between whole blood HCQ levels and QTc intervals on simultaneous EKG performed during a routine visit.
Method(s): This prospective study was IRB approved and all patients provided consent. At the time of data lock, 84 patients fulfilled ACR/SLICC criteria for SLE. These patients were on HCQ for at least 3 months at doses used for standard of care treatment. Whole blood levels were drawn and EKGs were obtained during a routine outpatient faculty practice visit for patients consecutively seen between February 5 and May 10, 2021 with senior author. Statistical analyses was performed using one way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient and t-test.
Result(s): 84 patients, 93% female, 47% European, 35% African, 15% Asian, and 25% Hispanic were included (Table 1). HCQ levels were higher in patients on 400 mg, lower after 10 years of exposure, and unrelated to eGFR (Table 2). There was no correlation between blood HCQ levels and QTc intervals in the 84 patients (r=-0.017; p=0.87) (Fig 1a). Additionally, there was no correlation between blood HCQ levels and QTc intervals in patients on 200 mg or 400 mg of HCQ (r=0.113, p=0.61; r=-0.06, p=0.65) (Fig 1b-c). There was no correlation between blood HCQ levels and QTc intervals in patients who had chronic kidney disease (defined as eGFR < 60), (r=-0.482, p=0.09) or those with underlying cardiac abnormalities noted on transthoracic echocardiogram (r=-0.430, p=0.16) (Fig 1d-e). However, there was a positive correlation between blood HCQ levels and QTc intervals in patients who were on concomitant QTc prolonging agents, (r=0.795, p=0.005). but none in excess of 456 msec (Fig 1f).
Conclusion(s): Our study provides reassurance that hydroxychloroquine is not associated with QTc prolongation in patients with SLE and across different subsets of patients irrespective of blood level, dose prescribed, CKD or underlying cardiac abnormalities. There was a positive correlation between blood HCQ levels and QTc intervals in patients on concomitant QTc prolonging agents, but none were severely prolonged (eg > 500 msec). This is the first study relying on measured blood levels demonstrating the absence of consequential increase in QTc levels in HCQ treated SLE patients

Background/Purpose: The clinical heterogeneity of SLE with its complex pathogenesis remains challenging as we strive to provide optimal management. The contribution of platelets to endovascular homeostasis, inflammation and immune regulation highlights their potential importance in SLE. Prior work from our group showed that the Fcgamma receptor type IIa (FcgammaRIIa)-R/H131 biallelic polymorphism is associated with increased platelet activity and cardiovascular risk in SLE. The study was initiated to investigate the platelet transcriptome in patients with SLE and evaluate its association across FcgammaRIIa genotypes and distinct clinical features.
Method(s): RNA-sequencing was done on platelets isolated from 51 patients fulfilling criteria for the classification of SLE based on recent EULAR/ACR definitions, and 18 healthy controls matched on age, sex, and race. Unsupervised clustering, differential gene expression, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were used to analyze differences between SLE patients and controls, and SLE subpopulations, based on SELENA SLEDAI Hybrid disease activity, specific organ manifestations, and FcgammaRIIa genotype. Weighted Gene Correlation Network Analysis (WGCNA) was performed to create a modular transcriptomic framework.
Result(s): Our cross-sectional SLE cohort (N=51, age = 41.1+/-12.3, 100% female, 45% Hispanic, 24% black, 22% Asian, 51% white, SLEDAI = 4.4+/-4.2) was comprised of patients consecutively enrolled excluding those on aspirin or anticoagulants. Compared to the 18 controls, there were 2290 (p.adj < 0.05) differentially expressed genes. ( Figure 1 A, B) GSEA revealed positive enrichment for pathways related to interferon response, TNFa signaling, and coagulation in SLE. ( Figure 1C) WGCNA was used to create a modular transcriptomic framework. ( Figure 2A ) Modules enriched for platelet activity, immune response, and WNT signaling were significantly increased in SLE versus controls. Moreover, modules enriched for interferon response and WNT signaling paralleled increases in disease activity. ( Figure 2B) When analyzing patients with proteinuria, modules associated with oxidative phosphorylation and platelet activity were unexpectedly decreased. (Figure 2C) Analyzing the ratio of fold changes between SLE/Control vs SLE Proteinuria/SLE No Proteinuria, genes increased in SLE and those with proteinuria were enriched for immune effector processes, while genes increased in SLE but decreased in proteinuria were enriched for coagulation and cell adhesion. (Figure 2D) The module enriched for FCR activation was decreased in SLE and was affected by the FcgammaRIIa genotype. (Figure 3A) FcgammaRIIa R131 and H131 patients showed significantly different platelet transcriptomes. (Figure 3B) The combination of SLE with an FcgammaRIIa R131 variant leads to a significant increase in the platelet activity module not seen in controls. (Figure 3C)
Conclusion(s): These analyses reveal that SLE patients have a significantly different platelet transcriptome from controls, different phenotypic presentations of SLE patients associate with distinct platelet transcriptomic signatures, and FCGR2a variants may differentially influence the role of platelets in the contribution to SLE disease activity

Background/UNASSIGNED:Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at risk of developing COVID-19 due to underlying immune abnormalities and regular use of immunosuppressant medications. We aimed to evaluate the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in patients with SLE with or without previous COVID-19-related symptoms or RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods/UNASSIGNED:For this analysis, we included patients with SLE from two cohorts based in New York City: the Web-based Assessment of Autoimmune, Immune-Mediated and Rheumatic Patients during the COVID-19 pandemic (WARCOV) study; and the NYU Lupus Cohort (a prospective registry of patients at NYU Langone Health and NYC Health + Hospitals/Bellevue). Patients in both cohorts were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies via commercially available immunoassays, processed through hospital or outpatient laboratories. Patients recruited from the NYU Lupus Cohort, referred from affiliated providers, or admitted to hospital with COVID-19 were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies as part of routine surveillance during follow-up clinical visits. Findings/UNASSIGNED:67 [24%] of 278). Other demographic variables, SLE-specific factors, and immunosuppressant use were not associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Of the 29 patients with COVID-19 previously confirmed by RT-PCR, 18 (62%) were on immunosuppressants; 24 (83%) of 29 patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Of 17 patients who had symptoms of COVID-19 but negative concurrent RT-PCR testing, one (6%) developed an antibody response. Of 26 patients who had COVID-19-related symptoms but did not undergo RT-PCR testing, six (23%) developed an antibody response. Of 83 patients who had no symptoms of COVID-19 and no RT-PCR testing, four (5%) developed an antibody response. Among 36 patients who were initially SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive, the majority maintained reactivity serially (88% up to 10 weeks, 83% up to 20 weeks, and 80% up to 30 weeks). Seven (70%) of ten patients with confirmed COVID-19 had antibody positivity beyond 30 weeks from disease onset. Interpretation/UNASSIGNED:Most patients with SLE and confirmed COVID-19 were able to produce and maintain a serological response despite the use of a variety of immunosuppressants, providing reassurance about the efficacy and durability of humoral immunity and possible protection against re-infection with SARS-CoV-2. Funding/UNASSIGNED:National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, and Bloomberg Philanthropies COVID-19 Response Initiative Grant.

OBJECTIVES:In lupus nephritis the pathological diagnosis from tissue retrieved during kidney biopsy drives treatment and management. Despite recent approval of new drugs, complete remission rates remain well under aspirational levels, necessitating identification of new therapeutic targets by greater dissection of the pathways to tissue inflammation and injury. This study assessed the safety of kidney biopsies in patients with SLE enrolled in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership, a consortium formed to molecularly deconstruct nephritis. METHODS:475 patients with SLE across 15 clinical sites in the USA consented to obtain tissue for research purposes during a clinically indicated kidney biopsy. Adverse events (AEs) were documented for 30 days following the procedure and were determined to be related or unrelated by all site investigators. Serious AEs were defined according to the National Institutes of Health reporting guidelines. RESULTS:34 patients (7.2%) experienced a procedure-related AE: 30 with haematoma, 2 with jets, 1 with pain and 1 with an arteriovenous fistula. Eighteen (3.8%) experienced a serious AE requiring hospitalisation; four patients (0.8%) required a blood transfusion related to the kidney biopsy. At one site where the number of cores retrieved during the biopsy was recorded, the mean was 3.4 for those who experienced a related AE (n=9) and 3.07 for those who did not experience any AE (n=140). All related AEs resolved. CONCLUSIONS:Procurement of research tissue should be considered feasible, accompanied by a complication risk likely no greater than that incurred for standard clinical purposes. In the quest for targeted treatments personalised based on molecular findings, enhanced diagnostics beyond histology will likely be required.