Faculty Bibliography

MR enterography (MRE) protocols used in patients with Crohn disease (CD) are burdened by long acquisition time, high cost, and suboptimal patient experience. For several indications, highly diagnostic MRE can be performed in five or fewer sequences, without IV contrast material or antiperistaltic medication, and with a room time of less than 12 minutes. As such, MRE could be more patient-friendly and more frequently performed while requiring fewer healthcare resources.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to compare the image quality of portal venous phase-derived virtual noncontrast (VNC) images from photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) with energy-integrating dual-energy computed tomography (EI-DECT) in the same patient using quantitative and qualitative analyses. METHODS:Consecutive patients retrospectively identified with available portal venous phase-derived VNC images from both PCCT and EI-DECT were included. Patients without available VNC in picture archiving and communication system in PCCT or prior EI-DECT and non-portal venous phase acquisitions were excluded. Three fellowship-trained radiologists blinded to VNC source qualitatively assessed VNC images on a 5-point scale for overall image quality, image noise, small structure delineation, noise texture, artifacts, and degree of iodine removal. Quantitative assessment used region-of-interest measurements within the aorta at 4 standard locations, both psoas muscles, both renal cortices, spleen, retroperitoneal fat, and inferior vena cava. Attenuation (Hounsfield unit), quantitative noise (Hounsfield unit SD), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) (CNRvascular, CNRkidney, CNRspleen, CNRfat), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (SNRvascular, SNRkidney, SNRspleen, SNRfat), and radiation dose were compared between PCCT and EI-DECT with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. A P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS:A total of 74 patients (27 men; mean ± SD age, 63 ± 13 years) were included. Computed tomography dose index volumes for PCCT and EI-DECT were 9.2 ± 3.5 mGy and 9.4 ± 9.0 mGy, respectively (P = 0.06). Qualitatively, PCCT VNC images had better overall image quality, image noise, small structure delineation, noise texture, and fewer artifacts (all P < 0.00001). Virtual noncontrast images from PCCT had lower attenuation (all P < 0.05), noise (P = 0.006), and higher CNR (P < 0.0001-0.04). Contrast-enhanced structures had lower SNR on PCCT (P = 0.001, 0.002), reflecting greater contrast removal. The SNRfat (nonenhancing) was higher for PCCT than EI-DECT (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS:Virtual noncontrast images from PCCT had improved image quality, lower noise, improved CNR and SNR compared with those derived from EI-DECT.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To quantitatively and qualitatively compare the degree of iodine removal in the collecting system from PCCT urographic phase-derived virtual noncontrast (VNC) images obtained at 140 kV versus 120 kV. METHODS:A retrospective PACS search identified adult patients (>18 years) who underwent a PCCT urogram for hematuria from 4/2022 to 4/2023 with available urographic phase-derived VNC images in PACS. Tube voltage (120 kV, 140 kV), body mass index, CTDIvol, dose length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were recorded. Hounsfield Unit (HU) in both renal pelvises and the urinary bladder on urographic-derived VNC were recorded. Three radiologists qualitatively assessed the degree of iodine removal (renal pelvis, urinary bladder) and diagnostic confidence for urinary stone detection. Continuous variables were compared for 140 kV versus 120 kV with the Wilcoxon rank sum test. A p < .05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS:63 patients (34 male; median (Q1, Q3) age: 30 (26, 34) years; 140 kV/120 kV: 30 patients/33 patients) were included. BMI, CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE were not different for 140 kV and 120 kV (all p > .05). Median (Q1, Q3) collecting system HU (renal pelvis and bladder) was 0.9 (- 3.6, 4.4) HU at 140 kV and 10.5 (3.6, 26.7) HU at 120 kV (p = .04). Diagnostic confidence for urinary calculi was 4.6 [1.1] at 140 kV and 4.1 [1.4] at 120 kV (p = .005). Diagnostic confidence was 5/5 (all readers) in 82.2% (74/90) at 140 kV and 59.6% (59/99) at 120 kV (p < .001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:PCCT urographic phase-derived VNC images obtained at 140 kV had better collecting system iodine removal than 120 kV with similar patient radiation exposure. With excellent PCCT urographic phase iodine removal at 140 kV, consideration can be made to utilize a single-phase CT urogram in young patients.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To determine optimal iodine density thresholds for active inflammation in CD patients with PCCT enterography and determine if iodine density can be used to stratify CD activity severity. METHODS:A retrospective PACS search identified patients with CD imaged with PCCT enterography from 4/11/2022 to 10/30/2022 and with clinical notes, endoscopic/surgical pathology and available source PCCT data for iodine density analysis. Two abdominal radiologists with expertise in CD each drew two region of interest measurements within the visibly most affected region of terminal or neoterminal ileum wall on commercially available system (SyngoVia). Radiologists were blinded to clinical information and pathologic findings. Disease activity and severity were recorded from the pathology report. Harvey-Bradshaw Index, medications, and laboratory values were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to determine the optimum iodine density threshold for active inflammation and mild versus moderate-to-severe inflammation. Intra- and inter-reader agreement was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS:23 CD patients (15 females; mean [SD] age: 52 [17] years) imaged with PCCT enterography were included. 15/23 had active inflammation: 9/15 mild, 4/15 moderate, and 2/15 severe active inflammation. The optimal iodine density threshold for active inflammation was 2.7 mg/mL, with 97% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 98% accuracy (AUC = 1.00). The optimal iodine density threshold for distinguishing mild from moderate-to-severe inflammation was 3.4 mg/mL, with 83% sensitivity, 89% specificity, and 87% accuracy (AUC = 0.85). Intra-reader reliability (R1/R2) ICC was 0.81/0.86. Inter-reader reliability ICC was 0.94. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Iodine density from PCCT enterography can distinguish mild from moderate-to-severe active inflammation.

The use of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) allows for reconstruction of energy- and material-specific image series. The combination of low-energy monochromatic images, iodine maps, and virtual unenhanced images can improve lesion detection and disease characterization in the gastrointestinal tract in comparison with single-energy CT.

The differential diagnosis for left lower quadrant pain is wide and conditions range from the benign and self-limited to life-threatening surgical emergencies. Along with patient history, physical examination, and laboratory tests, imaging is often critical to limit the differential diagnosis and identify life-threatening abnormalities. This document will discuss the guidelines for the appropriate use of imaging in the initial workup for patients who present with left lower quadrant pain, patients with suspected diverticulitis, and patients with suspected complications from diverticulitis. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Compared to conventional single-energy CT (SECT), dual-energy CT (DECT) provides additional information to better characterize imaged tissues. Approaches to DECT acquisition vary by vendor and include source-based and detector-based systems, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Despite the different approaches to DECT acquisition, the most utilized DECT images include routine SECT equivalent, virtual monoenergetic, material density (eg, iodine map), and virtual non-contrast images. These images are generated either through reconstructions in the projection or image domains. Designing and implementing an optimal DECT workflow into routine clinical practice depends on radiologist and technologist input with special considerations including appropriate patient and protocol selection and workflow automation. In addition to better tissue characterization, DECT provides numerous advantages over SECT such as the characterization of incidental findings and dose reduction in radiation and iodinated contrast.

The sections of this special issue on the ileal pouch demonstrate that in the nearly 45 years since the ileal pouch has been utilized to treat patients with colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis, a substantial number of patients experience both short- and long-term morbidity and that imaging plays an important role in their management. Further, referral centers are encountering an increasing number of patients with pouch and peri-pouch complications and dysfunction. Many of these patients have had their pouches for years, and many have experienced a reduced quality of life as a result of their symptoms.As we look to the future, what are the specific questions that arise from this compilation of experience from institutions that see large numbers of patients with an ileal pouch? In what areas are we deficient? In what areas are we using the wrong methods? What should we be doing differently?

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a potentially life-threatening condition accounting for more than 300 000 annual hospitalizations. Multidetector abdominopelvic CT angiography is commonly used in the evaluation of patients with GI bleeding. Given that many patients with severe overt GI bleeding are unlikely to tolerate bowel preparation, and inpatient colonoscopy is frequently limited by suboptimal preparation obscuring mucosal visibility, CT angiography is recommended as a first-line diagnostic test in patients with severe hematochezia to localize a source of bleeding. Assessment of these patients with conventional single-energy CT systems typically requires the performance of a noncontrast series followed by imaging during multiple postcontrast phases. Dual-energy CT (DECT) offers several potential advantages for performing these examinations. DECT may eliminate the need for a noncontrast acquisition by allowing the creation of virtual noncontrast (VNC) images from contrast-enhanced data, affording significant radiation dose reduction while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. VNC images can help radiologists to differentiate active bleeding, hyperattenuating enteric contents, hematomas, and enhancing masses. Additional postprocessing techniques such as low-kiloelectron voltage virtual monoenergetic images, iodine maps, and iodine overlay images can increase the conspicuity of contrast material extravasation and improve the visibility of subtle causes of GI bleeding, thereby increasing diagnostic confidence and assisting with problem solving. GI bleeding can also be diagnosed with routine single-phase DECT scans by constructing VNC images and iodine maps. Radiologists should also be aware of the potential pitfalls and limitations of DECT. ^©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.